Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anforderungen und Herausforderungen durch die Pandemie im akademischen Bereich

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Neugestaltung der Pädagogik und der Lehrplanpraxis im Hinblick auf den Online-Unterricht

  • 623 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Abschnitt befasst sich mit den Herausforderungen, die sich aus den Umwälzungen ergeben, die die Einführung des Fernunterrichts auf verschiedenen Ebenen der Gesellschaft mit sich bringt. Darüber hinaus waren der Einsatz von Technik, digitalen Möglichkeiten, kultureller Kompetenz und Ressourcen erforderlich. Die Schaffung einer lernfreundlichen Umgebung führte zur Frage nach der Bereitschaft und Anpassungsfähigkeit von Schülern, Lehrern, Schulen und Eltern. Die Frage, ob die digitalen Medien nur ein Accessoire für diese Phase sind oder ob sie die Pädagogik bereichern und ihren Glanz auch in Zukunft behalten werden, ist ein Streitpunkt, der noch nicht geklärt ist. Die Notwendigkeit, ein Gleichgewicht zwischen sozialen, emotionalen und psychologischen Lernmöglichkeiten herzustellen, ist eine Herausforderung, die in diesem Kapitel dargestellt wird.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Therborn, G. (2009). The killing fields of inequality. Soundings, 42(42), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Therborn, G. (2012). The killing fields of inequality. International Journal of Health Services, 42(4), 579–589, https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.42.4.a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Therborn, G. (2013). The killing fields of inequality. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Therborn, G. (2020). How the dimensions of human inequality affect who and what we are. The Conversation Africa, 8 July. https://theconversation.com/howthe-dimensions-of-human-inequality-affect-who-and-what-we-are-137296. Accessed 22 July 2020.

  5. Hodges, C,. Moore, S; Lockee, B,. Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27 March. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning. Accessed 22 July 2020.

  6. Timeslive (2020). Blade Nzimande’s statement on government plans to save the 2020 university year. Times Live, 30 April. https://www.timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2020-04-30-in-full-blade-nzimandes-statement-on-government-plans-to-save-the-2020-university-year/. Accessed 22 July 2020.

  7. Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York & London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tronto, J. (2001). An ethic of care. In M. Holstein & P. Mitzen (Eds.), Ethics in community-based elder care (pp. 60–68). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Knox, J. (2019). What Does the ‘Postdigital’ Mean for Education? Three Critical Perspectives on the Digital, with Implications for Educational Research and Practice. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(2), 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-019-00045-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890.

  11. Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review, 27 March. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning. Accessed 29 October 2021.

  12. Czerniewicz, L., Agherdien, N., Badenhorst, J., Belluigi, D., Chambers, T., Chili, M., de Villiers, M., Felix, A., Gachago, D., Gokhale, C., Ivala, E., Kramm, N., Madiba, M., Mistri, G., Mgqwashu, E., Pallitt, N., Prinsloo, P., Solomon, K., Strydom, K., Swanepoel, M., Waghid, F., & Wissing, G. (2020). A Wake-Up Call: Equity, Inequality and Covid-19 Emergency Remote Teaching and Learning. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 946–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00187-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2007). Piecing Together the Student Success Puzzle: Research, Propositions, and Recommendations. ASHE Higher Education Report, 32(5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.3205.

  14. Bayne, S., Gallagher, M. S., & Lamb, J. (2013). Being ‘at’ University; the social typologies of distance students. Higher Education, 67(5), 569–583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9662-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones, D., Lotz, N., & Holden, G. (2021). A longitudinal study of Virtual Design Studio (VDS) use in STEM distance design education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31, 839–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09576-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cennamo, K., & Brandt, C. (2012). The “right kind of telling”: Knowledge building in the academic design studio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 839–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-012-9254-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gelles, L. A., Lord, S. M., Hoople, G. D., Chen, D. A., & Mejia, J. A. (2020). Compassionate flexibility and self-discipline: Student adaptation to emergency remote teaching in an integrated engineering energy course during COVID-19. Education Sciences, 10(11), 304. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10110304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Affouneh, S., Salha, S., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2020). Designing quality e-learning environments for emergency remote teaching in coronavirus crisis. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 135–137. https://doi.org/10.30476/ijvlms.2020.86120.1033

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Iglesias-Pradas, S., Hernández-García, Á., Chaparro-Peláez, J., & Prieto, J. L. (2021). Emergency remote teaching and students’ academic performance in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 119, 106713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Karakaya, K. (2021). Design considerations in emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a human-centered approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(1), 295–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09884-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., & Williams, J. (2020). Emergency remote teaching environment: A conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises. Information and Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0099

  24. Reinholz, D. L., Stone-Johnstone, A., White, I., Sianez, L. M., & Shah, N. (2020). A pandemic crash course: learning to teach equitably in synchronous online classes. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(4), 60. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-06-0126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Erickson, M., & Wattiaux, M. A. (2021). Practices and perceptions at the COVID-19 transition in undergraduate animal science courses. Natural Sciences Education, 50(1), e20039. https://doi.org/10.1002/nse2.20039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, 32(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171368103200101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Malterud, K. (2001). Qualitative research: Standards, challenges, and guidelines. The Lancet, 358(9280), 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelchtermans, G. (1993). Teachers and their career story: A biographical perspective on professional development. In C. Day, J. Calderhead, & P. Denicolo (Eds.), Research on teacher thinking: understanding professional development (pp. 198–217). The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kelchtermans, G. (2009). Who I am in how I teach is the message: Self-understanding, vulnerability and reflection. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bourdieu, P. (1990). Logic of practice. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Steinert, Y., Mann, K., Anderson, B., Barnett, B. M., Centeno, A., Naismith, L., Prideaux D, Spencer J, Tullo E, Viggiano T, Ward H, & Dolmans, D. (2016). A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to enhance teaching effectiveness: A 10-year update: BEME Guide No. 40. Medical Teacher, 38(8), 769–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2016.1181851.

  34. Trautwein, C. (2018). Academics’ identity development as teachers. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1449739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Lankveld, T., Thampy, H., Cantillon, P., Horsburgh, J., & Kluijtmans, M. (2021). Supporting a teacher identity in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 132. Medical Teacher, 43(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838463.

  36. Radović, S., & Passey, D. (2016). Digital resource developments for mathematics education involving homework across formal, non-formal and informal settings. The Curriculum Journal, 27(4), 538–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E. W., Gutiérrez, K. D., et al. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle: LIFE Center and Center for Multicultural Education (University of Washington).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fallik, O., Rosenfeld, S., & Eylon, B. (2013). School and out-of-school science: A model for bridging the gap. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hung, D., Lee, S. S., & Lim, K. Y. T. (2012). Authenticity in learning for the twenty first century: Bridging the formal and the informal. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1071–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ito, M., Gutierrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., et al. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Lemke, J. L., Lecusay, R., Cole, M., & Michalchik, V. (2015). Documenting and assessing learning in informal and media-rich environments. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Laru, J., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Seamless learning despite context. In L.-H. Wong, M. Specht, & M. Milrad (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 471–484). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Boticki, I., Baksa, J., Seow, P., & Looi, C. (2015). Usage of a mobile social learning platform with virtual badges in a primary school. Computers & Education, 86, 120–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Khaddage, F., Müller, W., & Flintoff, K. (2016). Advancing mobile learning in formal and informal settings via mobile app technology: Where to from here, and how? Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lai, K. W., Khaddage, F., & Knezek, G. (2013). Blending student technology experiences in formal and informal learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 29(5), 414–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rajala, A., Kumpulainen, K., Hilppö, J., Paananen, A., & Lipponen, L. (2016). Connecting learning across school and out-of-school contexts: A review of pedagogical approaches. In O. Erstad, K. Kumpulainen, Å. Mäkitalo, K. C. Schrøder, P. Pruulmann-Vegerfeldt, & T. Jóhannsdóttir (Eds.), Learning across contexts in the knowledge society (pp. 15–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Lewin, C., Lai, K. W., van Bergen, H., Charania, A., Ntebutse, J. G., & Sherman, R. (2017). Informal learning with technology. EDUsummIT summary report. In K. W. Lai, J. Voogt, & G. Knezek (Eds.), Rethinking learning in a digital age: EDUsummIT 2017 summary report (pp. 27–32). http://unesco.unibit.bg/en/EDUsummIT17. Accessed 19 January 2018.

  48. Desimone, L. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Philipsen, B., Tondeur, J., ParejaRoblin, N., Vanslambrouck, S., & Zhu, C. (2019). Improving teacher professional development for online and blended learning: A systematic meta-aggregative review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67, 1145–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09645-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Scottish Government. (2016). Enhancing learning and teaching through the use of digital technology: A digital learning and teaching strategy for Scotland. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/enhancing-learning-teaching-through-use-digital-technology/.

  51. Scottish Government. (2019). Achieving excellence and equity: National improvement framework and improvement plan. Retrieved from https://www.gov.scot/publications/2020-national-improvement-framework-improvement-plan/.

  52. Butcher, J. (2020). Public-private virtual-school partnerships and federal flexibility for schools during COVID-19 (Mercatus center research paper series) [special edition policy brief]. Mercatus Center.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mackey, J., Gilmore, F., & Dabner, N. (2012). Blended learning for academic resilience in times of disaster or crisis. Journal of Online Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Bates, R. (2013). Institutional continuity and distance learning: A symbiotic relationship. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 16(4).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Tull, S., Dabner, N., & Ayebi-Arthur, K. (2017). Social media and e-learning in response to seismic events: Resilient practices. Journal of Open Flexible and Distance Learning, 21(1), 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Fox, R. (2004). SARS epidemic: Teachers’ experiences using ICTs. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer, & R. Phillips (Eds.), Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp. 319–327). ASCILITE.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Liao, Y.-C., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Karlin, M., Glazewski, K., & Brush, T. (2017). Supporting change in teacher practice: Examining shifts of teachers’ professional development preferences and needs for technology integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 17(4), 522–548.

    Google Scholar 

  58. An, Y., & Reigeluth, C. (2012). Creating technology-enhanced, learner-centered classrooms: K-12 teachers’ beliefs, perceptions, barriers, and support needs. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 28(2), 54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Reigeluth, C. M., Beatty, B., & Myers, R. (2016). The learner-centered paradigm of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth, B. Beatty, & R. Myers (Eds.), Instructional-design theories and models: The learner-centered paradigm of education. Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Springer Nature, Pune, Indien

    Anamica Sinha

Authors
  1. Anamica Sinha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Springer Nature, Pune, India

    Anamica Sinha

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinha, A. (2023). Anforderungen und Herausforderungen durch die Pandemie im akademischen Bereich. In: Sinha, A. (eds) Neugestaltung der Pädagogik und der Lehrplanpraxis im Hinblick auf den Online-Unterricht. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39609-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39609-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39608-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39609-1

  • eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation