Abstract
Arguably more than ever, global societal aspirations are demanding more sustainable consumption and production patterns. However, the “sustainability-liability effect” poses a significant challenge for brand managers: When it comes to product categories in which functionality and strength are key attributes, consumers are likely to equate sustainability with inferior performance. Our experiment with a random German nat. rep. sample reveals promising strategies along the brand-product marketing continuum to eliciting a “sustainability-asset effect” that enhances consumers’ product evaluations. We also find that consumers’ perceived credibility of sustainability claims and generational differences in feeling overloaded vs. reassured are likely to influence the strength of the sustainability-asset effect. Our findings show that sustainability can now be perceived as an asset, if interwoven in an effective brand-product communication strategy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acuti, D., Pizzetti, M., & Dolnicar, S. (2022). When sustainability backfires: A review on the unintended negative side – effects of product and service sustainability on consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 39(10), 1933–1945. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21709.
Appelman, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2016). Measuring message credibility: Construction and validation of an exclusive scale. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 93(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015606057.
Atkinson, L., & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Signaling the green sell: The influence of eco-label source, argument specificity, and product involvement on consumer trust. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834803.
Bonera, M., Codini, A. P., & Miniero, G. (2020). The great Millennials’ trouble: Leading or confused green generation? An Italian insight. Italian Journal of Marketing, 2020, 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-020-00015-4.
Chernev, A. (2007). Jack of all trades or master of one? Product differentiation and compensatory reasoning in consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 430–444. https://doi.org/10.1086/510217.
Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2015). Doing well by doing good: The benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1412–1425. https://doi.org/10.1086/680089.
Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2020). When sustainability is not a liability: The Halo effect of marketplace morality. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 31(3), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1195
Chernev, A., & Carpenter, G. S. (2001). The role of market efficiency intuitions in consumer choice: A case of compensatory inferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.3.349.18865.
Chernev, A., Blair, S., & Böckenholt, U. (2021). Is sustainability a liability? Green marketing and consumer beliefs about eco-friendly products. Georgetown McDonough School of Business Research Paper, 3988848. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3988848.
Dick, A., Chakravarti, D., & Biehal, G. (1990). Memory-based inferences during consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1086/208539.
Donato, C., & D’Aniello, A. (2022). Tell me more and make me feel proud: The role of eco-labels and informational cues on consumers’ food perceptions. British Food Journal, 124(4), 1365–1382. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2021-0416.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x.
Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Convergence of interests – cultivating consumer trust through corporate social initiatives. In G. Fitzsimons & V. Morwitz (Hrsg.), Advances in consumer research: North American conference proceedings, 34 (S. 687). Association for Consumer Research.
Gershoff, A. D., & Frels, J. K. (2015). What makes it green? The role of centrality of green attributes in evaluations of the greenness of products. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0303.
Goh, S. K., & Balaji, M. S. (2016). Linking green skepticism to green purchase behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 629–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.122.
Gong, S., Wang, L., Peverelli, P., & Suo, D. (2022). When is sustainability an asset? The interaction effects between the green attributes and product category. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(6), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-06-2021-3534.
Granato, G., Fischer, A. R. H., & Van Trijp, H. C. M. (2022). A meaningful reminder on sustainability: When explicit and implicit packaging cues meet. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79(101724), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101724.
Grolleau, G., Mzoughi, N., & Sutan, A. (2019). Does advertising the green benefits of products contribute to sustainable development goals? A quasi-experimental test of the dilution effect. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 786–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2280.
Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Summary for Policymakers. In H.-O. Pörtner, D. C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E. S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem & B. Rama (Eds.), Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the Iintergovernmental panel on climate change (S. 3–33). CUP. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.001.
Jäger, A.-K., & Weber, A. (2020). Can you believe it? The effects of benefit type versus construal level on advertisement credibility and purchase intention for organic food. Journal of Cleaner Production, 257(120543), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120543.
Lin, Y.-C., & Chang, C.-C.A. (2012). Double standard: The role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.11.0264.
Luchs, M. G., & Kumar, M. (2017). “Yes, but this other one looks better/works better”: How do consumers respond to trade-offs between sustainability and other valued attributes? Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2695-0.
Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: Potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.74.5.18.
Luchs, M. G., Brower, J., & Chitturi, R. (2012). Product choice and the importance of aesthetic design given the emotion-laden trade-off between sustainability and functional performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 903–916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00970.x.
Mai, R., Hoffmann, S., Lasarov, W., & Buhs, A. (2019). Ethical products = less strong: how explicit and implicit reliance on the Lay theory affects consumption behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(3), 659–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3669-1.
Moon, S.-J., Costello, J. P., & Koo, D.-M. (2017). The impact of consumer confusion from eco-labels on negative WOM, distrust, and dissatisfaction. International Journal of Advertising, 36(2), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1158223.
Musgrove, C. F., Choi, F., & Cox, K. C. (2018). Consumer perceptions of green marketing claims: An examination of the relationships with type of claim and corporate credibility. Services Marketing Quarterly, 39(4), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2018.1514794.
Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M., & Dhar, R. (2014). When Going Green Backfires: How Firm Intentions Shape the Evaluation of Socially Beneficial Product Enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 823–839. https://doi.org/10.1086/677841.
Olsen, M. C., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Chandukala, S. R. (2014). Green claims and message frames: How green new products change brand attitude. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0387.
Pancer, E., McShane, L., & Noseworthy, T. (2017). Isolated environmental cues and product efficacy penalties: The color green and eco-labels. Journal of Business Ethics, 143(1), 159–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2764-4.
Ahmad, S., & F., Rosli, N. T., & Quoquab, F. (2022). Environmental quality awareness, green trust, green self-efficacy and environmental attitude in influencing green purchase behaviour. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 38(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2020-0072.
Skard, S., Jørgensen, S., & Pedersen, L. J. T. (2021). When is sustainability a liability, and when is it an asset? Quality inferences for core and peripheral attributes. Journal of Business Ethics, 173, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04415-1.
Soares, R. R., Zhang, T. T., Proença, J. F., & Kandampully, J. (2017). Why are generation Y consumers the most likely to complain and repurchase? Journal of Service Management, 28(3), 520–540. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-08-2015-0256.
Song, Y., Qin, Z., & Qin, Z. (2020). Green marketing to Gen Z consumers in China: Examining the mediating factors of an eco-label–informed purchase. SAGE Open, 10(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020963573.
Tucker, E. M., Rifon, N. J., Lee, E. M., & Reece, B. B. (2012). Consumer receptivity to green ads. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2012.10672454.
Van Doorn, J., Verhoef, P. C., & Risselada, H. (2020). Sustainability claims and perceived product quality: The moderating role of brand CSR. Sustainability, 12(9), 3711, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093711.
Van Doorn, J., Risselada, H., & Verhoef, P. C. (2021). Does sustainability sell? The impact of sustainability claims on the success of national brands’ new product introductions. Journal of Business Research, 137, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.032.
Wood, S., Robinson, S., & Poor, M. (2018). The efficacy of green package cues for mainstream versus niche brands: How mainstream green brands can suffer at the shelf. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2018-025.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: Visual Materials Used in the Study
Appendix: Visual Materials Used in the Study
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dreyer, J., Fretschner, M. (2023). Beyond the Sustainability-Liability Effect: Developing Sustainable Brand Strategies by Understanding Sustainability as an Asset. In: Schuster, G., Wolter, LC. (eds) Nachhaltiges Markenmanagement. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42569-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42569-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-42568-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-42569-2
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)