Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Regulierung und Einfluss von Interessenorganisationen in der EU-Gesetzgebung

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Europäische Union

  • 684 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Klassische Integrationstheorien schreiben Interessenorganisationen eine bedeutsame Rolle für die Europäische Integration zu. Die zunehmende Regulierung und Institutionalisierung der politischen Interessenvermittlung und die gegenwärtigen Pläne zur Einrichtung eines obligatorischen Interessengruppenregisters zur Stärkung von Demokratie, Transparenz und Verantwortlichkeit in der EU unterstützen eine solche Einschätzung. Die empirische Forschung über die Bedeutung von Interessenorganisationezn in den legislativen Prozessen der Europäischen Union hat sich dabei stärker von Fallstudien hin zu umfassenden quantitativen Untersuchungen entwickelt. Daraus ergeben sich teils neue Fragestellungen und neue Antworten auf klassische Fragen zu Mobilisierung, Zugang, Bindungen und Einfluss von Interessengruppen im EU-Mehrebenensystem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Almond, Gabriel A. 1958. A comparative study of interest groups in the political process. American Political Science Review 52(1): 270–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ALTER-EU. 2016. EU lobby transparency: time for a stronger lobby register. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank, Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, und Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and policy change – Who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers. 2004. Voice and access – Political practices of European interest associations. European Union Politics 5(2): 211–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, Jan, Rainer Eising, und William Maloney Hrsg. 2008. The politics of organised interests in Europe: Lessons from EU studies and comparative politics. West European Politics 31(6): 1129–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, Jan, Laura Bonafont Chaques, Andreas Dür, Rainer Eising, Daniela Fink-Hafner, David Lowery, William Maloney, und Daniel Naurin. 2014. The INTEREURO project: Logic and structure. Interest Groups & Advocacy 3(2): 126–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, Jan, Iskander De Bruycker, und Inger Baller. 2015. The alignment of parties and interest groups in EU legislative politics: A tale of two different worlds? Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 534–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Börang, Frida, und Daniel Naurin. 2015. ‚Try to see it my way!‘ Frame congruence between lobbyists and European Commission officials. European Journal of Public Policy 22(4): 499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwen, Pieter. 2004. Exchanging access goods for access: A comparative study of business lobbying in the European Union institutions. European Journal of Political Research 43(2): 337–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, Adriana. 2017. Designing stakeholder consultations – Reinforcing or alleviating bias in the European Union system of governance? European Journal of Political Research 56(1): 46–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunea, Adriana, und Frank Baumgartner. 2014. The state of the discipline – Authorship, research designs, and citation patterns in studies of the EU interest groups and lobbying. Journal of European Public Policy 21(10): 1412–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burstein, Paul, und C. Elizabeth Hirsh. 2007. Interest oorganizations, information, and policy innovation in the U.S. congress. Sociological Forum 22(2): 174–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daviter, Falk. 2011. Policy framing in the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Bruycker, Iskander. 2016. Pressure and expertise: Explaining the information supply of interest groups in EU legislative lobbying. Journal of Common Market Studies 54(3): 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delogu, Bernardo. 2016. Risk analysis and governance in EU policy making and regulation. An introductory guide. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dür, Andreas. 2008. Measuring interest group influence in the EU – A note on methodology. European Union Politics 9(4): 559–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dür, Andreas, und Gemma Mateo. 2016. Insiders versus outsiders. Interest group politics in multilevel Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dür, Andreas, Patrick Bernhagen, und David Marshall. 2015. Interest group success in the European Union: When (and why) does business lose? Comparative Political Studies 48(8): 951–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eising, Rainer. 2009. The political economy of state-business relations in Europe capitalism, interest mediation, and EU-policy-making. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eising, Rainer. 2017. Studying interest groups: Methodological challenges and tools. European Political Science 16(3): 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eising, Rainer. 2018. Interest groups in the European Union. In European union politics, Hrsg. M. Cini und N. Pérez-Solórzano Borragan. Oxford: Oxford University Press. i. E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eising, Rainer, Daniel Rasch, und Patrycja Rozbicka. 2017a. National interest organisations in EU policy-making. West European Politics 40(5): 939–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eising, Rainer, et al. 2017b. Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making. West European Politics 40(5): 957–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 1992. An open and structured dialogue between the Commission and special interest groups. Brussels: SEC (92) 2272 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 2001. European governance. A white paper. Brussels: COM (2001) 428 final, 25 July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 2002. Communication from the commission – Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue – General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission. Brussels: COM (2002) 704 final, 11 Dec 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 2006. Green paper European transparency initiative. Brussels: COM (2006) 194 final, 3 May 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 2008. Communication from the commission – European transparency initiative. A framework for relations with interest representatives (Register and Code of Conduct). Brussels: COM (2008) 323 final, 27 May 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 2014. Budgetary impact of NGO funding in the last 10 Years. Speech by Manfred Kraff, Deputy Director-general for budget at the EP hearing on ‚implementation of EU policies by NGOs‘ Brussels, 30 Jan 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 2016. Proposal for a [sic] interinstitutional agreement on a mandatory transparency register. Brussels: COM (2016) 627 final, 28 Sep 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäische Kommission. 2017. Commission staff working document. Better regulation guidelines. Brussels [SWD (2017) 350], https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/better-regulation-guidelines.pdf. Zugegriffen am 07.07.2017.

  • Europäische Kommission. 2018. Transparency register: Statistics – Evolution of registrations. Brussels, 9 Jan 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäisches Parlament. 2001. EP resolution on the commission white paper on European governance, A5-0399/2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäisches Parlament. 2011. Agreement between the European parliament and the European commission on the establishment of a transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation, PE446.932/CPG/GT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Europäisches Parlament, und Europäische Kommission. 2014. Agreement between the European parliament and the European commission on the transparency register for organisations and self-employed individuals engaged in EU policy-making and policy implementation, OJ L 277/11- L 277/24, 19.09.2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, Gerda. 1998. EU social policy in the 1990s. Towards a corporatist policy community. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, Justin, und Joanna Dreger. 2013. The transparency register: A European vanguard of strong lobby regulation? Interest Groups & Advocacy 2(2): 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes-Renshaw, Fiona. 2009. Least accessible but not inaccessible: Lobbying the council. In Lobbying the European union: Institutions, actors, and issues, Hrsg. D. Coen und J. R. Richardson, 70–88. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, Simon, und Bjørn Høyland. 2013. Empowerment of the European parliament. Annual Review of Political Science 16:171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juncker, Jean-Claude (Candidate for President of the European Commission). 2014. A new start for Europe: My agenda for jobs, growth, fairness and democratic change. Political guidelines for the next European Commission. Opening statement in the European Parliament Plenary session. Strasbourg, 15 July 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klüver, Heike, Caelesta Braun, und Jan Beyers. 2015. Legislative lobbying in context: Towards a conceptual framework of interest group lobbying in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 22(4): 447–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, Beate. 1997. Organized interests in European integration – The evolution of a new type of governance. In Participation and policy making in European integration, Hrsg. Hellen Wallace und Alasdair R. Young. London: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, Beate, und Christine Quittkat. 2013. De-mystification of participatory democracy. EU-governance and civil society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, Leon N. 1963. The political dynamics of European economic integration. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, David, et al. 2015. Images of an unbiased interest system. Journal of European Public Policy 22(8): 1212–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, Christine. 2008. Brussels versus the beltway – Advocacy in the United States and the European Union. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, Gary, und Liesbet Hooghe. 2001. Multi-level governance and European integration. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, David, und Patrick Bernhagen. 2017. Government-business relations in multilevel systems: The effect of conflict perception on venue choice. West European Politics 40(5): 981–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, Andrew. 1998. The choice for Europe. Ithaka: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1965. The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachl, Ursula. 2015. Repercussions of the European commission’s better regulation agenda on consumer interest and policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation 6(3): 375–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Mark A. 1997. Representing Diffuse Interests in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 4(4): 572–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, Thomas James. 2016. Economic union without social union: The strange case of the European social dialogue. Journal of European Social Policy 26(5): 460–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rat der Europäischen Union. 2017a. Proposal for an inter-institutional agreement on a mandatory transparency register. Approval of a negotiating mandate, Brussels, 15173/17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rat der Europäischen Union. 2017b. Transparency register: Council agrees mandate for negotiations. Brussels: General Secretariat of the Council, Press office, 744/17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smismans, Stijn. 2008. The European social dialogue in the shadow of hierarchy. Journal of Public Policy 28(1): 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fakultät für Sozialwissenschaft, Ruhr Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland

    Rainer Eising

Authors
  1. Rainer Eising
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Eising .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik , Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Peter Becker

  2. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik , Berlin, Germany

    Barbara Lippert

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Eising, R. (2018). Regulierung und Einfluss von Interessenorganisationen in der EU-Gesetzgebung. In: Becker, P., Lippert, B. (eds) Handbuch Europäische Union. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17436-1_25-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17436-1_25-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17436-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17436-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation