Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regionale Innovationssysteme und Innovationscluster

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Innovationsforschung

Zusammenfassung

In der Debatte um regionale Innovationssysteme und Innovationscluster wird der Raumbezug innovativen Handelns aus wirtschaftsgeografischer und regionalsoziologischer Perspektive thematisiert. Hierbei stehen die zentrale Bedeutung räumlicher Nähe und regionaler Institutionen im Mittelpunkt, wobei Regionalisierungs- und Globalisierungsprozesse zusammenwirken. Regionale Netzwerke, lokale Wissens- und Erfahrungsbestände und lokale Interaktionen avancieren gerade durch die regionale Einbettung multinationaler Unternehmen zu zentralen Brenn- und Knotenpunkten einer weltweiten Wissensgesellschaft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Asheim, Bjørn T., und Meric S. Gertler. 2005. The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In The Oxford handbook of innovation, Hrsg. Jan Fagerberg, David C. Mowery und Richard R. Nelson, 291–317. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, Bjørn, und Høgni Kalsø Hansen. 2009. Knowledge bases, talents, and contexts: On the usefulness of the creative class approach in Sweden. Economic Geography 85(4): 425–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, Bjørn T., und Arne Isaksen. 2002. Regional innovation systems: The integration of local ‚sticky‘ and global ‚ubiquitous‘ knowledge. Journal of Technology Transfer 27(1): 77–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, Bjørn, Lars Coenen, und Jan Vang. 2007. Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Socio-spatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 25(5): 655–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, Erkko. 1998. Evaluation of RTD in regional systems of innovation. European Planning Studies 6(2): 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt, Harald, Anders Malmberg, und Peter Maskell. 2004. Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography 28(1): 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becattini, Giacomo. 2017. The marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. Revue d'économie industrielle 157(1): 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, Ron. 2005. Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39(1): 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, Ron, und Koen Frenken. 2010. The spatial evolution of innovation networks. A proximity perspective. In The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, Hrsg. Ron Boschma und Ron Martin, 120–135. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, Roberto. 1991. Innovation networks: Spatial perspectives. London: Wiley/Belhaven Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Tom. 2017. Can post-Brexit London survive as Europe’s cultural and financial capital? The Guardian, 23. Januar. www.theguardian.com/cities/2017/jan/23/post-brexit-london-economic-self-sabotage. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2018.

  • Cantwell, John, und Simona Iammarino. 2003. Multinational corporations and European regional systems of innovation. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, John, und Lucia Piscitello. 2005. Recent location of foreign-owned research and development activities by large multinational corporations in the European regions: The role of spillovers and externalities. Regional Studies 39(1): 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellani, Davide, und Antonello Zanfei. 2006. Multinational firms, innovation and productivity. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Philip. 2004. Introduction: Regional innovation systems: An evolutionary approach. In Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world, Hrsg. Philip N., Martin Heidenreich Cooke und Hans-Joachim Braczyk, 1–18. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Philip N., Patries Boekholt, und Franz Tödtling. 2000. The governance of innovation in Europe: Regional perspectives on global competitiveness. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, Philip N., Martin Heidenreich, und Hans-Joachim Braczyk, Hrsg. 2004. Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni. 1988. The nature of the innovative process. In Technical change and economic theory, 221–238. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, Charles. 2001. Innovation policy: A systemic approach. In The globalizing learning economy, Hrsg. Daniele Archibugi und Bengt-Ake Lundvall, 219–237. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Einwiller, Ruth. 2016. Innovationsindex 2016: Baden-Württemberg im europäischen Vergleich. Statistisches Monatsheft Baden-Württemberg 12:17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard L. 2014. The rise of the creative class: Revisited. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geppert, Mike. 2003. Sensemaking and politics in MNCs: A comparative analysis of vocabularies within the global manufacturing discourse in one industrial sector. Journal of Management Inquiry 12(4): 312–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Teis. 2015. Substitution or overlap? The relations between geographical and non-spatial proximity dimensions in collaborative innovation projects. Regional Studies 49(10): 1672–1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, Martin. 2012. The social embeddedness of multinational companies: A literature review. Socio-Economic Review 10(3): 549–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, Martin, und Knut Koschatzky. 2011. Regional innovation governance. In Handbook of regional innovation and growth, Hrsg. Philip Cooke, Bjørn Asheim, Ron Boschma, Ron Martin, Dafna Schwartz und Franz Tödtling, 534–546. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidenreich, Martin, und Gerhard Krauss. 2004. The Baden-Württemberg production and innovation regime: Between past successes and new challenges. In Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world, Hrsg. Philip N. Cooke, Martin Heidenreich und Hans-Joachim Braczyk, 186–213. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrigel, Gary. 1996. Crisis in German decentralized production: Unexpected rigidity and the challenge of an alternative form of flexible organization in Baden Württemberg. European Urban and Regional Studies 3(1): 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky, Knut. 2001. Räumliche Aspekte im Innovationsprozess: Ein Beitrag zur neuen Wirtschaftsgeographie aus Sicht der regionalen Innovationsforschung. Münster: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschatzky, Knut, und Elisabeth Baier. 2012. The impact of regional institutional characteristics on the location of MNCs: A European perspective. In Innovation and institutional embeddedness of multinational companies, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich, 222–248. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul R. 1991. Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüth, Katharina. 2018. Regionale Innovationsnetzwerke in Frankreich: F&E-Kooperationen innerhalb der pôles de compétitivité. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Le Bas, Christian, und Christophe Sierra. 2002. ‚Location versus home country advantages‘ in R&D activities: Some further results on multinationals’ locational strategies. Research Policy 31(4): 589–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Galès, Patrick, und Helmut Voelzkow. 2001. Introduction: The governance of local economies. In Local production systems in Europe: Rise or demise? Hrsg. Colin Crouch, Patrick Le Galès, Carlo Trigilia und Helmut Voelzkow, 1–24. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, Ann. 1996. Sticky places in slippery space: A typology of industrial districts. Economic Geography 72(3): 293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, Ann. 1999. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: The case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies. Regional Studies 33(9): 869–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred. 1982. Principles of economics: Unabridged eighth edition, 8. Aufl. [Erstauflage: 1890]. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maskell, Peter, und Anders Malmberg. 1999. Localised learning and industrial competitiveness. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23(2): 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Jannika. 2010. Innovation in multinational companies: Organisational, international and regional dilemmas. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Jannika. 2012. Dimensions of proximity and knowledge bases: Innovation between spatial and non-spatial factors. Regional Studies 46(8): 1085–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Jannika. 2013. The regional embeddedness of multinational companies: A critical perspective. European Planning Studies 21(4): 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Jannika. 2016. The geography of innovation in multinational companies: Internal distribution and external embeddedness. In Handbook on the geographies of innovation, Hrsg. Richard Shearmur, Christophe Carrincazeaux und David Doloreux, 399–414. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Jannika, und Martin Heidenreich. 2012. Conclusion: Corporate embeddedness as a strategic and dynamic process of skilled actors. In Innovation and institutional embeddedness of multinational companies, Hrsg. Martin Heidenreich, 329–343. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Jannika, und Sinje Späth. 2013. Upgrading foreign subsidiaries in the case of a German multinational company: Bargaining processes at strategic and operative levels. Competition & Change 17(2): 129–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattes, Jannika, Andreas Huber, und Jens Koehrsen. 2015. Energy transitions in small-scale regions – What we can learn from a regional innovation systems perspective. Energy Policy 78(C): 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalfe, Stan. 1995. The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Hrsg. Paul Stoneman, 409–512. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, Magnus, und Jannika Mattes. 2015. The spatiality of trust: Factors influencing the creation of trust and the role of face-to-face contacts. European Management Journal 33(4): 230–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael J., und Charles F. Sabel. 1985. Das Ende der Massenproduktion: Studie über die Requalifizierung der Arbeit und die Rückkehr der Ökonomie in die Gesellschaft. Berlin: Wagenbach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 1998. Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review 76(6): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. 2008. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance, 2. Aufl. Riverside: Simon and Schuster/Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W., Kenneth W. Koput, und Laurel Smith-Doerr. 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41:116–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, Anna Lee. 1996. Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Allen J. 1995. The geographic foundations of industrial performance. Competition & Change 1(1): 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitlin, Jonathan. 2008. The rediscovery of industrial districts: A disciplinary paradox. In The Oxford handbook of business history, Hrsg. Geoffrey Jones und Jonathan Zeitlin, 219–241. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland

    Martin Heidenreich & Jannika Mattes

Authors
  1. Martin Heidenreich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jannika Mattes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Heidenreich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Inst für Soziologie Campus Westend PEG, Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany

    Birgit Blättel-Mink

  2. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Germany

    Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer

  3. Institut für Soziologie, TU Berlin Institut für Soziologie, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Arnold Windeler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Heidenreich, M., Mattes, J. (2019). Regionale Innovationssysteme und Innovationscluster. In: Blättel-Mink, B., Schulz-Schaeffer, I., Windeler, A. (eds) Handbuch Innovationsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_12-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17671-6_12-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17671-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Naturwissenschaften

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation