Abstract
Since epistemology has traditionally been heavily individualistic in focus, the investigation of a European space of knowledge, which has its focus on a specific European space of knowledge production and on processes of knowledge exchange and dissemination in Europe, and hence on social dimensions of knowledge, at first sight does not seem to be a task of modern epistemology. However, from the 1970s on a new branch of epistemology was gradually established which tries to investigate social conditions of knowledge and cognition: Social epistemology. Based on a critical reflection of the two opposing fundamental positions in this field, revisionism and preservationism-expansionism, this chapter sketches an account of social epistemology, a so-called “epistemic-consequentialist social epistemology”, which might be expected to provide a suitable framework for further epistemological investigations concerning a common European knowledge community. Following Alvin Goldman’s veritistic social epistemology, this account seeks to investigate social-epistemic practices regarding their epistemic outputs while trying to overcome the shortcomings of Goldman’s theory. That is to say, it presumes a classic concept of knowledge, which includes the justification condition, it stays open to an integration of epistemic relevant values other than knowledge, and it dispenses with a precise numerical quantification of a social-epistemic practice’s epistemic output. Instead, an epistemic-consequentialist analysis of social-epistemic practices is based on rational considerations, aimed at plausibly qualifying a practice’s epistemic output as better or worse in comparison to one of another social-epistemic practice regarding the same range of applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristoteles. 1997. Topik. In Aristoteles, Organon, vol. 1, ed. Hans Günther Zekl, 1–447. Hamburg: Meiner.
Barnes, Barry S. and David Bloor. 1982. Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge. In Rationality and relativism, ed. Martin Hollis and Steven Lukes, 21–47. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bloor, David. 1991. Knowledge and social imagery. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
Bloor, David. 1997. Wittgenstein, rules and institutions. London: Routledge.
Boghossian, Paul. 2006. Fear of knowledge – against relativism and constructivism. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Brendel, Elke. 2009. Truth and weak knowledge in Goldman’s veritistic social epistemology. In Reliable knowledge and social epistemology: Essays on the philosophy of Alvin Goldman and replies by Goldman, ed. Gerhard Schurz and Markus Werning, 3–17. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Descartes, Rene. (1641) 2009. Meditationen, ed. Christian Wohlers. Hamburg: Meiner.
Egan, Margaret Elizabeth and Jesse Shera. 1952. Foundations of a theory of bibliography. Library Quarterly 22 (2): 125–137.
Feldman, Richard and Ted A. Warfield. 2010. Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Gilbert, Margaret. 1989. On social facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Goldman, Alvin I. 1999. Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Goldman, Alvin I. 2002. Pathways to knowledge. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Goldman, Alvin I. 2010. Why social epistemology is real epistemology. In Social epistemology, ed. Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar and Duncan Pritchard, 1–28. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Goldman, Alvin I. 2011a. A guide to social epistemology. In Social epistemology: Essential readings, ed. Alvin Goldman and Dennis Whitcomb, 11–37. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Goldman, Alvin I. 2011b. Experts: Which one should you trust? In Social epistemology: Essential readings, ed. Alvin Goldman and Dennis Whitcomb, 109–133. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Hardwig, John. 1985. Epistemic dependence. Journal of Philosophy 82: 335–349.
Hardy, Jörg. 2010. Seeking the truth and taking care for common goods: Plato on expertise and recognizing experts. Episteme 7 (1): 7–22.
Holzner, Burkart. 1968. Reality construction in society. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.
Kitcher, Philip. 1994. Contrasting conceptions of social epistemology. In Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge, ed. Frederick F. Schmitt, 115–129. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kusch, Martin. 2006. Knowledge by agreement: The programme of communitarian epistemology. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Kusch, Martin. 2011. Social epistemology. In The Routledge companion to epistemology, ed. Sven Bernecker and Duncan Pritchard, 873–884. London: Routledge.
List, Christian and Philip Pettit. 2011. Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Mc Ginn, Colin. 1984. Wittgenstein on meaning: An interpretation and evaluation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nähr, Sebastian. 2017. Grundzüge und Grundpositionen der Sozialen Erkenntnistheorie. Siegen: Siegen Univ. Press.
Pasnau, Robert. 2010. Medieval social epistemology: Scientia for mere mortals. Episteme 7 (1): 23–41.
Peirce, Charles Sanders. (1877) 1976. Die Festlegung einer Überzeugung. In Charles S. Peirce: Schriften zum Pragmatismus und Pragmatizismus, vol. 1, ed. Karl-Otto Apel, 149–181. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Reid, Thomas. (1764) 1983. Essays on the intellectual powers of man. In Philosophical works, ed. William Hamilton, 215–509. Hildesheim: Olms.
Schmitt, Frederick F. and Oliver R. Scholz. 2010. Introduction: The history of social epistemology. Episteme 7 (1): 1–6.
Schmitt, Frederick F. 1994. The justification of group beliefs. In Socializing epistemology: The social dimensions of knowledge, ed. Frederick F. Schmitt, 257–287. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Scholz, Oliver R. 2014. Soziale Erkenntnistheorie. In Grundkurs Erkenntnistheorie, ed. Nikola Kompa and Sebastian Schmoranzer, 259–272. Münster: Mentis.
Searle, John R. 1995. The construction of social reality. London: Penguin.
Tuomela, Raimo. 2002. The philosophy of social practices: A collective acceptance view. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Williams, Michael. 2001. Problems of knowledge: A critical introduction to epistemology. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953) 1984. Philosophische Untersuchungen. In Werkausgabe, vol. I, 225–580. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1969) 1990. Über Gewißheit, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. Wright. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Zandonade, Tarcisio. 2004. Social epistemology from Jesse Shera to Steve Fuller. Library Trends 52 (4): 810–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nähr, S. (2018). An Epistemic-Consequentialist Social Epistemology as an Epistemological Perspective Concerning the Investigation of a Common, European Knowledge Community. In: Schweitzer, B., Sukopp, T. (eds) Knowledge Communities in Europe. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18852-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-18852-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-18851-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-18852-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)