Skip to main content

Automated Decision-Making in Swedish Tax Law and the GDPR

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
WCLF Tax und IP Gesprächsband 2019
  • 664 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Sweden started applyingautomated decision-making in many fields of tax lawalready inthe late 1970 s. Decisions on tax deductions, social security contributions, value added tax (VAT) and excise duties are made automatically based on a tax return if itisfiledtimely and correctly. Since 1994, also routine decisions on income tax returns are automated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ch. 53 s. 2 the Swedish Tax Procedure Act (2011:1244), STPA (Skatteförfarandelagen).

  2. 2.

    Regulation (EU)2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation).

  3. 3.

    Recitals 1 and 4 of the preamble to the GDPR.

  4. 4.

    Recital 71 of the preamble to the GDPR.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    Ibid.

  7. 7.

    Ibid.

  8. 8.

    Ibid.

  9. 9.

    Ibid.

  10. 10.

    Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, Guidelines on Automated Individual Decision-Making and Profiling for the purposes of Regulation 2016/679 (wp251rev.01), 20.

  11. 11.

    Ibid 19.

  12. 12.

    Ibid20–21.

  13. 13.

    Ibid24.

  14. 14.

    Ibid. 27.

  15. 15.

    See also Art. 15 GDPR.

  16. 16.

    Ibid. 25.

  17. 17.

    SFS 1979:304.

  18. 18.

    See Government Bill (proposition, Prop.) prop. 1978:79:114, 18.

  19. 19.

    Government Bill prop. 1993/94:224, 13.

  20. 20.

    Ibid.

  21. 21.

    Taxeringslagen (1990:324).

  22. 22.

    Government Bill prop. 1993/94:224, 13.

  23. 23.

    Government Bill prop. 1993/94:224, 19.

  24. 24.

    Alhager, Eleonor, Deklarationer på Internet – Rättssäkert eller osäkert, Norstedts juridik 2007, 83–90.

  25. 25.

    Sec. 32 of the Administrative Act (2017:900) and Sec. 20 of the previous Administrative Act.

  26. 26.

    Government Bill prop. 2010/11:165,496.

  27. 27.

    Government Bill prop. 1993/94:224, 20–21.

  28. 28.

    Förvaltningslagen (2017:900).

  29. 29.

    Government Bill prop. 2016/17, 179.

  30. 30.

    Ibid 180.

  31. 31.

    Ibid 185.

  32. 32.

    Lag (2018:218) med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s dataskyddsförordning.

  33. 33.

    Government Bill prop. 2017/18:105,151.

  34. 34.

    Ibid p. 152.

  35. 35.

    Statlig offentlig utredning, SOU 2014:75.

  36. 36.

    SOU 2014:75, 15–16.

  37. 37.

    Skatteverket, Registrerades rättigheter 2019, https://www4.skatteverket.se/rattsligvagledning/edition/2019.8/368086.html#h-Automatiserade-beslut, downloaded 28.1.2020.

  38. 38.

    Ibid.

  39. 39.

    Sec. 6, 7, 10 and 40 of the Swedish Administrative Act.

  40. 40.

    Sec. 32 of the Swedish Administrative Act.

  41. 41.

    Ibid.

  42. 42.

    Sec. 38 of the Swedish administrative act.

  43. 43.

    Ibid.

  44. 44.

    See Elizabeth E. Joh, Automated Policing, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 15, no. 2 (Spring 2018): 559–564 (563).

  45. 45.

    862.

  46. 46.

    Skatteverket, Beslut om slutlig skatt 2020, shttps://www4.skatteverket.se/rattsligvagledning/edition/2020.1/326455.html, downloaded 8.2.2020.

  47. 47.

    Makoto Hong Chang; Hui Choon Kuen, Towards a Digital Government: Reflections on Automated Decision-Making and the Principles of Administrative Justice, Singapore Academy of Law Journal 31, no. 2 (September 2019): 875–906 (888).

  48. 48.

    Ibid.

  49. 49.

    Ibid.

  50. 50.

    Sandra Wachter; Brent Mittelstadt; Chris Russell, Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (Harvard JOLT) 31, no. 2 (Spring 2018): 841–888 (871–872).

  51. 51.

    Ibid, 844.

  52. 52.

    Guido Noto La Diega, Against the Dehumanisation of Decision-Making, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law 9, no. 1 (May 2018): 3–34, (8–11).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleonor Kristoffersson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kristoffersson, E. (2021). Automated Decision-Making in Swedish Tax Law and the GDPR. In: Kraft, W.W., Striegel, A. (eds) WCLF Tax und IP Gesprächsband 2019. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32073-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32073-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-32072-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-32073-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics