Skip to main content

Zusammenfassung

Emotionen, Gefühle, vergangene Erfahrungen, die eigene Identität und soziale Interaktionen beeinflussen, wie wir Landschaft wahrnehmen und wertschätzen. Wahrgenommene Werte von Landschaften variieren daher ganz grundlegend zwischen verschiedenen Menschen. Aus diesem Grund definiert beispielsweise die Europäische Landschaftskonvention Landschaft „as a zone or area as perceived by local people or visitors“ (ELC art. 1, para. 38). Für anwendungsorientierte Disziplinen wie die Landschaftsplanung bedeutet dies oft eine große Herausforderung. Informationen darüber, wie Landschaft durch viele Menschen wahrgenommen wird sind entweder nur aufwendig zu beschaffen oder schlichtweg nicht verfügbar. Die hier vorgestellte Visualisierungsmethode von ‚Tag Maps‘ nutzt Daten aus Sozialen Medien als neue Informationsquelle, um subjektive Wert- und Bedeutungszuschreibungen von vielen Menschen darzustellen. Die Grafiken sind besonders geeignet, um Gemeinsamkeiten der Wahrnehmung vieler Menschen kartografisch auszuwerten. Die Ergebnisse können als zusätzliche Informationsquelle genutzt werden, um Planungsentscheidungen auf eine breitere, repräsentativere Basis zu stellen. Aufgrund der Generalisierung sind der Interpretation von Tag Maps Grenzen gesetzt, welche im Abschluss diskutiert werden. Betont wird die Bedeutung der vorgestellten Methode als Ausgangspunkt für weiterführende aktive Beteiligung und Diskussion von und mit der Bevölkerung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    github.com/sieboldianus/tagmaps

  2. 2.

    unicode.org/emoji/charts-12.0/

Literatur

  • Albrechts, L. (2003). Public involvement: The challenges of difference. Disp, 155, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2003.10556860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alivand, M., & Hochmair, H. (2013). Extracting scenic routes from VGI data sources. In Proceedings of the Second ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Crowdsourced and Volunteered Geographic Information – GEOCROWD, 13, 23–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2534732.2534743.

  • Antoniou, V., Morley, J., & Haklay, M. (2010). Web 2.0 geotagged photos: Assessing the spatial dimension of the phenomenon. Geomatica, 64(1), 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriaza, M., Cañas-Ortega, J. F., Cañas-Madueño, J. A., & Ruiz-Aviles, P. (2004). Assessing the visual quality of rural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(1), 115–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, L. M., Daniel, T. C., & Boster, R. S. (1977). Scenic assessment: An overview. Landscape Planning, 4, 109–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action: Mass participation in five Western democracies. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S. (2001). Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 201–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boler, M., & Davis, E. (2018). The affective politics of the „post-truth“ era: Feeling rules and networked subjects. Emotion, Space and Society, 27, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emospa.2018.03.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boy, J. D., & Uitermark, J. (2016). How to study the city on Instagram. PLoS ONE, 11(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information Communication and Society, 15(5), 662–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y., Parkins, J. R., & Sherren, K. (2017). Using geo-tagged Instagram posts to reveal landscape values around current and proposed hydroelectric dams and their reservoirs. Landscape and Urban Planning, 0–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.07.004.

  • Collier, J. (1967). Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. (2000). European Landscape Convention (ELC). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakin, S. (2003). There’s more to landscape than meets the eye: Towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management. The Canadian Geographer, 47(2), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010). Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7(3), 260–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., & Halevy, A. Y. (2011). Crowdsourcing systems on the world-wide web. Communications of the ACM, 54(4), 86. https://doi.org/10.1145/1924421.1924442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, A. (2014). Flickr spatiotemporal tag clouds. Interactive maps. https://maps.alexanderdunkel.com.

  • Dunkel, A. (2015). Visualizing the perceived environment using crowdsourced photo geodata. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142(2015), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunkel, A. (2016). Assessing the perceived environment through crowdsourced spatial photo content for application to the fields of landscape and urban planning. Dissertation, TU Dresden. URN: nbn:de:bsz:14-qucosa-207927.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson, H. (2013). The social production of ecosystem services: A framework for studying environmental justice and ecological complexity in urbanized landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 109(1), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field Operations, J. C., & Renfro, D. S. (2015). The high line: Foreseen, unforeseen. London: Phaidon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Gäde U. (2016). Partizipation – Eine Herausforderung in der Landschaftsplanung. In Riedel, W., Lange, H., Jedicke, E., & Reinke, M. (Hrsg.), Landschaftsplanung. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frias-Martinez, V., Soto, V., Hohwald, H., & Frias-Martinez, E. (2012). Characterizing urban landscapes using geolocated tweets. International Conference on Social Computing, SocialCom/PASSAT, 2012, 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garduno, F. C. (2010). Photosharing on Flickr: Intangible heritage and emergent publics. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16, 4–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlitz, C. (2016). What counts? Reflections on the multivalence of social media data. Digital Culture & Society, 2(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0203..

  • Girardin, F., Fiore, F. D., Ratti, C., & Blat, J. (2008). Leveraging explicitly disclosed location information to understand tourist dynamics: A case study. Journal of Location Based Services, 2(1), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golder, S. A., & Huberman, B. A. (2006). Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506062337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greater London Authority. (2012). London view management framework: The London plan supplementary planning guidance. London: Greater London Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahmann, S., Purves, R., & Burghardt, D. (2014). Twitter location (sometimes) matters: Exploring the relationship between georeferenced tweet content and nearby feature classes. Journal of Spatial Information Science, 9, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauthal, E. (2013). Detection, modelling and visualisation of georeferenced emotions from user-generated content. In 26th international cartographic conference proceedings, 25–30 August, Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollenstein, L., & Purves, R. S. (2010). Exploring place through user-generated content: Using Flickr to describe city cores. Scientific Journals International. https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2010.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instagram & TechCrunch. (2018). Number of monthly active Instagram users from January 2013 to June 2018 (in millions) (S. 2018). Statista. Web.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. B., Purves, R. S., Clough, P. D., & Joho, H. (2008). Modelling vague places with knowledge from the web. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(10), 1045–1065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. (1985). The analysis of perception via preference: A strategy for studying how the environment is experienced. Landscape Planning, 12(2), 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L., & Naaman, M. (2008). Generating diverse and representative image search results for landmarks. Proceeding of the 17th international conference on World Wide Web (S. 297–306). New York: ACM.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L., Naaman, M., Ahern, S., Nair, R., & Rattenbury, T. (2007). How Flickr helps us make sense of the world. In Proceedings of the 15th international conference on multimedia ACM (S. 631–640).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, A. M. (2015). Critical cartography 2.0: Moving from „participatory mapping“ to authored visualizations of power and people. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisilevich, S., Andrienko, G., Krstajic, M., Keim, D., & Andrienko, N. (2010). Event-based analysis of people’s activities and behavior using Flickr and Panoramio geotagged photo collections. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on information visualisation (S. 289–296).

    Google Scholar 

  • König, R. (2013). Wikipedia: Between lay participation and elite knowledge representation. Information Communication and Society, 16(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.734319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, J., Stodden, V., Bender, S., & Nissenbaum, H. (2015). Privacy, big data, and the public good: Frameworks for engagement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107590205

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, K. (2007). User participation in social media: Digg study. WI-IAT Workshops, 2007, 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. W. (2011). A qualitative enquiry into OpenStreetMap making. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 17(1), 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2011.552647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Wu, L., & Li, X. R. (2018). Social media envy: How experience sharing on social networking sites drives millennials’ aspirational tourism consumption. Journal of Travel Research, 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518761615

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, S., & Sullivan, D. O. (2006). Complexity theory in the study of space and place. Environment & Planning, 38(4), 677–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, C., Naaman, M., Davis, M., & Hall, S. (2006). Position paper, tagging, taxonomy, flickr, article toread. . Structure, 9,. https://doi.org/10.1145/1149941.1149949.

  • Matsuoka, R., & Kaplan, R. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84(1), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, L., & Healy, J. (2017). Accelerated Hierarchical Density Based Clustering In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), IEEE (S. 33–42).

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, J., & Crawford, K. (2016). Where are human subjects in big data research? The emerging ethics divide. Big Data & Society, 3(1), 205395171665021. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716650211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naaman, M., Davis, M. E., Jaffe, A. B. (2010). Visualizing location-based datasets using „tag maps“. U.S. Patent Nr. 7769745 B2. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nov, O., Naaman, M., & Ye, C. (2010). Analysis of participation in an online photo-sharing community: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of the AmericanSociety for Information Science and Technology, 61(3), 555–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Øian, H., Fredman, P., Sandell, K., Sæþórsdóttir, A. D., Tyrväinen, L., & Jensen, F. S. (2018). Tourism, nature and sustainability: A review of policy instruments in the Nordic countries. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. https://doi.org/10.6027/TN2018-534.

  • Politou, E., Alepis, E., & Patsakis, C. (2018). Forgetting personal data and revoking consent under the GDPR: Challenges and proposed solutions (S. 1–20). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyy001

  • Polous, K. (2015). Event cartography – A new perspective in mapping. Dissertation, TU München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, A., & Grefenstette, G. (2010). Mining user home location and gender from Flickr tags. ICWSM: International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyman, J. (2013). User data on the social web: Authorship, agency, and appropriation. College English, 75(5), 513–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, K.-F., & Winter, S. (2011). Citizens as database: Conscious ubiquity in data collection. In Advances in spatial and temporal databases, 12th international symposium, SSTD (S. 445–448).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, M. J., & Canter, D. V. (1997). Picture or place? A multiple sorting study of landscape. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(4), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selle, K. (2004). Kommunikation in der Kritik? In Müller, B., Löb, S., & Zimmermann, K. (Hrsg.) Steuerung und Planung im Wandel. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessions, C., Wood, S. A., Rabotyagov, S., & Fisher, D. M. (2016). Measuring recreational visitation at U.S. National Parks with crowd-sourced photographs. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, T., Poorthuis, A., & Zook, M. (2015). Social media and the city: Rethinking urban socio-spatial inequality using user-generated geographic information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1977). On photography. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steels, L. (2006). Collaborative tagging as distributed cognition. In Harnad, S. & Dror, I. E. (Hrsg.), Cognition distributed: How cognitive technology extends our minds, Pragmatics & Cognition (S. 93–98).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stvilia, B., & Jörgensen, C. (2010). Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2477–2489. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sui, D. Z., Elwood, S., & Goodchild, M. F. (2013). Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geo-graphic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, C. R. (2018). . Princeton: University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12344.

  • Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2011). Banal globalization? Embodied actions and mediated practices in tourists’ online photo-sharing. In Digital discourse: Language in the new media. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twaroch, F., Jones, C., & Abdelmoty, A. (2008). Acquisition of a vernacular gazetteer from web sources. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on location and the web. ACM, New York (S. 61–64).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehlinger, H.-M. (1988). Politische Partizipation in der Bundesrepublik: Strukturen und Erklärungsmodelle. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2002). The tourist gaze (2. Aufl). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijck, J. (2011). Flickr and the culture of connectivity: Sharing views, experiences, memories. Memory Studies, 4(4), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. M., Loumakis, A., & Bergman, J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439302238969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. L., Burnap, P., & Sloan, L. (2017). Towards an ethical framework for publishing twitter data in social research: Taking into account users’ views online context and algorithmic estimation. Sociology, 51(6), 1149–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038517708140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zube, E. H., Sell, J. L., & Taylor, J. G. (1982). Landscape perception: Research, application and theory. Landscape Planning, 9(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Dunkel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dunkel, A. (2021). Tag Maps in der Landschaftsplanung. In: Bruns, D., Stemmer, B., Münderlein, D., Theile, S. (eds) Handbuch Methoden Visueller Kommunikation in der Räumlichen Planung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29862-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics