Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Zukunft und neue Geschäftsmöglichkeiten

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Auswirkungen von Covid-19 auf die Wirtschaft

  • 968 Accesses

Einführung des Herausgebers

Im ersten Teil des Buches geben wir einen Überblick über die allgemeinen geschäftlichen Herausforderungen, die sich aus Covid-19 ergeben, und darüber, wie sie sich weltweit auf verschiedene Wirtschaftszweige auswirken. Der zweite Abschnitt hilft uns zu verstehen, wie die Unternehmen und die Weltwirtschaft begonnen haben, den Wirtschaftskreislauf neu zu gestalten: Anpassung moderner Strategien, Verfahren und Richtlinien zur Erfüllung der geschäftlichen Anforderungen und erforderlichen Arbeitsweisen. Um die Herausforderungen von Covid-19 zu bewältigen, mussten Unternehmen auf der ganzen Welt agil und entschlossen reagieren. Die Digitalisierung von Unternehmen ist eine der Lösungen, die von erfolgreichen Unternehmern empfohlen werden. Es ist ungewiss, wann die Pandemie nachlässt oder endet, und die Unternehmen müssen sich darauf vorbereiten, den Geschäftsbetrieb vor einer finanziellen Notlage zu bewahren. Die neue Normalität hängt von Innovationen und Strategien für geschäftliche Verbesserungen ab. In diesem Abschnitt werden wir einen Überblick über die „Zukunft und neue Geschäftsmöglichkeiten“ für Unternehmen geben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. ILO. (2020). The Six-Step COVID-19 Business Continuity Plan for SMEs. International Labor Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kumar, A., & Ayedee, N. (2021). Technology Adoption: A Solution for SMEs to Overcome Problems During COVID-19. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 25(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Priyono, A., Moin, A., & Putri, V. N. A. O. (2020). Identifying Digital Transformation Paths in the Business Model of SMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity, 6, 104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein, V. B., & Todesco, J. L. (2021). COVID-19 Crisis and SMEs Responses: The Role of Digital Transformation. Knowledge and Progress Management, 28(2), 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kreiser, P. M., Marino, L. D., Kuratko, D. F., & Weaver, K. M. (2013). Disaggregating Entrepreneurial Orientation: The Non-Linear Impact of Innovativeness, Proactiveness and Risk-Taking on SME Performance. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategy Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Basri, W. (2021). Examining the Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Assisted Social Media Marketing on the Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises: Toward Effective Business Management in the Saudi Arabian Context. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 13(1), 142–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Camacho-Miñano, M. D. M., Segovia-Vargas, M. J., & Pascual-Ezama, D. (2015). Which Characteristics Predict the Survival of Insolvent Firms? An SME Reorganization Prediction Model. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 340–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamal, S., & Senvar, O. (2021). Effectiveness of Machine Learning Classifiers in Detecting Financial Accounting Fraud for Turkish SMEs. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 14(1), 769–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ikumoro, A. O., & Jawad, M. S. (2019). Assessing Intelligence Conversation Agent Trends-Chatbots-AI Technology Application for Personalized Marketing. TEST Engineering and Management, 81, 4779–4785.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, H. K., So, W. H., & Je, S. M. (2019). A Big Data Framework for Network Security of Small and Medium Enterprises for Future Computing. Journal of Supercomputing, 75, 3334–3367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pérez, P., De-La-Cruz, F., Guerrón, X., Conrado, G., Quiroz-Palma, P., & Molina, W. (2019). “ChatPy: Conversational Agent for SMEs.” In 2019 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) (pp. 1–6). Coimbra: CISTI. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760624.

  13. Rebón, F., Castander, I., Argandoña, J., Gerrikagoitia, J. K., & Alzua-Sorzabal, A. (2015). An Antifraud System for Tourism SMEs in the Context of Electronic Operations with Credit Cards. American Journal of Intelligent Systems, 5(1), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sood, N. (2020). The Power of AI to Transform the Global SME Credit Landscape, in. S. Chishti, I. Bartoletti, A. Leslie, and. S. M. Millie, The AI Book: The Artificial Intelligence Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and FinTech Visionaries (pp. 52–53). New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Watney, C., & Auer, D. (2021). Encouraging AI adoption by EU SMEs. Progressive Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hansen, E. B., & Bøgh, S. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Survey. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 58(B), 362–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar, A., & Kalse, A. (2021). Usage and Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in SMEs. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.595.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar, V., Rajan, B., Venkatesan, R., & Lecinski, J. (2019). Understanding the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized Engagement Marketing. California Management Review, 61(4), 135–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Li, H. (2019). Special Section Introduction: Artificial Intelligence and Advertising. Journal of Advertising, 48(4), 333–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kietzmann, J., Paschen, J., & Rae Treen, E. (2018). Artificial Intelligence in Advertising: How Marketers Can Leverage Artificial Intelligence along the Consumer Journey. Journal of Advertising Research, 58(3), 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, W., Deng, S. T., & C-W. and Pan, Y. (2019). Smart Generation System of Personalized Advertising Copy and Its Application to Advertising Practice and Research. Journal of Advertising, 48(4), 356–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jablonska, R. M., & Polkowski, Z. (2017). Artificial Intelligence Based Processes in SMEs. Studies and Proceedings of Polish Association for Knowledge Management, 86, 13–23.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Um, T., Kim, T., & Chung, N. (2020). How Does an Intelligence Chatbot Affect Customers Compared with Self-Service Technology for Sustainable Services? Sustainability, 12, 5119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vishnoi, S. K., Bagga, T., Sharma, A., & Wani, S. N. (2018). Artificial Intelligence Enabled Marketing Solutions: A Review. Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 17(4), 167–177.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Garbellano, S., & Da Veiga, M. D. R. (2019). Dynamic Capabilities in Italian Leading SMEs Adopting Industry 4.0. Measuring Business Excellence, 23(4), 472–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hercheui, M., & Ranjith, R. (2020). Improving Organization Dynamic Capabilities Using Artificial Intelligence. Global Journal of Business Research, 14(1), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sunday, C. E., & Vera, C. C. E. (2018). Examining Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Adoption in SMEs: A Dynamic Capabilities Approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(2), 338–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Y., & Shi, X. (2011). Thrive, Not Just Survive: Enhance Dynamic Capabilities of SMEs Through IS Competence. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 13(2), 200–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Laaksonen, O., & Peltoniemi, M. (2016). The Essence of Dynamic Capabilities and their Measurement. International Journal of Management Review, 20(2), 184–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Campbell, C., Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Tsao, H.-Y., & Mavrommatis, A. (2020). From Data to Action: How Marketers can Leverage AI. Business Horizons, 63, 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Canhoto, A., & Clear, F. (2020). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning as Business Tools: A Framework for Diagnosing Value Destruction Potential. Business Horizons, 63(2), 183–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Day, G. S., & Schoemaker, P. J. H. (2016). Adapting to Fast-Changing Markets and Technologies. California Management Review, 58(4), 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Anthoula K (2016) Circular Economy and Corporate Financial Performance. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mol MJ, Birkinshaw J (2009) The sources of supply chain management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices. J Bus Res 62:1269–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hazen BT, Russo I, Confente I, Pellathy D (2020) Supply chain management for circular economy: conceptual framework and research agenda. Int J Logist Manag.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Murray A, Skene K, Haynes K (2017) The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. J Bus Ethics 140(3):369–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sharma M, Kamble S, Mani V, Sehrawat R, Belhadi A, Sharma V (2021) Industry 4.0 adoption for sustainability in multi-tier manufacturing supply chain in emerging economies. J Clean Prod 281:125013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Govindan K, Hasanagic M (2018) A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2):278–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Min S, Zacharia ZG, Smith CD (2019) Defining supply chain management: in the past, present, and future. J Bus Logist 40(1):44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tjahjono B, Ripanti E (2019) “Circular economy–what does it mean for remanufacturing operations?.” Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/circular-economy-what-does-meanremanufacturing-operations-høegh/. Accessed 1 May 2021.

  42. Corrêa HL, Corrêa DG (2021) The Covid-19 Pandemic – Opportunities for Circular Economy Practices Among Sewing Professionals in the City of Curitiba-Brazil. Front Sustain 2:644309. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2021.644309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ibn-Mohammed T, Mustapha KB, Godsell J, Adamu Z, Babatunde KA, Akintade DD, Koh SCL (2021) A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resour Conserv Recycl 164:105169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cooper RB, Zmud RW (1990) Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Manag Sci 36(2):123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hair JF Jr, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M (2017) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), 2nd edn. Sage, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach for structural equation modelling. modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erbaum Associates. Mahwah, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gyau A, Spiller A (2007) Determinants of trust in the international fresh produce business between Ghana and Europe. Int Bus Manag 1(4):104–111.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ranta V, Aarikka-Stenroos L, Väisänen JM (2021) Digital technologies catalyzing business model innovation for circular economy – Multiple case study. Resour Conserv Recycl 164:105155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Bai C, Sarkis J, Yin F, Dou Y (2020) Sustainable supply chain flexibility and its relationship to circular economy-target performance. Int J Prod Res 58(19):5893–5910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Manzanedo RD, Manning P (2020) COVID-19: Lessons for the climate change emergency. Sci Total Environ 742:140563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Alpert G (2020) COVID-19 Government Stimulus and Financial Relief Guide. https://www.investopedia.com/government-stimulus-efforts-to-fight-the-covid-19-crisis-4799723

  52. EY (2020) The Role of Corporate Governance in Shaping Europe Recovery Post COVID-19. Paper presented at the 25th European Corporate Governance Conference, Zagreb, Croatia, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-eRT_LVFlAc&feature=youtu.be

  53. Oord Fvd (2020) Lessons Learned from the Corona Crisis – An International Board Perspective. Paper presented at the Lessons Learned from Corona Crisis: An International Board Perspective, International Center for Corporate Governance (ICfCG), Switzerland, https://zoom.us/rec/share/2M9NPp77-jJJXYHX1GbPQ6gHG8fgaaa82yRI_PpeyEgCuZX5F01GtDR2f92EZoSS?startTime=1586430033000

  54. Baker, R. E., Mahmud, A. S., Miller, I. F., Rajeev, M., Rasambainarivo, F., Rice, B. L., Takahashi, S., Tatem, A. J., Wagner, C. E., Wang, L. F., & Wesolowski, A. 2021. Infectious disease in an era of global change. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 13: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Harrison, M. 2012. Contagion. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. King, D. A., Peckham, C., Waage, J. K., Brownlie, J., & Woolhouse, M. E. J. 2006. Infectious diseases: Preparing for the future. Science, 313(5792): 1392–1393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Labonté, R., Blouin, C., & Forman, L. 2009. Trade and health. In A. Kay, & O. D. Williams (Eds.), Global health governance: Crisis, institutions and political economy: 182–208. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Morse, S. S., Mazet, J. A., Woolhouse, M., Parrish, C. R., Carroll, D., Karesh, W. B., et al. 2012. Prediction and prevention of the next pandemic zoonosis. The Lancet, 380(9857): 1956–1965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rohr, J. R., Barrett, C. B., Civitello, D. J., Craft, M. E., Delius, B., DeLeo, G. A., et al. 2019. Emerging human infectious diseases and the links to global food production. Nature Sustainability, 2(6): 445–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wilson, M. E. 2003. The traveller and emerging infections: Sentinel, courier, transmitter. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 94(Suppl): 1S-11S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wu, T., Perrings, C., Kinzig, A., Collins, J. P., Minteer, B. A., & Daszak, P. 2017. Economic growth, urbanization, globalization, and the risks of emerging infectious diseases in China: A review. Ambio, 46(1): 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kraiselburd, S., & Yadav, P. 2013. Supply chains and global health: An imperative for bringing operations management scholarship into action. Production and Operations Management, 22(2): 377–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Park, J., Montiel, I., Husted, B. W., & Balarezo, R. 2022. The grand challenge of human health: A review and an urgent call for business-health research. Business & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503211073519.

  64. Baum, F. E., Sanders, D. M., Fisher, M., Anaf, J., Freudenberg, N., Friel, S., et al. 2016. Assessing the health impact of transnational corporations: Its importance and a framework. Globalization and Health, 12(1): 27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Marais, B. J., Lönnroth, K., Lawn, S. D., Migliori, G. B., Mwaba, P., Glaziou, P., et al. 2013. Tuberculosis comorbidity with communicable and non-communicable diseases: Integrating health services and control efforts. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 13(5): 436–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Ballesteros, L., Useem, M., & Wry, T. (2017). Masters of disasters? An empirical analysis of how societies benefit from corporate disaster aid. Academy of Management Journal, 60(5), 1682–1708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lampel, J., Shamsie, J., & Shapira, Z. (2009). Experiencing the improbable: Rare events and organizational learning. Organization Science, 20(5), 835–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Easterby-Smith, M., Lyles, M. A., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: Current debates and future directions. British Journal of Management, 20(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Makkonen, H., Pohjola, M., Olkkonen, R., & Koponen, A. (2014). Dynamic capabilities and firm performance in a financial crisis. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2707–2719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Ekbia, H. R. (2009). Digital artifacts as quasi-objects: Qualification, mediation, and materiality. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2554–2566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., & Bush, A. (2010). Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information Systems Research, 21(4), 675–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Kumar S, Raut RD, Nayal K, Kraus S, Surendra V, Narkhede BE (2021) To identify industry 4.0 and circular economy adoption barriers in the agriculture supply chain by using ISM-ANP. J Clean Prod 293:126023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Bag S, Gupta S, Kumar S (2021) Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development. Int J Prod Econ 231:107844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Bag S, Yadav G, Wood LC, Dhamija P, Joshi S (2020) Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: resource melioration in logistics. Resour Policy 68:101776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Närvänen E, Mattila M, Mesiranta N (2020) Institutional work in food waste reduction: Start-ups ’ role in moving towards a circular economy. Ind Mark Manag. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.009.

  80. Van der Heijden K (2011) Scenarios: the art of strategic conversation. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Schmalz U, Spinler S, Ringbeck J (2020) Lessons Learned from a Two-Round Delphi-based Scenario Study. MethodsX, 8, 101179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2020.101179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Tunn VSC, Bocken NMP, van den Hende EA, Schoormans JPL (2019) Business models for sustainable consumption in the circular economy: an expert study. J. Clean. Prod. 212:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Ahn, Hie Joo, and Hamilton, James D. 2020. Measuring Labor-Force Participation and the Incidence and Duration of Unemployment. https://econweb.ucsd.edu/~jhamilto/AH2.pdf. Accessed 25 Sept 2020.

  84. Blick, Alexander, and Blandin, Adam. 2020. Real-Time Labor Market Estimates During the 2020 Coronavirus Outbreak. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uQrlBJ_w4b2Fps6Zp9qgc-9pMnbC-mjq/view. Accessed 25 Sept 2020.

  85. Apple. (2020b). iTunes Preview. App Store. https://apps.apple.com/us/genre/mobile-software-applications/id36

    Google Scholar 

  86. Google. (2020). Google Play Store. Apps. https://play.google.com/store/apps?hl=es_CL

  87. Battisti, S. (2019). Digital Social Entrepreneurs as Bridges in Public-Private Partnerships. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1541006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Ghatak, A., Chatterjee, S., & Bhowmick, B. (2020). Intention towards digital social entrepreneurship: An integrated model. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2020.1826563.

  89. Short, J. C., Moss, T. W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2009). Research in social entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 161–194. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Guerrero, M., Santamaría-Velasco, C. A., & Mahto, R. (2020a). Intermediaries and social entrepreneurship identity: Implications for business model innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 27(2), 520–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Gajón, E. (2020b). Entrepreneurial university eco-systems and graduates’ career patterns: do entrepreneurship education programmes and university business incubators matter? Journal of Management Development, 39(5), 753–775. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-10-2019-0439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Susanto, T. D., Diani, M. M., & Hafidz, I. (2017). User acceptance of e-government citizen report system (a Case Study of City113 App). Procedia Computer Science, 124, 560–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Luke, B., & Chu, V. (2013). Social enterprise versus social entrepreneurship: An examination of the ‘why’and ‘how’in pursuing social change. International Small Business Journal, 31(7), 764–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Baier-Fuentes, H., Guerrero, M., & Amorós, J. E. (2021). Does triple helix collaboration matter for the early internationalisation of technology-based firms in emerging Economies? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Lazzarotti, V., & Manzini, R. (2009). Different modes of open innovation: A theoretical framework and an empirical study. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(04), 615–636. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919609002443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Santos, A. B., & Mendonça, S. (2017). Open Innovation Adoption in Clusters: The Portuguese Case. In:The Quadruple Innovation Helix Nexus (pp. 245–264). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55577-9_9.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  97. Apple. (2020a). Apple and Google join forces to develop contact-tracking technology against COVID-19. Newsroom. https://www.apple.com/cl/newsroom/2020/04/apple-and-google-partner-on-covid-19-contact-tracing-technology/

  98. Banskota, S., Healy, M., & Goldberg, E. M. (2020). 15 Smartphone apps for older adults to use while in isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Western Journal of Emergency Medicine, 21(3), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.4.47372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Mahajan, V., Singh, T., & Azad, C. (2020). Using telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Pediatrics, 57(7), 658–661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-020-1895-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. WHO. (2020a). The COVID-19 Solidarity Response Fund for WHO. HELP FIGHT COVID-19. https://covid19responsefund.org/

  101. Marceau, J. (2002). Divining directions for development: a cooperative industry-government-public sector research approach to establishing R&D priorities. R&D Management, 32(3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Lee, J. 2019. Effects of operational performance on financial performance. Management Science Letters. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2018.11.003.

  103. Mahtani, U.S., and C.P. Garg. 2018. An analysis of key factors of financial distress in airline companies in India using fuzzy AHP framework. Transportation Research Part A 117: 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Ohri, M. 2012. Discussion paper: Airport privatization in India. Networks and Spatial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-009-9117-8.

  105. Srinidhi, S. 2010. Demand model for air passenger traffic on international sectors. South Asian Journal of Management. 17: 23–56.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Sakariya, S., Parmar, D., Thandamalla, J. S., & Suresh, K. (2009). Kingfisher’s acquisition of air deccan: Altering India’s LCC scenario? The Case Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Altman, I. (1968). Altman Z-Score. FCS Commercial Finance Group.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Hong, S.-J., W. Randall, K. Han, and A.S. Malhan. 2018. Estimation viability of dedicated freighter aircraft of combination carriers: A data envelopment and principal component analysis. International Journal of Production Economics 202: 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Erickson, S., & Rothberg, H. (2015). Big data and knowledge management: establishing a conceptual foundation. Leading Issues in Knowledge Management, 2, 204.

    Google Scholar 

  110. Vivacqua, A. S., & Borges, M. R. (2012). Taking advantage of collective knowledge in emergency response systems. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 35(1), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Christensen, C. M. (2001). The past and future of competitive advantage. Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 105–109.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Hu, T. S., Lin, C. Y., & Chang, S. L. (2005). Technology-based regional development strategies and the emergence of technological communities: a case study of HSIP, Taiwan. Technovation, 25(4), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Caputo, F., & Walletzky, L. (2017). Investigating the users’ approach to ICT platforms in the city management. Systems, 5(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Amendola, C., Calabrese, M., & Caputo, F. (2018). Fashion companies and customer satisfaction: a relation mediated by information and communication technologies. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 43, 251–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. Tapscott, D. (1996). The digital economy: promise and peril in the age of networked intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Brynjolfsson, E., & Kahin, B. (Eds.). (2002). Understanding the digital economy: data, tools, and research. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Turban, E., Leidner, D., McLean, E., Wetherbe, J., & Cheung, C. (2006). Information technology for management: transforming organizations in the digital economy. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Leeflang, P. S., Verhoef, P. C., Dahlström, P., & Freundt, T. (2014). Challenges and solutions for marketing in a digital era. European Management Journal, 32(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. Lamont, J. (2012). Big data has big implications for knowledge management. KM World, 21(4), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  120. LaValle, S., Lesser, E., Shockley, R., Hopkins, M. S., & Kruschwitz, N. (2011). Big data, analytics and the path from insights to value. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(2), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Bose, R. (2009). Advanced analytics: opportunities and challenges. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(2), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Pauleen, D. J., & Wang, W. Y. (2017). Does big data mean big knowledge? KM perspectives on big data and analytics. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29, 311–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Holtshouse, D. K. (2013). Information technology for knowledge management. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Carayannis, G. E., Del Giudice, M., Saviano, M., & Caputo, F. (2018). Beyond big data: from smart to wise knowledge management. In S. Barile, R. Espejo, I. Perko, & M. Saviano (Eds.), Cybernetics and systems. Social and business decisions (pp. 261–267). London: Giappichelli-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Lévy, P., & Bononno, R. (1997). Collective intelligence: mankind’s emerging world in cyberspace. New York: Perseus books.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Vivacqua, A. S., & Borges, M. R. (2010). Collective intelligence for the design of emergency response. In The 2010 14th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (pp. 623–628). New York: IEEE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  128. Gruber, T. (2008). Collective knowledge systems: where the social web meets the semantic web. Journal of web semantics, 6(1), 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Barile, S., & Polese, F. (2010). Smart service systems and viable service systems: applying systems theory to service science. Service Science, 2(1–2), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Caputo, F., Evangelista, F., Perko, I., & Russo, G. (2017). The role of big data in value co-creation for the knowledge economy. In S. Vrontis, T. Weber, & E. Tsoukatos (Eds.), Global and national business theories and practice: bridging the past with the future (pp. 269–280). Cyprus: EuroMed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  131. International Transport Forum (ITF). 2018. The impacts of Alliances in container shipping – Case specific policy analysis. OECD.ITF.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Fedi, L. 2019. Alliances stratégiques dans l’industrie des liners: Les voies de réponses du droit de la concurrence européen et international. Droit Maritime Français 816: 675–686.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Notteboom, T., T. Pallis, and J.-P. Rodrigue. 2021. Disruptions and resilience in global container shipping and ports: The COVID-19 pandemic versus the 2008–2009 financial crisis. Maritime Economics & Logistics. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00180-5.

  134. UNCTAD. 2020a. COVID-19 and Maritime Transport: Impact and Responses. UNCATD/DTL/TLB/NF/2020a/1. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Dawar, N. (2013). When marketing is strategy. Harvard Business Review, 91(12), 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  136. Momaya, K. S. (2019). The past and the future of competitiveness research: A review in an emerging context of innovation and EMNEs. International Journal of Business and Competitiveness, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-019-00002-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Dietl, H., Royer, S., & Stratmann, U. (2009). Value creation architectures and competitive advantage: Lessons from the European automobile industry. California Management Review, 51(3), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  139. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10/11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategies and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679. https://doi.org/10.2307/259056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Bitner, M. J. (1997). Service marketing: Perspective on service excellence. Journal of Retailing, 73(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Bitner, M. J. (1992). “Servicescapes: The impact of physical surroundings on customers and employees”. Journal of Marketing, 56(2), 57–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. UNWTO (2020) International tourist numbers could fall 60–80 % in 2020, UNWTO Reports. World Tourism Organization. https://www.unwto.org/news/covid-19-international-tourist-numbers-could-fall-60-80-in-2020. Accessed 10 May 2020.

  145. AHLA (2020) COVID-19’s impact on the hotel industry. American Hotel & Lodging Association. https://www.ahla.com/covid-19s-impact-hotel-industry. Accessed 28 Sept 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Ma Y, Shi H, Ma H, Wang M (2013) Dynamic process monitoring using adaptive local outlier factor. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 127:89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Baloch ZA, Tan Q, Iqbal N, Mohsin M, Abbas Q, Iqbal W, Chaudhry IS (2020) Trilemma assessment of energy intensity, efficiency, and environmental index: evidence from BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09578-3.

  148. Gerald, E., Obianuju, A., & Chukwunonso, N. (2020). Strategic agility and performance of small and medium enterprises in the phase of Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Financial, Accounting, and Management, 2(1), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Guo, H., Yang, Z., Huang, R., & Guo, A. (2020). The digitalization and public crisis responses of small and medium enterprises: Implications from a COVID-19 survey. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 14(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. Indriastuti, M., & Fuad, K. (2020). Impact of covid-19 on digital transformation and sustainability in small and medium enterprises (smes): A conceptual framework [Paper presentation]. Conference on Complex, Intelligent, and Software Intensive Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Song, H., Yang, Y., & Tao, Z. (2020). How different types of financial service providers support small- and medium-enterprises under the impact of COVID-19 pandemic: From the perspective of expectancy theory. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 14(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Ortiz-Villajos, J. M. (2014). Patents, what for? The case of Crossley Brothers and the introduction of the gas engine into Spain, c. 1870–1914. Business History, 56(4), 650–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/00076791.2013.837890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. Hair Jr., J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Metcalfe, J. S., & Ramlogan, R. (2005). Limits to the economy of knowledge and knowledge of the economy. Futures, 37(7), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2004.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. Kang J, Diao Z, Zanini MT (2020) Business-to-business marketing responses to COVID-19 crisis: a business process perspective. Mark Intell Plan 39(3):454–468. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-05-2020-0217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Wang, Y., Hong, A., Li, X., & Gao, J. (2020). Marketing Innovations during a global crisis: A study of china firms’ response to COVID-19. Journal of Business Research, 116(1), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Sharma, A., & Sheth, J. N. (2004). Web-based marketing: The coming revolution in marketing thought and strategy. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 696–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(02)00350-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Rapaccini, M., Saccani, N., Kowalkowski, C., Paiola, M., & Adrodegari, F. (2020). Navigating disruptive crises through service-led growth: The impact of COVID-19 on Italian manufacturing firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 88, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Siggelkow, N., & Terwiesch, C. (2019). Connected strategy: Building continuous customer relationships for competitive advantage. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  163. He, W., Zhang, Z., & Li, W. (2021). Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287.

  164. Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Kohtamäki, M., Parida, V., Patel, P. C., & Gebauer, H. (2020). The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119804.

  166. Moreira, F., Ferreira, M. J., & Seruca, I. (2018). Enterprise 4.0 – the emerging digital transformed enterprise? Procedia Computer Science, 138, 525–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Yadav, N., Gupta, K., Rani, L., & Rawat, D. (2018). Drivers of sustainability practices and smes: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(4), 531–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. Hakanen, E., & Rajala, R. (2018). Material intelligence as a driver for value creation in IoT-enabled business ecosystems. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 33(6), 857–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. Strategy, D. I. B. U. S., Mithas, S., Tafti, A., & Mitchell, W. (2013). How a firm’s competitive environment and digital strategic posture influence digital business strategy. Digital Business Strategys, 37(2), 511–536.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Winarsih, M. Indriastuti, and K. Fuad, Impact of covid-19 on digital transformation and sustainability in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): a conceptual framework, AISC. Springer International Publishing, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  171. Remane, G., Hanelt, A., Nickerson, R. C., & Kolbe, L. M. (2017). Discovering digital business models in traditional industries. The Journal of Business Strategy, 38(2), 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. Luz Martín-Peña, M., Díaz-Garrido, E., & Sánchez-López, J. M. (2018). The digitalization and servitization of manufacturing: a review on digital business models. Strategic Changes, 27(2), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Manogaran, G., Alazab, M., Saravanan, V., Rawal, B. S., Sundarasekar, R., Nagarajan, S. M., … & Montenegro-Marin, C. E. (2020). Machine Learning Assisted Information Management Scheme in Service Concentrated IoT. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

    Google Scholar 

  174. Arendt, L. (2008). Barriers to ICT adoption in SMEs: How to bridge the digital divide? Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 10(2), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/13287260810897738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. Ballantine, J., Levy, M., & Powell, P. (1998). Evaluating information systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: Issues and evidence. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(4), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  176. Chang, V. (2020). Presenting cloud business performance for manufacturing organizations. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9798-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. Huber, G. P., & Power, D. J. (1985). Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250060206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Lechner, C., Dowling, M., & Welpe, I. (2006). Firm networks and firm development: The role of the relational mix. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(4), 514–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  180. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Baryannis G, Dani S, Antoniou G (2019a) Predicting supply chain risks using machine learning: The trade-off between performance and interpretability. Futur Gener Comput Syst 101:993–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. Nayal K, Raut RD, Queiroz MM, Yadav VS, Narkhede BE (2021) Are artificial intelligence and machine learning suitable to tackle the COVID-19 impacts? An agriculture supply chain perspective. Int J Logist Manag. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-01-2021-0002.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  183. Ivanov D, Dolgui A, Sokolov B (2019) The impact of digital technology and industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. Int J Prod Res 57:829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  184. Belhadi A, Kamble S, Jabbour CJC, Gunasekaran A, Ndubisi NO, Venkatesh M (2021a) Manufacturing and service supply chain resilience to the COVID-19 outbreak: Lessons learned from the automobile and airline industries. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 163:120447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. Kuhn KD (2018) Using structural topic modeling to identify latent topics and trends in aviation incident reports. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 87:105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. Roberts ME, Stewart BM, Tingley D (2019) Stm: An R package for structural topic models. J Stat Softw 91(1):1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Singh S, Ghosh S, Jayaram J, Tiwari MK (2019) Enhancing supply chain resilience using ontology-based decision support system. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 32(7):642–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Ivanov D, Dolgui A (2020) A digital supply chain twin for managing the disruption risks and resilience in the era of Industry 4.0. Prod Plan Control 32(9):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  189. Belhadi A, Mani V, Kamble SS, Khan SAR, Verma S (2021b) Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation. Ann Oper Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03956-x.

  190. European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA). 2021a. Impacts of COVID-19 on the maritime sector in the EU, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Pune, Indien

    Deegvijay Shimpi

Authors
  1. Deegvijay Shimpi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Pune, India

    Deegvijay Shimpi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shimpi, D. (2023). Zukunft und neue Geschäftsmöglichkeiten. In: Shimpi, D. (eds) Auswirkungen von Covid-19 auf die Wirtschaft. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39277-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39277-2_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39276-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39277-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation