Abstract
The rich conceptual space opened by Rafael Capurro’s research on the ethical dimensions of communication and message theory has inspired this investigation of Paolo Virno’s concept of general intellect. Virno analyses how contemporary topoi function as conditions of the possibility of thought and language, whereas Aristotle analyses them as modes of argument. The contrasts between the two exposes problems with Virno’s conceptions of political possibilities of abstract human capacities of language and thought. I torque Virno’s use of topoi by imposing what I call “Virno-Aristotle variations” on the contemporary roles of two kinds of topoi, to suggest a political role for them quite different from Virno’s scheme, and present a more plausible scenario of their actual political entanglements. His ideas are also tested by provocations from contemporary media theory: Friedrich Kittler’s argument that the essence of the human has escaped into apparatuses, Claude Shannon’s theory of communication, Noam Chomsky’s conception of grammar, and Jacques Lacan’s notion of the symbolic as the world of the machine. I conclude with a brief glance at John Durham Peters’ insistence on the great variety of conceptions of communication, which I suggest generates a corresponding variety of connections between communication and politics, thereby destabilizing or at least complicating not just Virno’s but any notion of privileged connections between a pure potential of human communication and an ethics and politics of freedom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chang, B. G. (1996). Deconstructing communication: Representation, subject, and economies of exchange. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Collier, S. J., & Lakoff, A. (2005). On regimes of living. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 22–39). Malden, ML: Blackwell.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999). Cyber-Marx: Cycles and circuits of struggle in high-technology capitalism. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Dyer-Witheford, N. (2005). Cyber-Negri: General intellect and immaterial labor. In T. S. Murphy & A.-K. Mustapha (Eds.), Resistance in practice: The philosophy of Antonio Negri (pp. 136–162). London, United Kingdom & Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
Frohmann, B. (2009). Revisiting “What is a ‘document’?”. Journal of Documentation, 65(2), 291–303.
Frohmann, B. (2011). The documentality of Mme Briet’s antelope. In J. Packer & S. Wiley (Eds.), Communication matters: Materialist approaches to media, mobility, and networks (pp. 173–182). London, United Kingdom & New York, NY: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1979). Communication and the evolution of society. (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.
Johnston, J. (2008). The allure of machinic life: Cybernetics, artificial life, and the new AI. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kittler, F. A. (1990). Discourse networks: 1800 / 1900. (M. Metteer & C. Cullens, Trans., D. E. Wellbery, Foreword). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kittler, F. A. (1999). Gramophone, film, typewriter. Writing science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Lacan, J. (1988). The ego in Freud’s theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis, 1954–1955, (S. Thomaselli, Trans., J. Forrester, notes). New York, NY & London, United Kingdom: W. W. Norton & Company.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA & London, United Kingdom: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Clarendon lectures in management studies. Oxford, United Kingdom & New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Liu, L. H. (2010). The Freudian robot: Digital media and the future of the unconscious. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lord, A. B. (1960). The singer of tales. (Harvard studies in comparative literature, no. 24). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McKeon, R. (ed & introd by). (1941). The basic works of Aristotle. The Lifetime Library. New York, NY: Random House.
Nougayréde, N. (2015, 5–11 June). Cameron should beware the referendum. The Guardian Weekly, 192(26), 18.
Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: A history of the idea of communication. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Rapp, C. (2012). Aristotle’s rhetoric. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2010/entries/aristotle-rhetoric
Shannon, C. E. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Terranova, T. (2004). Network culture: Politics for the information age. London, United Kingdom & Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto Press.
Virno, P. (2004). A grammar of the multitude: For an analysis of contemporary forms of life. Semiotext(e) foreign agents series. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext (e).
Vismann, C. (2008). Files: Law and media technology. (G. Winthrop-Young, Trans.). Meridian. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Winthrop-Young, G., & Wütz, M. (1999). Translator’s introduction: Friedrich Kittler and media discourse analysis. In F. A. Kittler, Gramophone, film, typewriter (pp. xi-xxxviii). Writing science. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frohmann, B. (2016). General Intellect, Communication and Contemporary Media Theory. In: Kelly, M., Bielby, J. (eds) Information Cultures in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14679-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14681-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)