Zusammenfassung
In den letzten Jahrzehnten haben sich Designforschung und Designpraxis auf eine neue Art und Weise miteinander verwoben. Seit den 1990er-Jahren beherrscht das Anliegen, Forschungsbereiche im Design zu definieren die akademische Debatte. Als Resultat dieser Debatten stehen wir heute vor unterschiedlichen Verständnissen von Forschung im Design, wie diese umgesetzt werden kann und welche Methoden dafür eingesetzt werden sollen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Allpress, B., & Barnacle, R. (Hrsg.). (2012). Supervising practices for postgraduate research in art, architecture and design. Sense Publishers.
Archer, B. (1979). Design as a discipline. Design Studies, 1(1), 18–20.
Archer, B. (1995). The nature of research. In Co-design, interdisciplinary journal of design, 6–13.
Badura, J., Dubach, S., Haarmann, A., Mersch, D., Rey, A., Schenker, C., & Toro-Pérez, G. (2015). Künstlerische Forschung. Ein Handbuch. Diaphanes.
Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating design. A review of forty years of design research. Design Issues, 20(1), 16–29.
Brandes, U., Erlhoff, M., & Schemmann, N. (2009). Designtheorie und Designforschung. Fink.
Candy, L. (2006). Practice based research: A guide. CCS Report: 2006-V1.0 November, University of Technology Sydney (online). https://www.creativityandcognition.com/resources/PBR%20Guide-1.1-2006.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. März 2019.
Candy, L., & Edmonds, E. (2018). Practice-based research in the creative arts. Foundations and futures from the front line. Leonardo, 51(1), 63–69.
Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227.
de Freitas, N. (2002). Towards a definition of studio documentation: Working tool and transparent record. In Working Papers in Art and Design, 2 (online). https://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/12305/WPIAAD_vol2_freitas.pdf. Zugegriffen: 26. März 2019.
de Freitas, N. (2007). Activating a research context in art and design practice. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 1, 2, Art. 14 (online). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2007.010214. Zugegriffen: 10. März 2019.
Dittenberger, S. (2019). Actively reflective: Understanding the drivers and hurdles of building knowledge bridges between theory and practice in design education. In J. Häkkilä, M. Pakanen, E. Luiro, E. Mikkonen, & S. Miettinen (Hrsg.), Cumulus Conference Proceedings Series 5/2019: Around the Campfire – Resilience and Intelligence. Rovaniemi: Cumulus: International Association of Universities and Colleges of Art, Design and Media.
Dittenberger, S. (2018). Putting Theory to Practice. Reflections on the Integration of Product Design Aspects in AAL Projects. In D. Marjanović, M. Štorga, S. Škec, N. Bojčetić, & N. Pavković (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 15th international design conference DESIGN 2018. Croatia.
Duxbury, R. (2012). Opening the door. Portals to good supervision of creative practice-led research. In B. Allpress & R. Barnacle (Hrsg.), Supervising practices for postgraduate research in art, architecture and design, 15–21. Sense Publishers.
Ehn, P., & Ullmark, P. (2019). Educating the reflective designer. In Vaughan, L. (Hrsg.), Practice-based design research, 77–86. Bloomsbury.
Findeli, A. (1998). A quest for credibility. Doctoral education and research in design at the University of Montreal. In Proceedings of the Ohio conference on doctoral education in design, Ohio, Oct. 8–11, 1998, 99–116.
Flick, U. (2009). Sozialforschung: Methoden und Anwendungen. Ein Überblick für die BA-Studiengänge, Reinbek bei Hamburg. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag.
Frascara, J. (2007). Hiding lack of knowledge. Bad words in design education. Design Issues, 23(4), 62–68.
Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.
Friedman, K. (2003). Theory construction in design research criteria. Design Studies, 24(6), 507–522.
Gray, C., & Malins, J. (2004). Visualizing research: A guide to the research process in art and design. Ashgate.
Hohl, M. (2020). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten in Kunst, Design und Architektur. Kriterien für praxisgeleitete Ph.D.-Forschung. DOM publishers.
Huber, L. (2013). Warum Forschendes Lernen nötig und möglich ist. In L. Huber, J. Hellmer, & F. Schneider (Hrsg.), Forschendes Lernen im Studium, 9–35). Universitätsverlag Webler.
Jonas, W. (2004). Forschung durch Design. In Erstes Design Forschungssymposion (Tagung des Swiss Design Network, HGK Basel, 13./14. 05. 2004), 26–33. https://swissdesignnetwork.ch/en/conferences/first-swiss-design-network-symposium/. Zugegriffen: 22. Jan. 2023.
Koskinen, I., Zimmerman, J., Binder, T., Redström, J., & Wensveen, S. (2011). Design research through practice: From lab, field, and showroom. Morgan Kaufmann.
Koskinen, I., & Krogh, P. G. (2015). Design accountability: When design research entangles theory and practice. International Journal of Design, 9(1), 121–127.
Krogh, P. G., & Koskinen, I. (2020). Drifting by intention: Four epistemic traditions from within constructive design research. Springer International Publishing.
Mäkelä, M., & Nimkulrat, N. (2018). Documentation as a practice-led research tool for reflexion on experimental knowledge. In FormAkademisk, 11(2), Art. 5, 1-16.
Muratovski, G. (2016). Research for designers: A guide to methods and practice. Sage.
OECD. (2015). Frascati manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. OECD Publishing.
Phillips, E. M., & Pugh, D. S. (2005). How to get a PhD: A handbook for students and their supervisors. Open University Press.
Scrivener, S. A. R. (2002). The art object does not embody a form of knowledge. In Working Papers in Art & Design, 2 (Online). http://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/12311/WPIAAD_vol2_scrivener.pdf. Zugegriffen: 10. März 2019.
Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3 Aufl.). MIT Press.
Vaughan, L. (2019a). Introducing practiced-based design research. In Dies. (Hrsg.), Practice-based design research, 1–6. Bloomsbury.
Vaughan, L. (2019b). Embracing the literacies of design as means and mode of dissemination. In Dies. (Hrsg.), Practice-based design research, 111–118. Bloomsbury.
Vaughan, L., & Morrison, A. (2014). Unpacking models, approaches and materialisations of the design Ph.D. In Studies in material thinking. Bd. 11, 3–19 (online). https://www.materialthinking.org/sites/default/files/papers/SMT_Vol%2011_Paper%2002_Vaughan.pdf. Zugegriffen: 24. Jan. 2020.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dittenberger, S., Moritsch, S., Raschauer, A. (2023). Forschung in der Designausbildung: Eine Arbeitsdefinition. In: Schweppenhäuser, G., Popp, JF., Bauer, C. (eds) Designmethoden im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Würzburger Beiträge zur Designforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41763-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41763-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-41762-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-41763-5
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)