Abstract
This paper highlights the applicability of novel visualization types for the representation of multidimensional data. For this purpose, multidimensional visualizations for several dimensions (Sankey, Sunburst and Treemap visualization) as well as for several attributes (Parallel Coordinates Plot, Heatmap) are presented. For this purpose, on the one hand, more than 100 practitioners from the financial sector were interviewed about challenges in dealing with Big Data, and on the other hand, several online experiments as well as experiments by means of eye tracking technology were conducted. This approach allows to derive and summarize a comprehensive judgment about the usability as well as the advantages and disadvantages of these Big Data visualizations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bostock, M., V. Ogievetsky, and J. Heer. 2011. D3: Data-driven documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17 (12): 2301–2309.
Brehmer, M., and T. Munzner. 2013. A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 19 (12): 2376–2385.
Bruls, M., K. Huizing, and J.J. van Wijk. 2000. Squarified Treemaps. In Eurographics/IEEE VGTC. Unter Mitarbeit von IEEE Computer Society. IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization, ed. W. de Leeuw and R. van Liere, 1–10. Amsterdam, 29–30. Mai 2000.
Chou, J.-K., Y. Wang, and K.-L. Ma. 2016. Privacy preserving event sequence data visualization using a Sankey diagram-like representation. In SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 symposium on visualization, ed. W. Wei and D. Weiskopf, 1–8. Macau: ACM.
Dilla, W., D.J. Janvrin, and R. Raschke. 2010. Interactive data visualization. New directions for accounting information systems research. Journal of Information Systems 24 (2): 1–37. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.2010.24.2.1.
Egle, U., and I. Keimer. 2018. Digitaler Wandel im Controlling. Luzern: Schriften aus dem Institut für Finanzdienstleistungen Zug IFZ. https://blog.hslu.ch/digitalcontrolling/files/2017/09/Egle_Keimer_Digitaler_Wandel_im_Controlling.pdf. Accessed on: 29.01.2019.
Eisl, C., H. Losbichler, L. Falschlunger, B. Fischer, and P. Hofer. 2012. Reporting Design. Status quo und neue Wege in der Gestaltung des internen und externen Berichtswesens. In FH Oberösterreich, ed. C. Eisl, H. Losbichler, C. Engelbrechtsmüller, M. Büttner, H. Wambach, and A. Schmidt-Pöstion. KPMG Advisory AG, pmOne AG.
Eisl, C., H. Losbichler, and L. Falschlunger. 2015. Wahrnehmungsoptimierte Gestaltung von Information-Dashboards auf Basis von Eye-Tracking-Analysen. Zusammenhänge erkennen und effizienter entscheiden. CFOaktuell September 2015, 199–203.
Elmqvist, N., A.V. Moere, H.-C. Jetter, D. Cernea, H. Reiterer, and T.J. Jankun-Kelly. 2011. Fluid interaction for information visualization. Information Visualization 10 (4): 327–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871611413180.
Falschlunger, L., O. Lehner, and H. Treiblmaier. 2016. InfoVis: The impact of information overload on decision making outcome in high complexity settings. In Proceedings of the 15th annual Pre-ICIS Workshop on HCI Research in MIS. SIGHCI 2016. Dublin, 11.12.2016. AIS Electronic Library: Association for Information Systems (Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction), 1–6, Paper 3.
Heer, J., and B. Shneiderman. 2012. Interactive dynamics for visual analysis. Communications of the ACM 55 (4): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133821.
Hofer, P., A. Mayr, and C. Walchshofer. 2018. Interaktive Visualisierungen von Big Data. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. CFOaktuell 2: 78–82, zuletzt geprüft am 27. Juni 2018.
Inselberg, A. 1985. The plane with parallel coordinates. The Visual Computer 1 (2): 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01898350.
Johnson, B., and B. Shneiderman. 1991. Tree-maps: A space-filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. In Proceedings of the 2nd international IEEE visualization conference, (San Diego, Oct. 1991), 284–291.
Keim, D.A. 2001. Visual exploration of large data sets. Communications of the ACM 44 (8): 38–44. https://doi.org/10.1145/381641.381656.
Lehmann, D.J., G. Albuquerque, M. Eisemann, A. Tatu, D. Keim, H. Schumann, et al. 2010. Visualisierung und Analyse multidimensionaler Datensätze. Informatik-Spektrum 6 (33): 589–600.
Liu, S., D. Maljovec, B. Wang, P.-T. Bremer, and V. Pascucci. 2017. Visualizing high-dimensional data. Advances in the past decade. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 23 (3): 1249–1268. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2016.2640960.
Losbichler, H., C. Eisl, and T. Plank. 2016. Neue Visualisierungsformen auf dem Prüfstand. Controlling & Management Review Sonderheft (1): 46–53, zuletzt geprüft am 27.06.2018.
Lund, H. 2016. Eye tracking in library and information science: A literature review. Library Hi Tech 34 (4): 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/lht-07-2016-0085.
Perkhofer, L., and O. Lehner. 2019. Using gaze behavior to measure cognitive load. In Information Systems and Neuroscience. NeuroIS Retreat 2018, Aufl. 1 Bd. 29, Hrsg. F. Davis, R. Riedl, J. Vom Brocke, P.-M. Léger, und A. Randolph, 73–83. Springer International Publishing (Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, NeuroIS Retreat 2018).
Perrot, A., R. Bourqui, N. Hanusse, and D. Auber. 2017. HeatPipe: High throughput, low latency big data heatmap with spark streaming. In 21st international conference on information visualization 2017, Information Visualization 2017. London, 11–14.07.2017. IVS, 1–6. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01516888/document.
Pike, W.A., J. Stasko, R. Chang, and T.A. O’Connell. 2009. The science of interaction. Information Visualization 8 (4): 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1057/ivs.2009.22.
Rodden, K. 2014. Applying a sunburst visualization to summarize user navigation sequences. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 34 (5): 36–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/mcg.2014.63.
Severino, R. 2015. The data visualization catalogue – An online Blog. Heatmap. Tableau. https://datavizcatalogue.com/methods/heatmap.html. Accessed on: 21.06.2019.
Shneiderman, B. 1996. The eyes have it. A task by data type taxonomy for information visualization. In IEEE 1996. Proceedings, August 14–16, 1996, Blue Mountain Lake, New York. New York State Center for Advanced Technology in Computer Applications and Software Engineering (Syracuse University); IEEE Computer Society. Los Alamitos Calif.: IEEE Computer Society Press, 336–343.
Silva, S., B. Sousa Santos, and J. Madeira. 2011. Using color in visualization: A survey. Computers & Graphics 35 (2): 320–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2010.11.015.
Wang, L., G. Wang, and C. Alexander. 2015. Big data and visualization. Methods, challenges, and technology progress. Digital Technologies 1 (1): 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119197249.ch1.
Waniczek, M., and T. Patloch. 2018. Dashboarding neu gedacht. Leistungsstarkes Reporting durch innovative Diagramme. CFOaktuell 31 (1): 31–35. https://rdb.manz.at/document/rdb.tso.LIcfoaktuell20180111. Accessesd on: 22.05.2018.
Yi, J.S., Y. Kang, J.T. Stasko, and J.A. Jacko. 2007. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 13 (6): 1224–1231.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hofer, P., Perkhofer, L., Mayr, A. (2023). Interactive Big Data Visualizations: Potential for Management Reporting. In: Keimer, I., Egle, U. (eds) The Digitalization of Management Accounting. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41524-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-41524-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-41523-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-41524-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)