Abstract
The debate on militant democracy is very much focused on whether legal restrictions against antidemocratic parties are justified. By contrast, this paper moves beyond the legal exclusion dilemma, and gestures towards a social conception of democratic self-defence. It does so by examining Hermann Heller’s ideas on the origins and solutions to antidemocratic threats. Arguing against Schmitt’s ‘authoritarian liberalism’, Heller pointed at the autocratic and decisionistic logic of restricting participation rights in the name of liberty. Not only did this programme negate rather than defend constitutionalism and democracy, he said, it also promoted a liberalisation of the economy at the expense of social welfare. In pretending to make social concessions when in reality it subordinated all economic life to the state, authoritarian liberalism was comparable to Italian fascism. The antidote for Heller was a social state based on the rule of law (sozialer Rechtsstaat). Such a state would be governed by laws, which would draw their validity from the representation of all social classes in law-making. It would also produce loyal citizens through an economy that catered for the needs of the many. But above all, a social Rechtsstaat would create a genuine sense of community by integrating all members of society into a common political culture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bonefeld, Werner. 2017. Authoritarian Liberalism: From Schmitt via Ordoliberalism to the Euro. In Critical Sociology 43(4–5): 747–761.
Bookbinder, Paul. 1987. Hermann Heller versus Carl Schmitt. In International Social Science Review 62(3): 119‒127.
Cristi, Renato. 1998. Carl Schmitt and authoritarian liberalism: Strong state, free economy. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Dyzenhaus, David. 2015. Kelsen, Heller and Schmitt: Paradigms of sovereignty thought. In Theoretical Inquiries in Law 16(2): 337‒366.
Finchelstein, Federico. 2017. From fascism to populism in history. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Greenberg, Udi. 2016. The Weimar century: German émigrés and the ideological foundations of the Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Heller, Hermann. 1992 [1929a]. Was bringt uns eine Diktatur?. In Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 2, Ed. Christoph Müller, 435‒442. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Heller, Hermann. 1929b. Europa und der Fascismus. Berlin und Leipzig: Walter de Gruyter.
Heller, Hermann. 1930. Rechtsstaat oder Diktatur?. In Recht und Staat in Geschichte und Gegenwart, vol. 68, 1‒26. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Heller, Hermann. 1933. Power, political. In Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, Ed. E. Seligman, vol. 11, 300‒305. New York: The Macmillan Company.
Heller, Hermann. 1996 [1934]. The nature and structure of the state. Transl. D. Dyzenhaus. In Cardozo Law Review 18: 1139‒1216.
Heller, Hermann. 2000 [1928]. Political democracy and social homogeneity. Transl. D. Dyzenhaus. In Weimar: A jurisprudence of crisis, Eds. A. J. Jacobson und B. Schlink, 256‒265. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Heller, Hermann. 2015 [1933]. Authoritarian liberalism? European Law Journal 21(3): 295‒301.
Heller, Hermann. 2019 [1927]. Sovereignty: A Contribution to the Theory of Public and International Law, Ed. D. Dyzenhaus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Invernizzi Accetti, Carlo und Ian Zuckerman. 2017. What’s wrong with militant democracy?. In Political Studies 65(IS): 182‒199.
Kelsen Hans. 2013 [1920]. The essence and value of democracy. Transl. B. Graf. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kennedy, Ellen. 1984. The politics of toleration in late Weimar: Hermann Heller’s analysis of fascism and political culture. In History of Political Thought 5(1): 109‒127.
Loewenstein, Karl. 1937. Militant democracy and fundamental rights, I. In American Political Science Review 31(3): 417‒432.
Malkopoulou, Anthoula und Alexander S. Kirshner, Eds. 2019. Militant Democracy and its Critics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Malkopoulou, Anthoula und Ludvig Norman. 2018. Three models of democratic self-defence: Militant democracy and its alternatives. In Political Studies 66(2): 442‒458.
Menéndez, Agustin Jose, Ed. 2015. Editorial; Special Section: Hermann Heller’s Authoritarian Liberalism. In European Law Journal 21(3): 285‒383.
Scheppele, Kim Lane und Daniel Hegedüs. (2019, January 10). How Orbán Manipulates Markets to Suppress Hungary’s Opposition (K. Simon, Interviewer), In Green European Journal. Retrieved from https://www.greeneuropeanjournal.eu/how-orban-manipulates-markets-to-suppress-hungarys-opposition/ Last Accessed: December 2, 2020.
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2013. The rule of law and the Frankenstate: Why governance checklists do not work. In Governance 26(4): 559‒562.
Schmitt, Carl. 1998 [1932]. Sound economy—Strong state: An address to business leaders. Appendix. Transl. R. Cristi. In Carl Schmitt and authoritarian liberalism, Ed. R. Cristi, 213‒232. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.
Schmitt, Carl. 2004 [1932]. Legality and legitimacy. Durham: Duke University Press.
Schupmann, Benjamin. 2017. Carl Schmitt’s state and constitutional theory: A critical analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Marianne and Marcus Wallenberg Foundation [MMW 2018.0035].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Malkopoulou, A. (2022). Herman Heller on Democratic Self-defence: Militant Democracy Revisited. In: Frick, V., Lembcke, O.W. (eds) Hermann Hellers demokratischer Konstitutionalismus. Staat – Souveränität – Nation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37577-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37577-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-37576-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-37577-5
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)