Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Einwanderung und Wohlfahrtsstaat

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Sozialpolitik

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag thematisiert die Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Einwanderung und den Wohlfahrtsstaaten der Zielländer. Dabei wird die relevante Literatur in ökonomische, sozialpsychologische, soziologische und politikwissenschaftliche Studien unterteilt. Obwohl die genannten Disziplinen in einem engen theoretischen Austausch stehen, befassen sie sich mit ganz unterschiedlichen Facetten des Forschungsgegenstands. Der Beitrag führt daher sowohl in die arbeitsmarktbezogenen und fiskalischen Effekte von Einwanderung, Wohlfahrtstaaten als „Migrationsmagneten“, die Auswirkungen von Immigration auf die individuelle wohlfahrtsstaatliche Unterstützung der nativen Bevölkerung und in das Spannungsfeld zwischen Zuwanderung und wohlfahrtsstaatlicher Kürzungspolitik ein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Afonso, Alexandre. 2015. Choosing whom to betray: Populist right-wing parties, welfare state reforms and the trade-off between office and votes. European Political Science Review 7(2): 271 – 292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, Alberto und Edward L. Glaeser. 2004. Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, Alberto, Armando Miano und Stefanie Stantcheva. 2018. Immigration and redistribution. NBER working paper 24733. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w24733.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Altonji, Joseph G. und David Card. 1991. The effects of immigration on the labor market outcomes of less-skilled natives. In Immigration, trade and the labor market, Hrgs. John M. Abowd und Richard B. Freeman, 201 – 234. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Kate und John D. Huber. 2010. Economic versus cultural differences: Forms of ethnic diversity and public goods provision. American Political Science Review 104 (4): 644 – 662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banting, Keith G. 2005. The multicultural welfare state: International experience and North American narratives. Social Policy & Administration 39(2): 98 – 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blalock, Hubert M. 1967. Toward a theory of minority-group relations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, Herbert. 1958. Race prejudice as a sense of group position. Pacific Sociological Review 1(1): 3 – 7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, Holger. 2001. Generational accounting – theory and application. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bonin, Holger. 2006. Der Finanzierungsbeitrag der Ausländer zu den deutschen Staatsfinanzen: Eine Bilanz für 2004. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2444. Bonn: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA). ftp.iza.org/dp2444.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Bonin, Holger. 2014. Der Beitrag von Ausländern und künftiger Zuwanderung zum deutschen Staatshaushalt. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung. https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/fileadmin/files/user_upload/Bonin_Beitrag_Zuwanderung_zum_dt_Staatshaushalt_141204_nm.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Bonin, Holger. 2016. Gewinne der Integration: Berufliche Qualifikation und Integrationstempo entscheiden über die langfristigen fiskalischen Kosten der Aufnahme Geflüchteter. böll.brief – Teilhabegesellschaft #1. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Stiftung. https://www.boell.de/sites/default/files/160427_bb_teilhabe_holger_bonin.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Borjas, George J. 1999. Immigration and welfare magnets. Journal of Labor Economics 17(4): 607 – 637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, George J. 2003. The labor demand curve is downward sloping: Reexamining the impact of immigration on the labor market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(4): 1335 – 1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, David und Ryan Finnigan. 2013. Does immigration undermine public support for social policy ? American Sociological Review 79(1): 17 – 42

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, Marilynn B. 1979. In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin 86(2): 307 – 324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmeier, Kerstin und Jürgen Wiemers. 2016. Differences in welfare take-up between immigrants and natives – a microsimulation study. IAB discussion paper 08/2016. Nürnberg: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB). http://doku.iab.de/discussionpapers/2016/dp0816.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. August 2018.

  • Bundesfinanzministerium 2017. Bericht der Bundesregierung über Maßnahmen des Bundes zur Unterstützung von Ländern und Kommunen im Bereich der Flüchtlings- und Integrationskosten und die Mittelverwendung durch die Länder im Jahr 2017. https://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Standardartikel/Themen/Schlaglichter/Fluechtlingshilfe/18-05-30-fluechtlingskosten-bericht.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4. Zugegriffen: 28. Juli 2018.

  • Card, David. 2009. Immigration and inequality. American Economic Review 99(2): 1 – 21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenders, Marcel, Marcel Lubbers und Peer Scheepers. 2005. Majorities’ attitudes towards minorities in Western and Eastern European societies: Results from the European Social Survey 2002 – 2003. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, Klaus, Shlomo Weber und Ignacio Ortuño-Ortín. 2009. Linguistic diversity and redistribution. Journal of the European Economic Association 7(6): 1291 – 1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Destatis. 2017. Bevölkerung mit Migrationshintergrund um 8,5 % gestiegen. Pressemitteilung Nr. 261 vom 01. 08. 2017: https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/2017/08/PD17_261_12511.html. Zugegriffen: 28. Juli 2018.

  • Dustmann, Christian und Tommaso Fratini. 2014. The fiscal effects of immigration to the UK. Economic Journal 124(580): F593 – F643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, Christian, Albrecht Glitz und Tommaso Frattini. 2008. The labour market impact of immigration. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 24(3): 477 – 494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, Christian, Uta Schönberg und Jan Stuhler. 2016. The impact of immigration: Why do studies reach such different results ? Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(4): 31 – 56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eger, Maureen A. 2010. Even in Sweden: The effect of immigration on support for welfare state spending. European Sociological Review 26(2): 203 – 217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommision. 2009. Eurobarometer 71: Future of Europe. Brüssel. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb71/eb713_future_europe.pdf. Zugegriffen: 31. Juli 2018.

  • Eurostat. 2015. Migration and migrant population statistics [database]. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Migration_and_migrant_population_statistics. Luxembourg: Eurostat.

  • Eurostat. 2017. Asylum quarterly report. Pressemitteilung vom 15 März 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Asylum_quarterly_report. Zugegriffen: 31. Juli 2018.

  • Fellowes, Matthew C. und Gretchen Rowe. 2004. Politics and the new American welfare states. American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 362 – 373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finseraas, Henning. 2008. Immigration and preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis of European survey data. Comparative European Politics 6(4): 407 – 431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Cybelle. 2004. The changing color of welfare ? How Whites’ attitudes toward Latinos influence support for welfare. American Journal of Sociology 110(3): 580 – 625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Cybelle. 2012. Three worlds of relief: Race, immigration, and the American welfare state from the progressive era to the new deal. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston, Noel und Gulasekaran Rajaguru. 2013. International migration and the welfare state revisited. European Journal of Political Economy 29: 90 – 101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, Martin. 1995. Racial attitudes and opposition to welfare. The Journal of Politics 57(4): 994 – 1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilens, Martin. 1999. Why Americans hate welfare: Race, media, and the politics of antipoverty policy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giulietti, Corrado. 2014. The welfare magnet hypothesis and the welfare take-up of migrants. IZA World of Labor 2014: 37. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.37. https://wol.iza.org/articles/welfare-magnet-hypothesis-and-welfare-take-up-of-migrants. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Goldschmidt, Tina. 2015. Anti-immigrant sentiment and majority support for three types of welfare. European Societies 17(5): 620 – 652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagist, Christian, Stefan Moog und Bernd Raffelhüschen. 2008. Ehrbarer Staat ? Die Generationenbilanz, Update 2008: Migration und Nachhaltigkeit. Diskussionsbeiträge des Forschungszentrums Generationenverträge Nr. 30. Freiburg. https://freidok.uni-freiburg.de/fedora/objects/freidok:13470/datastreams/FILE1/content. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Hajnal, Zoltan und Michael U. Rivera. 2014. Immigration, Latinos, and white partisan politics: The new democratic defection. American Journal of Political Science 58(4): 773 – 789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, Silja, Georg Picot und Dominik Geering. 2013. Rethinking party politics and the welfare state – recent advances in the literature. British Journal of Political Science 43(1): 221 – 240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hero, Rodney E. und Robert R. Preuhs. 2007. Immigration and the evolving American welfare state: Examining policies in the U. S. states. American Journal of Political Science 51(3): 498 – 517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinte, Holger. 2014. What determines the net fiscal effects of migration ? IZA World of Labor 2014: 78. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.78. https://wol.iza.org/articles/what-determinesthe-net-fiscal-effects-of-migration. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Hinte, Holger und Ulf Rinne. 2017. Fachkräfte gewinnen – Konzept für eine aktive deutsche Zuwanderungspolitik. IZA Research Report No. 77. Bonn: Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA). ftp.iza.org/report_pdfs/iza_report_77.pdf. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Hinte, Holger, Ulf Rinne und Klaus F. Zimmermann. 2012. Zuwanderung, Demografie und Arbeitsmarkt: Fakten statt Vorbehalte. In Einwanderung – Bedrohung oder Zukunft ? Mythen und Fakten zur Integration, Hrgs. Andreas Heinz und Ulrike Kluge, 263 – 278. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth. 2005. The vulnerable populist right parties: No economic realignment fuelling their electoral success. European Journal of Political Research 44(3): 465 –492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Aaron L., David L. Ortmeyer und Michael A. Quinn. 2013. Are immigrants really attracted to the welfare state ? Evidence from OECD countries. International Economics and Economic Policy 10(4): 491 – 519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahanec, Martin und Klaus F. Zimmermann. 2009. EU labor markets after post-enlargement migration. Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katznelson, Ira. 2005. When affirmative action was white: An untold history of racial inequality in twentieth-century America. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert. 1995. The radical right in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter und Joakim Palme. 1998. The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the Western countries. American Sociological Review 63(5): 661 – 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Christian Albrekt. 2011. Ethnic heterogeneity and public support for welfare: Is the American experience replicated in Britain, Sweden and Denmark ? Scandinavian Political Studies 34(4): 332 – 353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemos, Sara und Jonathan Portes. 2013. New labour ? The effects of migration from Central and Eastern Europe on unemployment and wages in the UK. The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 14(1): 299 – 338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttmer, Erzo F. P. und Monica Singhal. 2011. Culture, context, and the taste for redistribution. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy 3(1): 157 – 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mau, Steffen und Christoph Burkhardt. 2009. Migration and welfare state solidarity in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy 19(3): 213 – 229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, Cas. 2007. Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubeck, Kenneth J. und Noel A. Cazenave. 2001. Welfare racism: Playing the race card against America’s poor. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2015. International migration outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2018. International migration outlook. Online database: https://data.oecd.org/migration/foreign-born-population.htm Zugegriffen: 28. Juli 2018.

  • Ottaviano, Gianmarco und Giovanni Peri. 2012. Rethinking the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of the European Economic Association 10(1): 152 – 197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Peter J., Mariola Pytlikova und Nina Smith. 2008. Selection and network effects: Migration flows into OECD countries 1990 – 2000. European Economic Review 52(7): 1160 – 1186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peri, Giovanni. 2014. Do immigrant workers depress the wages of native workers ? IZA World of Labor 2014: 42. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.42. https://wol.iza.org/articles/do-immigrant-workers-depress-the-wages-of-native-workers. Zugegriffen: 23. Juli 2018.

  • Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the welfare state ? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics 48(2): 143 – 179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontusson, Jonas. 2006. The American welfare state in comparative perspective: Reflections on Alberto Alesina and Edward L. Glaeser, Fighting poverty in the US and Europe. Perspectives on Politics 4(2): 315 – 326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadagno, Jill. 1994. The color of welfare: How racism undermined the war on poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quillian, Lincoln. 1995. Prejudice as a response to perceived group threat: Population composition and anti-immigrant and racial prejudice in Europe. American Sociological Review 60(4): 586 – 611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Razin, Assaf und Jackline Wahba. 2015. Welfare magnet hypothesis, fiscal burden, and immigration skill selectivity. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 117(2): 369 – 402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, Ellen. 2005. Backlash against welfare mothers: Past and present. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Alexander W. und Dennis C. Spies. 2014. Do parties ‚playing the race card‘ undermine natives’ support for redistribution ? Evidence from Europe. Comparative Political Studies 47(4): 519 – 549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senik, Claudia, Holger Stichnoth und Karine Van der Straeten. 2008. Immigration and natives’ attitudes towards the welfare state: Evidence from the European Social Survey. Social Indicators Research 91(3): 345 – 370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spies, Dennis C. 2018. Immigration and welfare state retrenchment: Why the US experience is not reflected in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Liza G. 2016. Ethnic diversity and support for redistributive social policies. Social Forces 94(4): 1439 – 1481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, Stuart N., Richard Johnston, Anthony Kevins, Keith Banting und Will Kymlicka. 2016. Migration and welfare state spending. European Political Science Review 8(2): 173 – 194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soss, Joe, Sanford F. Schram, Thomas P. Vartanian und Erin O’Brien. 2001. Setting the terms of relief: Explaining state policy choices in the devolution revolution. American Journal of Political Science 45(2): 378 – 395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soss, Joe, Sanford F. Schram, Thomas P. Vartanian und Erin O’Brien. 2003. The hard line and the color line: Race, welfare, and the roots of get-tough-reform. In Race and the politics of welfare reform, Hrsg. Sanford F. Schram, Joe Soss und Richard C. Fording, 225 – 53. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, Henri, M. G. Billig, R. P. Bundy und Claude Flament. 1971. Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. European Journal of Social Psychology 1(2): 149 – 178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, Henri. 1974. Social identity and intergroup behaviour. Social Science Information 13(2): 65 – 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Waal, Jeroen, Willem De Koster und Wim Van Oorschot. 2013. Three worlds of welfare chauvinism ? How welfare regimes affect support for distributing welfare to immigrants in Europe. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 15(2): 164 – 81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oorschot, Wim. 2006. Making the difference in social Europe: Deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy 16(1): 23 – 42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Köln, Deutschland

    Dennis C. Spies

  2. Bonn, Deutschland

    Ulf Rinne

Authors
  1. Dennis C. Spies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ulf Rinne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dennis C. Spies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Bremen Socium, Bremen, Germany

    Herbert Obinger

  2. Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Manfred G. Schmidt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spies, D.C., Rinne, U. (2019). Einwanderung und Wohlfahrtsstaat. In: Obinger, H., Schmidt, M. (eds) Handbuch Sozialpolitik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22802-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22803-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation