Skip to main content

Just Inequalities of Power?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Demokratie und Entscheidung

Zusammenfassung

The key difference between the two concepts is that power acts directly on the actions of others by providing incentives and penalties for action, whereas influence operates on beliefs. From this distinction it follows that the exercise of influence is not simply a sub-class of instances of the exercise of power. It can be perfectly reasonable to attribute influence where there is no power, as in the example of the influence of Cervantes on subsequent writers (Zimmerling 2005: 147).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aristotle (1944): The Politics. Translated by Harris Rackham. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Brian (1989): Theories of Justice. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, Richard B. (1955): The Theory of Games as a Tool for the Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. (1975): The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Joseph (1726/1969): Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel, with Introduction, Analyses, and Notes by The Very Rev. W. R. Matthews. London: G. Bell & Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, Stephen (2003): Introduction. In: Stephen Darwall, ed.: Contractarianism/Contractualism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denyer, Nicholas (1983): The Origins of Justice. In: Giovanni Pugliese Carratelli, ed.: ΣΥΖΗΤΗΣΙΣ. Studi sull’Epicureismo Greco e Romano: Offerti a Marcello Gigante. Naples: Gaetano Macchiaroli Editore, 133-152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diogenes Laertius (1925): Lives of the Eminent Philosophers. Translated by Robert D. Hicks, Volume II. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Samuel (2007): Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, David (1997): Political Contractarianism. In: Journal of Political Philosophy 5: 2, 132-148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, David (1986): Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, Thomas (1651/1950): Leviathan. Edited by Michael Oakeshott. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, David (1739-40/1969): A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Ernest C. Mossner. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Fontaine, Jean (1668-1694/1972) : Fables. Edited by Pierre Clarac, Paris: Livre de Poche.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthoo, Abhinay (1999): Bargaining Theory with Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, John F. (1950): The Bargaining Problem. In: Econometrica 18, 155-162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1971): Protagoras. Translated by W. C. K. Guthrie. In: Edith Hamilton and Huntingdon Cairns, eds.: The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 308-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1941): The Republic. Translated and edited by Francis MacDonald Cornford. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John (1999): A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, Henry (1907/1981): The Methods of Ethics. 7th edition. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph (2016): The Euro: And Its Threat to the Future of Europe. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michael (1976): Anarchy and Cooperation. London: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weale, Albert (2013): Democratic Justice and the Social Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerling, Ruth (2005): Power and Influence: Variations on a Messy Theme. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert Weale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weale, A. (2019). Just Inequalities of Power?. In: Marker, K., Schmitt, A., Sirsch, J. (eds) Demokratie und Entscheidung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24529-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24529-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-24528-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-24529-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics