Skip to main content

Problem-based Learning and Community Engagement: A Service-Learning Project with Social Pedagogues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hochschullehre erforschen

Part of the book series: Diversität und Bildung im digitalen Zeitalter ((DIBIDZ))

Abstract

This Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) project focuses on social pedagogy students’ problem-based learning process in an undergraduate service-learning course at a German University of Applied Sciences. Based on the continuous reflection on their learning experiences in a social work management education environment, students learned to implement a crowdfunding campaign. As previous research has shown, the didactic concept of service-learning initiates problem-based learning at different levels: (a) a deeper understanding and exploration of a topic in their field of training (here, financing of social initiatives), (b) the promotion of both entrepreneurial as well as intra- and interpersonal communication and team skills, (c) community engagement and social responsibility in a challenging field of society, while applying theories, concepts and methods to practice, and (d) the preparation for a job in youth work at the undergraduate level. The underlying qualitative-empirical study uses data collected by a focus group discussion and critical incidents to describe students’ perception of a problem, contracting, structuring of their learning process, decision-making, communication, conflict and problem-solving skills, and team development. This paper not only presents findings of the research accompanying the service-learning course on crowdfunding but also leads to a discussion and reflection of a sustainable service-learning framework for good teaching practices, social work management didactics in higher education and the achievement of teaching and learning goals of service-learning at the level of the learner, the study program, and the university (micro-, meso- and macro-level). In conclusion, successful service-learning courses do not only support experiential learning and trigger reflective learning from failures and problems that occurred in the project but also require a different attitude and role of the lecturer as coach and mentor and will greatly benefit from an effective technology-enhanced learning environment.

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Projekt beschäftigt sich mit dem problembasierten Lernprozess von Studierenden der Sozialpädagogik und des Sozialmanagements im Rahmen eines Service Learning-Seminars für Bachelorstudierende an einer deutschen Fachhochschule. Basierend auf der kontinuierlichen Reflexion ihrer Lernerfahrungen entwickelten Studierende eine Crowdfunding-Kampagne für Jugendliche. Bisherige Untersuchungen haben gezeigt, dass das didaktische Konzept des Service Lernens problembasiertes Lernen auf unterschiedlichen Ebenen initiiert: (a) ein tieferes Verständnis und die Erforschung eines Themas in ihrem Ausbildungsbereich (hier Finanzierung sozialer Kampagnen), (b) die Förderung sowohl unternehmerischer als auch individueller und zwischenmenschlicher Kommunikations- und Teamfähigkeiten, (c) gesellschaftliches Engagement und soziale Verantwortung in einem herausfordernden Bereich der Gesellschaft unter Anwendung von Theorien, Konzepten und Methoden in der Praxis sowie (d) die Vorbereitung auf zukünftige Tätigkeiten in der Jugendarbeit auf Bachelor-Ebene. Die zugrunde liegende qualitativ-empirische SoTL-Forschung erhebt mittels einer Fokusgruppendiskussion und der Critical Incident Methode Daten zur Problemwahrnehmung der Studierenden, Auftragsabwicklung, Strukturierung ihrer Lernprozesse, Entscheidungsfindung, Kommunikation, Fähigkeiten zur Konflikt- und Problemlösung sowie Teamentwicklung. Dieser Beitrag präsentiert nicht nur Ergebnisse der SoTL-Forschung zum Service Learning-Seminar, sondern diskutiert und reflektiert auch die Rahmenbedingungen für das Unterrichtsformat Service Learning, für die spezifische Hochschuldidaktik des Sozialmanagements und für die notwendige Lernumgebung auf der Ebene des Lernenden, des Studienprogramms und der Hochschule (Mikro-, Meso- und Makroebene). Es wird festgestellt, dass erfolgreiches Service Learning nicht nur das Erfahrungslernen unterstützt und reflektiertes Lernen aus Fehlern ermöglicht, sondern auch einen Rollenwechsel der Dozierenden hin zum Coaching und Mentoring erfordert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Arnold, M. (2020). Change Management Education in Social Work Degree Programmes in Germany: Bridging the Gap Between Management Science and Professional Practice. In S. M. Sajid, R. Baikady, C. Sheng-li, & H. Sakaguchi (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Work Education (pp. 101–117). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39966-5_7

  • Barth, M., Adomßent, M., Fischer, D., Richter, S., & Rieckmann, M. (2014). Learning to change universities from within: A service-learning perspective on promoting sustainable consumption in higher education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 62, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, J., & Jameson, D. A. (2004). Problem-based learning in graduate management education: An integrative model and interdisciplinary application. Journal of Management Education, 28(5), 558–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562904266073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charbit, C., & G. Desmoulins (2017). Civic Crowdfunding: A collective option for local public goods? (OECD Regional Development Working Papers No. 2017/02). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b3f7a1c5-en

  • Csapó, B., & Funke, J. (2017). (Eds.). The Nature of Problem Solving: Using Research to Inspire 21st Century Learning. OECD Education Research and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273955-en

  • Farrow, K., & Fillingham, J. (2012). Promises and pitfalls: Involving service users and carers in social work manager education. Social Work Education, 31(7), 835–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, B., & Featherstone, B. (1994). Making the transition from social work management to social work teaching: It’s the same difference? Social Work Education, 13(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The Critical Incident Technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green Lister, P., & Crisp, B. R. (2007). Critical incident analyses: A practice learning tool for students and practitioners. Practice, 19(1), 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, F., Yao, M., Wang, C., Yan, W., & Zong, X. (2016). The Effects of Service Learning on Student Problem Solving: The Mediating Role of Classroom Engagement. Teaching of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315620064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, J., Schank, C., Euler, M., & Harms, R. (2019). Learning sustainability entrepreneurship by doing: Providing a lecturer-oriented service learning framework. Sustainability, 11(5), 1217, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051217

  • Hoidn, S., & Olbert-Bock, S. (2016). Learning and teaching research methods in management education: Development of a curriculum to combine theory and practice—A Swiss case. International Journal of Education Management, 30(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2014-0117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber, L. (2014). Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: Konzept, Geschichte, Formen, Entwicklungsaufgaben. In L. Huber, A. Pilniok, R. Sethe, B. Szczyrba, & M. Vogel (Eds.), Forschendes Lehren im eigenen Fach: Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Beispielen (pp. 19–36). Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M., & Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, J. (1994). A competence based approach to management education in social work: A discussion of the approach and its relevance. Social Work Education, 13(1), 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, L. E., & Lough, B. J. (2017). Challenges social work students encounter in international field placements and recommendations for responsible management. Journal of Social Work Education, 53(1), 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papouli, E. (2016). Using the Critical Incident Technique (CIT) to Explore How Students Develop Their Understanding of Social Work Values and Ethics in the Workplace During Their Final Placement. The Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 13(2), 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S., Racz, M., & Palmer, P. (2020). Reflexive learning and performative failure. Management Learning. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620903170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosegrant-Alvarez, A., & Moxley, D. (2004). The Student Portfolio in Social Work Education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 1–2(24), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v24n01_06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, M., Trembath, K. S., Duncombe, R., Whitaker, L., & Wiman, G. (2019). Contemporizing teaching case management: mapping the tensions. Social Work Education, 38(2), 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, J. (2006). Understanding cultural differences: Relational hermeneutics and comparative analysis in cultural psychology. In J. Straub, D. Weidemann, C. Kölbl, & B. Zielke (Eds.), Pursuit of meaning: Theoretical and methodological advances in cultural and cross-cultural psychology (pp. 163–213). transcript.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Yorio, P. L., & Ye, F. (2012). A meta-analysis on the effects of service-learning on the social, personal, and cognitive outcomes of learning. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 11(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maik Arnold .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arnold, M. (2022). Problem-based Learning and Community Engagement: A Service-Learning Project with Social Pedagogues. In: Fahr, U., Alessandra, K., Angenent, H., Eßer-Lüghausen, A. (eds) Hochschullehre erforschen. Diversität und Bildung im digitalen Zeitalter. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34185-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34185-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-34184-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-34185-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics