Skip to main content

Interactive Big Data Visualizations: Potential for Management Reporting

A Summary of Empirical Studies on the Selection, Use, and Design of Novel Visualization Types

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Digitalization of Management Accounting

Abstract

This paper highlights the applicability of novel visualization types for the representation of multidimensional data. For this purpose, multidimensional visualizations for several dimensions (Sankey, Sunburst and Treemap visualization) as well as for several attributes (Parallel Coordinates Plot, Heatmap) are presented. For this purpose, on the one hand, more than 100 practitioners from the financial sector were interviewed about challenges in dealing with Big Data, and on the other hand, several online experiments as well as experiments by means of eye tracking technology were conducted. This approach allows to derive and summarize a comprehensive judgment about the usability as well as the advantages and disadvantages of these Big Data visualizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bostock, M., V. Ogievetsky, and J. Heer. 2011. D3: Data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17 (12): 2301–2309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehmer, M., and T. Munzner. 2013. A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19 (12): 2376–2385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruls, M., K. Huizing, and J.J. van Wijk. 2000. Squarified Treemaps. In Eurographics/IEEE VGTC. Unter Mitarbeit von IEEE Computer Society. IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization, ed. W. de Leeuw and R. van Liere, 1–10. Amsterdam, 29–30. Mai 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, J.-K., Y. Wang, and K.-L. Ma. 2016. Privacy preserving event sequence data visualization using a Sankey diagram-like representation. In SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 symposium on visualization, ed. W. Wei and D. Weiskopf, 1–8. Macau: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilla, W., D.J. Janvrin, and R. Raschke. 2010. Interactive data visualization. New directions for accounting information systems research. Journal of Information Systems 24 (2): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egle, U., and I. Keimer. 2018. Digitaler Wandel im Controlling. Luzern: Schriften aus dem Institut für Finanzdienstleistungen Zug IFZ. https://blog.hslu.ch/digitalcontrolling/files/2017/09/Egle_Keimer_Digitaler_Wandel_im_Controlling.pdf. Accessed on: 29.01.2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisl, C., H. Losbichler, L. Falschlunger, B. Fischer, and P. Hofer. 2012. Reporting Design. Status quo und neue Wege in der Gestaltung des internen und externen Berichtswesens. In FH Oberösterreich, ed. C. Eisl, H. Losbichler, C. Engelbrechtsmüller, M. Büttner, H. Wambach, and A. Schmidt-Pöstion. KPMG Advisory AG, pmOne AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisl, C., H. Losbichler, and L. Falschlunger. 2015. Wahrnehmungsoptimierte Gestaltung von Information-Dashboards auf Basis von Eye-Tracking-Analysen. Zusammenhänge erkennen und effizienter entscheiden. CFOaktuell September 2015, 199–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist, N., A.V. Moere, H.-C. Jetter, D. Cernea, H. Reiterer, and T.J. Jankun-Kelly. 2011. Fluid interaction for information visualization. Information Visualization 10 (4): 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611413180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falschlunger, L., O. Lehner, and H. Treiblmaier. 2016. InfoVis: The impact of information overload on decision making outcome in high complexity settings. In Proceedings of the 15th annual Pre-ICIS Workshop on HCI Research in MIS. SIGHCI 2016. Dublin, 11.12.2016. AIS Electronic Library: Association for Information Systems (Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction), 1–6, Paper 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heer, J., and B. Shneiderman. 2012. Interactive dynamics for visual analysis. Communications of the ACM 55 (4): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, P., A. Mayr, and C. Walchshofer. 2018. Interaktive Visualisierungen von Big Data. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. CFOaktuell 2: 78–82, zuletzt geprüft am 27. Juni 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inselberg, A. 1985. The plane with parallel coordinates. The Visual Computer 1 (2): 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01898350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B., and B. Shneiderman. 1991. Tree-maps: A space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. In Proceedings of the 2nd international IEEE visualization conference, (San Diego, Oct. 1991), 284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D.A. 2001. Visual exploration of large data sets. Communications of the ACM 44 (8): 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/381641.381656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, D.J., G. Albuquerque, M. Eisemann, A. Tatu, D. Keim, H. Schumann, et al. 2010. Visualisierung und Analyse multidimensionaler Datensätze. Informatik-Spektrum 6 (33): 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., D. Maljovec, B. Wang, P.-T. Bremer, and V. Pascucci. 2017. Visualizing high-dimensional data. Advances in the past decade. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23 (3): 1249–1268. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2016.2640960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losbichler, H., C. Eisl, and T. Plank. 2016. Neue Visualisierungsformen auf dem Prüfstand. Controlling & Management Review Sonderheft (1): 46–53, zuletzt geprüft am 27.06.2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, H. 2016. Eye tracking in library and information science: A literature review. Library Hi Tech 34 (4): 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-07-2016-0085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkhofer, L., and O. Lehner. 2019. Using gaze behavior to measure cognitive load. In Information Systems and Neuroscience. NeuroIS Retreat 2018, Aufl. 1 Bd. 29, Hrsg. F. Davis, R. Riedl, J. Vom Brocke, P.-M. Léger, und A. Randolph, 73–83. Springer International Publishing (Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, NeuroIS Retreat 2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrot, A., R. Bourqui, N. Hanusse, and D. Auber. 2017. HeatPipe: High throughput, low latency big data heatmap with spark streaming. In 21st international conference on information visualization 2017, Information Visualization 2017. London, 11–14.07.2017. IVS, 1–6. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01516888/document.

  • Pike, W.A., J. Stasko, R. Chang, and T.A. O’Connell. 2009. The science of interaction. Information Visualization 8 (4): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2009.22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodden, K. 2014. Applying a sunburst visualization to summarize user navigation sequences. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 34 (5): 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2014.63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Severino, R. 2015. The data visualization catalogue – An online Blog. Heatmap. Tableau. https://datavizcatalogue.com/methods/heatmap.html. Accessed on: 21.06.2019.

  • Shneiderman, B. 1996. The eyes have it. A task by data type taxonomy for information visualization. In IEEE 1996. Proceedings, August 14–16, 1996, Blue Mountain Lake, New York. New York State Center for Advanced Technology in Computer Applications and Software Engineering (Syracuse University); IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos Calif.: IEEE Computer Society Press, 336–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, S., B. Sousa Santos, and J. Madeira. 2011. Using color in visualization: A survey. Computers & Graphics 35 (2): 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2010.11.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., G. Wang, and C. Alexander. 2015. Big data and visualization. Methods, challenges, and technology progress. Digital Technologies 1 (1): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119197249.ch1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waniczek, M., and T. Patloch. 2018. Dashboarding neu gedacht. Leistungsstarkes Reporting durch innovative Diagramme. CFOaktuell 31 (1): 31–35. https://rdb.manz.at/document/rdb.tso.LIcfoaktuell20180111. Accessesd on: 22.05.2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yi, J.S., Y. Kang, J.T. Stasko, and J.A. Jacko. 2007. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13 (6): 1224–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Hofer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hofer, P., Perkhofer, L., Mayr, A. (2023). Interactive Big Data Visualizations: Potential for Management Reporting. In: Keimer, I., Egle, U. (eds) The Digitalization of Management Accounting. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41524-2_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics