Skip to main content

Change Strategy for ISO/IEC 33014: A Multi-case Study on Which Change Strategies Were Chosen

  • Conference paper
Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement (EuroSPI 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 425))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the newly published ISO/IEC 33014.2013 [1] standard there is a strategic activity called “Identify the overall change strategy” that includes selecting a change strategy “from among a myriad of available change models”. The book [2] on the ImprovAbility model describes a framework of how to select change strategy. There are 10 different change strategies to choose from. But which ones are chosen in practice? To answer that we have analysed data from 49 assessments in 44 organizations that have used the framework. We give a ranking of strategies chosen and we analyse how they adapt the change strategy to their specific conditions. We conclude that the most often recommended organizational change strategy is Optionality followed by three other strategies: Socializing, Learning-driven, and Specialist-driven.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ISO, ISO/IEC/TR 33014, in Information technology – Process assessment – Guide for process improvement, Geneva, Switzerland (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J. (eds.): ImprovAbility: Success with process improvement. DELTA, Hørsholm (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donaldson, L.: The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burnes, B.: Managing Change, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Finacial Times (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borum, F.: Strategier for organisationsændring (Strategies for organizational change), 2nd edn. Handelshøjskolens Forlag, Copenhagen (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Handy, C.: Understanding Organizations. Reprint ed2007. Penguin Books Limited

    Google Scholar 

  8. Huy, Q.N.: Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Academy of Management Review 26(4), 601–623 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., Lampel, J.: Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. Financial Times, Prentice Hall, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Andersen, C.V., et al.: The Grass Root Effort. In: Mathiassen, L., Pries-Heje, J., Ngwenyama, O. (eds.) Improving Software Organizations - From Principles to Practice, pp. 83–98. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kensing, F.: Methods and Practices in Participatory Design. ITU Press, Copenhagen (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kensing, F., Blomberg, J.: Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 7(3-4), 167–185 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Benner, M., Tushman, M.: Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review 28(2), 238–256 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mintzberg, H.: Structure in Fives - designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Senge, P.M.: The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oakland, J.S.: TQM – Text with Cases, 3rd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pande, P.S., Holpp, L.: What is Six Sigma. McGraw-Hill (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edn. Free Press,

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bashein, B.J., Markus, M.L., Riley, P.: Preconditions for BPR Success: And How to Prevent Failures. Information Systems Management 11(2), 7–13 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boudreau, M.-C., Robey, D.: Coping with contradictions in business process re-engineering. Information Technology and People 9(4), 40–57 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Davenport, T.H.: Process Innovation: Re-engineering Work through Information Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hammer, M.: Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate. Harvard Business Review, 104-112 (July-August 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation; A Manifesto For Business Revolution. Harper Business (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. King, W.R.: Process Reengineering: The Strategic Dimensions. Information Systems Management 11(2), 71–73 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Malhotra, Y.: Business Process Redesign: An Overview. IEEE Engineering Management Review 26(3) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Willcocks, L., Feeny, D., Islei, G.: Managing IT as a Strategic Resource. McGraw-Hill (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1), 1–25 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ciborra, C.U.: From Control to Drift. The dynamics of cooporate information infrastructures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Simon, H.A.: The Structure of Ill Structured Problems. Artificial Intelligence 4, 181–201 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Simon, H.A.: Search and Reasoning in Problem Solving. Artificial Intelligence 21, 7–29 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Woods, D.D., Hollnagel, E.: Mapping cognitive demands in complex problem-solving worlds. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 26(2), 257–275 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Woods, Coping with complexity: the psychology of human behavior in complex systems. In: Goodstein, L.P., Andersen, H.B., Olsen, S.E. (eds.) Tasks, Errors and Mental Models, pp. 128–148. Taylor & Francis: London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pries-Heje, J., Johansen, J. (2014). Change Strategy for ISO/IEC 33014: A Multi-case Study on Which Change Strategies Were Chosen. In: Barafort, B., O’Connor, R.V., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 425. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43895-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43896-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics