Skip to main content

Sustainability in Environmental Communication Research: Emerging Trends and Future Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Sustainability Communication Reader

Abstract

This chapter provides a comprehensive overview of how sustainability has been addressed in Environmental Communication scholarship and reflects upon key future challenges. It begins by tracing how over time sustainability communication has become a distinctive area of research in its own right. Early scholarship tended to focus on localized conflicts over environmental issues and mostly examined print media representations in Western countries. However, over recent decades, the scope has broadened and covered a greater range of issues and there has been a greater focus upon digital media. This reflects major shifts in the media landscape with the move to an increasingly networked society where there are multiple intersecting flows of information and the traditional roles of news sources and readers have become redefined. The sheer proliferation of news has encouraged a sound bite culture where images and celebrity gossip takes central stage and complex concepts such as sustainability tend to be marginalized. Much coverage of environmental issues has now migrated online. Digitalisation has encouraged a new attention economy and information overload can lead to cognitive dissonance. Moreover, the increasingly personalized information environment online tends to promote homophily and echo chambers. As the urgency of the issues has become more apparent over time there has also been an emerging interest among scholars in the ecological impact of the communication systems themselves, such as the energy used by media corporations, the film industry, and cloud computing. The chapter concludes by reflecting upon how new digital platforms both constrain and enable shifts to a more sustainable society and offers a number of suggestions as to how sustainability communication can be enhanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson A (1991) Source strategies and the communication of environmental affairs. Media Cult Soc 13(4):459–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A (1997) Media, Culture and the Environment. UCL, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A (2009) Media, politics and climate change: towards a new research agenda. Sociol Compass 3(2):166–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A (2011) Sources, media, and modes of climate change communication: the role of celebrities. WIRES Clim Change 2:535–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A (2013) ‘Together we can save the arctic’: celebrity advocacy and the Rio Earth Summit 2012. Celebrity Stud 4(3):339–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A (2015a) The mediatization of environmental conflict in the ‘network society.’ In: Eskjær M, Hjarvard S, Mortensen M (eds) The dynamics of mediatized conflicts. Lang, London, pp 31–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson A (2015b) Reflections on environmental communication and the challenges of a new research agenda. Environ Commun 9(3):379–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkemeyer R, Figge F, Holt D (2013) Sustainability-related media coverage and socioeconomic development: a regional and North-South perspective. Environ Plann C: Gov Policy 31(4):716–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkemeyer R, Givry P, Figge F (2018) Trends and patterns in sustainability-related media coverage: a classification of issue-level attention. Environ Plann C: Politics Space 36(5):937–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor R (2013) New media and the turn to experience in environmental communication. PhD Thesis, Simon Fraser University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor R (2018) Interactive media for sustainability. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bendor R, Lyons SH, Robinson J (2012) What’s there not to ‘like’? The technical affordances of sustainability deliberations on Facebook. eJournal eDemocracy Open Gov 4:67–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfadelli H (2010) Environmental sustainability as challenge for media and journalism. In: Gross M, Heinrichs H (eds) Environmental sociology: european perspectives and interdisciplinary challenges. Springer, New York, pp 255–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff M (2019) Creative (Climate) communications: productive pathways in science, policy and society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff M (2020) Digital cultures and climate change: “Here and now.” J Environ Media 1(1):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady WJ, Wills JA, Jost J, Tucker J, Van Bavel J, Fiske ST (2017) Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114(28):7313–7318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brereton P (2019) Environmental literacy and new digital audiences. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brevini B (2016) The value of environmental communication research. Int Commun Gaz 78(7):684–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brevini B, Murdock G (2017) Carbon capitalism and communications: confronting climate crisis. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess J, Harrison C, Maiteny P (1991) Contested meanings: the consumption of news about nature conservation. Media Cult Soc 13(4):499–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2009) Communication power. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (ed) (2005) The network society: a cross-cultural perspective. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2012) Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the internet age. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A (2019) Exercise of citizenship in network society: cyberactivism and the fight against fake news in the Brazilian context. In: Melro A, Oliveira L (Eds) Constitutional knowledge and its impact on citizenship exercise in a networked society. IGI Global, Hershey

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle S (2006) Mediatized conflict: understanding media and conflicts in the contemporary world. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox R (2007) Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environ Commun 1(1):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox R (2015) Scale, complexity, and communicative systems. Environ Commun 9(3):370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca K (1999) Image politics. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca KM, Peeples J (2002) From public sphere to public screen: democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. Crit Stud Media Commun 19(2):125–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLuca K, Lawson S, Sun Y (2012) Occupy wall street on the public screens of social media: the many framings of the birth of a protest movement. Commun Cult Critique 5:483–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depoe S (2007) Environmental communication as nexus. Environ Commun 1(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diprose K, Fern R, Vanderbeck RM, Chen L, Valentine G, Liu G, McQuaid K (2018) Corporations, consumerism and culpability: sustainability in the British press. Environ Commun 12(5):672–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulic A, Angel J, Sheppard S (2016) Designing futures: inquiry in climate change communication. Futures 81:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fankhauser S, de Menezes A, Opacic N (2019) UK research on the social science of climate change: a synthesis of ESRC and related investments. Policy Report, Place-Based Climate Action Network, London School of Economics and Political Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer D, Haucke F, Sundermann A (2017) What does the media mean by ‘sustainability’ or ‘sustainable development’? An empirical analysis of sustainability terminology in German newspapers over two decades. Sust Dev 25(6):610–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Globescan (2016) Awareness of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) vs Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). https://globescan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Radar_eBrief_SDGvsMDG.pdf

  • Goldsmith B (2016) Why selling the SDGs isn’t as easy as ABC. Thomson Reuters Foundation News

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen A (1991) The media and the social construction of the environment. Media Cult Soc 13(4):443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen A (2015) Promising directions for environmental communication research. Environ Commun 9(3):384–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrabin R (2000) Reporting sustainable development: a broadcast journalist’s view. In: Smith J (ed) The daily globe: environmental change, the public and the media. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, pp 49–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepp A (2013) Cultures of mediatization. Policy Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard S (2008) The mediatization of society: a theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review 29(2):105–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes D, Hall S (2019) A literature review of best practice communication of climate science and impacts: guide for policy makers. Monash Climate Change Communication Research Hub, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt D, Barkemeyer R (2012) Media coverage of sustainable development issues—attention cycles or punctuated equilibrium? Sustain Dev 20:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber B, Barnidge M, Gil de Zúñiga H, Liu J (2019) Fostering public trust in science: the role of social media. Public Underst Sci 28(7):759–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janoušková S, Hák T, Nečas V, Moldan B (2019) Sustainable development—a poorly communicated concept by mass media. Another challenge for SDGs? Sustainability 11:3181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaapa P (2019) Environmental management of the media: policy, industry, practice. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating M (1994) Media, fish and sustainability: a paper on sustainable development and the Canadian news media. National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuntsman A (2020) From digital solutionism to materialist accountability: the urgency of new interventions. J Environ Media 1(1):15–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho W (2000) Communicating sustainability: some international considerations and challenges. In: Leal FW (ed) Communicating sustainability. Frankfurt, Lang, pp 11–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal W, Borner J (2005) Mass media and sustainability. In: Communicating sustainable development: a practical guide for communications and media professionals – Part 2: mass media and sustainability. Berlin: KMGNE

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky S, Hunter J (30. January 2020) We have the vaccine for climate disinformation—let’s use it. The Conversation

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis T (2000) Representations of “Sustainable Development”: Sustaining the Status Quo? Sci Commun 21(3):244–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenfeld LA, Hall DM, McGreavy B, Silka L, Hart D (2012) Creating a place for environmental communication research in sustainability science. Environ Commun 6:23–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell R, Miller T (2010) Greening the media. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell R, Miller T (2019) How green is your smart phone? Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse S (2010) Out of sight, out of mind. Reporting of three indices in the UK National Press between 1990 and 2009. Sustain Devel 21(4):242–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC (2016) Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say? Wiley Interdisc Rev Clim Change 7(3):345–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock G, Brevini B (2019) Communications and the capitalocene: disputed ecologies, contested economies, competing futures. Polit Econ Commun 7(1):51–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman N, Fletcher R, Kalogeropoulos A, Levy D, Nielsen R (2018) Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2018. Oxford: Reuters Institute and University Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman N, Fletcher R, Kalogeropoulos A, Nielsen RK (2019) Reuters digital news report 2019. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017) What people know and think about the sustainable development goals. https://www.oecd.org/development/pgd/International_Survey_Data_DevCom_June%202017.pdf

  • O’Neill S, Boykoff M (2011) The role of new media in engaging the public with climate change. In: Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S, Lorenzoni I (eds) Engaging the public with climate change: behaviour change and communication. Earthscan, London, pp 233–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Oravec C (1981) John Muir, Yosemite, and the sublime response: a study in the rhetoric of preservationism. Q J Speech 67:245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oravec C (1984) Conservationism vs. preservationism: The “public interest” in the Hetch Hetchy controversy, Q J Speech 70(4):444–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Pezzullo P, Cox R (2018) Environmental communication and the public sphere. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Philo G, Happer C (2013) Communicating Climate Change and Energy Security: New Methods in Audience Research. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer MS, Schlichting I (2014) Media representations of climate change: a meta-analysis of the research field. Environ Commun 8(2):142–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth O, Angel J, Sheppard S, Dulic A (2014) Visual climate change communication: from iconography to locally framed 3D visualization. Environ Commun 8(4):413–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senecah SL (2007) Impetus, mission, and future of the environmental communication commission/division: are we still on track? were we ever? Environ Commun 1(1):21–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith H, Suldovsky B, Lindenfeld L (2016) Mass communication research in sustainability science: moving toward an engaged approach to address society’s sustainability dilemma. Mass Commun Soc 19(5):548–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci Z (2013) ‘Not this one’ social movements, the attention economy, and microcelebrity networked activism. Am Behav Sci 57(7):848–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan H (2019) Hollywood’s dirtiest secret: the hidden environmental cost of the movies. Columbia University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Voisey H, Church C (2000) Media coverage of sustainable development and local agenda 21. In: Smith J (ed) The daily globe: environmental change, the public and the media. Earthscan Publications Ltd., London, pp 198–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams H, McMurray JR, Kurz T et al (2015) Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Glob Environ Change 32:126–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacoumis P (2018) Making progress? Reproducing hegemony through discourses of “sustainable development” in the Australian news media. Environ Commun 12(6):840–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Anderson A (2014) Media, environment and the network society. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bendor R (2018) Interactive media for sustainability. Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzullo P, Cox R (2018) Environmental communication and the public sphere. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Anderson, A. (2021). Sustainability in Environmental Communication Research: Emerging Trends and Future Challenges. In: Weder, F., Krainer, L., Karmasin, M. (eds) The Sustainability Communication Reader. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31882-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31883-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics