Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ein neuer Blick auf Schulentwicklung. Das Zusammenspiel zwischen impliziten und expliziten Prozessen der Weiterentwicklung der Einzelschule

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Schulentwicklung als Theorieprojekt

Part of the book series: Schule und Gesellschaft ((SUGES,volume 61))

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag wird, ausgehend von Theorien des organisationalen Lernens und des selbstregulierten Lernens, das Zusammenspiel zwischen impliziten, relativ stabilen und expliziten, systematisch gestalteten Prozessen der Schulentwicklung untersucht. Wir argumentieren, dass es die Analyse dieses Zusammenspiels besser ermöglicht herauszuarbeiten, welche stabilen Orientierungen und Praktiken den Schulentwicklungsalltag der Akteur*innen in der Schule prägen sowie wann und in welchen Situationen diese impliziten, routinierten Prozesse unterbrochen werden, weil sie für die Bearbeitung spezifischer schulinterner oder schulexterner Herausforderungen nicht (mehr) funktional sind bzw. zu sein scheinen. Es wird ein theoretisches Rahmenmodell entwickelt, dessen Potential für die Schulentwicklungsforschung aufgezeigt wird, dessen Schwächen aber auch diskutiert werden.

Katharina Maag Merki und Andrea Wullschleger haben diesen Beitrag in geteilter Erstautorinnenschaft verfasst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organisational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: A review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643–678. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dth026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryk, A. S., Bender Sebring, P., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement. Lessons from Chicago. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camburn, E. M. (2010). Embedded teacher learning opportunities as a site for reflective practice: An exploratory study. American Journal of Education, 116, 463–489. https://dx.doi.org/10.1086/653624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camburn, E. M., & Won Han, S. (2017). Teachers’ professional learning experiences and their engagement in reflective practice: A replication study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(4), 527–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2017.1302968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, D. K., Spillane, J. P., & Peurach, D. J. (2018). The dilemmas of educational reform. Educational Researcher, 47(3), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0013189X17743488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2012). Improving quality in education. Dynamic approaches to school improvement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Nobile, J. (2017). Towards a theoretical model of middle leadership in schools. School Leadership & Management, 38(4), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2017.1411902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students. A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and secondary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3(3), 231–264. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-008-9029-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, M., & Maag Merki, K. (2014). Die Entwicklung von Schule. Theorie – Forschung – Praxis. Enzyklopädie Erziehungswissenschaft online. Fachgebiet/Unterüberschrift: Erziehungs- und Bildungssoziologie, Makrosoziologische Analysen: Funktionen, Strukturen und Institutionen, 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerich, M., & Werner, S. (2013). Kooperationsgestützte Unterrichtsentwicklung zwischen Interventionslogik und schulischer Eigenrationalität. In M. Keller-Schneider, S. Albisser, & J. Wissinger (Hrsg.), Professionalität und Kooperation in Schulen. Beiträge zur Diskussion über Schulqualität (S. 167–184). Bad Heilbrunn: Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2010). Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farley-Ripple, E., & Buttram, J. (2015). The development of capacity for data use: The role of teacher networks in an elementary school. Teachers College Record, 117(4), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 94–118. https://doi.org/10.2307%2F3556620.

  • Fend, H. (1986). „Gute Schulen – Schlechte Schulen“. Die einzelne Schule als pädagogische Handlungseinheit. Deutsche Schule, 78(3), 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian, J. (2000). Sustaining education reform: Influential factors. Aurora: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2016). The NEW meaning of educational change (5. Aufl.). New York: Teachers College Press, Routledge, Ontario Principals’ Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Göhlich, M. (2018). Organisationales Lernen als zentraler Gegenstand der Organisationspädagogik. In M. Göhlich, A. Schröer, & S. M. Weber (Hrsg.), Handbuch Organisationspädagogik (S. 365–379). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Teachers’ reflective practice in lesson study: A tool for improving instructional practice. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 63(3), 314–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Hrsg.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (S. 65–84). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2011). Exploring the journey of school improvement: Classifying and analyzing patterns of change in school improvement processes and learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2010.536322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., & Chrispeels, J. H. (2006). Improving schools and educational systems: International perspectives. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., Chapman, C., Muijs, D., Russ, J., & Stoll, L. (2006). Improving schools in challenging contexts: Exploring the possible. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450600743483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtappels, H. G. (2014). Schulentwicklung und Schulwirksamkeit als Forschungsfeld. Theorieansätze und Forschungserkenntnisse zum schulischen Wandel. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtappels, H. G., & Rolff, H.-G. (2004). Zum Stand von Schulentwicklungstheorie und -forschung. In U. Popp & S. Reh (Hrsg.), Schule forschend entwickeln. Schul- und Unterrichtsentwicklung zwischen Systemzwang und Reformansprüchen (S. 51–74). Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (2005). Introduction. Tensions in and prospects for school improvement. In D. Hopkins (Hrsg.), The practice and theory of school improvement. International handbook of educational change (S. 1–21). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D. (2013). Exploding the myths of school reform. School Leadership & Management, 33(4), 304–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2013.793493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D., & Reynolds, D. (2001). The past, present and future of school improvement: Towards the third age. British Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920120071461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, D., Stringfield, S., Harris, A., Stoll, L., & Mackay, T. (2014). School and system improvement: A narrative state-of-the-art review. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 257–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Järvenoja, H., Järvelä, S., & Malmberg, J. (2015). Understanding regulated learning in situative and contextual frameworks. Educational Psychologist, 50(3), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1075400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolleck, N. (2014). Innovations through networks: Understanding the role of social relations for educational innovations. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 17, 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0547-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00101-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyndt, E., Gijbels, D., Grosemans, I., & Donche, V. (2016). Teachers’ everyday professional development: Mapping informal learning activities, antecedents, and learning outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 1111–1150. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654315627864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides, L., Charalambous, E., Creemers, B. P. M., Antoniou, P., Devine, D., Papastylianou, D., & Fahie, D. (2019). Using the dynamic approach to school improvement to promote quality and equity in education. An European study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31, 121–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9289-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Leonard, L., & Sharratt, L. (1998). Conditions fostering organizational learning in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 243–276. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X98034002005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–348. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.14.080188.001535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipshitz, R., Friedman, V. J., & Popper, M. (2007). Demystifying organizational learning. Thousan Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maag Merki, K. (2008). Die Architektur einer Theorie der Schulentwicklung. Strukturanalyse und Interdependenzen. journal für schulentwicklung, 12(2), 22–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maag Merki, K. (2020). Das Educational Governance-System im Dienste der Schulentwicklung. Oder: Wie kann Steuerung die Weiterentwicklung von Schulen unterstützen? In I. Van Ackeren, H. Bremer, F. Kessl, H. C. Koller, N. Pfaff, C. Rotter, E. D. Klein, & U. Salaschek (Hrsg.), Bewegungen. Beiträge zum 26. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Erziehungswissenschaft (S. 405–417). Opladen: Barbara Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maag Merki, K. (im Druck). Schulentwicklungsforschung. In T. Hascher, T.-S. Idel & W. Helsper (Hrsg.), Handbuch Schulforschung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maag Merki, K., & Emmerich, M. (2011). Schulexterne Steuerungsinstrumente der Schulentwicklung. In H. Altrichter & C. Helm (Hrsg.), Akteure & Instrumente der Schulentwicklung (S. 151–168). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maag Merki, K., Grob, U., Rechsteiner, B., Wullschleger, A., Schori, N., & Rickenbacher, A. (im Druck). Regulation activities of teachers in secondary schools: Development of a theoretical framework and exploratory analyses in four secondary schools based on time sampling data. In A. Oude Groote Beverborg, K. Maag Merki, T. Feldhoff & F. Radisch (Hrsg.), Concept and design developments in school improvement research. State of the art. Longitudinal, multilevel, and mixed methods and their relevance for educational accountability. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olsen, J. (1975). The uncertainty of the past. Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1975.tb00521.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, M., Geldhof, J., Morrison, F., Gestsdottir, S., Cameron, C., Bowers, E., Duckworth, A., Little, T., & Grammer, J. (2018). Self-regulation. In N. Halfon, C. B. Forrest, R. M. Lerner, & E. M. Faustman (Hrsg.), Handbook of life course health development (S. 275–298). Cham: Springer Nature.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, C., Moolenaar, N. M., Struyve, C., Vandecandelaere, M., Gielen, S., & Kyndt, E. (2017). The measurement of collaborative culture in secondary schools: An informal subgroup approach. Frontline Learning Research, 5(2), 24–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miner, A. S., Ciuchta, M. P., & Gong, Y. (2008). Organizational routines and organizational learning. In M. C. Becker (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational routines (S. 152–186). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2011). Profound improvement. Building learning-community capacity on living-system principles (2. Aufl.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D., Van der Werf, G., Creemers, B. P. M., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art – Teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 231–256. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palardy, G. J. (2008). Differential school effects among low, middle, and high social class composition schools: A multilevel, multiple group latent growth curve analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(1), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450801936845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(422). https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

  • Persico, D., Milligan, C., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). The interplay between self-regulated professional learning and teachers’ work-practice. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 191, 2481–2486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolff, H.-G. (1991). Schulentwicklung als Entwicklung von Einzelschulen? Theorien und Indikatoren von Entwicklungsprozessen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 37(6), 866–886.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolff, H.-G. (1993). Wandel durch Selbstorganisation. Theoretische Grundlagen und praktische Hinweise für eine bessere Schule. Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolff, H.-G. (1998). Entwicklung von Einzelschulen: Viel Praxis, wenig Theorie und kaum Forschung – Ein Versuch, Schulentwicklung zu systematisieren. Daten, Beispiele und Perspektiven. In H.-G. Rolff, K.-O. Bauer, K. Klemm, & H. Pfeiffer (Hrsg.), Jahrbuch der Schulentwicklung (Bd. 10, S. 295–326). Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, C., & Atarchi, L. (2014). The meaning and measure of organizational learning mechanisms in secondary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(4), 577–609. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13508772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J. (2014). School, teaching, and system effectiveness: some comments on three state-of-the-art reviews. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational Research, 61(3), 257–273. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. The American Economics Review, 49(3), 258–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., & Hunt, B. R. (2010). Days of their lives: A mixed-methods, descriptive analysis of the men and women at work in the principal’s office. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(3), 293–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270903527623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillane, J. P., Shirrell, M., & Adhikari, S. (2018). Constructing “experts” among peers: Educational infrastructure, test data, and teachers’ interactions about teaching. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(4), 586–612. https://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0162373718785764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. C. (2008). Improving secondary students’ academic achievement through a focus on reform reliability: 4- and 9-year findings from the High Reliability Schools project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(4), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243450802535190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C. B., & Stringfield, S. (2006). A brief history of school improvement research in the USA. In A. Harris & J. H. Chrispeels (Hrsg.), Improving schools and educational systems (S. 23–38). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teacher and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenmann, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Interaction between learning and developement. In L. S. Vykotsky (Hrsg.), Mind and society (S. 79–91). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Hrsg.), Handbook of research in teaching (S. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Hrsg.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (S. 15–32). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Hrsg.), Metacognition in education theory and practice (S. 277–304). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Hrsg.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (S. 297–314). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, J., & Leutner, D. (2008). Self-regulated learning as a competence. Implications of theoretical models for assessment methods. Journal of Psychology, 216(2), 102–110. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/0044-3409.216.2.102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1986). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(86)90027-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Zürich, Institut für Erziehungswissenschaft, Zürich, Deutschland

    Katharina Maag Merki, Andrea Wullschleger & Beat Rechsteiner

Authors
  1. Katharina Maag Merki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Wullschleger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beat Rechsteiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Maag Merki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät Erziehungswissenschaften, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany

    Anna Moldenhauer

  2. FB Erziehungswissenschaften, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany

    Barbara Asbrand

  3. FB Erziehungswissenschaften, Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany

    Merle Hummrich

  4. Institut für Pädagogik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Niedersachsen, Germany

    Till-Sebastian Idel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Merki, K.M., Wullschleger, A., Rechsteiner, B. (2021). Ein neuer Blick auf Schulentwicklung. Das Zusammenspiel zwischen impliziten und expliziten Prozessen der Weiterentwicklung der Einzelschule. In: Moldenhauer, A., Asbrand, B., Hummrich, M., Idel, TS. (eds) Schulentwicklung als Theorieprojekt . Schule und Gesellschaft, vol 61. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30774-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30774-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-30773-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-30774-5

  • eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation