Skip to main content
  • 3399 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die endoskopischen Resektionsverfahren sind sowohl in der Diagnostik als auch in der Therapie von großer Bedeutung. Ihr Schwierigkeitsgrad ist stark von der Größe und Form der Läsion abhängig. Obwohl sich die Anwendung der einzelnen Verfahren in den verschiedenen Organen und Abschnitten des Gastrointestinaltraktes erheblich voneinander unterscheidet, werden die Verfahren hier unter dem übergeordneten technischen Aspekt ihrer Durchführung dargestellt; auf eventuelle organspezifische Besonderheiten wird im Text verwiesen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Barreiro P, Dinis-Ribeiro M (2013) Expanded criteria for endoscopic treatment of early gastric cancer: safe in the long term if feasible in the short term! Endoscopy 45: 689–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron EJ, Lin J, Chang AC, Orringer MB, Reddy RM (2014) Endoscopic ultrasound is inadequate to determine which T1/T2 esophageal tumors are candidates for endoluminal therapies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147: 765–771, Discussion 771–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Häfner M, Gangl A, Kwitt R, Uhl A, Vécsei A, Wrba F (2009) Improving Pit-Pattern Classification of Endoscopy Images by a Combination of Experts. In: Yang G-Z et al. (eds) MICCAI 2009. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, p 254

    Google Scholar 

  • Haji A, Adams K, Bjarnason I, Papagrigoriadis S (2014) High-frequency mini probe ultrasound before endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps – is it useful? Dis Colon Rectum 57: 378–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurlstone D (2008) Surface Analysis with Magnifying Chromoendoscopy in the Colon. In: Kiesslich R, Galle PR, Neurath ME (eds) Atlas of Endomicroscopy. Springer, Heidelberg, p 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Imaeda H, Hosoe N, Kashiwagi K, Ohmori T, Yahagi N, Kanai T, Ogata H (2014) Advanced endoscopic submucosal dissection with traction. World J Gastrointest Endosc 6: 286–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung Y, Kato M, Lee J, Gromski MA, Chuttani R, Matthes K (2013) Prospective, randomized comparison of a prototype endoscope with deflecting working channels versus a conventional double-channel endoscope for rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in an established experimental simulation model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 78: 756–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Kähler G, Grobholz R, Langner C, Suchan K, Post S (2006a) A new technique of endoscopic full-thickness resection using a flexible stapler. Endoscopy 38: 86–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Kähler G, Langner C, Suchan KL, Freudenberg S, Post S (2006b) Endoscopic full-thickness resection of the stomach. Surg Endosc 2: 519–521

    Google Scholar 

  • Kähler G, Sold MS, Post S, Fischer K, Enderle MD (2007) Selective tissue elevation by pressure injection (STEP) facilitates endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Surg Technol Int 16: 107–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingenfelder T, Fischer K, Sold mg, Post S, Enderle MD, Kaehler GF (2009) Combination of water-jet dissection and needle-knife as a hybrid knife simplifies endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 23: 1531–1535

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdeburg R, Collet P, Post S, Kaehler G (2008) Endoclipping of iatrogenic colonic perforation to avoid surgery. Surg Endosc 22: 1500–1504

    Google Scholar 

  • Magdeburg R, Sold M, Post S, Kaehler G (2013) Differences in the endoscopic closure of colonic perforation due to diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 48: 862–827

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda T, et al. (2004) Complete closure of a large defect after EMR of a lateral spreading colorectal tumor when using a two-channel colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 60: 836–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto K, Nagahara A, Terai T, et al. (2011) Evaluation of new subclassification of type VI pit pattern for determining the depth and type of invasion of colorectal neoplasm. J Gastroenterol 46: 31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus H, Wirths K, Schenk M, Enderle MD, Schumacher B (2009) Randomized controlled study of EMR versus endoscopic submucosal dissection with a water-jet hybrid-knife of esophageal lesions in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc 70: 112–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouw RE, Seewald S, Gondrie JJ, Deprez PH, Piessevaux H, Pohl H, Rosch T, Soehendra N, Bergman JJ (2010) Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for eradication of Barrett’s oesophagus with early neoplasia in a cohort of 169 patients. Gut 59: 1169–1177

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt A, Bauder M, Riecken B, von Renteln D, Muehleisen H, Caca K (2014) Endoscopic full-thickness resection of gastric subepithelial tumors: a single-center series. Endoscopy 47: 154–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurr MO, Baur FE, Krautwald M, Fehlker M, Wehrmann M, Gottwald T, Prosst RL (2014) Endoscopic full-thickness resection and clip defect closure in the colon with the new FTRD system: experimental study. Surg Endosc, Epub ahead of print

    Google Scholar 

  • Sold MG, Grobholz R, Post S, Enderle MD, Kaehler GF (2008) Submucosal cushioning with water jet before endoscopic mucosal resection : Which fluids are effective? Surg Endosc 22: 443–447

    Google Scholar 

  • Taban S, Dema A, Lazar D, Sporea I, Lazar E, Cornianu M (2006) An unusual »tumor« of the cecum: the inverted appendiceal stump. Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie 47: 193–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyoshima N, Sakamoto T, Makazu M, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Kushima R, Shimoda T, Fujii T, Inoue H, Kudo SE, Saito Y (2015) Prevalence of serrated polyposis syndrome and its association with synchronous advanced adenoma and lifestyle. Mol Clin Oncol 3: 69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Walz B, von Renteln D, Schmidt A, Caca K (2011) Endoscopic full-thickness resection of subepithelial tumors with the use of resorbable sutures (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 73: 1288–1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland T, Fehlker M, Gottwald T, Schurr MO (2013) Performance of the OTSC System in the endoscopic closure of iatrogenic gastrointestinal perforations: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 27: 2258–2274

    Google Scholar 

  • Yahagi N, Neuhaus H, Schumacher B, Neugebauer A, Kaehler GF, Schenk M, Fischer K, Fujishiro M, Enderle MD (2009) Comparison of standard endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus an optimized ESD technique for the colon: an animal study. Endoscopy 41: 340–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung JM, Maxwell-Armstrong C, Acheson AG (2009) Colonic tattooing in laparoscopic surgery – making the mark? Colorectal Dis 11: 527–530

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Kähler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kähler, G. (2016). Endoskopische Resektionsverfahren. In: Kähler, G., Götz, M., Senninger, N. (eds) Therapeutische Endoskopie im Gastrointestinaltrakt. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45194-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45194-6_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-45193-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-45194-6

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics