Abstract
The following chapter explores implicitly and explicitly communicated value judgments in documentaries on environmental and sustainability issues. The insights exemplified within films on food production, processing and sustainable (and unsustainable) patterns of consumption will be used in a theoretical deconstruction of value judgments in relation to sustainability. They simultaneously show the potential of using documentaries to construct sustainability as moral framework. In this chapter, environmental and explicitly sustainability-focused documentaries are identified as mostly reflexive and performative and thus are conceptualized as having moral agency. To this purpose the chapter ends with a discussion of three regulative ideas which, firstly, might be used as guidelines in creating critical media productions in the field of environmental documentaries in the future, and secondly, show the potential for empirical follow-up research from the perspective of sustainability as moral framework in visual communication.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aaltola E (2014) Varieties of empathy and moral agency. Topoi 33(1):243–253
Allen M (2016) Strategic communication for sustainable organizations: theory and practice. Springer, Cham et al.
Arendt F, Matthes J (2016) Nature documentaries, connectedness to nature, and pro-environmental behavior. Environ Commun 10(4):453–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.993415
Anders P, Staiger M, Albrecht C, Rüsel M, Vorst C (2019) Einführung in die Filmdidaktik. Heidelberg et al, Metzler
Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Politics 3:24–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003322757916
Barbas T, Paraskevopoulos S, Stamou A (2009) The effect of nature documentaries on students’ environmental sensitivity: a case study. Learn Media Technol 34:61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902759943
Beam B, Buck E, Parrott J, Specht A, Whittington, MS (2017) Lights, cameras, and agricultural documentaries: understanding viewers’ interpretation of source credibility in food documentary films. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/2009445987/
Bergmann J, Luckmann, T (Ed.) (1999) Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. Band 1: Struktur und Dynamik der Formen moralischer Kommunikation. Opladen, Bd 2: Von der Moral zu den Moralen. Google Scholar
Bernauer T, McGrath LF (2016) Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nature climate change available: https://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate2948.html [Jan, 2020].
Binder AR, Scheufele DA, Brossard D (2012) Misguided science policy? The pitfalls of using public meetings as surrogate gauges of public opinion. The Scientist, April 10. available: https://the-scientist.com/2012/04/10/opinion-misguided-science-policy [Jan, 2020].
BMU, Carbon Footprint. https://www.bmu.de/themen/wirtschaft-produkte-ressourcen-tourismus/produkte-und-konsum/produktbereiche/konsum-und-ernaehrung/. August 21, 2019
BMU, Planetare Grenzen, https://www.bmu.de/themen/nachhaltigkeit-internationales/nachhaltige-entwicklung/integriertes-umweltprogramm-2030/planetare-belastbarkeitsgrenzen/, August 21, 2019
Bolsen T, Druckman JN (2015) Counteracting the politicization of science. J Commun 65(5):745–769
Brackin P et al (2011) Institutionalized: organizational obstacles to communicating sustainability. IEEE Int Prof Commun Conf 2011:1–5
Brandon V, Foss K, Nodulman J, Littlejohn S, Robinson J, White J (2014) Fantasy-theme analysis of food documentaries: contention, collaboration, and consultation as health promotion approaches. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1622142786/
Brereton Pat (2018) Food documentaries and green anxieties: actively promoting environ5 mental literacy. French J Media Res. https://doaj.org/article/c1377c53569246bea7fd3ae92b2ab3e0
Brossard D, Scheufele DA (2013) Science, new media, and the public. Sci 339(6115):40–41
Burleson BR (1989) The constructivist approach to person-centerer communication: analysis of a research exemplar. In: Dervin B, Grossberg L, O’Keefe BJ, Wartella E (eds) Rethinking communication: paradigm exemplars. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 33–72
Christensen LT, Morsing M, Thyssen O (2017) License to critique: a communication perspective on sustainability standards. Bus Ethics Q 27:239–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.66
Christmann GB (1999) Moralisierungsaskese in der Kommunikation von Ökologiegruppen. In: Bergmann J, Luckmann T (eds) Kommunikative Konstruktion von Moral. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden
Cook J (2016) Countering climate science denial and communicating scientific consensus. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. http://climatescience.oxfordre.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-314 [Jan. 2020].
Creswell JW (2007) Qualitative inquiry & research design. Choosing among five traditions, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Delia J, O’Keefe BJ, O’Keefe DJ (1982) The constructivist approach to communication. In: Dance FEX (ed) Human communication theory: comparative essays. Harper and Row, New York, pp 147–191
Gordon AD, Kittross JM, Merrill JC, Reuss C (1999) Controversies in media ethics, 2d edn. Addison Wesley Longman, New York
Habermas J (1973) Erkenntnis und Interesse. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
Habermas J (1992) Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtstaates. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
Hall S (1997) Representation: cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage, Londo.
Herrick CN, Pratt JL (2013) Communication and the narrative basis of sustainability: observations from the municipal water sector. Sustainability 5:4428–4443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5104428
Hmielowski JD, Feldman L, Myers TA, Lieserowitz A, Maibach E (2014) An attack on science? media use, trust in scientists, and perception of global warming. Pub Underst Sci 23(7):866–883
Janpol HL, Dilts R (2016) Does viewing documentary films affect environmental perceptions and behaviors? Appl Environ Educ Commun 15(1):90–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2016.1142197
Johannesen RL, Valde KS, Whedbee KE (2008) Ethics in human communication, 6th edn. Waveland, Long Grove
Karmasin M, Bichler K (2017) Corporate social responsibility in the media industry: setting the benchmark of falling behind? In: Altmeppen K-D, Hollifield CA, van Loon J (eds) Value-oriented media management: decision making between profit and responsibility. Springer, Cham, pp 135–146
Knoblauch H (1995) Kommunikationskultur: Die kommunikative Konstruktion kultureller Kontexte. Google Scholar, Berlin
Lindenfeld L (2010) Can documentary food films like food Inc. Achieve their promise? Environ Commun 4(3):378–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2010.500449
Lindlof TR (2008) Constructivism. In: Donsbach W (ed) International encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, vol 3. Blackwell, Malden, pp 944–950
Luckmann T (2001) Sinn in Sozialstruktur. In: Brosziewski A, Eberle TS, Maeder C (eds) Moderne Zeiten. Reflexionen zur Multioptionsgesellschaft. UVK-Verl.-Ges., Konstanz, pp 311–325
Milstein T, Anguiano C, Sandoval J, Chen Y, Dickinson E (2011) Communicating a “new” environmental vernacular: a sense of relations-in-place. Commun Monogr 78:486–510
Murray RL, Heumann JK (2012) Contemporary eco-food films: the documentary tradition. Stud Doc Film, 6, 43–59. [Taylor & Francis Online]
NABU 2020 Ökologischer Rucksack. www.nabu.de/themen/konsumressourcenmuell/waskannichtun/oekologischerrucksack.html, August 21, 2019.
Nichols B (2001) Introduction to Documentary. Indiana University Press, Bloomington & Indianapolis, Indiana
Plaisance P (2014) Media ethics 55 city road. SAGE Publications, Inc., London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781544308517
Pörksen B (2010) Konstruktivismus. In: Schicha C, Brosda C (eds) Handbuch Medienethik. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp 53–67
Polanyi M (1985) Implizites Wissen. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a. M.
Rasche A, Morsing M, Moon J (2017) Corporate social responsibility. Strategy, communication, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Rockström J et al. (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32
Schiavo R (2016) Revisiting media ethics in the age of global public conversations. J Commun Healthc 9(3):143–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538068.2016.1242211
Schicha C (2019) Medienethik. UTB, Stuttgart
Schicha C, Brosda C (2000) Medienethik zwischen Theorie und Praxis: Normen für dieKommunikationsgesellschaft, Lit.
Schnettler B (2006) Thomas Luckmann: Kultur zwischen Konstitution, Konstruktion und Kommunikation. In: Moebius S, Quadflieg D (eds) Kultur. Theorien der Gegenwart. VS Verlag, Wiesbaden
Slovic P (2016) Understanding perceived risk: 1978–2015. Environ Sci Policy Sustainable Dev 58(1):25–29
Smaill B (2014) New food documentary: animals, identification, and the citizen consumer. Film Criticism, xxxix(2): 79–102. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1745705883/
Spence A, Pidgeon N (2010) Framing and communicating climate change: the effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):656–667
Stiftung für die Rechte zukünftiger Generationen (2007) Generationengerechtigkeit. Was ist Gerechtigkeit? 4. https://generationengerechtigkeit.info/
Stockholm Resilience Centre 2020 https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries/planetary-boundaries/about-the-research/the-nine-planetary-boundaries.html. January 24, 2020.
Taylor JR, Van Every EJ (2011) The situated organization. Case studies in the pragmatics of communication research. Routledge, New York
Thompson DB, McDonald B (2013) What Food is “Good” for You? toward a pragmatic consideration of multiple values domains. J Agricu Environ Ethics 26(1):137–163
Umweltbundesamt, Treibhausgasausstoß (2019) https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/376/bilder/01_abb_treibhausgasausstoss_pro_kopf_in_deutschland_nach_konsumbereichen_2017.png. (Aug. 2019)
UN (2019) Sustainable development goals. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs. Jan. 2020.
Vogt M, Ostheimer J, Uekötter F (eds) (2013) Wo steht die Umweltethik? Argumentationsmuster im Wandel. Beiträge zur sozialwissenschaftlichen Nachhaltigkeitsforschung, vol 5. Metropolis, Marburg
Wallace RJ (1994) Responsibility and the moral sentiments. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Weder F (2017) CSR as common sense issue. In: Diehl S, Karmasin M, Mueller B, Terlutter R, Weder F (eds) Handbook of integrated CSR communication. Springer, Berlin, pp 23–36
Weder F, Krainer L (2011)(Eds) (2011) Medienjournal 1/2011, Special Issue: Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation
Weder F, Lemke S, Tungarat A (2019) (Re)storying sustainability: the Use of story cubes in narrative inquiries to understand individual perceptions of sustainability. Sustainability 11(19). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195264
Weick KE (1979) The social psychology of organizing, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Weizsäcker EU, v Wijkman A (2017) Come On!: capitalism, short-termism, population and the destruction of the planet. Springer, New York
Wilkins L, Coleman R (2005) The moral media: how journalists reason about ethics. Erlbaum, Mahwah
Yearley S (2005) Making sense of science. SAGE Publications, London
Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gottwald, FT., Weder, F. (2021). Food and Morality: Deconstruction of Value Judgments in Sustainability Documentary Films. In: Weder, F., Krainer, L., Karmasin, M. (eds) The Sustainability Communication Reader. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31883-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31882-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31883-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)