Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geburtseinleitung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Weiterbildung Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe

  • 2195 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Geburtseinleitung ist ein häufig angewendetes Vorgehen, wenn eine Entbindung vor dem Einsetzen spontaner Wehen angestrebt werden soll, sie betrifft etwa 20–25% aller Schwangerschaften. Da die Einleitung den natürlichen Verlauf der Schwangerschaft beeinflusst, muss eine entsprechende Aufklärung über die Vor- und Nachteile und die unterschiedlichen Einleitungsmethoden erfolgen und dokumentiert werden. Neben medizinischen Indikationen kann auch eine elektive „Wunscheinleitung“ gerechtfertigt sein. Die unterschiedlichen Einleitungsverfahren, wie Oxytocin, Prostaglandine und mechanische Methoden, müssen abhängig von den Vorbedingungen sorgfältig gegeneinander abgewogen werden. Vor Beginn einer Einleitung muss neben der Überprüfung des fetalen und maternalen Zustands die Einleitungsindikation, das Gestationsalter und der Cervixbefund beurteilt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 17.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. World Health Organization (2011) WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva: world health organization. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK131963/

  2. Crane JMG (2006) Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49(3):573–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hatfield AS, Sanchez-Ramos L, Kaunitz AM (2007) Sonographic cervical assessment to predict the success of labor induction: a systematic review with metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197(2):186–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Divon MY, Haglund B, Nisell H et al (1998) Fetal and neonatal mortality in the postterm pregnancy: the impact of gestational age and fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 178(4):726–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruckner TA, Cheng YW, Caughey AB (2008) Increased neonatal mortality among normal-weight births beyond 41 weeks of gestation in California. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(4):421.e1–e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gülmezoglu AM, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Heatley E (2012) Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD004945

    Google Scholar 

  7. Heimstad R, Romundstad PR, Hyett J, Mattsson L-A (2007) Salvesen KA. Women’s experiences and attitudes towards expectant management and induction of labor for post-term pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 86(8):950–956

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cammu H, Verlaenen H, Perde MP (1990) Premature rupture of membranes at term in nulliparous women: a hazard? Obstet Gynecol 76(4):671–674

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herbst A, Källén K (2007) Time between membrane rupture and delivery and septicemia in term neonates. Obstet Gynecol 110(3):612–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tran SH, Cheng YW, Kaimal AJ, Caughey AB (2008) Length of rupture of membranes in the setting of premature rupture of membranes at term and infectious maternal morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198(6):700.e1– e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dare MR, Middleton P, Crowther CA et al (2006) Planned early birth versus expectant management (waiting) for prelabour rupture of membranes at term (37 weeks or more). Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD005302

    Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Ham DP, Van der Heyden JL, Opmeer BC et al (2012) Management of late-preterm premature rupture of membranes: the PPROMEXIL- 2 trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(4):276.e1–e10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Buchanan SL, Crowther CA, Levett KM et al (2010) Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks‘ gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004735

    Google Scholar 

  14. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D’alton M et al (2011) Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol 118(2 Pt 1):323–333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM et al (2012) The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational- age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(4):318.e1–e6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boers KE, Vijgen SMC, Bijlenga D et al (2010) Induction versus expectant monitoring for intrauterine growth restriction at term: randomised equivalence trial (DIGITAT). BMJ 341:c7087

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kenny LC, McCowan L (2010) Induction of labour for intrauterine growth restriction at term. BMJ 341:c6768

    Google Scholar 

  18. (o A) (2009) ACOG practice bulletin no. 102: management of stillbirth. Obstet Gynecol 113(3):748–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. O’Sullivan O, Stephen G, Martindale E, Heazell AEP (2009) Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol 29(8):705–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 27 Sussex Place RP, 6200 T +44 (0)20 7772. http://www.rcog.org.uk. Reduced fetal movements (Green-top 57). http://www.rcog.org.uk/womenshealth/clinical-guidance/reduced-fetal-movements-green-top-57

  21. Irion O, Boulvain M (2000) Induction of labour for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000938

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sanchez-Ramos L, Bernstein S, Kaunitz AM (2002) Expectant management versus labor induction for suspected fetal macrosomia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 100(5 Pt 1):997–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenstein MG, Cheng YW, Snowden JM et al (2012) The risk of stillbirth and infant death stratified by gestational age in women with gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 206(4):309.e1–e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nicholson JM, Kellar LC, Kellar GM (2006) The impact of the interaction between increasing gestational age and obstetrical risk on birth outcomes: evidence of a varying optimal time of delivery. J Perinatol 26(7):392–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang DY, Usher RH, Kramer MS et al (2000) Determinants of unexplained antepartum fetal deaths. Obstet Gynecol 95(2):215–221

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Haavaldsen C, Sarfraz AA, Samuelsen SO, Eskild A (2010) The impact of maternal age on fetal death: does length of gestation matter? Am J Obstet Gynecol 203(6):554.e1–e8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Williamson C, Hems LM, Goulis DG et al (2004) Clinical outcome in a series of cases of obstetric cholestasis identified via a patient support group. BJOG 111(7):676–681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kenyon AP, Piercy CN, Girling J et al (2002) Obstetric cholestasis, outcome with active management: a series of 70 cases. BJOG 109(3):282–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee RH, Kwok KM, Ingles S et al (2008) Pregnancy outcomes during an era of aggressive management for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Am J Perinatol 25(6):341–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Koopmans CM, Bijlenga D, Groen H et al (2009) Induction of labour versus expectant monitoring for gestational hypertension or mild pre-eclampsia after 36 weeks‘ gestation (HYPITAT): a multicentre, open-label randomised controlled trial. Lancet 374(9694):979–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Stock SJ, Ferguson E, Duffy A et al (2012) Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study. BMJ 344:e2838

    Google Scholar 

  32. NICE. Induction of labour. NICE. http://www.nice.org.uk/

  33. Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T (2009) Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD003246

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM, Pileggi C (2010) Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (10):CD000941

    Google Scholar 

  35. Alfirevic Z, Weeks A (2006) Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD001338

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kelly AJ, Malik S, Smith L et al (2009) Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD003101

    Google Scholar 

  37. DGGG Leitlinie: Anwendung von Prostaglandinen in Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie 8-2008. http://www.awmf.org

  38. Salim R, Zafran N, Nachum Z et al (2011) Single-balloon compared with double-balloon catheters for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 118(1):79–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Agosti M et al (2011) Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204(4):338.e1–e7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ et al (2012) Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD001233

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jozwiak M, Oude Rengerink K, Benthem M et al (2011) Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 378(9809):2095–2103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pettker CM, Pocock SB, Smok DP et al (2008) Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 111(6):1320–1326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Macones GA, Cahill A, Stamilio DM, Odibo AO (2012) The efficacy of early amniotomy in nulliparous labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207(5):403. e1–e5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Klinik für Geburtshilfe, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Schewiz

    Dr. L. Schäffer

Authors
  1. Dr. L. Schäffer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Direktor der Frauenklinik, Klinikum Kassel GmbH, Kassel, Germany

    Thomas Dimpfl

  2. Klinik für Frauenheilkunde u. Geburtshilfe, Universitätsklinikum, Ulm, Germany

    Wolfgang Janni

  3. Landshut, Germany

    Rolf Kreienberg

  4. Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Uniklinik RWTH, Aachen, Germany

    Nicolai Maass

  5. Klinik f. Frauenheilkunde u. Geburtshilfe, Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany

    Olaf Ortmann

  6. Frauenklinik, Abt. gyn. Endokrin. u. Fertilitätsst., Universitätsklinik, Heidelberg, Germany

    Thomas Strowitzki

  7. Berlin, Germany

    Klaus Vetter

  8. Klinik für Geburtshilfe, Universitätsspital, Zürich, Switzerland

    Roland Zimmermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schäffer, L. (2015). Geburtseinleitung. In: Dimpfl, T., et al. Weiterbildung Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44424-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44424-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44423-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44424-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation