Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Relationship between Gender Research and Society in the Norwegian Brainwash Controversy of 2010–2011

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance

  • 404 Accesses

Abstract

The author investigates the relationship between gender research and society in the current context of neo-liberal and managerial universities. In this context of the new governance of science, research is expected to actively interact with society and to be involved in transdisciplinary problem-solving in close collaboration with various social actors (Slaughter and Leslie 1997; Gibbons et al. 1994; Etzkowitz and Leydesdorff 1998). The article provides an in-depth empirical study of the relationship between gender research and society by analysing a recent public controversy in Norway that unveiled different social actors’ definitions and expectations of gender research. The study focuses on the different views and perceptions that different actors had of the relationship between gender research and society during this unusually large public controversy. The analysis is conducted through a close reading of newspaper articles, articles in scholarly journals and blog posts. The article highlights the diverse understandings of the relationship between gender research and society, and hence strengthens claims that a transformation is taking place in universities from detached research systems to more interactive ones. The academic community as a whole, including gender researchers, can benefit from learning about the rhetorical strategies of the social world of gender research in this debate to maintain and change the public image of the interaction between science and society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albert, Mathieu. 2003. Universities and the Market Economy: The Differential Impact on Knowledge Production in Sociology and Economics. Higher Education 45 (2): 147–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Mathieu, and Wendy McGuire. 2014. Understanding Change in Academic Knowledge Production in a Neoliberal Era. In Fields of Knowledge: Science, Politics and Publics in the Neoliberal Age, ed. by Scott Frickel and David J. Hess, 33–57. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, Malcolm, Steven D. Brown and Katie Macmillan. 2005. Lost in the Mall with Mesmer and Wundt: Demarcations and Demonstrations in the Psychologies. Science, Technology & Human Values 30 (1): 76–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blais, Melissa, and Francis Dupuis-Déri. 2012. Masculinism and the Antifeminist Countermovement. Social Movement Studies: Journal of Social, Cultural and Political Protest 11 (1): 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerrum Nielsen, Harriet. 2010. Kriterier i forskning. [Criteria in Research]. Aftenposten, 26.3.2010: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge Direct Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brante, Thomas, Steven Fuller and William Lynch. Eds. 1993. Controversial Science. From Content to Contention. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, Angela. 2007. The (Sexual) Politics of Evolution. Popular Controversy in the Late 20th-Century United Kingdom. History of Psychology 10 (2): 199–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, Angela. 2008. Communicating the Social Sciences. In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, ed. by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench, 225–236. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele, and Teresa Montini. 1993. The Many Faces of RU486: Tales of Situated Knowledges and Technological Contestations. Science, Technology & Human Values 18 (1): 42–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele, and Susan Leigh Star. 2008. The Social Worlds Framework: A Theory/Methods Package. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch and Judy Wajcman, 113–137. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derichs, Claudia, and Dana Fennert. 2015. Women’s Movements and Countermovements. The Quest for Gender Equality in Southeast Asia and the Middle East. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engelhart, H. Tristram, and Arthur L. Caplan. 1987. Scientific Controversies. Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, Mia. 2013. “Wronged White Men”: The Performativity of Hate in Feminist Narratives about Anti-Feminism in Sweden. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 21 (4): 249–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, Henry, and Loet Leydesdorff. 1998. The Endless Transition: A “Triple Helix” of University-Industry-Government Relations. Minerva 36 (3): 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, Jeanne. 1997. Arguing in Different Forums: The Bering Crossover Controversy. In Landmark Essays on Rhetoric of Science: Case Studies, ed. by Randy Allen Harris, 53–67. Mahwah: Hermagoras Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahnestock, Jeanne. 2009. The Rhetoric of the Natural Sciences. In The SAGE Handbook of Rhetorical Studies, ed. by Andrea A. Lunsford, Kirt H. Wilson and Rosa A. Eberly, 175–195. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. 2000. Gender Politics and the Construction of Sexuality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, Michael, Camilla Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giebel, Katja, and Gert Röhrborn. 2015. Anti-Gender Movements on the Rise? Strategising for Gender Equality in Central and Eastern Europe. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, Benoit. 1998. Writing Performative History: The New “New Atlantis”? Social Studies of Science 28 (3): 465–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grauerholz, Liz, and Lori Baker-Sperry. 2007. Feminist Research in the Public Domain. Risks and Recommendations. Gender and Society 21 (2): 272–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Gabriele. 2009. The “Ins” and “Outs” of Women’s/Gender Studies: A Response to Reports of Its Demise in 2008. Women’s History Review 18 (3): 485–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullvåg Holter, Øystein. 2010. Mellom forskjell og makt. [Between Difference and Power]. Aftenposten, 6.4.2010: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen, Kristian. 2010. Kjønnsforskning tatt på alvor. [Gender Research Taken Seriously]. Dagbladet, 23.3.2010: 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helland, Frode. 2014. Rasisme Uten Rasister i Norge. Agora: Journal for metafysisk Spekulasjon 32 (3–4): 108–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, Clare. 2011. Why Stories Matter. The Political Grammar of Feminist Theory. Durham, London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, David, Steve Breyman, Nancy Campbell and Brian Martin. 2008. Science, Technology, and Social Movements. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. by Edward D. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch and Judy Wajcman, 473–498. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hessels, Laurens K., and Harro van Lente. 2008. Re-thinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda. Research Policy 37 (4): 740–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjernevask. 2017. “Hjernevask” – English subtitles. Brainwashing in Norway. Dailymotion. http://www.dailymotion.com/playlist/x1xv47_BrainwashingInNorway_hjernevask-english/1#video=xp0tg8. Accessed: May 10, 2017.

  • Idunn. Online database. Accessed via University of Oslo Library, June–July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, Anders, Lars Klüver and Mikko Rask. 2009. Relevant Research in a Knowledge Democracy: Citizens Participation in Defining Research Agendas for Europe. Paper for the International Conference Towards Knowledge Democracy, Consequences for Science, Politics and Media, Leiden, Netherlands, 25–27 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, Evelina, and Mona Lilja. 2013. Understanding Power and Performing Resistance: Swedish Feminists, Civil Society Voices, Biopolitics and “Angry” Men. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 21 (4): 264–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2010. The Mirage of Space between Nature and Nurture. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, Daniel L., Jason Delborne, Karen A. Cloud-Hansen and Jo Handelsman. 2010. Controversies in Science and Technology Volume 3: From Evolution to Energy. New Rochelle: Mary Ann Liebert Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labinger, Jay A., and Harry Collins. 2001. The One Culture? A Conversation about Science. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie, Merete. 2011. Brainwashing: Taking Another Turn with Biology. NORA: Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research 19 (1): 53–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Listhaug, Sylvi. 2010. Ikke i mitt navn! [Not in My Name!]. Dagsavisen, 8.3.2010: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lødrup, Julie. 2010. Vi skylder kvinnekampen alt. [We Owe the Women’s Movement Everything]. Dagsavisen, 10.3.2010: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Brian, Evelleen Richards and Peter Scott. 1991. Who’s a Captive? Who’s a Victim? Response to Collins’s Method Talk. Science, Technology and Human Values 16 (2): 252–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miettinen, Reijo, Juha Tuunainen and Terhi Esko. 2015. Epistemological, Artefactual and Interactional-Institutional Foundations of Social Impact of Academic Research. Minerva 53 (3): 257-277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mysterud, Iver. 2011. Ekko fra en nyttig Hjernevask. [Echoes from an Advantageous Brainwash]. Naturen 135 (5): 235–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, Dorothy. 1979. Controversy. Politics of Technical Decisions. Beverly Hills, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Maria do Mar. 2012. “Feminist Theory Is Proper Knowledge, But?…”: The Status of Feminist Scholarship in the Academy. Feminist Theory 13 (3): 283–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pötzsch, Holger. 2010. Kunstige konflikter [Artificial Conflicts]. Klassekampen, 8.3.2010: 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Retriever. Online database. Accessed via University of Oslo Library, June–July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, Merrilee H. 2000. Anthropology: Art or Science? A Controversy about the Evidence for Cannibalism. In Scientific Controversies. Philosophical and Historical Perspectives, ed. by Peter Machamer, Marcello Pera and Aristides Baltas, 199–212. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharff, Christina. 2013. Schröder versus Schwarzer? Analysing the Discursive Terrain of Media Debates about Feminism. Feminist Media Studies 14 (5): 837–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segerstråle, Ullica. 2000. Beyond the Science Wars. The Missing Discourse about Science and Society. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, Beverley. 2008. The Dirty History of Feminism and Sociology: Or the War of Conceptual Attrition. Sociological Review 56 (4): 670–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, Sheila, and Larry L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, London: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan Leigh, and James R. Griesemer. 1989. Institutional Ecology, “Translations” and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuunainen, Juha. 2005. Contesting a Hybrid Firm at a Traditional University. Social Studies of Science 35 (2): 173–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuunainen, Juha. 2013. Science Transformed? Reflections on Professed Changes in Knowledge Production. In Organisations, People and Strategies in Astronomy (OPSA 2), ed. by André Heck, 43–71. Duttelheim: Venngeist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuolanto, Pia. 2015. Boundary Work and Power in the Controversy over Therapeutic Touch in Finnish Nursing Science. Minerva 53 (4): 359–380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuolanto, Pia. 2017. The Universities’ Transformation Thesis Revisited: A Case Study of the Relationship between Nursing Science and Society. Science and Technology Studies 30 (2): 34–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widerberg, Karin. 2006. Disciplinization of Gender Studies. Old Questions, New Answers? Nordic Strategies in the European Context. Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies 14 (2): 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMASAW. 2013. What Men Are Saying about Women. Hooray!!! Nordic Countries Defund Gender Ideology. http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.fi/2013/04/hooray-nordic-countries-defund-gender.html. Accessed: February 3, 2017.

  • Ylijoki, Oili-Helena. 2003. Entangled in Academic Capitalism? A Case-Study on Changing Ideals and Practices of University Research. Higher Education 45 (3): 307–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ylijoki, Oili-Helena, Anu Lyytinen and Liisa Marttila. 2011. Different Research Markets: A Disciplinary Perspective. Higher Education 62 (6): 721–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Åsberg, Cecilia, and Lynda Birke. 2010. Biology Is a Feminist Issue: Interview with Lynda Birke. European Journal of Women’s Studies 17 (4): 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tampere, Finland

    Pia Vuolanto

Authors
  1. Pia Vuolanto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pia Vuolanto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ruhr-Universität Bochum , Bochum, Germany

    Heike Kahlert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vuolanto, P. (2018). The Relationship between Gender Research and Society in the Norwegian Brainwash Controversy of 2010–2011. In: Kahlert, H. (eds) Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19853-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19853-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-19852-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-19853-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation