Skip to main content

Migration as an Asset? Polish Returnees at the Time of the Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Labor Migration, EU Enlargement, and the Great Recession

Abstract

In the second half of the 1990s, the European Union (EU) witnessed two important processes shaping many areas of its socio-economic reality. First, two enlargement rounds initiated in May 2004 have led to a significant change in the internal structure of the EU in terms of income structures, welfare, social conditions, etc. Second, similarly to other parts of the global economy, many member states are suffering from a severe economic crisis. These two effects are supposed to impact migration processes, both in internal and international terms. Against this background, Poland presents an interesting case study, largely due to its massive involvement in the post-enlargement migration.

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee as well as the editors of this volume for providing a number of suggestions that helped to improve the chapter significantly. We remain responsible for any mistakes still present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Estimates of the Polish Central Statistical Office present a unique exercise, combining data from both sending and receiving countries. The outcomes are based on census data (2002, 2011) but this information is enriched with data obtained from Labor Force Survey (Polish one) and all available data from receiving countries (LFS, WRS, NIN, etc.) (CSO 2012).

  2. 2.

    A number of empirical studies looking at position of Polish workers in the most important destinations, particularly in the UK and Ireland, point out that despite of a deteriorating situation on the domestic labor market, the position of Polish migrants is still relatively favorable (as compared to other migrants groups or even natives). This paradox can be explained in terms of both demand side (relatively low wages) and supply side factors (differences with access to welfare benefits, motivation and attitudes towards particular jobs etc.) (Barrett and Elish 2012; Dustmann et al. 2010).

  3. 3.

    For more information on Polish migrants residing in Spain and Sweden refer to chapters “Post-enlargement Migration and Adjustment in a Receiving Country: The Case of Sweden” and “Migration, Crisis and Adjustment in an Enlarged EU: The Spanish Perspective” on these two countries in this volume.

  4. 4.

    At least according to the data at our disposal. Due to data limitations, at the time of writing inclusion of 2013 data was not feasible. New datasets are expected to change the picture, mostly due to the significantly worse situation within the Polish labor market.

  5. 5.

    The highest number of return migrants was provided by the Public Opinion Research Centre survey and equaled 2.9 million persons (over 9 % of the adult population) who took job abroad in the period 1998–2007 and were present in Poland at the time of the survey (i.e. 2007) (Fiałkowska and Szczepański 2012).

  6. 6.

    These groups are ‘pulling regions’ (with SI >0.1), ‘pushing out regions’ (SI < −0.1) and ‘unspecified regions’ (−0.1< SI <0.1) (Anacka and Fihel 2012a).

  7. 7.

    See also extensive literature review presented in Mezger Kveder 2012.

  8. 8.

    Respondents are considered as employed even if they were working without any salary in the family agricultural farm or family business (e.g. not exclusively wage-employment was considered).

  9. 9.

    Alternatively, it can be provided by the authors upon request.

References

  • Alberto, A., & Esteva, A. (2013). Stayers and returners: Educational self-selection among U.S. immigrants and returning migrants. IZA discussion paper no. 7222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anacka, M. (2010) Poakcesyjni migranci powrotni w Badaniu Aktywności Ekonomicznej Ludności. In I. Grabowska-Lusińska (Ed.), Powroty Polaków (pp. 11–26). CMR working paper 43/101. Warsaw: Centre of Migration Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anacka, M., & Fihel, A. (2012a). Return migration to Poland in the post-accession period. In J. Leschke, B. Galgoczi, & A. Watt (Eds.), Migration and labour markets in troubled times: Skills mismatch, return migration and policy response. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anacka, M., & Fihel, A. (2012b). Selectivity of the recent return migration to Poland. University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economics (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Anacka, M., Grabowska-Lusińska, I., Matejko, E., & Nestorowicz, J. (2010). Koncepcja monitoringu migracji powrotnych. In I. Grabowska-Lusińska (Ed.), Powroty Polaków (pp. 48–55). CMR working paper 43/101. Warsaw: Centre of Migration Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A., & Elish, K. (2012). The impact of Ireland’s recession on the labour market outcomes of its immigrants. European Journal of Population, 28(1), 91–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A., & Goggin, J. (2010). Returning to the question of a wage premium for returning migrants. National Institute Economic Review, 213(1), 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A., & Mosca, I. (2013). The psychic costs of migration: Evidence from Irish return migrants. Journal of Population Economics, 26(2), 483–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A., & O’Connell, P. J. (2000). Is there a wage premium for returning Irish migrants? Economic and Social Review, 32(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A., & Trace, F. (1998). Who is coming back? The educational profile of returning migrants in the 1990s. Irish Banking Review, 38–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borodak, D., & Piracha, M. (2011). Occupational choice of return migrants in Moldova. Eastern European Economics, 49(4), 24–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brzozowski, J. (2012). Prognoza migracji powrotnych do województwa śląskiego na lata. In Powroty z emigracji do województwa śląskiego w perspektywie pięcioletniej (pp. 38–54). Krakow: Centrum Doradztwa Strategicznego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistical Office. (2008). Informacja o badaniach zasobów imigracyjnych w Polsce w 2008 r. – notatka Informacyjna [Information on research on immigration resources in Poland in 2008, Press release]. Warsaw: CSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistical Office. (2012). Informacja o rozmiarach i kierunkach emigracji z Polski w latach 2004–2011 – notatka informacyjna [Information on the scale and destinations of Polish emigrants, 2004–2011 – Press release]. Warsaw: CSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cieslik, A. (2011). Where do you prefer to work? How the work environment influences return migration decisions from the United Kingdom to Poland. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(9), 1367–1383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Co, K., Gang, I. N., & Yun, M. S. (2000). Returns to returning: Who went abroad and what does it matter? Journal of Population Economics, 13(1), 57–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSO. (2013). Labour force survey in Poland IV quarter 2012, statistical information and elaborations. Warsaw: Central Statistical Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancygier, R. M., & Donnelly, M. J. (2013). Sectoral economies, economic contexts, and attitudes toward immigration. The Journal of Politics, 7, 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, H. (2010). Migration and development: A theoretical perspective. International Migration Review, 44(1), 227–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, G. F., Chamratrithirong, A., & Tran, Q. G. (2002). For better, for worse: Life satisfaction consequences of migration. International Migration Review, 36, 838–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Démurger, S., & Xu, H. (2011). Return migrants: The rise of new entrepreneurs in rural China. World Development, 39(10), 1847–1861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C., Frattini, T., & Halls, C. (2010). Assessing the fiscal costs and benefits of A8 migration to the UK. Fiscal Studies, 31(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsner, B., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2016). Migration 10 years after: EU enlargement, closed borders, and migration to Germany. In M. Kahanec & K. F. Zimmermann (Eds.), Labor migration, EU enlargement, and the great recession. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer. Chapter “Migration 10 Years After: EU Enlargement, Closed Borders, and Migration to Germany” in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbersen, G., Leerkes, A., Grabowska-Lusinska, I., Snel, E., & Burgers, J. (2013). On the differential attachments of migrants from Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6), 959–981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiałkowska, K., & Szczepański, M. (2012). Labour mobility within the EU – Impacts of return migration: Poland case study. Eurofuond – PPMI (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fihel, A. (Ed.). (2011). Recent trends in international migration in Poland. The 2011 SOPEMI report, CMR working paper no. 52(110). Warsaw: CMR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friberg, J. H. (2012). The stages of migration. From going abroad to settling down: Post-accession polish migrant workers in Norway. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(10), 1589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerdes, C., & Wadensjö, E. (2016). Post-enlargement migration and adjustment in a receiving country: The case of Sweden. In M. Kahanec & K. F. Zimmermann (Eds.), Labor migration, EU enlargement, and the great recession. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer. Chapter “Post-enlargement Migration and Adjustment in a Receiving Country: The Case of Sweden” in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmaj, K., & Małek, A. (2010). Powroty Polaków po 2004 roku: wyniki badania jakościowego (Returns of Poles after 2004: results of qualitative research), w: Poakcesyjne migracje powrotne Polaków: geneza, przyczyny i konsekwencje (Post-Accession Return Migrations of Poles: Background, Reasons and Consequences), Biuletyn Naukowy Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich No. 69. Warsaw: Październik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowska, I., & Okólski, M. (2010). Emigracja ostatnia? Warszawa: Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazans, M., & Philips, K. (2011). The post-enlargement migration experience in the baltic labor markets. In M. Kahanec & K. F. Zimmermann (Eds.), EU labor markets after post-enlargement migration (pp. 255–304). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iglicka, K. (2010). Powroty Polaków po 200 4 r. W pętli pułapki migracji (p. 160). Warsaw: Scholar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarczyk, P. (Ed.). (2011). Recent trends in international migration in Poland. The 2010 SOPEMI report, CMR working paper no. 51(109). Warsaw: CMR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarczyk, P., & Okólski, M. (2008). Demographic and labour-market impacts of migration on Poland. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24(3), 600–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczmarczyk, P., & Tyrowicz, J. (2015). Winners and losers among the well-educated Polish migrants in the UK. IZA discussion paper no. 9057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahanec, M., & Fabo, B. (2013). Migration strategies of the crisis-stricken youth in an enlarged European Union. Transfer: European Review of Labor and Research, 19(3), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahanec, M., Kim, A. M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2013). Pitfalls of immigrant inclusion into the European welfare state. International Journal of Manpower, 34(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klagge, B., & Klein-Hitpass, K. (2010). High-skilled return migration and knowledge-based development in Poland. European Planning Studies, 18(10), 1631–1651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahuteau, S., & Tani, M. (2011). Labour market outcomes and skill acquisition in the host country: North African migrants returning home from the European Union. IZA discussion paper no. 5441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. (2009). Recession and migration: A new era for labor migration? International Migration Review, 43, 671–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P., Midgley, E., & Teitelbaum, M. (2001). Migration and development: Focus on Turkey. International Migration Review, 35, 596–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mezger Kveder, C. L. (2012). Essays on migration between Senegal and Europe: Migration attempts, investment at origin and returnees’ occupational status. Ph.D. thesis at the University of Sussex (Department of Economics) (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezger Kveder, C. L., & Flahaux, M. L. (2013). Returning to Dakar: A mixed methods analysis of the role of migration experience for occupational status. World Development, 45, 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okolski, M. (2012). Modernising impacts of emigration. Studia Socjologiczne, 3, 49–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pemberton, S., & Scullion, L. (2013). The policies and politics of managed migration: Exploring mature labour migration from Central and Eastern Europe into the UK. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(3), 443–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piracha, M., & Vadean, F. (2010). Return migration and occupational choice. World Development, 38(8), 1141–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Planas, N., & Farré, L. (2016). Migration, crisis and adjustment in an enlarged EU: The Spanish perspective. In M. Kahanec & K. F. Zimmermann (Eds.), Labor migration, EU enlargement, and the great recession. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer. Chapter “Migration, Crisis and Adjustment in an Enlarged EU: The Spanish Perspective” in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • SSC. (2010). Migracja powrotna w Województwie Dolnośląskim. Skala zjawiska, potencjał oraz pogłębiona charakterystyka powracających (Return migration in the Dolny Śląsk Voivodship. Scale of the phenomenon, potential and characteristic of returnees). Cracow: Strategic Consulting Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • SSC. (2011a). Powroty z migracji zagranicznych do Małopolski. Skala zjawiska, charakterystyka oraz potencjał powracająych (Return form emigration to Małopolska. Scale of the Phenomenon, characteristic, and Potential of returnees). Cracow: Strategic Consulting Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • SSC. (2011b). Wyjazdy i powroty z emigracji mieszkańców Województwa Śląskiego (Departures and returns from emigration of inhabitants of Śląskie Voivodship). Cracow: Strategic Consulting Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. J. (2008). Return migration in Africa and the relationship between educational attainment and labor market success: Evidence from Uganda. International Migration Review, 42(3), 652–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahba, J., & Zenou, Y. (2012). Out of sight, out of mind: Migration, entrepreneurship and social capital. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(5), 890–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, A. M., & Baláž, V. (2005). What human capital, which migrants? Returned skilled migration to Slovakia from the UK. International Migration Review, 39, 439–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaiceva, A., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2016). Returning home at times of trouble? Return migration of EU enlargement migrants during the crisis. In M. Kahanec & K. F. Zimmermann (Eds.), Labor migration, EU enlargement, and the great recession. Heidelberg/Berlin: Springer. Chapter “Returning Home at Times of Trouble? Return Migration of EU Enlargement Migrants During the Crisis” in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pawel Kaczmarczyk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex

Annex

Variables used in the labour market status equation

  • Region (16 levels referring to administrative regions in Poland)

  • Type of locality of residence (2 levels – urban area, rural area)

  • Sex (2 levels – male, female)

  • Age (4 levels – 15–17, 18–29, 30–44, 45 and more)

  • Relationship to the head of the household (4 levels – head, spouse, children and children-in-law, other)

  • Marital status (4 levels – single, married, divorced, widowed)

  • Education (5 levels – tertiary, secondary vocational and post-secondary, secondary, basic vocational, primary and lower secondary)

  • Disability (4 levels – certificate of severe disability, certificate of moderate disability, certificate of minor disability, without any certificate of disability)

  • Agricultural household (2 levels – agricultural household, non-agricultural household)

  • Return migrant (3 levels – non- migrant, short-term migrant, long-term migrant)

  • Interactions:

    • Return migration x Age

    • Return migration x Education

    • Return migration x Agricultural household

    • Return migration x Type of locality of residence (Tables 6 and 7)

      Table 6 Testing global null hypothesis (β = 0) in the multinomial logit for labour market status
      Table 7 Testing effects in the multinomial logit for labour market status

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaczmarczyk, P., Anacka, M., Fihel, A. (2016). Migration as an Asset? Polish Returnees at the Time of the Crisis. In: Kahanec, M., Zimmermann, K.F. (eds) Labor Migration, EU Enlargement, and the Great Recession. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45320-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45320-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45319-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45320-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics