Zusammenfassung
Emotionen, Gefühle, vergangene Erfahrungen, die eigene Identität und soziale Interaktionen beeinflussen, wie wir Landschaft wahrnehmen und wertschätzen. Wahrgenommene Werte von Landschaften variieren daher ganz grundlegend zwischen verschiedenen Menschen. Aus diesem Grund definiert beispielsweise die Europäische Landschaftskonvention Landschaft „as a zone or area as perceived by local people or visitors“ (ELC art. 1, para. 38). Für anwendungsorientierte Disziplinen wie die Landschaftsplanung bedeutet dies oft eine große Herausforderung. Informationen darüber, wie Landschaft durch viele Menschen wahrgenommen wird sind entweder nur aufwendig zu beschaffen oder schlichtweg nicht verfügbar. Die hier vorgestellte Visualisierungsmethode von ‚Tag Maps‘ nutzt Daten aus Sozialen Medien als neue Informationsquelle, um subjektive Wert- und Bedeutungszuschreibungen von vielen Menschen darzustellen. Die Grafiken sind besonders geeignet, um Gemeinsamkeiten der Wahrnehmung vieler Menschen kartografisch auszuwerten. Die Ergebnisse können als zusätzliche Informationsquelle genutzt werden, um Planungsentscheidungen auf eine breitere, repräsentativere Basis zu stellen. Aufgrund der Generalisierung sind der Interpretation von Tag Maps Grenzen gesetzt, welche im Abschluss diskutiert werden. Betont wird die Bedeutung der vorgestellten Methode als Ausgangspunkt für weiterführende aktive Beteiligung und Diskussion von und mit der Bevölkerung.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
github.com/sieboldianus/tagmaps
- 2.
unicode.org/emoji/charts-12.0/
Literatur
Albrechts, L. (2003). Public involvement: The challenges of difference. Disp, 155, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2003.10556860.
Alivand, M., & Hochmair, H. (2013). Extracting scenic routes from VGI data sources. In Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Crowdsourced and Volunteered Geographic Information – GEOCROWD, 13, 23–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2534732.2534743.
Antoniou, V., Morley, J., & Haklay, M. (2010). Web 2.0 geotagged photos: Assessing the spatial dimension of the phenomenon. Geomatica, 64(1), 99–110.
Arriaza, M., Cañas-Ortega, J. F., Cañas-Madueño, J. A., & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1), 115–125.
Arthur, L. M., Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1977). Scenic assessment: An overview. Landscape Planning, 4, 109–129.
Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Bell, S. (2001). Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 201–211.
Boler, M., & Davis, E. (2018). The affective politics of the „post-truth“ era: Feeling rules and networked subjects. Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.03.002.
Boy, J. D., & Uitermark, J. (2016). How to study the city on Instagram. PLoS ONE, 11(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158161.
Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information Communication and Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
Chen, Y., Parkins, J. R., & Sherren, K. (2017). Using geo-tagged Instagram posts to reveal landscape values around current and proposed hydroelectric dams and their reservoirs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.07.004.
Collier, J. (1967). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Council of Europe. (2000). European Landscape Convention (ELC). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Dakin, S. (2003). There’s more to landscape than meets the eye: Towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management. The Canadian Geographer, 47(2), 185–200.
Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 267–281.
De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260–272.
Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. Y. (2011). Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.1145/1924421.1924442.
Dunkel, A. (2014). Flickr spatiotemporal tag clouds. Interactive maps. https://maps.alexanderdunkel.com.
Dunkel, A. (2015). Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142(2015), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022.
Dunkel, A. (2016). Assessing the perceived environment through crowdsourced spatial photo content for application to the fields of landscape and urban planning. Dissertation, TU Dresden. URN: nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-207927.
Ernstson, H. (2013). The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 7–17.
Field Operations, J. C., & Renfro, D. S. (2015). The high line: Foreseen, unforeseen. London: Phaidon.
Fischer-Gäde U. (2016). Partizipation – Eine Herausforderung in der Landschaftsplanung. In Riedel, W., Lange, H., Jedicke, E., & Reinke, M. (Hrsg.), Landschaftsplanung. Berlin: Springer.
Frias-Martinez, V., Soto, V., Hohwald, H., & Frias-Martinez, E. (2012). Characterizing urban landscapes using geolocated tweets. International Conference on Social Computing, SocialCom/PASSAT, 2012, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.19.
Garduno, F. C. (2010). Photosharing on Flickr: Intangible heritage and emergent publics. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16, 4–5.
Gerlitz, C. (2016). What counts? Reflections on the multivalence of social media data. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0203..
Girardin, F., Fiore, F. D., Ratti, C., & Blat, J. (2008). Leveraging explicitly disclosed location information to understand tourist dynamics: A case study. Journal of Location Based Services, 2(1), 41–56.
Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506062337.
Greater London Authority. (2012). London view management framework: The London plan supplementary planning guidance. London: Greater London Authority.
Hahmann, S., Purves, R., & Burghardt, D. (2014). Twitter location (sometimes) matters: Exploring the relationship between georeferenced tweet content and nearby feature classes. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 9, 1.
Hauthal, E. (2013). Detection, modelling and visualisation of georeferenced emotions from user-generated content. In 26th international cartographic conference proceedings, 25–30 August, Dresden.
Hollenstein, L., & Purves, R. S. (2010). Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr to describe city cores. Scientific Journals International. https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2010.1.3.
Instagram & TechCrunch. (2018). Number of monthly active Instagram users from January 2013 to June 2018 (in millions) (S. 2018). Statista. Web.
Jones, C. B., Purves, R. S., Clough, P. D., & Joho, H. (2008). Modelling vague places with knowledge from the web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(10), 1045–1065.
Kaplan, R. (1985). The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Planning, 12(2), 161–176.
Kennedy, L., & Naaman, M. (2008). Generating diverse and representative image search results for landmarks. Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (S. 297–306). New York: ACM.
Kennedy, L., Naaman, M., Ahern, S., Nair, R., & Rattenbury, T. (2007). How Flickr helps us make sense of the world. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on multimedia ACM (S. 631–640).
Kim, A. M. (2015). Critical cartography 2.0: Moving from „participatory mapping“ to authored visualizations of power and people. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 215–225.
Kisilevich, S., Andrienko, G., Krstajic, M., Keim, D., & Andrienko, N. (2010). Event-based analysis of people’s activities and behavior using Flickr and Panoramio geotagged photo collections. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on information visualisation (S. 289–296).
König, R. (2013). Wikipedia: Between lay participation and elite knowledge representation. Information Communication and Society, 16(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.734319.
Lane, J., Stodden, V., Bender, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2015). Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205
Lerman, K. (2007). User participation in social media: Digg study. WI-IAT Workshops, 2007, 255–258.
Lin, Y. W. (2011). A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 17(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2011.552647.
Liu, H., Wu, L., & Li, X. R. (2018). Social media envy: How experience sharing on social networking sites drives millennials’ aspirational tourism consumption. Journal of Travel Research, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518761615
Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Manson, S., & Sullivan, D. O. (2006). Complexity theory in the study of space and place. Environment & Planning, 38(4), 677–692.
Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Davis, M., & Hall, S. (2006). Position paper, tagging, taxonomy, flickr, article toread. . Structure, 9,. https://doi.org/10.1145/1149941.1149949.
Matsuoka, R., & Kaplan, R. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009.
McInnes, L., & Healy, J. (2017). Accelerated Hierarchical Density Based Clustering In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), IEEE (S. 33–42).
Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in big data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171665021. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211.
Naaman, M., Davis, M. E., Jaffe, A. B. (2010). Visualizing location-based datasets using „tag maps“. U.S. Patent Nr. 7769745 B2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 555–566.
Øian, H., Fredman, P., Sandell, K., Sæþórsdóttir, A. D., Tyrväinen, L., & Jensen, F. S. (2018). Tourism, nature and sustainability: A review of policy instruments in the Nordic countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/TN2018-534.
Politou, E., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2018). Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions (S. 1–20). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyy001
Polous, K. (2015). Event cartography – A new perspective in mapping. Dissertation, TU München.
Popescu, A., & Grefenstette, G. (2010). Mining user home location and gender from Flickr tags. ICWSM: International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
Reyman, J. (2013). User data on the social web: Authorship, agency, and appropriation. College English, 75(5), 513–533.
Richter, K.-F., & Winter, S. (2011). Citizens as database: Conscious ubiquity in data collection. In Advances in spatial and temporal databases, 12th international symposium, SSTD (S. 445–448).
Scott, M. J., & Canter, D. V. (1997). Picture or place? A multiple sorting study of landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(4), 263–281.
Selle, K. (2004). Kommunikation in der Kritik? In Müller, B., Löb, S., & Zimmermann, K. (Hrsg.) Steuerung und Planung im Wandel. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Sessions, C., Wood, S. A., Rabotyagov, S., & Fisher, D. M. (2016). Measuring recreational visitation at U.S. National Parks with crowd-sourced photographs. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.018.
Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., & Zook, M. (2015). Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.020.
Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Steels, L. (2006). Collaborative tagging as distributed cognition. In Harnad, S. & Dror, I. E. (Hrsg.), Cognition distributed: How cognitive technology extends our minds, Pragmatics & Cognition (S. 93–98).
Stvilia, B., & Jörgensen, C. (2010). Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2477–2489. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21432.
Sui, D. Z., Elwood, S., & Goodchild, M. F. (2013). Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geo-graphic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). . Princeton: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12344.
Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2011). Banal globalization? Embodied actions and mediated practices in tourists’ online photo-sharing. In Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford University Press.
Twaroch, F., Jones, C., & Abdelmoty, A. (2008). Acquisition of a vernacular gazetteer from web sources. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on location and the web. ACM, New York (S. 61–64).
Uehlinger, H.-M. (1988). Politische Partizipation in der Bundesrepublik: Strukturen und Erklärungsmodelle. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Urry, J. (2002). The tourist gaze (2. Aufl). London: Sage.
Van Dijck, J. (2011). Flickr and the culture of connectivity: Sharing views, experiences, memories. Memory Studies, 4(4), 401–415.
Weber, L. M., Loumakis, A., & Bergman, J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439302238969.
Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Towards an ethical framework for publishing twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views online context and algorithmic estimation. Sociology, 51(6), 1149–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140.
Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9(1), 1–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dunkel, A. (2021). Tag Maps in der Landschaftsplanung. In: Bruns, D., Stemmer, B., Münderlein, D., Theile, S. (eds) Handbuch Methoden Visueller Kommunikation in der Räumlichen Planung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29862-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29862-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29861-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29862-3
eBook Packages: Life Science and Basic Disciplines (German Language)