Skip to main content

Abstract

Enterprise risk management (ERM) has been practiced in a wide variety of industries, and construction firms have been seen as prime candidates for ERM adoption. The objectives of this study are to develop a computerized knowledge-based decision support system (KBDSS) for ERM and to investigate the ERM maturity in Chinese construction firms (CCFs) based in Singapore. The KBDSS allows users to assess the ERM maturity of their organizations using a fuzzy model and performs the perceptibly complicated mathematical calculations. By conducting a questionnaire survey with 35 Singapore-based CCFs and inputting the relevant data into the KBDSS, the ERM maturity of these firms was assessed. The results suggested that these CCFs had a low level of ERM maturity and that the weakest criterion was the application of a risk management information system. The results also indicated positive association between ERM maturity and firm size, and significant agreement on the ranking of the maturity criteria among all the survey CCFs. The ERM maturity of Singapore-based CCFs can serve as a benchmark, with which the other firms can compare, and the methodology adopted is applicable to other construction firms, thus contributing to the body of knowledge relating to ERM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arain FM, Low SP (2006) Knowledge-based decision support system for management of variation orders for institutional building projects. Autom Constr 15:272–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley MS, Clune R, Hermanson DR (2005) Enterprise risk management: an empirical analysis of factors associated with the extent of implementation. J Account Public Policy 24:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COSO (2004) Enterprise risk management—integrated framework: executive summary and framework. Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, Jersey City

    Google Scholar 

  • Druml D (2009) Contractors: are you adopting ERM or still stuck in the mud? Available at: http://www.druml.com/about/articles2009/04/contractors-enterprise-risk-management-adoption-construction-risk-management/. Accessed 3 June 2011

  • Gordon LA, Loeb MP, Tseng CY (2009) Enterprise risk management and firm performance: a contingency perspective. J Account Public Policy 28:301–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt RE, Liebenberg AP (2011) The value of enterprise risk management. J Risk Insur 78:795–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleffner AE, Lee RB, McGannon B (2003) The effect of corporate governance on the use of enterprise risk management: Evidence from Canada. Risk Manag Insur Rev 6:53–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG (2010) Charting a safe and sustainable growth journey: Singapore enterprise risk management survey 2010. KPMG in Singapore, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu JY, Zou PXW, Gong W (2013) Managing project risk at enterprise level: exploratory case studies in China. J Constr Eng Manag 139:1268–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loosemore M (2006) Risk management in projects. Tayor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu W, Li H, Shen L, Huang T (2009) Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of Chinese construction companies in the global market. J Manag Eng 25:166–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negnevitsky M (2006) Artificial intelligence: a guide to intelligent systems. Pearson Education Limited, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SASAC (2006) Guidance to enterprise risk management for central enterprises. State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council of China, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Hwang BG, Low SP (2013a) Critical success factors for enterprise risk management in Chinese construction companies. Constr Manag Econ 31:1199–1214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Hwang BG, Low SP (2013b) Developing fuzzy enterprise risk management maturity model for construction firms. J Constr Eng Manag 139:1179–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Hwang BG, Yu GS (2013c) Identifying the critical risks in underground rail international construction joint ventures: case study of Singapore. Int J Project Manage 31:554–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Hwang BG, Low SP (2014a) Investigating enterprise risk management maturity in construction firms. J Constr Eng Manag 140(8):05014006. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000873

  • Zhao X, Hwang BG, Phng W (2014b) Construction project risk management in Singapore: resources, effectiveness, impact, and understanding. KSCE J Civil Eng 18:27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhi H (1995) Risk management for overseas construction projects. Int J Project Manage 13:231–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann HJ (2001) Fuzzy set theory and its applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xianbo Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, X., Hwang, BG., Low, S.P. (2015). Understanding Enterprise Risk Management Maturity in Construction Firms. In: Shen, L., Ye, K., Mao, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46994-1_74

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics