Skip to main content

Branching Bisimilarity Checking for PRS

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8573))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recent studies reveal that branching bisimilarity is decidable for both nBPP (normed Basic Parallel Processes) and nBPA (normed Basic Process Algebras). These results lead to the question if there are any other models in the hierarchy of PRS (Process Rewrite Systems) whose branching bisimilarity is decidable. It is shown in this paper that the branching bisimilarity for both nOCN (normed One Counter Nets) and nPA (normed Process Algebras) is undecidable. These results essentially imply that the question has a negative answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baeten, J.C.M., Bergstra, J.A., Klop, J.W.: Decidability of Bisimulation Equivalence for Processes Generating Context-free Languages. In: de Bakker, J.W., Nijman, A.J., Treleaven, P.C. (eds.) PARLE 1987. LNCS, vol. 259, pp. 94–111. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Burkart, O., Caucal, D., Moller, F., Steffen, B.: Verification on Infinite Structures. In: Handbook of Process Algebra. Elsevier Science (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christensen, S., Hirshfeld, Y., Moller, F.: Bisimulation Equivalence is Decidable for Basic Parallel Processes. In: Best, E. (ed.) CONCUR 1993. LNCS, vol. 715, pp. 143–157. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Christensen, S., Hüttel, H., Stirling, C.: Bisimulation Equivalence is Decidable for all Context-free Processes. In: Cleaveland, W.R. (ed.) CONCUR 1992. LNCS, vol. 630, pp. 138–147. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Czerwiński, W., Hofman, P., Lasota, S.: Decidability of Branching Bisimulation on Normed Commutative Context-free Processes. In: Katoen, J.-P., König, B. (eds.) CONCUR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6901, pp. 528–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. De Nicola, R., Montanari, U., Vaandrager, F.: Back and Forth Bisimulations. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Klop, J.W. (eds.) CONCUR 1990. LNCS, vol. 458, pp. 152–165. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fu, Y.: Checking Equality and Regularity for Normed BPA with Silent Moves. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds.) ICALP 2013, Part II. LNCS, vol. 7966, pp. 238–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hirshfeld, Y., Jerrum, M.: Bisimulation Equivanlence is Decidable for Normed Process Algebra. In: Wiedermann, J., Van Emde Boas, P., Nielsen, M. (eds.) ICALP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1644, pp. 412–421. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Jančar, P.: Undecidability of Bisimilarity for Petri Nets and Some Related Problems. Theoretical Computer Science 148, 281–301 (1995)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Jančar, P., Brics, J.S.: Highly Undecidable Questions for Process Algebras. In: Levy, J.-J., Mayr, E.W., Mitchell, J.C. (eds.) TCS 2004. IFIP, vol. 155, pp. 507–520. Springer, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jančar, P., Srba, J.: Undecidability of Bisimilarity by Defender’s Forcing. Journal of the ACM 55, 1–26 (2008)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kučera, A., Jančar, P.: Equivalence-Checking on Infinite-State Systems: Techniques and Results. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 6, 227–264 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayr, R.: Process Rewrite Systems. Information and Computation 156, 264–286 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayr, R.: Undecidability of Weak Bisimulation Equivalence for 1-Counter Processes. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 570–583. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Milner, R.: Communication and Concurrency. Prentice Hall (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Park, D.: Concurrency and Automata on Infinite Sequences. In: Deussen, P. (ed.) GI-TCS 1981. LNCS, vol. 104, pp. 167–183. Springer, Heidelberg (1981)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Srba, J.: Undecidability of Weak Bisimilarity for Pushdown Processes. In: Brim, L., Jančar, P., Křetínský, M., Kučera, A. (eds.) CONCUR 2002. LNCS, vol. 2421, pp. 579–594. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Srba, J.: Roadmap of Infinite Results. EATCS 78, 163–175 (2002)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Srba, J.: Undecidability of Weak Bisimilarity for PA-Processes. In: Ito, M., Toyama, M. (eds.) DLT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2450, pp. 197–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Srba, J.: Completeness Results for Undecidable Bisimilarity Problems. Electronic Notes in Computer Science 98, 5–19 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stirling, C.: Decidability of Bisimulation Equivalence for Normed Pushdown Processes. Theoretical Computer Science 195, 113–131 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Stirling, C.: The Joys of Bisimulation. In: Brim, L., Gruska, J., Zlatuška, J. (eds.) MFCS 1998. LNCS, vol. 1450, pp. 142–151. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Stirling, C.: Decidability of Weak Bisimilarity for a Subset of Basic Parallel Processes. In: Honsell, F., Miculan, M. (eds.) FOSSACS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2030, pp. 379–393. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. van Glabbeek, R., Weijland, W.: Branching Time and Abstraction in Bisimulation Semantics. Journal of ACM 43, 555–600 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Yin, Q., Fu, Y., He, C., Huang, M., Tao, X.: Branching Bisimilarity Checking for PRS (2014), http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0050

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yin, Q., Fu, Y., He, C., Huang, M., Tao, X. (2014). Branching Bisimilarity Checking for PRS. In: Esparza, J., Fraigniaud, P., Husfeldt, T., Koutsoupias, E. (eds) Automata, Languages, and Programming. ICALP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8573. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43951-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43951-7_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43950-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43951-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics