Skip to main content

Environmental Emissions of Construction Equipment Usage in Pile Foundation Construction Process—A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate

Abstract

The level of emissions to the environment imposed by different human activities has been increasing at an alarming rate over the past decades. Measurement and control of air pollutant emissions into the atmosphere can lead towards reducing the emission level considerably. Construction industry is a major contributor to the environmental emissions due to the extensive use of construction equipment, which is responsible for greenhouse gas emissions and harmful substances such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxide and particulate matter emissions. Pile foundation is extensively used in high-rise buildings construction and it involves operation of heavy construction equipment. This study developed a process-based model to quantify environmental emissions of equipment usage in a typical pile foundation construction using the US EPA methodology. The emissions of excavation works govern the total emissions at site because of the high usage hours of excavators. In general the emission rates of piling rig and concrete pumping truck were found to be the highest although excavator emission rates are higher for carbon monoxide and particulate matter. It is seen that careful selection of machines and equipment can reduce the emissions up to 10 %. These findings of the study could be effectively used for minimizing the environmental emissions by careful selection of suitable equipment and technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abolhasani S, Frey HC, Kim K, Rasdorf W, Lewis P, Pang S-H (2008) Real-world in-use activity, fuel use, and emissions for nonroad construction vehicles: a case study for excavators. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 58:1033–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariaratnam ST, Sihabuddin SS (2009) Comparison of emitted emissions between trenchless pipe replacement and open cut utility construction. J Green Build 4:126–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau CK, Hui WK, Ng WY, Powell G (2012) Assessment of CO2 emissions reduction in high-rise concrete office buildings using different material use options. Resour Conserv Recycl 61:22–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen GQ, Zhang B (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions in China 2007: inventory and input-output analysis. Energy Policy 38:6180–6193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhu Y (2008) Analysis of environmental impacts in the construction phase of concrete frame buildings. Department of Construction Management, Tsinghua University, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong H, Geng Y, Xi F, Fujita T (2013) Carbon footprint evaluation at industrial park level: a hybrid life cycle assessment approach. Energy Policy 57:298–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fay R, Treloar G, Iyer-Raniga U (2000) Life-cycle energy analysis of buildings: a case study. Build Res Inf 28:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey H, Rasdorf W, Lewis P (2010) Comprehensive field study of fuel use and emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment. Transp Res Rec: J Transp Res Board 2158:69–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham LA, Rideout G, Rosenblatt D, Hendren J (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions from heavy-duty vehicles. Atmos Environ 42:4665–4681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guggemos AA (2003) Environmental impacts of on-site construction processes: focus on structural frames. University of California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Guggemos AA, Horvath A (2006) Decision-support tool for assessing the environmental effects of constructing commercial buildings. J Archit Eng 12:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannigan PJ, Goble GG, Thendean G, Likins GE, Rausche F (1997) Design and construction of driven pile foundations-volume II

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman N, Pearlmutter D (2008) A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert. Energy Build 40:837–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung S-W, Lee T-W, Kim J-C, Seo C-Y, Ryu J-H, Hwang J-W, Kim S-M, Eom D-S (2009) A study on calculation of air pollutants emission factors for construction equipment. J Korean Soc Atmos Environ 25:188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junnila S, Horvath A (2003) Life-cycle environmental effects of an office building. J Infrastruct Syst 9:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kean AJ, Sawyer RF, Harley RA (2000) A fuel-based assessment of off-road diesel engine emissions. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 50:1929–1939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kok R, Benders RMJ, Moll HC (2006) Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input–output energy analysis: a comparison of methods and a discussion of results. Energy Policy 34:2744–2761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis P, Leming M, Rasdorf W (2011) Impact of engine idling on fuel use and CO2 emissions of nonroad diesel construction equipment. J Manage Eng 28:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Zhu Y, Zhang Z (2010) An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes. Build Environ 45:766–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao C, Shen Q, Shen L, Tang L (2013) Comparative study of greenhouse gas emissions between off-site prefabrication and conventional construction methods: two case studies of residential projects. Energy Build 66:165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monahan J, Powell J (2011) An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: a case study using a lifecycle assessment framework. Energy Build 43:179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul C (1937) Pile foundation construction. US Patent 2,086,977

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulos HG, Davis EH (1980) Pile foundation analysis and design

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo S, Hwang Y (2001) Estimation of CO2 emissions in life cycle of residential buildings. J Constr Eng Manage 127:414–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sihabuddin SS, Ariaratnam ST (2009) Methodology for estimating emissions in underground utility construction operations. J Eng, Des Technol 7:37–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson MJ (2001) Foundation design and construction. Pearson Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeeck G, Hens H (2010) Life cycle inventory of buildings: a calculation method. Build Environ 45:1037–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesić AS (1975) Principles of pile foundation designs. Duke University, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Xing S, Xu Z, Jun G (2008) Inventory analysis of LCA on steel- and concrete-construction office buildings. Energy Build 40:1188–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan H, Shen Q, Fan LC, Wang Y, Zhang L (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions in building construction: a case study of one Peking in Hong Kong. Build Environ 45:949–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malindu Sandanayake .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sandanayake, M., Zhang, G., Setunge, S., Thomas, C.M. (2015). Environmental Emissions of Construction Equipment Usage in Pile Foundation Construction Process—A Case Study. In: Shen, L., Ye, K., Mao, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46994-1_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics