Zusammenfassung
Der US-amerikanische Philosoph Tom Beauchamp lehrt an der Georgetown University in Washington D. C., USA, und ist außerdem seit Mitte der 1970er Jahre am dortigen Kennedy Institute of Ethics tätig. Beauchamp kann als einer der maßgeblichen Autoren der heutigen Medizinethik betrachtet werden. Mit seinem Kollegen James Childress publizierte er 1977 erstmals „Principles of Biomedical Ethics“, das heute als Standardwerk der Medizinethik gilt. Die darin entfalteten vier ethischen Prinzipien stellten in theoretischer, praktischer und methodischer Hinsicht eine Innovation dar.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Literatur
Appelbaum, P. S. (1990): The parable of the forensic physician: Ethics and the problem of doing harm. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 13, S. 249 – 259.
Arras, J. D. (1994): Principles and particularity: The roles of cases in bio-ethics. Indiana Law Journal 69, S. 983 – 1014.
Beauchamp, T. L./Childress, J. F. (1979): Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bloch, S./Reddaway R. (1984): Soviet psychiatric abuse: The shadow over world psychiatry. Boulder: Westview Press.
Bok, S. (1995): Common values. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
Buchanan, A. (1997): Health-care delivery and resource allocation. In: R. Veatch (Hrsg.): Medical ethics. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, S. 321 – 362.
Buchanan, A. et al. (2000): From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Childress, J. F. (1990): The place of autonomy in bioethics. Hastings Center Report 20, S. 12 – 16.
Childress, J. F./Meslin, E. M./Shapiro, H. T. (Hrsg.) (2005): Belmont revisited: Ethical principles for research with human subjects. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Daniels, N. (1979): Wide reflective equilibrium and theory acceptance in ethics. The Journal of Philosophy 76, S. 256 – 282.
— (1985): Just health care. New York: Cambridge University Press.
— (1996): Wide reflective equilibrium in practice. In: L. W. Sumner/J. Boyle (Hrsg.): Philosophical perspectives on bioethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, S. 96 – 114.
— (2006): Just health. New York: Cambridge University Press.
DeGrazia, D. (1992): Moving forward in bioethical theory: Theories, cases, and specified principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 17, S. 511 – 539.
— (2003): Common morality, coherence, and the principles of biomedical ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13, S. 219 – 230.
DeGrazia, D./Beauchamp, T. L. (2001): Philosophical foundations and philosophical methods. In: D. Sulmasy/J. Sugarman (Hrsg.): Methods of bioethics. Washington: Georgetown University Press, S. 33 – 36.
Engelhardt Jr., H. T. (1996): The foundations of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Evans, J. H. (2000): A sociological account of the growth of principlism. Hastings Center Report 30, S. 31 – 38.
Faden, R. R./Beauchamp, T. L. (1986): A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gert, B. (2005): Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gert, B./Culver, C. M./Clouser, K. D. (1997): Bioethics: A return to fundamentals. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jonsen, A. R. (1998): The birth of bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kagan, S. (1989): The limits of morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Katz, J. (1984): The silent world of doctor and patient. New York: The Free Press.
Kukla, R. (2005): Conscientious autonomy: Displacing decisions in health care. Hastings Center Report 35(2), S. 34 – 44.
Mackie, J. (1997): Ethics: Inventing right and wrong. London: Penguin (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Ethik: die Erfindung des moralisch Richtigen und Falschen).
Miller, R. W. (2004): Beneficence, duty, and distance. Philosophy & Public Affairs 32, S. 357 – 383.
NCPHS – National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978): The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington: DHEW Publication.
Pellegrino, E. (1994): The four principles and the doctor-patient relationship: The need for a better linkage. In: R. Gillon (Hrsg.): Principles of health care ethics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, S. 353 – 365.
Pellegrino, E./Thomasma, D. (1988): For the patient’s good: The restoration of beneficence in health care. New York: Oxford University Press.
— (1993): The virtues in medical practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Percival, T. (1803): Medical ethics or a code of institutes and precepts, adapted to the professional conduct of physicians and surgeons. Manchester: S. Russell for J. Johnson and R. Bickerstaff. Anm. d. Hrsg.: Percivals Arbeit war 1847 die Grundlage für den ersten Ethikkodex der AMA, der American Medical Association.
Powers, M./Faden, R. (2006): Social justice: The moral foundations of public health and health policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Richardson, H. S. (1990): Specifying norms as a way to resolve concrete ethical problems. Philosophy & Public Affairs 19, S. 279 – 310.
— (2000): Specifying, balancing, and interpreting bioethical principles. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25, S. 285 – 307.
Singer, P. (1993): Practical ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (auf Deutsch erschienen unter dem Titel Praktische Ethik).
— (1999): Living high and letting die. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59, S. 183 – 187.
Strong, C. (2000): Specified principlism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25, S. 285 – 307.
Warnock, G. J. (1971): The object of morality. London: Methuen & Co.
Winkler, E. (1996): Moral philosophy and bioethics: Contextualism versus the paradigm theory. In: L. W. Sumner/J. Boyle (Hrsg.): Philosophical perspectives on bioethics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, S. 50 – 78.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Beauchamp, T.L. (2021). Der ‚Vier-Prinzipien‘-Ansatz in der Medizinethik. In: Biller-Andorno, N., Monteverde, S., Krones, T., Eichinger, T. (eds) Medizinethik. Grundlagentexte zur Angewandten Ethik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27696-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27695-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27696-6
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)