Abstract
The lean management philosophy is applied to improve the productivity and customer satisfaction of an organization. Besides the manufacturing sector, where it has been a standard for a long time, it was adopted by other sectors like service, administration, research. Though lean implementations often fail or are not sustainable. Failure reasons and success factors are named based on literature reviews. Furthermore, business models and awarding prizes for lean approaches are described and analyzed. Based on this, an assessment tool is developed. It consists of 24 criteria that are divided in the 4 categories: leadership, culture, knowledge, and process. The category culture is subdivided in: improvement, empowering, and partnering. The rating of each criterion works by interviews on the management and supervisor level, and surveys on all levels of the company. To get an objective third-party feedback, external experts can be consulted. The highest possible score is 10 and the lowest possible 1. To improve the score of low rated criteria, different countermeasures for each criterion are named. By gathering the knowledge of different research and case studies, this tool can help companies to implement lean in a sustainable way. Still it has to be considered, that every lean approach is individual and the proposed countermeasures have to be used properly. This tool is not verified in practice yet and needs of further research are mentioned as well.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Achanga P, Shehab E et al (2006) Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manag 17:460–471
Allwood J, Lee WL (2004) The impact of job rotation on problem solving skills. Int J Prod Res 42:865–881
Bhasin S (2011) Improving performance through lean. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 6:23–36
Bhasin S, Burcher P (2006) Lean viewed as a philosophy. J Manuf Technol Manag 17:56–72
Bou-Llusar JC, Escrig-Tena AB et al (2009) An empirical assessment of the EFQM excellence model: evaluation as a TQM framework relative to the MBNQA model. J Oper Manag 27:1–22
Cruz P (2012) Lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management interoperability assessment methodology. Master thesis, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Dombrowski U, Mielke T (2013) Lean leadership–fundamental principles and their application. Procedia CIRP 7:569–574
Dombrowski U, Mielke T (2014) Lean leadership-15 rules for a sustainable lean implementation. Procedia CIRP 17:565–570
Dombrowski U, Zahn T (2011) Design of a lean development framework. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management. IEEE, pp 1917–1921
Duarte S, Cruz-Machado V (2013) Modelling lean and green: a review from business models. Int J Lean Six Sigma 4:228–250
Haak R (2006) Implementing process innovation—the case of the Toyota production system. In: Management of technology and innovation in Japan. Springer, pp 185–203
Hilton RJ, Sohal A (2012) A conceptual model for the successful deployment of Lean Six Sigma. Int J Quality Reliab Manag 29:54–70
Horbal R, Kagan R et al (2008) Lean business system and beyond. Springer, New York
Irani SA (1999) Handbook of cellular manufacturing systems. Wiley, New York
Jackson TL (2006) Hoshin Kanri for the Lean enterprise: developing competitive capabilities and managing profit. Productivity Press, New York
Jorgensen F, Matthiesen R et al (2007) Lean maturity, lean sustainability. Advances in production management systems. Springer, New York, pp 371–378
Kumar MR (2007) Comparison between DP and MBNQA: convergence and divergence over time. TQM Mag 19:245–258
Liker J (2004) The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York
Liker J, Rother M (2013) Why Lean programs fail. Accessed 20 Sept 2013
Losonci D, Demeter K et al (2011) Factors influencing employee perceptions in Lean transformations. Int J Prod Econ 131:30–43
Miina A (2012) Lean problem: why companies fail with lean implementation? Management 2:232–250
Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, New york
Pay R (2008) Everybody’s jumping on the lean bandwagon, but many are being taken for a ride. Industry Week 5
Santos D (2013) Lean performance measures in a supply chain. Master thesis, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa
Scherrer-Rathje M, Boyle TA et al (2009) Lean, take two! reflections from the second attempt at lean implementation. Bus Horiz 52:79–88
Schlichting DIBC (2009) Sustaining lean improvements. PhD thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute
Talwar B (2011) Comparative study of framework, criteria and criterion weighting of excellence models. Meas Bus Excell 15:49–65
Torielli R, Abrahams R et al (2011) Using lean methodologies for economically and environmentally sustainable foundries. China Foundry 8:74–88
Vinodh S, Arvind K et al (2011) Tools and techniques for enabling sustainability through lean initiatives. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13:469–479
Womack JP, Jones DT (2010) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Simon and Schuster, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schröders, T., Cruz-Machado, V. (2015). Sustainable Lean Implementation: An Assessment Tool . In: Xu, J., Nickel, S., Machado, V., Hajiyev, A. (eds) Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 362. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47241-5_105
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47241-5_105
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-47240-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-47241-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)