Skip to main content

Skin Aging and Cellulite in Women

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Textbook of Aging Skin

Abstract

Skin aging is characterized by cumulative molecular and morphological changes that trigger clinical alterations with significant health and aesthetic implications. Disorganization of the original connective tissue architecture in the dermis and subcutaneous compartments is a hallmark of aging and potentially contributes to the appearance of different skin disorders. Cellulite is a distressing condition that originates from changes in the biomechanical and density properties of the cutaneous connective tissue, which affect the skin surface topography. The limited studies that have directly addressed the relationship between cellulite development and skin aging indicate they are potentially correlated. Cellulite tends to worsen with age, and laxity is one of the major skin aggravating factors that may be considered in the efficient diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of this condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lorencini M, Feferman IHS, Maibach HI. New perspectives in the control of the skin aging process. In: Barel AO, Paye M, Maibach HI, editors. Handbook of cosmetic science and technology. 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014. p. 245–50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Farage MA, et al. Psychological and social implications of aging skin: normal aging and the effects of cutaneous disease. In: Farage MA, Miller KW, Maibach HI, editors. Textbook of aging skin. 1st ed. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010. p. 949–57.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Luebberding S, Krueger N, Sadick NS. Cellulite: an evidence-based review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16(4):243–56. doi:10.1007/s40257-015-0129-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hexsel DM, et al. Assessment of psychological, psychiatric, and behavioral aspects of patients with cellulite: a pilot study. Surg Cosmet Dermatol. 2012;4(2):131–6.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ortonne JP, et al. Cellulite and skin ageing: is there any interaction? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(7):827–34. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02570.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hexsel D, Hexsel C. The role of skin tightening in improving cellulite. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40 Suppl 12:180–3. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000000204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkwood TBL. Understanding the odd science of aging. Cell. 2005;120(4):437–47. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kammeyer A, Luiten RM. Oxidation events and skin aging. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;21:16–29. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2015.01.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scharffetter-Kochanek K, et al. Photoaging of the skin from phenotype to mechanisms. Exp Gerontol. 2000;35(3):307–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Waller JM, Maibach HI. Age and skin structure and function, a quantitative approach (II): protein, glycosaminoglycan, water, and lipid content and structure. Skin Res Technol. 2006;12(3):145–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonta M, Daina L, Muţiu G. The process of ageing reflected by histological changes in the skin. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2013;54(3):797–804.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Varani J, et al. Decreased collagen production in chronologically aged skin: roles of age-dependent alteration in fibroblast function and defective mechanical stimulation. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(6):1861–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu S, et al. Quantitative analysis on collagen morphology in aging skin based on multiphoton microscopy. J Biomed Opt. 2011;16(4):040502. doi:10.1117/1.3565439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen TT, et al. Changes of skin collagen orientation associated with chronological aging as probed by polarized-FTIR micro-imaging. Analyst. 2014;139(10):2482–8. doi:10.1039/c3an00353a.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Callaghan TM, Wilhelm KP. A review of ageing and an examination of clinical methods in the assessment of ageing skin. Part I: cellular and molecular perspectives of skin ageing. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2008;30(5):313–22. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00454.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Calleja-Agius J, Muscat-Baron Y, Brincat MP. Skin ageing. Menopause Int. 2007;13(2):60–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Langton AK, et al. Cross-linking of structural proteins in ageing skin: an in situ assay for the detection of amine oxidase activity. Biogerontology. 2013;14(1):89–97. doi:10.1007/s10522-012-9394-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Danoux L, et al. How to help the skin cope with glycoxidation. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52(1):175–82. doi:10.1515/cclm-2012-0828.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Klein JA. Subcutaneous fat: anatomy and histology. In: Klein JA, editor. Tumescent technique: tumescent anesthesia & microcannular liposuction. 1st ed. Saint Louis: Mosby; 2000. p. 213–21.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Murphy GF. Histopathology of the skin. In: Elder DE et al., editors. Lever’s histopathology of the skin. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997. p. 5–50.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kuk JL, et al. Age-related changes in total and regional fat distribution. Ageing Res Rev. 2009;8(4):339–48. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2009.06.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim EJ, et al. UV modulation of subcutaneous fat metabolism. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(8):1720–6. doi:10.1038/jid.2011.106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Krutmann J, Morita A, Chung JH. Sun exposure: what molecular photodermatology tells us about its good and bad sides. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(3 Pt 2):976–84. doi:10.1038/jid.2011.394.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Christ C, et al. Improvement in skin elasticity in the treatment of cellulite and connective tissue weakness by means of extracorporeal pulse activation therapy. Aesthet Surg J. 2008;28(5):538–44. doi:10.1016/j.asj.2008.07.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scherwitz C, Braun-Falco O. So-called cellulite. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1978;4(3):230–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Segers AM, et al. Cellulitis. Histopathologic and histochemical study of 100 cases. Med Cutan Ibero Lat Am. 1984;12(2):167–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hexsel DM. Body repair. In: Parish LC, Brenner S, Ramos-e-Silva M, editors. Women’s dermatology: from infancy to maturity. 1st ed. New York: Parthenon Publishing Group; 2001. p. 586–95.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hexsel D, Dal’Forno TO, Cignachi S. Definition, clinical aspects, associated conditions, and differential diagnosis. In: Goldman MP et al., editors. Cellulite: pathophysiology and treatment. 1st ed. New York: Taylor & Francis Group; 2006. p. 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Khan MH, et al. Treatment of cellulite: part I. Pathophysiology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(3):361–70. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Khan MH, et al. Treatment of cellulite: part II. Advances and controversies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(3):373–84. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.10.041.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Curri SB. Cellulite and fatty tissue microcirculation. Cosmet Toiletries. 1993;108(4):51–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rossi AB, Vergnanini AL. Cellulite: a review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2000;14(4):251–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Nürnberger F, Müller G. So-called cellulite: an invented disease. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1978;4(3):221–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Piérard GE, Nizet JL, Piérard-Franchimont C. Cellulite: from standing fat herniation to hypodermal stretch marks. Am J Dermatopathol. 2000;22(1):34–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Querleux B, et al. Anatomy and physiology of subcutaneous adipose tissue by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy: relationships with sex and presence of cellulite. Skin Res Technol. 2002;8(2):118–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Draelos ZD, Marenus KD. Cellulite. Etiology and purported treatment. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(12):1177–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mirrashed F, et al. Pilot study of dermal and subcutaneous fat structures by MRI in individuals who differ in gender, BMI, and cellulite grading. Skin Res Technol. 2004;10(3):161–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kligman AM. Cellulite: facts and fiction. J Geriatr Dermatol. 1997;5(4):136–9.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hexsel DM, et al. Lipodistrofia ginóide. In: Kede MPV, Sabatovich O, editors. Dermatologia Estética. 1st ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2003. p. 350–9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hexsel DM, et al. Side-by-side comparison of areas with and without cellulite depressions using magnetic resonance imaging. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(10):471–7. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01260.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Nürnberger F. Practically important diseases of the subcutaneous fatty tissue (including so-called cellulite). Med Welt. 1981;32(18):682–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hexsel D, et al. A comparative study of the anatomy of adipose tissue in areas with and without raised lesions of cellulite using magnetic resonance imaging. Dermatol Surg. 2013;39(12):1877–86. doi:10.1111/dsu.12360.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Smalls LK, et al. Quantitative model of cellulite: three-dimensional skin surface topography, biophysical characterization, and relationship to human perception. J Cosmet Sci. 2005;56(2):105–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Smalls LK, Randall Wickett R, Visscher MO. Effect of dermal thickness, tissue composition, and body site on skin biomechanical properties. Skin Res Technol. 2006;12(1):43–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Smalls LK, et al. Effect of weight loss on cellulite: gynoid lypodystrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(2):510–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Matarasso A, Matarasso SL. When does your liposuction patient require an abdominoplasty? Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(12):1151–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dobke MK, et al. Assessment of biomechanical skin properties: is cellulitic skin different? Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22(3):260–6. doi:10.1067/maj.2002.124711.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hexsel DM, Dal’forno T, Hexsel CL. A validated photonumeric cellulite severity scale. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(5):523–8. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03101.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Márcio Lorencini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lorencini, M., Camozzato, F., Hexsel, D. (2017). Skin Aging and Cellulite in Women. In: Farage, M., Miller, K., Maibach, H. (eds) Textbook of Aging Skin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47398-6_160

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47398-6_160

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47397-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47398-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics