Skip to main content

Forecast Aggregation and Error Comparison: An Empirical Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Data Science – Analytics and Applications
  • 2996 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

The aim of this paper is to present empirical results associated with forecast performance. It is known that common measures of error fail to be scale invariant, and hence cannot be used to make meaningful error comparisons on forecasts across differing time series. This offers a particular challenge toward forecast improvement when one’s intent is to compare error across different units or granularity. Moreover, although it is prudent to test many forecast methods on a time series, one cannot be sure that a single selected method will not lead to complete forecast failure. We address the aforementioned challenges by analyzing a sizable collection of time series in-house.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. J. Casals, M. Jerez, and S. Sotoca, “Modeling and forecasting time series sampled at different frequencies,” Journal of Forecasting, vol. 28, pp. 316 – 342, 07 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Gilliland, L. Tashman, and U. Sglavo, Business Forecasting. Practical Problems and Solutions. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Hyndman, “Another look at measures of forecast accuracy,” International Journal of Forecasting, pp. 43–46, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. S. Armstrong and F. Collopy, “Error measures for generalizing about forecasting methods: Empirical comparisons,” International Journal of Forecasting, pp. 69–80, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. B. Flores, “A pragmatic view of accuracy measurement in forecasting,” Omega, pp. 93–98, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Wallström and A. Segerstedt, “Evaluation of forecasting error measurements and techniques for intermittent demand,” International Journal of Production Economics, pp. 625–636, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. Armstrong, Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Clemen, “Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography,” International Journal of Forecasting, pp. 559–583, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Mertens and S. Rässler, Prognoserechnung. Physica-Verlag, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Croston, “Forecasting and stock control for intermittent demands,” Operational Research Quarterly, pp. 289–303, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Hyndman and G. Athanasopoulos, Forecasting: Principles and Practice, 2nd ed. Australia: OTexts, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Dutta and S. Shiralkar, Demand Planning with SAP APO - Concepts and Design. Espresso Tutorials GmbH, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Holt, “Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponential weighted moving averages,” International Journal of Forecasting, vol. 20, pp. 5–10, 03 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. Winters, “Forecasting sales by exponentially weighted moving averages,” Management Science, vol. 6, pp. 324–342, 04 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Friedman, “Multivariate adaptive regression spline,” The Annals of Statistics, vol. 19, 03 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Syntetos, A.A.andBoylan and J. Croston, “On the categorization of demand patterns,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, pp. 495–503, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. S. Armstrong, “Combining forecasts: The end of the beginning or the beginning of the end?” International Journal of Forecasting, pp. 585–588, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to German Wehinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH , ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wehinger, G., Beal, J. (2021). Forecast Aggregation and Error Comparison: An Empirical Study. In: Haber, P., Lampoltshammer, T., Mayr, M., Plankensteiner, K. (eds) Data Science – Analytics and Applications. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32182-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics