Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender, Race and Inclusive Citizenship as a Momentum Concept: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Race and Inclusive Citizenship

  • 1106 Accesses

Abstract

In this introduction to the edited volume, we argue that citizenship is a “momentum concept” (Hoffman 2004, Citizenship Beyond the State, Sage, Thousand Oaks) which encompasses the potential to build up spaces for equality and inclusion. We aim to further develop the concept of inclusive citizenship, which is a common working base at the Leibniz Research Center for Inclusive Citizenship (CINC) at Leibniz University Hannover. Gender and race are two pivotal dimensions of inequality which have received public attention in recent years, for example, within debates on racist police violence in the USA and Europe, and in the care crisis, not only during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this introduction, we elaborate on our understanding of acts of inclusive citizenship, linking debates on migration and racism in Germany with concepts from citizenship studies, explain the focus on gender and race of this collaborative publication project and embed it in the field of intersectionality research. We also present the four fields of discussion of inclusive citizenship in this volume: care, institutional racism, language and the digital sphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Ignorance’ here takes up Patrick Simon’s 2008 paper “The Choice of Ignorance: The Debate on Ethnic and Racial Statistics in France” about the French state’s ban to collect statistics on race, and therefore, being unable to monitor racist discrimination.

  2. 2.

    A comprehensive list of the different areas of application can be found, for example, in Armin Nassehi’s discussion of what he calls the “digitale Gesellschaft” (digital society) (2019).

References

  • Anthias, F. 2012. Transnational mobilities, migration research and intersectionality. Towards a translocational frame. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 2: 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. 1986 [1951]. The Origins of Totalitarianism. London: André Deutsch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, É. 2012. Gleichfreiheit. Politische Essays. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, É. 2017 [2011]. Citizen Subject. Foundations for Philosophical Anthropology. New York: Fordham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsmeier, B. and M. Woerter. 2019. Is this time different? How digitalization influences job creation and destruction. Research Policy 48(8), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.010.

  • Benz, W. 2020. Antisemitismus. Präsenz und Tradition eines Ressentiments. Frankfurt: Wochenschau, 3rd. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bickerton, J. 2018. Managing Diversity through Citizenization: Citizenship Regime as a Framework of Analysis. In Citizenship as a Regime: Canadian and International Perspectives, Eds. A.-C. Fourot, M. Paquet and N. Nagels, 141–164. Montreal & Kingston, London, Chicago: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilge, S. 2013. Intersectionality Undone. Saving Intersectionality from Feminist Intersectionality Studies. Du Bois Review 10(2): 405–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilge, S. 2014. Whitening Intersectionality. In Lentin, A. and Hundt, W. Eds. Racism and Sociology. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittlingmayer U.H. and D. Sahrai. 2017. Inklusion als Anti-Diskriminierungsstrategie. In Handbuch Diskriminierung, Eds. A. Scherr, A. El-Mafaalani and G. Yüksel, 683–699. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Block, K. and S. Dickel. 2020. Jenseits der Autonomie. Die De/Problematisierung des Subjekts in Zeiten der Digitalisierung. Behemoth – A Journal on Civilisation 1: 109–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bojadžijev, M. 2006. Verlorene Gelassenheit. Eine Genealogie der Integration. Die Geschichte des deutschen Migrationsregimes als Geschichte der Kämpfe. https://www.linksnet.de/artikel/20122 Zugegriffen: 4. November 2021.

  • Bojadžijev, M. 2008. Die windige Internationale. Rassismus und Kämpfe der Migration. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bös, M. and V. Schmid. 2012. Staatsbürgerschaft – ein Auslaufmodell? Zur Dialektik der Konstruktion von Mitgliedschaft in nationalstaatlich verfassten Gesellschaften. In Selbstbeobachtung der modernen Gesellschaft und die neuen Grenzen des Sozialen, Eds. G. Peter, and R.-M. Krauße, 53–72. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brückner, M. 2010. Entwicklungen der Care-Debatte: Wurzeln und Begrifflichkeiten. In Care und Migration: Die Ent-Sorgung menschlicher Reproduktionsarbeit entlang von Geschlechter- und Armutsgrenzen, Eds. U. Apitzsch, and M. Schmidbauer, 43–58. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E. and A. McAfee. 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 2015. Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, S. and C.V. Hamilton. 1967. Black Power. The Politics of Liberation. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Cortés, M. 2019. Care-tizenship: Precarity, social movements, and the deleting/re-writing of citizenship. Citizenship Studies 23: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1556248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro Varela, M. 2013. Ist Integration nötig? Eine Streitschrift. Freiburg: Lambertus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherubini, D. 2011. Intersectionality and the study of lived citizenship: a case study on migrant women’s experiences in Andalusia. Graduate Journal of Social Science (GJSS) 8: 114–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. and S. Bilge. 2020. Intersectionality. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. 1989. Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics, University of Chicago Legal Forum: 8: 139–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M. 2020. Enacting critical citizenship: An intersectional approach to global citizenship education. Societies 10(4): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, W.E.B. 1995 [1903]. The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Signet Classic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. 2005. Reproducing Labor Inequalities: Challenges for Feminists Conceptualizing Care at the Intersections of Gender, Race, and Class. Gender & Society 19(1): 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204269499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, M.M., G. Kilomba, P. Piesche and S. Arndt, Eds. 2005. Mythen, Masken und Subjekte. Kritische Weißseinsforschung in Deutschland. Münster: Unrast.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Tayeb, F. 2001. Schwarze Deutsche. Der Diskurs um ‚Rasse‘ und nationale Identität 1890–1933. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Tayeb, F. 2013. Time Travelers and Queer Heterotopias: Narratives from the Muslim Underground. The Germanic Review: Literature, Culture, Theory 88(3): 305–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • End, M. 2016. Die Dialektik der Aufklärung als Antiziganismuskritik. Thesen zu einer Kritischen Theorie des Antiziganismus. In Konstellationen des Antiziganismus, Ed. W. Stender, 53–94. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engster, D. 2007. The Heart of Justice: Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erel, U. and N. Acik. 2019. Enacting intersectional multilayered citizenship: Kurdish women’s politics. Gender, Place & Culture 27: 479–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, J.R. 2000. Racist America: Roots, current realities, and future reparations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M.M. 2008. Framing Equality: The Politics of Race, Class, and Gender in the US, Germany, and the Expanding European Union. In Gender Politics in the Expanding European Union: Mobilization, Inclusion, Exclusion, Ed., S. Roth, 237–256. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M.M. 2011. The Discursive Politics of Feminist Intersectionality. In Lutz, H., M.T. Herrera Vivar and L.Supik, Eds. Framing Intersectionality. Debates on a Multi-Faceted Concept in Gender Studies. Aldershot: Ashgate. 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourot, A.-C., M. Paquet and N. Nagels, Eds. 2018. Citizenship as a Regime: Canadian and International Perspectives. Montreal & Kingston, London, Chicago: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. 2016. Contradictions of Capital and Care. New Left Review 100: 99–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomolla, M. and F.-O. Radtke. 2009. Institutionelle Diskriminierung. Die Herstellung ethnischer Differenz in der Schule. Wiesbaden: Springer, 3rd. ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschlich, D., S. Roth, A. Härtel, U. Röhr, S. Hackfort, D. Segebart and C. König. 2014. Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften im Spannungsfeld von Gender, Care und Green Economy Debatten–Schnittstellen–blinde Flecken. CaGE Texte 1: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. 2007. The Ethics of Care, Black Women and the Social Professions: Implications of a New Analysis. Ethics and Social Welfare 1(2): 194–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496530701450372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, K. N. 2007. Deutsche Integrationspolitik als koloniale Praxis. In re/visionen. Postkoloniale Perspektiven von People of Color auf Rassismus, Kulturpolitik und Widerstand in Deutschland, Eds. K.N. Ha, N.L. al-Samarai, and S. Mysorekar, 113–127. Münster: Unrast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, K.N., N.L. al-Samarai and S. Mysorekar, Eds. 2007. re/visionen. Postkoloniale Perspektiven von People of Color auf Rassismus, Kulturpolitik und Widerstand in Deutschland. Münster: Unrast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug, F. 2011. Das Care-Syndrom. Ohne Geschichte hat die Frauenbewegung keine Perspektive. Das Argument 3(292): 345–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazibar, K., and P. Mecheril. 2013. Es gibt keine richtige Pädagogik in falschen gesellschaftlichen Verhältnissen. Widerspruch als Grundkategorie einer Behinderungspädagogik. Zeitschrift für Inklusion (3). https://www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/23.

  • Hoffman, J. 2004. Citizenship Beyond the State. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houston, B. 1990. Caring and Exploitation. Hypatia, 5(1), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1990.tb00395.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C. 2002. Key concepts in feminist theory and research. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, B., L. McKie, D. Hopkins, and N. Watson. 2005. Love’s Labours Lost? Feminism, the Disabled People’s Movement and an Ethic of Care. Sociology 39(2): 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505050538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. 2009. Citizenship in Flux: The Figure of the Activist Citizen. Subjectivity 29: 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. 2017. Performative Citizenship. In The Oxford Handbook of Citizenship, Eds. A. Shachar, R. Bauböck, I. Bloemraad, and M. Vink, 500–523. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. 2021. Bedeutungen von Citizenship. Polis (1): 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. and B.S. Turner. 2002. Citizenship Studies. An Introduction. In Handbook of citizenship studies, Eds. E.F. Isin and B.S. Turner, 1–10. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. and G.M. Nielsen, Eds. 2008. Acts of Citizenship. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isin, E. and E. Ruppert. 2015. Being digital citizens. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, J. and M. Papillon. 2000. Challenging the Citizenship Regime: The James Bay Cree and Transnational Action. Politics & Society 23: 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kabeer, N. 2005. The search for inclusive citizenship: Meanings and expressions in an interconnected world. In Inclusive Citizenship, Ed. N. Kabeer, 1–30. London, New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalpaka, A. and N. Räthzel, Eds. 1986. Die Schwierigkeit, nicht rassistisch zu sein. Berlin: Express Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakayalı, J., Ed. 2020. Unterscheiden und Trennen. Die Herstellung von natio-ethno-kultureller Differenz und Segregation in der Schule. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakayalı, S. and Tsianos, V. 2002. Migrationsregimes in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In Konjunkturen des Rassismus, Eds. M. Bojadžijev and A. Demirovic, 246–267. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakayalı, J., Ç. Kahveci, D. Liebscher and C. Melchers, Eds. 2017. Den NSU-Komplex analysieren. Aktuelle Perspektiven aus der Wissenschaft. Bielefeldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastl, J.M. 2018. Inklusion. In Handbuch Soziale Arbeit, Eds. Otto, H.U., Thiersch, H., Treptow, R., Ziegler, H., 6th Edition, München: Reinhardt, 665–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khasnabish, A. and M. Haiven. 2012. Convoking the Radical Imagination: Social Movement Research, Dialogic Methodologies, and Scholarly Vocations. Cultural Studies< >Critical Methodologies 12 (5): 408–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt, M. 2017. Inclusive Citizenship als Forschungsperspektive: Vom Denken in Spannungsverhältnissen. Zeitschrift für Inklusion. https://www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/443 Zugegriffen: 4. November 2021.

  • Kleinschmidt, M. 2018. Politische Bildung und Behinderung. Inclusive Citizenship als Forschungsperspektive. Sonderpädagogische Förderung heute 65: 365–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt, M. 2021. Dekoloniale politische Bildung. Eine empirische Untersuchung von Lernendenvorstellungen zum postkolonialen Erbe. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt, M. and D. Lange. 2020. Demokratie in der Migrationsgesellschaft. Inclusive Citizenship Education als eine Forschungsperspektive für die politische Bildung. In Krise der Demokratie – Demokratie in der Krise, Ed. G. Hentges, 194–210. Frankfurt am Main: Wochenschau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt, M., S. Kenner and D. Lange. 2019. Inclusive Citizenship als Ausgangspunkt für emanzipative und inklusive politische Bildung in der Migrationsgesellschaft. In Sprache, Flucht, Migration. Kritische, historische und pädagogische Annäherungen, Ed. R. Natarajan, 407–416. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knijn, T. and M. Kremer. 1997. Gender and the caring dimension of welfare stares. Toward inclusive citizenship. Social Politics, 4(1): 328–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollaborative Forschungsgruppe Racial Profiling. 2019. Racial Profiling: Erfahrung, Wirkung, Widerstand. https://www.rosalux.de/fileadmin/rls_uploads/pdfs/Studien/racial-profiling.pdf. Accessed 20 October 2021.

  • Leiprecht, R. 2001. Alltagsrassismus. Eine Untersuchung bei Jugendlichen in Deutschland und den Niederlanden. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A. 2014. Postracial Silences: The Othering of Race in Europe. In Racism and Sociology, Eds. W.D. Hund and A. Lentin, 69–106. Münster: lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentin, A. 2020. Why Race Still Matters. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, G. 2009. Celebrating Intersectionality? Debates on a Multi-faceted Concept in Gender Studies: Themes from a Conference. European Journal of Women’s Studies 16(3): 203–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, H. 2011. The New Maids. Transnational Women and the Care Economy. London: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, H. 2018. Die Hinterbühne der Care-Arbeit. Weinheim and Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, H., M.T. Herrera Vivar and L. Supik, Eds. 2013. Fokus Intersektionalität. Bewegungen und Verortungen eines vielschichtigen Konzeptes. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, H. and A. Amelina. 2017. Gender, Migration, Transnationalisierung. Eine intersektionale Einführung. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, W. 1999. The Stephen Lawrence Inquiry. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/277111/4262.pdf, Accessed 01 October 2021.

  • Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class: Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. T. H. Marshall. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, S. 2017. Das metrische Wir. Über die Quantifizierung des Sozialen. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mecheril, P. 2003. Prekäre Verhältnisse. Über natio-ethno-kulturelle (Mehrfach-)Zugehörigkeit. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, M. 1979. Beyond the Domestic Labour Debate. New Left Review 116(1): 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, U. 1995. Colonialism and Its Others: Considerations on Rights and Care Discourses. Hypatia, 10(2): 133–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nassehi, A. 2019. Muster. Theorie der digitalen Gesellschaft. München: Beck.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oguntoye, K., M. Ayim, and D. Schultz, Eds. 1986. Farbe bekennen. Afro-deutsche Frauen auf den Spuren ihrer Geschichte. Berlin: Orlanda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omi, M. and H. Winant. 1994. Racial Formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, C. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterkamp, U. 1996. Rassismus als Selbstentmächtigung. Hamburg: Argument.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeck-Ho, C. 2020. Die Aushandlung von Citizenship. Komplexe Zugehörigkeiten aus postmigrantischer Perspektive am Beispiel britischer muslimischer Frauenorganisationen. In Postmigrantisch gelesen. Transnationalität, Gender, Care, Eds, K. Huxel, J. Karakayalı, E. Palenga-Möllenbeck, M. Schmidbaur, K. Shinozaki, T. Spies, L. Supik and E. Tuider, 269–284. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeck, C. and D. Sielert. 2019. Mit aktiver Intention_alität gegen alternative Fakten?. In: Komplexe Dynamiken globaler und lokaler Entwicklungen. Verhandlungen des 39. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Göttingen 2018, Ed. N. Burzan. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie, https://publikationen.soziologie.de/index.php/kongressband_2018.

  • Pieper, M., E. Panagiotidis and V. Tsianos. 2011. Konjunkturen der egalitären Exklusion: Postliberalierbaler Rassismus und verkörperte Erfahrung in der Prekarität. In Biopolitik – in der Debatte, Eds. M. Pieper, T. Atzert, S. Karakayalı and V. Tsianos, 193–226. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plonz, S., J. Meyer-Siebert, F. Haug, and T. Soiland. 2011. Editorial. Care - eine feministische Kritik der politischen Ökonomie? Das Argument. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften, 3(292): 329–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, F. 2011. The Ethics of Care: A Feminist Approach to Human Security. Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rottmann, S.B. and M.M. Ferree. 2008. Citizenship and Intersectionality: German Feminist Debates about Headscarf and Anti-discrimination Laws. Social Politics 15: 481–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, M. 2021. Sprache und Rassismus. Was es heißt, keinen Namen zu haben. Süddeutsche Zeitung 29 March 2021. https://www.sueddeutsche.de/kultur/rassismus-sprache-1.5249585?reduced=true (paywall) Accessed: 15 October 2021.

  • Sielert, D. 2019. Care und Imagination in der politischen Praxis. Eltern erzählen über die Partizipation von Kindern in sozialen Bewegungen. In Care: Praktiken und Politiken der Fürsorge. Ethnographische und geschlechtertheoretische Perspektiven, Eds., B. Binder, C. Bischoff, C. Endter, S. Hess, S. Kienitz and S. Bergmann. Opladen: Barbara Budrich, 91–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, P. 2008. The Choice of Ignorance: The Debate on Ethnic and Racial Statistics in France. French Politics, Culture & Society 26: 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stender, W., Ed. 2016. Konstellationen des Antiziganismus. Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Forschung und Vorschläge für die Praxis. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyerl, H. and E. Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Eds. 2003. Spricht die Subalterne deutsch? Migration und postkoloniale Kritik. Münster: Unrast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supik, L. 2014. Statistik und Rassismus. Das Dilemma der Erfassung von Ethnizität. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, B. 2020. Undermining Intersectionality: The Perils of Powerblind Feminism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J. 2013. Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • trouble everyday collective. 2014. Die Krise der sozialen Reproduktion. Kritik, Perspektiven, Strategien und Utopien. Münster: Unrast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.S. 1997. Citizenship Studies: A General Theory. Citizenship Studies 1: 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B.S. 2006. Vulnerability and Human Rights. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungerson, C. 1990. Gender and caring: Work and welfare in Britain and Scandinavia. Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werbner, P. and N. Yuval-Davis. 2005. Women, Citizenship and Difference. London: Zed books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winker, G. 2013. Zur Krise sozialer Reproduktion. In Care statt Crash. Sorgeökonomie und die Überwindung des Kapitalismus, Eds. H. Baumann, I. Bischel, M. Gemperle, U. Knobloch, B. Ringger, and H. Schatz , 119–133, Jahrbuch Denknetz 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. 1997. Women, Citizenship and Difference. Feminist Review 57: 4–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. 1999. The ‘Multi-Layered Citizen’. International Feminist Journal of Politics 1: 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. 2011. The Politics of Belonging: Intersectional Contestations. London, New Delhi, Singapore, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N. and P. Werbner. 1999. Women, Citizenship and Difference. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, N., K. Kannabiran and U.M. Vieten. 2006. The Situated Politics of Belonging. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zivi, K. 2012. Making Rights Claims: A Practice of Democratic Citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power.. London: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany

    Malte Kleinschmidt & Deborah Sielert

  2. Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany

    Radhika Natarajan

  3. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Catharina Peeck-Ho

  4. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Linda Supik

Authors
  1. Malte Kleinschmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Radhika Natarajan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Catharina Peeck-Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Deborah Sielert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Linda Supik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malte Kleinschmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Linda Supik

  2. Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland

    Malte Kleinschmidt

  3. Universität Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Deutschland

    Radhika Natarajan

  4. Technische Universität Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland

    Tobias Neuburger

  5. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland

    Catharina Peeck-Ho

  6. Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland

    Christiane Schröder

  7. Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Deutschland

    Deborah Sielert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kleinschmidt, M., Natarajan, R., Peeck-Ho, C., Sielert, D., Supik, L. (2022). Gender, Race and Inclusive Citizenship as a Momentum Concept: An Introduction. In: Supik, L., et al. Gender, Race and Inclusive Citizenship. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36391-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36391-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36390-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36391-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation