Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Vertrauens- und Misstrauenskulturen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Facetten des Vertrauens und Misstrauens

  • 12k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Für die Etablierung von Vertrauen als kollektives Phänomen innerhalb von Organisationen spielt die Organisationskultur eine zentrale Rolle. In diesem Zusammenhang mag es durchaus gerechtfertigt sein, von einer Vertrauenskultur zu sprechen. Eine solche Vertrauenskultur ermöglicht eine effektive spontane Selbstabstimmung zwischen den Mitarbeitern. Selbstabstimmung ist ein organisatorischer Integrationsmechanismus der in modernen Organisationsformen immer mehr zum Tragen kommt. Möchte man also Hierarchie und Verfahrensrichtlinien zurückfahren ist eine Vertrauenskultur eine förderliche informelle Rahmenbedingung. Möchte man eine solche entwickeln, ist ein sensibler und reflektierter Umgang mit organisatorischen Kontrollmechanismen erforderlich. Letztere haben in Bezug auf Vertrauen innerhalb von Organisation eine zentrale symbolische Wirkung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Bleicher, K. (1982). Vor dem Ende der Misstrauensorganisation? Office Management(H.4), S. 400–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, K. (1986). Strukturen und Kulturen der Organisation im Umbruch: Herausforderungen für den Organisator. Zeitschrift Führung + Organisation, 5, 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, H. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Tan, H. H. (2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(2), 227–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Rodell, J. B. (2011). Justice, Trust, and Trustworthiness: A Longitudinal Analysis Integrating Three Theoretical Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1183–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & LePine, J. A. (2007). Trust, Trustworthiness, and Trust Propensity: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Unique Relationships With Risk Taking and Job Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (2001). Trust, control, and risk in strategic alliances: An integrated framework. Organization Studies, 22(2), 251–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in Leadership: Meta-Analytic Findings and Implications for Research and Practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, P. (2010). Die Bedeutung von Vertrauen in schwach formalisierten Organisationen – Konsequenzen für die Führungspraxis. In S. Astrid & S.-L. Christoph (Eds.), Die Organisation in Supervision und Coaching (pp. 95–110). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, P., Clement, U., & Möller, H. (2012). Socialising employees’ trust in the organisation: an exploration of apprentices’ socialisation in two highly trusted companies. Human Resource Management Journal, 22(4), 343–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, P., Geiger, D., & Aßländer, M. S. (2015). Repairing Trust in an Organization after Integrity Violations: The Ambivalence of Organizational Rule Adjustments. Organization Studies, 36(9), 1205–1235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, P., & Möller, M. F. (2016). Zum Stand der führungsbezogenen Vertrauensforschung. In F. Keuper & T. Sommerlatte (Eds.), Vertrauensbasierte Führung : Devise und Forschung (pp. 73–87). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1985). Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches. Management Science, 31, 134–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrin, D. L., Kim, P. H., Cooper, C. D., & Dirks, K. T. (2007). Silence Speaks Volumes: The Effectiveness of Reticence in Comparison to Apology and Denial for Responding to Integrity- and Competence-Based Trust Violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 893–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, N., & Dietz, G. (2009). Trust Repair After an Organization-level Failure. Academy of Management Review, 34(1), 127–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, N., Dietz, G., & Lockey, S. (2014). Organizational Reintegration and Trust Repair after an Integrity Violation: A Case Study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(3), 371–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.5840/beq2014437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glanville, J. L., & Paxton, P. (2007). How do We Learn to Trust? A Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis of the Sources of Generalized Trust. Social Psychology Quarterly, 70(3), 230–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisig, U., & Littek, W. (1995). Wandel von Vertrauensbeziehungen im Arbeitsprozeß. Soziale Welt, 3, 282–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2013). Self-Organizing Roles on Agile Software Development Teams. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 39(3), 422–444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2012.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (2010). Collective Trust within Organizations: Conceptual Foundations and Empirical Insights. Corporate Reputation Review, 13(2), 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R. J., & Bunker, B. B. (1996). Developing and Maintaining Trust in Work Relationships. In R. M. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations. Frontiers of Theory and Research (pp. 114–139). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1989). Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität (Vol. 3). Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R., Davis, J., & Schoorman, D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvily, B., Perrone, V., & Zaheer, A. (2003). Trust as an Organizing Principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.926622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1979). A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms. Management Science, 25, 833–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, Bureaucracies and Clans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z. How American Business can meet the Japanese Challange. Reading (Mass.): Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripperger, A. (1998). Ökonomik des Vertrauens. Analyse eines Organisationsprinzips. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D., Sitkin, S., Burt, R., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not So Different After All: A Cross-discipline View of Trust. Introduction to Special Topic Forum. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 393–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership (1. ed.). San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1996). Culture: The Missing Concept in Organization Studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(2), 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R., & Davis, J. (2007). An Intergrative Model of Organizational Trust: Past, Present, and Future Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 344–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, G. (1989). Zu den problematischen Konsequenzen starker Unternehmenskulturen. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung (ZfbF), 41(2), 94–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, R., Hartog, D. N. D., Weibel, A., Gillespie, N., Six, F., Hatzakis, T., & Skinner, D. (2011). Trust in the employer: the role of high-involvement work practices and procedural justice in European organizations. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(5), 1069–1092.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjurts, I. (1998). Kontrolle ist gut, ist Vertrauen besser? Ökonomische Analysen zur Selbstorganisation als Leitidee neuer Organisationskonzepte. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 58, 283–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, D., Dietz, G., & Weibel, A. (2014). The dark side of trust: When trust becomes a ‚poisoned chalice‘. Organization, 21(2), 206–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412473866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, L. (1958). Surveillance and Trust. Journal of Personality, 26, 200–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydow, J. (1998). Understanding the Constitution of Interorganizational Trust. In C. Lane & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust Within and Between Organizations. Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications (pp. 31–63). Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, A., & Ouchi, W. G. (1983). Efficient Cultures: Exploring the Relationship between Culture and Organizational Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 468–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaheer, A., & Harris, J. (2006). Interorganizational Trust. In O. Shenkar & J. Reuer (Eds.), Handbook of Strategic Alliances (pp. 169–197). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. (1986). Production of trust: Institutional sources of economic structure, 1840–1920. In L. Cummings (Ed.), Research in Organizational Behaviour (pp. 53–111). Greenwich (Conn.): JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland

    Peter Eberl

Authors
  1. Peter Eberl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Eberl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Pädagogische Psychologie, Universität Vechta, Vechta, Deutschland

    Martin K. W. Schweer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Eberl, P. (2022). Vertrauens- und Misstrauenskulturen. In: Schweer, M.K.W. (eds) Facetten des Vertrauens und Misstrauens. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29047-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29047-4_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29046-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29047-4

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation