Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gerechtigkeit

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychologie der Werte

Zusammenfassung

Der Blick in die Geschichte der Menschheit zeigt: Seit 5.000 Jahren befassen sich die Menschen mit dem Wert Gerechtigkeit. Lange Zeit war die Untersuchung des Gerechtigkeitsbegriffes Theologen und Philosophen vorbehalten, erst seit etwa 50 Jahren setzen sich auch Psychologen mit der Thematik auseinander. Im zwischenmenschlichen Bereich konnten Ursachen und Folgen sowie intervenierende Faktoren des (Un-)Gerechtigkeitserlebens von Individuen identifiziert werden. Zudem wurden Modelle zur Entwicklung des Verständnisses von Gerechtigkeit über die Lebensspanne hinweg postuliert. Ungerechtigkeit ist assoziiert mit zahlreichen negativen Folgen für Individuen, Organisationen und Gesellschaften (z. B. Konflikte), gerechtes Handeln hingegen mit vielen positiven Konsequenzen (z. B. mehr Kooperation). Doch was ist gerechtes Handeln? Die Antwort auf diese Frage ist essenziell, denn es ist auch die Frage danach, was es heißt, ein Mensch zu sein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In: R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiation in organizations (pp. 43–55). Greenwich: Jai Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, A. (1983). Moral cognition and moral action: A theoretical perspective. Developmental Review 3, 178–210. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(83)90029-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin 120, 189–208. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., Lawrence, K., Gibbs, J., & Lieberman, M. (1994). A longitudinal study of moral judgment. In: B. Puka (Ed.), New research in moral development (pp. 1–124). New York: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, N. D., & Latham, G. P. (1997). Effects of training in procedural justice on perceptions of disciplinary fairness by unionized employees and disciplinary subject matter experts. Journal of Applied Psychology 82, 699–705. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.699

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, Christopher O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86, 425–445. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. P. (2008). What is organizational justice? An historic overview. In: J. A. Colquitt, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Handbook of organizational justice. New York: Psychological Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013). Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology 98, 199–236. doi:10.1037/a0031757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R. (2005). Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review. Journal of Management 31, 874–900. doi:10.1177/0149206305279602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Stein, J. H., & Nadisic, T. (2011). Social justice and the experience of emotion. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review 83, 85–113. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.83.2.85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalbert, C. (1998). Belief in a just world, well-being and coping with an unjust fate. In: L. Montada, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in the just world (pp. 87–105). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K. A., & Somberg, D. R. (1987). Hostile attributional biases among aggressive boys are exacerbated under conditions of threats to the self. Child Development 58, 213–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Donnerstein, E., & Walster, E. (1982). Aggression and inequity. In: J. Greenberg, & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and justice in social behavior (pp. 309–336). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duden (2015). Duden online: Die deutsche Rechtschreibung. http://www.duden.de/. Zugegriffen: 09. Februar 2015.

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32, 115–130. doi:10.2307/256422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. (2003). Belief in a just world: research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences 34, 795–817. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00072-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1987). Reactions to procedural injustice in payment distributions: Do the means justify the ends? Journal of Applied Psychology 72, 55–61. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1993). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54, 81–103. doi:10.1006/obhd.1993.1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (1994). Using socially fair treatment to promote acceptance of a work site smoking ban. Journal of Applied Psychology 79, 288–297. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2006). Losing sleep over organizational injustice: attenuating insomniac reactions to underpayment inequity with supervisory training in interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 58–69. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J. (2009). Everybody talks about organizational justice, but nobody does anything about it. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2, 181–195. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2009.01131.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hafer, C. L. (2000). Investment in long-term goals and commitment to just means drive the need to believe in a just world. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26, 1059–1073. doi:10.1177/01461672002611004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: an empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation and Emotion 30, 205–213. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9034-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, S. A., & Carlo, G. (2005). Identity as a source of moral motivation. Human Development 48, 232–256. doi:10.1159/000086859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A. (2004). Psychology in organizations: The social identity approach (2. Aufl.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höffe, O. (2010). Gerechtigkeit (4. Aufl.). München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höffe, O., & Ackrill, J. L. (1995). Aristoteles, die Nikomachische Ethik. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, C., Müller, J., & Söder, J. (2009). Platon-Handbuch: Leben – Werk – Wirkung. Stuttgart: Metzler

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to socialization. In: D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 325–480). New York: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal 38, 60–84. doi:10.2307/256728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1965). Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1, 355–360. doi:10.1037/h0021806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J. (1998). The two forms of belief in the just world: some thoughts on why and how people care about injustice. In: L. Montada, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to victimizations and belief in the just world (pp. 247–270). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin 85, 1030–1051. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In: K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange (pp. 27–55). Boston: Springer US.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgements as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In: J. Greenberg, & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lohaus, A., Vierhaus, M., & Maass, A. (2010). Entwicklungspsychologie des Kindes- und Jugendalters. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1986). The experience of injustice: Toward a better understanding of its phenomenology. In: H. W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations (pp. 103–124). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1993). On the Experience of Injustice. European Review of Social Psychology 4, 223–244. doi:10.1080/14792779343000077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G. (1994). Perspective-related differences in interpretations of injustice by victims and victimizers: A test with close relationships. In: M. J. Lerner, & G. Mikula (Eds.), Entitlement and the affectional bond. Justice in Close Relationships (pp. 175–203). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mikula, G., Petri, B., & Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology 20, 133–149. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420200205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology 52, 527–553. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S. (2011). Social injustice. In: D. J. Christie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1975). Eine Theorie der Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1977). Gerechtigkeit als Fairneß. Freiburg: Alber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J., & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice Sensitivity. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 21, 202–211. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.21.3.202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz von Thun, F. (2011a). Miteinander Reden 1: Störungen und Klärungen. Allgemeine Psychologie der Kommunikation (49. Aufl.). Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz von Thun, F. (2011b). Miteinander Reden 2: Stile, Werte und Persönlichkeitsentwicklung - Differenzielle Psychologie der Kommunikation (32. Aufl.). Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz von Thun, F. (2011c). Miteinander Reden 3: Das „Innere Team“ und situationsgerechte Kommunikation (20. Aufl.). Reinbek: Rowohlt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1996). Increasing citizenship behavior within a labor union: A test of organizational justice theory. Journal of Applied Psychology 81, 161–169. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., & Latham, G. P. (1997). Leadership training in organizational justice to increase citizenship behavior within a labor union: A replication. Personnel Psychology 50, 617–633. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00707.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomaka, J., & Blascovich, J. (1994). Effects of justice beliefs on cognitive appraisal of and subjective physiological, and behavioral responses to potential stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 732–740. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Vaish, A. (2013). Origins of Human Cooperation and Morality. Annual Review of Psychology 64, 231–255. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (2007). The development of morality. In: W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2000). Social justice: outcome and procedure. International Journal of Psychology 35, 117–125. doi:10.1080/002075900399411

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. München, Deutschland

    Martin P. Fladerer

Authors
  1. Martin P. Fladerer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin P. Fladerer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Bayern, Germany

    Dieter Frey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fladerer, M. (2016). Gerechtigkeit. In: Frey, D. (eds) Psychologie der Werte. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48014-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48014-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48013-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48014-4

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation