Skip to main content

Abstract

Situated at the intersection of time, power and education, we elaborate an argument for diffracting temporality to eschew the arrow of time, which promulgates pressure in modern societies. Risk adverse, neoliberal systems of education often invoke temporality as a reason not to provide genuine inclusive opportunities for diverse learners. Learning it would seem, comes at the cost of genuine inclusion. Drawing on the theoretical resources of chronopolitics, risk society and relational ontologies, we demonstrate that time is frequently put to work in the service of controlling and colonising education. Technology has come to dominate education—paradoxically saving time whilst permeating the membrane the professional and the personal for teachers and students. We deploy a methodological framework to diffract the temporal, fusing the past, together with present-future simultaneously, so as to re-imagine relational ontologies in the act of becoming. Temporality is demonstrably diffracted through the methodology, in an empirical project which is undertaken with pre-service teachers on a global education program in the South Pacific. The chapter concludes with a set of principles for explicitly drawing on time to inform wider applications of educational research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, B. (1995). Timewatch: the social analysis of time. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B. (2003). Reflexive Modernization Temporalized. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020002004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, B., & Allan, S. (1995). Theorizing culture: An interdisciplinary critique after postmodernism. New York, NY: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. (1996). Foucault and Special Educational Needs: A ‘box of tools’ for analysing children’s experiences of mainstreaming. Disability & Society, 11(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599650023245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, J., & Roberts, J. (2003). Living with Cyberspace: Technology and Society in the 21st Century. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2017). Foucault as educator. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13534645.2014.927623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2007). Liquid times: living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The Theory of Reflexive Modernization: Problematic, Hypotheses and Research Programme. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020002001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellingham, R., Thomas, M. K. E., Charman, K., Dixon, M., & Cooper, J. (2019). What Is Valued Knowledge and Where Does It Live? Educational Consciousness and the Democratisation of Education. In S. Riddle. & M. W. Apple (Eds.), Re-imagining Education for Democracy (pp. 77–91). London, United Kingdom: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, M., & Seeber, B. (2016). Slow Professor: Challenging the Culture of Speed in the Academy. Toronto, Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bogard, W. (2012). Simulation and Post-Panopticism. In K. Ball, K. Haggerty, & D. Lyon (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Surveillance Studies (pp. 30–37). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bozalek, V., & Zembylas, M. (2017). Diffraction or reflection? Sketching the contours of two methodologies in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1201166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, S. J. (2016). Post-panopticism and school inspection in England. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(4), 623–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2014.965806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coxon, S. (2012). Slow Bread, Slow Cities, Slow Pedagogy: Dale Primary School, Derby. In N. Owen (Ed.), Placing Students at the Heart of Creative Learning. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. K., & Arasaratnam-Smith, L. A. (2017). Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: International Approaches, Assessment and Application. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Done, E. J., & Murphy, M. (2016). The responsibilisation of teachers: a neoliberal solution to the problem of inclusion. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 39(1), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1243517.

  • Eacott, S. (2017). Beyond Leadership: A Relational Approach to Organizational Theory in Education. Singapore, Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher, G. (1989). Disabling Policies?: A Comparative Approach to Education Policy and Disability. London, UK: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glennie, P., & Thrift, N. (2009). Shaping the Day: A History of Timekeeping in England and Wales 1300–1800. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K. D., & Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. The British Journal of Sociology(4), 605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1997). Modest− Witness@ Second− Millennium. FemaleMan− Meets− OncoMouse: Feminism and Technoscience. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the Knowledge Society: Education in the Age of Insecurity. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphry, N. (2014). Disrupting deficit: the power of ‘the pause’ in resisting the dominance of deficit knowledges in education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(5), 484–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2013.789087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judith, L. K. (1981). Socialization and the Symbolic Order of the School. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 12(4), 258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, J., Burnett, B., & Morse, K. (2015). Destabilising Privilege: disrupting deficit thinking in white pre-service teachers on field experience in culturally diverse, high-poverty schools. In Tania Ferfolja, C. J. Díaz, & J. Ullman (Eds.), Understanding Sociological Theory for Educational Practices (pp. 76–92). Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, T. C. W. (2019). Slowness, disability, and academic productivity: The need to rethink academic culture. In C. McMaster & B. Whitburn. (Eds.), Disability at the University: A Disabled Students’ Manifesto. New York, NY: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibowitz, B., & Bozalek, V. (2018). Towards a Slow scholarship of teaching and learning in the South. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(8), 981–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1452730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingard, B., & Thompson, G. (2017). Doing time in the sociology of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2016.1260854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolev, J., Sullivan, A., & Slee, R. (2019). The datafication of discipline: ClassDojo, surveillance and a performative classroom culture. Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2018.1558237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. (2014). Lessons from the Great Underground Empire: Pedagogy, Computers and False Dawn. In A. Tatnall & B. Davey (Eds.), Reflections on the History of Computers in Education: Early Use of Computers and Teaching about Computing in Schools (pp. 1-25). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, G. N. (2016). Five challenges in Australian school education. Retrieved from.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGloin, C., & Georgeou, N. (2016). ‘Looks good on your CV’: The sociology of voluntourism recruitment in higher education. Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783314562416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittler, P. (2009). The Global Context of Inclusive Education: The Role of the United Nations. In D. Mitchell (Ed.), Contextualizing Inclusive Education: Evaluating Old and New International Paradigms (pp. 22–36). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mockler, N. (2011). Beyond ‘what works’: Understanding teacher identity as a practical and political tool. Teachers and teaching: theory and practice, 17(5), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2011.602059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, D. (2015). The Visibility and Invisibility of Performance Management in Schools. British Educational Research Journal, 41(6), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, B. C., & Kausimae, P. (2012). Social Policies in Solomon Islands and Vanuatu. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development: London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritzer, G. (2013). The McDonaldization of Society: 20th Anniversary Edition. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing Education Policy. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santiago, P., Donaldson, G., Herman, J., & Shewbridge, C. (2011). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Australia. OECD Publishing (NJ1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos-Trigo, M., & Reyes-Martínez, I. (2019). High school prospective teachers’ problem-solving reasoning that involves the coordinated use of digital technologies. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(2), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2018.1489075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, S. (2014). In the Meantime: Temporality and Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slattery, P. (1995). A postmodern vision of time and learning: a response to the National Education Commission Report Prisoners of Time. Harvard Educational Review(4), 612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee, R. (2018). Inclusive Education isn’t Dead, it just Smells Funny. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, T. (2016). Cyber Security and the Politics of Time. London, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatnall, A., & Davey, B. (2014). Reflections on the History of Computers in Education: Early Use of Computers and Teaching about Computing in Schools. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. K. E. (2020). Swarms and Murmurations. In M. K. E. Thomas & R. Bellingham (Eds.), Post-Qualitative Research and Innovative Methodologies (pp. 153–171). London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. K. E., & Bellingham, R. (Eds.). (2020). Post-Qualitative Research and Innovative Methodologies. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. K. E, Weston, H, Whitburn, B, & McCandless, T. (2018). Global Experience for Pre-Service Teachers: Challenging settings, temporality and the AITSL standards. Vanuatu, South Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. K. E., & Whitburn, B. (2019). Time for inclusion? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(2), 159–173. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1512848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1990). World Declaration on Education for All. Jomtien, Thailand: United Nations Educational Scientific Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for action on special needs education: adopted by the World Conference on Special Needs Education; Access and Quality. Salamanca, Spain, 7–10 June 1994. Salamanca, Spain: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Virilio, P. (2008). Pure war: Twenty-Five Years Later: (M. Polizzotti, Trans. S. Lotringer Ed.). Los Angeles, Calif.: Semiotexte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitburn, B., & Corcoran, T. (2019). Ontologies of Inclusion and Teacher Education. In B. M. Rice (Ed.), Global Perspectives on Inclusive Teacher Education (pp. 1–15). Hershey, PA: IGI Global, Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitburn, B., & Thomas, M. K. E. (2021). Risks in Time: To Inclusive Educational Rights. In Matthew Krehl Edward Thomas, Leechin Heng, & Peter Walker (Eds.), Inclusive Education is a Right, right? (Vol. 47, pp. 37–50). Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to Ms. Helen Weston, successive Global Experience Cohorts and the students and teachers of Port Villa and Espiritu Santo, Vanuatu for their contributions to the research we have drawn on in this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Krehl Edward Thomas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thomas, M.K.E., Whitburn, B. (2020). Time, Power and Education. Zeit, Macht und Bildung. In: Schilling, E., O'Neill, M. (eds) Frontiers in Time Research – Einführung in die interdisziplinäre Zeitforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31252-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31252-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31251-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31252-7

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics