Skip to main content

What the History of the COVID-19 Pandemic Teaches us—And What Not

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Covid-19 pandisziplinär und international

Part of the book series: Medizin, Kultur, Gesellschaft ((MKG))

  • 191 Accesses

Abstract

Crises turn history into a weapon. In wars and catastrophes, history becomes an argument. It promises not only a classification of the present but also simple answers to complicated questions. The use of history was also evident in times of COVID-19. Since February 2020, newspapers and magazines have been abundant with historical analogies: the “Spanish flu” dominated the headlines in particular. But the history of the plague, smallpox, cholera and polio was also suddenly high up on the agenda. The history of epidemics seemed to provide examples that could be used to classify or even solve current problems (Franchini et al. 2020; Agrawai et al. 2021).

Experts warned against such analogies between the past and the present early on (Borck 2020; Simonetti et al. 2021). History does not repeat itself, even if it sometimes rhymes, to borrow a bon mot from Mark Twain. The popularity of epidemic history actually became a danger during the COVID pandemic. Horror scenarios such as comparisons to the Spanish flu’s death toll of up to 50 or 100 million people did little to objectify the debate. Repeated references to the eradication of smallpox through global vaccination programmes were also only of limited help in classifying the battle against the pandemic. COVID mutated much faster than any of its predecessors.

History can nevertheless contribute to crisis management—also, and especially, in times of pandemics. We may learn little from historical analogies and parallels. But we do learn much more from a historical classification of our present that traces the roots of current problems. For a historical classification of COVID, we therefore do not have to go back that far in time. The plague outbreaks of the early modern era, the fight against cholera in the 18th and 19th centuries or the Spanish flu of 1918 are not as useful for analysing the current pandemic. Rather, a look at more recent developments of the 20th and 21st centuries proves to be sufficiently illustrative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawai A, Gindodiya A, Kaivalya D, Kashikar S, Fulzele P, Khatib N (2021) A Comparative Analysis of the Spanish Flu 1918 and COVID-19 Pandemics. The Open Pub Health J 14: 128–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allmendinger J (2020) Zurück in alte Rollen. Corona bedroht die Geschlechtergerechtigkeit. WZB Mitteilungen 168: 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baradel M, Costa E (2020) Discrimination, Othering, and the Political Instrumentalizing of Pandemic Disease. J of Interdisciplinary History of Ideas 18: 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béland D (2011) The Unhealthy Risk Society. Health Scares and the Politics of Moral Panic. In: Hier S P, ed., Moral Panic and the Politics of Anxiety. London/New York: Routledge: 225–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berghoff H, Thießen M (2021) Gesundheitsökonomien. Zeithistorische Fragen, Befunde und Perspektiven. Zeithistorische Forschungen 17: 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borck C (2020) Vom Unwissen in Zeiten von Corona. Z Kph 14: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt A M (1978) Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The Hastings Center Report 8: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun J (2020) Politische Medizin. Ideologie und Gesundheitsökonomie im SED-Staat der 1950er- und 1960er-Jahre. Zeithistorische Forschungen 17: 349–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutscher Bundestag (2020) Plenarprotokoll, 16.12.2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutschlandfunk (2020) Wer marschiert da zusammen? 10.12.2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne K Y, Turkmen F F (2020) The Politics of Pandemic Othering: Putting COVID-19 in Global and Historical Context. Int Organization 74: E213–E230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durbach N (2005) Bodily Matters: The Anti-Vaccination Movement in England, 1853–1907. Durham: Durham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans R (1987) Death in Hamburg. Society and Politics in the Cholera Years. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortier N (2020) COVID-19, Gender Inequality, and the Responsibility of the State. Int J of Wellbeing 10 (3): 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franchini A F, Auxilia F, Galimberti P M, Piga M A, Castaldi S, Porro A (2020): COVID-19 and Spanish Flu Pandemics: All It Changes, Nothing Changes. Acta Biomed 91: 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox G J, Orlova M, Schurr E (2016) Tuberculosis in Newborns: The Lessons of the Lübeck Disaster (1929–1933). PLoS Pathog 12: https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.ppat.1005271.

  • Gosewinkel D (2020) Die Renaissance nationaler Grenzen. Anhaltende Abschottung ist juristisch fraglich. WZB Mitteilungen 168: 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison M (2012) Contagion: How Commerce has Spread Disease. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel C (2021) „Das große Erwachen“: Affekt und Narrativ in der Bewegung gegen die Corona-Maßnahmen. Leviathan 49: 62–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitzer B (2021) Die Geschichte vor Corona. Erinnerung, Erfahrung und Emotion. Leviathan 49: 86–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honigsbaum M (2020) The Pandemic Century. A History of Global Contagion from the Spanish Flu to COVID-19. London: WH Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iivari N, Sharma S, Ventä-Olkkonen L (2020) Digital Transformation of Everyday Life—How COVID-19 Pandemic Transformed the Basic Education of the Young Generation and Why Information Management Research Should Care? Int J of Information Management 55: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerrod E, Geddes A M, Regan M, Leach S (2005) Surveillance and Control Measures during Smallpox Outbreaks. Emerging Infectious Diseases 11: 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraemer M U G, Hill V, Ruis C, Dellicour S, Bajaj S, McCrone J T, Baele G et al. (2021) Spatiotemporal Invasion Dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 Lineage B.1.1.7 Emergence. Science 373: 889–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer N (2013) Alter(n) als Thema der Zeitgeschichte. Zeithistorische Forschungen 10: 455–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leven K H (2008) Geschichte der Medizin. Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luks F (2020) Hoffnung im Ausnahmezustand. Über Abwägung, Angstmanagement und Aktivismus. In: Keitel C, Volkmer M, Werner K, eds., Die Corona-Gesellschaft. Analysen zur Lage und Perspektiven für die Zukunft. Bielefeld: Transcript: 341–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack T M (1972) Smallpox in Europe, 1950-71. J Infectious Diseases 125: 161–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenbach J P (2019) Health Inequalities. Persistence and Change in European Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merkel A (2020) Fernsehansprache von Angela Merkel, 18.03.2020. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/aktuelles/fernsehansprache-von-bundeskanzlerin-angela-merkel-1732134.

  • Nelkin D, Gilmann S L (1988) Placing Blame for Devastating Disease. Soc Research 55 (3): 361–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantenburg J, Reichardt S, Sepp B (2021) Corona-Proteste und das (Gegen-)Wissen sozialer Bewegungen. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 3-4/2021: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamburgische Bürgerschaft (2020) Plenarprotokoll, 22.04.2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin S (2014) History of Vaccination. PNAS 111: 12283–12287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach G, Göbel R, Wolff H, Stokar von Neuforn S (2008) Risiken und Herausforderungen für die öffentliche Sicherheit in Deutschland. Grünbuch des Zukunftsforums öffentliche Sicherheit. Berlin: ProPress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengeling D (2017) Vom geduldigen Ausharren zur allumfassenden Prävention. Grippe-Pandemien im Spiegel von Wissenschaft, Politik und Öffentlichkeit. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Koch Institut (2020) COVID-19-Lagebericht vom 17.03.2020. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonetti O, Martini M, Armocida E (2021) COVID-19 and Spanish Flu-18: Review of Medical and Social Parallelisms between Two Global Pandemics. J Prev Med Hyg 62: E613–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Süß W (1998) Gesundheitspolitik. In: Hockerts H G, ed., Drei Wege deutscher Sozialstaatlichkeit. NS-Diktatur, Bundesrepublik und DDR im Vergleich. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thießen M (2021a) Immunity as Relativity: German Vaccination Campaigns and Debates in Times of COVID-19. Historical Social Research 46: 316–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thießen M (2021b) Auf Abstand. Eine Gesellschaftsgeschichte der Coronapandemie. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thießen M (2021c) Vaccination and Society: A History from Smallpox to COVID-19 in Germany. Historical Social Research 46: 211–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooze A (2021) Shutdown. How COVID Shook the World’s Economy. New York City: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegener H (1912) Impf-Friedhof. Was das Volk, die Sachverständigen und die Regierungen vom „Segen der Impfung“ wissen. Erster Band mit mehr 36.000 Impfschäden und 139 Abbildungen, Frankfurt/Main: Wegener.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer T (2017) Welt ohne Krankheit. Geschichte der internationalen Gesundheitspolitik. Göttingen: Wallstein.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malte Thießen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thießen, M. (2023). What the History of the COVID-19 Pandemic Teaches us—And What Not. In: Kraemer, A., Medzech, M. (eds) Covid-19 pandisziplinär und international. Medizin, Kultur, Gesellschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40525-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40525-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-40524-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-40525-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics