Abstract
This essay critically engages with the notion of integration in the context of access to higher education for refugees. It argues that integration is a fuzzy and controversial concept and points to the risk of drawing attention away from structural issues, such as accessibility, debates on economization, notions of internationalization, and ways in which universities can be developing organisations. It argues that the debates around students with refugee backgrounds provide a chance to revisit processes of diversification and organisational change, development of and access to the educational system (e.g. beyond methodological nationalism, Western-centrism, and classism) and presents alternative perspectives of addressing the topic.
This chapter addresses initiatives, university actors, and researchers and points to questions of concepts and contexts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anthias, F. (2008). Thinking through the lens of translocational positionality: An intersectionality frame for understanding identity and belonging. Translocations: Migration and Social Change: An Inter-Disciplinary Open Access E-Journal, 4(1), 5–20. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from https://hdl.handle.net/10552/3331
Arslan, E. (2016). Reflektionen eines Projektes zur Mehrsprachigkeit in der universitären symbolischen Ordnung. In E. Arslan & K. Borzay (Eds.), Symbolische Ordnung und Bildungsungleichheit in der Migrationsgesellschaft, Interkulturelle Studien (pp. 501–522). Wiesbaden: Springer.
DFG (2012). Die Internationalisierungsstrategie der DFG. Bonn: DFG.
Favell, A. (2013). The Changing Face of “Integration” in a Mobile Europe. https://www.adrianfavell.com/CESweb.pdf
Favell, A. (2014). Immigration, Integration and Mobility: New Agendas in Migration Studies. Essays 1998–2014. Colchester: ECPR Press.
Giesinger, J. (2011). Bildung als öffentliches Gut und das Problem der Gerechtigkeit. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 57(3), 421–437.
Goel, U. (2009). Für eine nachhaltige Migrations- und Integrationspolitik in Deutschland. FES Gesprächskreis Migration, 99–113.
Hess, S. & Moser, J. (2009). Jenseits der Integration. Kulturwissenschaftliche Betrachtungen einer Debatte. In: Hess, Sabine, Jana Binder und Johannes Moser (Eds.): No integration?! Kulturwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Integrationsdebatte in Europa (pp. 11–25). Bielefeld: Transcript.
Hess, S. (2014). Von der Integrationskritik zur Kritik des migrationswissenschaftlichen Kulturalismus. In S. Kostner (Ed.) Migration und Integration: Akzeptanz und Widerstand im transnationalen Nationalstaat. Deutsche und internationale Perspektiven. Berlin/Münster: LIT-Verlag.
Hess, S., Binder, J. & Moser, J. (Eds.). (2009): No integration?! Kulturwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Integrationsdebatte in Europa. Bielefeld: Transcript.
Karakayali, S. (2009). Paranoic Integrationism. Die Integrationsformel als unmöglicher (Klassen-) Kompromiss. In S. Hess, J. Binder, & J. Moser (Eds.), No integration?! Kulturwissenschaftliche Beiträge zur Integrationsdebatte in Europa (pp. 95–104). Bielefeld: Transcript.
Korteweg, A. (2017). The failures of ‘immigrant integration’: The gendered racialized production of non-belonging. Migration Studies, 5(3), 428–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnx025
Leach, E. R. (1965). Culture and Social Cohesion: An Anthropologist's View. Daedalus, 94(1), 24–38.
Marcu, S. (2018). Refugee students in Spain: The role of universities as sustainable actors in institutional integration. Sustainability, 10(6), 2082.
Mecheril, P. (2011). “Wirklichkeit schaffen: Integration als Dispositiv - Ein Essay.” In Interkulturelle Schulentwicklung an Schulen in Nds, Fortbildungsmodul 1/ Oktober 2014. Niedersächsisches Landesinstitut für schulische Qualitätsentwicklung.
Mozetič, K. (2018). Being Highly Skilled and a Refugee: Self-Perceptions of Non-European Physicians in Sweden. Refugee Survey Quarterly, online first, 1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdy001.
Prodolliet, S. (2006). “Integration” als Zauberformel. Widerspruch: Beiträge zu sozialistischer Politik, 51(26), 85–94.
Römhild, R. (2014). Zur Vorgeschichte: Wie dieser Band entstanden ist. In Labor Migration (Ed.), Vom Rand ins Zentrum: Perspektiven einer kritischen Migrationsforschung (pp. 7–9). Berlin: Panama.
Römhild. R. (2015). Jenseits ethnischer Grenzen. Für eine postmigrantische Kultur- und Gesellschaftsforschung. In E. Yildiz & M. Hill (Eds.), Nach der Migration. Postmigrantische Perspektiven jenseits der Parallelgesellschaft. (pp. 49–64). Bielefeld: transcript.
Sandoz, L. (2018). Understanding access to the labour market through migration channels. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1502657.
Schröer, H. (2013). Inklusion versus Integration - Zauberformel oder neues Paradigma? Migration und soziale Arbeit, 35, 249–255.
SEM (2019). Integrationsagenda. Retrieved January 3, 2020 from https://www.sem.admin.ch/sem/de/home/themen/integration/integrationsagenda.html
Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization. London: Random House.
Sontag, K. (2018). Highly Skilled Asylum Seekers: Case studies of refugee students at a Swiss university. Migration Letters, 15(4), 533–544.
Sontag, K. (2019). Refugee students’ access to three European Universities – an ethnographic study. Social Inclusion, 7(1), 71–79.
Sontag, K., & Harder, T. (2018). What Are the Barriers for Asylum Seekers and Refugees Who Want to Enroll at a Swiss University? NCCR - On the Move, Policy Brief. Neuchatel: National Center of Competence in Research - the Migration Mobility Nexus. Uni Basel. Mobility. Retrieved January 3, 2020 from https://www.unibas.ch/en/Studies/Mobility.html.
VSS (2017a). Positionspapier Hochschulzugang für studentische Geflüchtete. Bern: Verband der Schweizer Studierendenschaften (VSS).
Wichmann, N. & D’Amato, G. (2010). Migration und Integration in Basel-Stadt: Ein „Pionierkanton“ unter der Lupe. Neuchâtel: Swiss Forum for Migratiosn and Population Studies SFM University of Neuchâtel.
Wieviorka, M. (2014). A critique of integration. Identities, 21(6), 633–641. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.828615
Wimmer, A., & Glick Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological nationalism and the study of migration. Archives of European Sociology, 43(2), 217–240.
Yildiz, E. (2015). Postmigrantische Perspektiven. Aufbruch in eine neue Geschichtlichkeit. In E. Yildiz & M. Hill (Eds.), Nach der Migration. Postmigrantische Perspektiven jenseits der Parallelgesellschaft. (pp. 19–36). Bielefeld: transcript.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the National Center of Competence in Research nccr—on the move funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation. I would like to thank the organizing team of the symposium “Studium gleich Integration?” and editors of the book, as well as Tim Harder, Silva Lässer, and Sarah Wipfli for their support in the preparation, and Hannes Schammann for his helpful feedback.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sontag, K. (2021). Beyond “Integration”—Why There is More at Stake. In: Berg, J., Grüttner, M., Streitwieser, B. (eds) Refugees in Higher Education. Higher Education Research and Science Studies. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33338-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33338-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33337-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33338-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)