Skip to main content

Rorty, Nietzsche and Romanticism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Richard Rorty
  • 34 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the approach to romanticism which Richard Rorty develops in light of Isaiah Berlin’s work. It further shows how Nietzsche’s approach to romanticism contributes, much like pragmatism does, to undermining the metaphysical presupposition that the world is to be divided into appearance and reality, objectivity and subjectivity. Rorty is found to be in agreement with Nietzsche’s project of the de-divinization of truth, with his explanation of language as tool of communication and reason, and with the idea of words as dead metaphors. On the other hand, the chapter shows how Rorty’s philosophy of redescription is animated by a notion of imagination closer to Shelley’s than to Nietzsche’s.

“I am convinced that Nietzsche wrote the better poem. As I see it, the romantic movement marked the beginning of the attempt to replace the tale told by the Greek philosophers with a better tale.”

“Nietzsche de-divinized truth, like Freud de-divinized conscience and Harold Bloom de-divinized the poet.”

(Richard Rorty)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    I discuss the problems concerning Rorty’s romantic description of vocabulary creation as a solitary act in Castro (2021).

  2. 2.

    The perspectival thinking of Nietzsche about Nature has, I think, a lot in common with the Amerindian cosmovision in Brazil. See, Viveiros de Castro 2004 pp. 3–7.

  3. 3.

    “Poets are the hierophants of an unapprehended inspiration; the mirrors of the gigantic shadows which futurity casts upon the present; the words which express what they understand not; the trumpets which sing to battle, and feel not what they inspire; the influence which is moved not, but moves. Poets are the unacknowledged legislators of the world” (Shelley 2019).

  4. 4.

    Dr. Samuel Johnson (1709–1784) was an English literary critic.

  5. 5.

    I am deeply grateful to Martin Müller for his great editorial advice and to Martijn Buijs for his careful assistance in revising the English.

References

  • Bloom, Harold. 2000. “Why read?”. Prologue. In How to read and why? 21–29. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Castro, Susana. 2011. Rorty and Nietzsche. Pragmatism Today 2(1): 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro, Susana de. (2021). Probleme der Feminismus-rezeption Richard Rortys. In: Soziale Hoffnung, liberale ironie - zur Aktualität von Richard Rorty’s politischem Denken. Eds. Veith Selk, Christof Held and Torben Schwuchow. Nomos: Baden Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson, R. Waldo. 1983. Essays and lectures. New York: Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques, António. 2003. A filosofia perspectivista de Nietzsche. São Paulo: discurso editorial, Editora UNIJUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1979. On truth and lies in a nonmoral sense. In Philosophy and truth – selections from Nietzsche’s notebooks of the early 1870’s. Trans. Daniel Breazeale. New Jersey: Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2005. The anti-christ, ecce homo, twilight of idols, and others writings. Trans. Judith Norman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2008. The gay science. Trans. Josephine Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1991. Solidarity or objectivity? In Objectivity, relativism, and truth. Philosophical papers, Vol. 1, 21–34. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1995a. Dewey: Between Hegel & Darwin. In Rorty & pragmatism – The philosopher responds to his critics, Ed. Herman J. Saatkamp, 1–15. Nashville/London: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1995b. Philosophy and the future. In Rorty & pragmatism – The philosopher responds to his critics, Ed. Herman J. Saatkamp, 197–205. Nashville/London: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 1999. Ethics without principles. In Philosophy and social hope, 72–90. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2005 Prefácio. In: Pragmatismo e Política. Translation with Introduction Paulo Ghiraldelli Jr. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2006. Pragmatism as anti-authoritarianism. In A companion to pragmatism. Eds. John R. Shook and Joseph Margolis, 257–266. London/New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2007a. Pragmatism and romanticism. In Philosophy as cultural politics. Philosophical papers, Vol. 4, 105–119. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2007b. Grandeur, profundity, and finitude. In Philosophy as cultural politics. Philosophical papers, Vol. 4, 73–88. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2007c. Dewey and Posner on pragmatism and moral progress. The University of Chicago Law Review 74(3): 915–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2010a. Feminism and pragmatism. In Feminist interpretations of Richard Rorty, Ed. Marianne Janack, 19–45. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2010b. Intellectual autobiography. In The philosophy of Richard Rorty, Eds. Randall E. Auxier and Lewis E. Hahn, 3–24. Chicago/La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, Richard. 2016. Philosophy as poetry: Page-Barbour lectures for 2004. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Percy B. A defense of poetry. https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5428/5428-h/5428-h.htm. Last accessed: 10/02/2019.

  • Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. Perspectival anthropology and the method of controlled equivocation. Tipití: Journals of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2(1) Http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/tipiti/vol2/iss1/1. Last accessed 04/08/2020.

  • WIKIPEDIA. 2020. Tinder. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tinder_(app). Last accessed: 04/08/2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susana de Castro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

de Castro, S. (2022). Rorty, Nietzsche and Romanticism. In: Müller, M. (eds) Handbuch Richard Rorty. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16260-3_27-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16260-3_27-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-16260-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-16260-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics