Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Interviewverfahren und biografischer Fragebogen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Personalauswahl

Zusammenfassung

Im vorliegenden Kapitel stellen wir Interviewverfahren und biografische Fragebogen als zwei valide Instrumente der beruflichen Eignungsdiagnostik vor. Zu Einstellungsinterviews werden Informationen über deren Verbreitung, Akzeptanz und Güte dargestellt. Ferner werden wesentliche Aspekte herausgearbeitet, die die Qualität von Einstellungsinterviews sichern können, die Rolle des Interviewers näher beleuchtet und strukturierte Interviewformen vorgestellt, um damit Empfehlungen zur Planung, Durchführung und Auswertung der Personalauswahlgespräche abzuleiten. Zu biografischen Fragebogen wird herausgearbeitet, dass diese geeignete Prädiktoren für eine Vielzahl unterschiedlicher Kriterien beruflicher Leistung darstellen und einen inkrementellen Erklärungsbeitrag über andere eignungsdiagnostische Maße hinaus liefern. Es wird gezeigt, dass diese wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnisse jedoch nicht mit den Wahrnehmungen in der Anwendungspraxis übereinstimmen, in der biografische Fragebogen vergleichsweise selten eingesetzt und sowohl von Anwendern als auch Bewerbern weniger gut akzeptiert werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (2000). Job requirements biodata as a predictor of performance in customer service roles. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 137–147. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, C. W. (1960). The relation between speaking times and decision in the employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 44, 267–268. doi:10.1037/h0042783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson, N., Salgado, J. F., & Hülsheger, U. R. (2010). Applicant reactions in selection: Comprehensive meta-analysis into reaction generalization versus situational specificity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 18, 291–304. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00512.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arbeitskreis Assessment Center e. V. (2008). Interview-Standards. http://www.arbeitskreis-ac.de/attachments/149_akac-interview-standards.pdf. Zugegriffen: 03. Dez. 2015.

  5. Asher, J. J. (1972). The biographical item: Can it be improved? Personnel Psychology, 25, 251–269. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1972.tb01102.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baehr, M. E., & Williams, G. B. (1968). Prediction of sales success from factorially determined dimensions of personal background data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 98–103. doi:10.1037/h0020587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A., & DeGrassi, S. W. (2009). What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1394–1411. doi:10.1037/a0016532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrick, M. R., & Zimmerman, R. D. (2005). Reducing voluntary, avoidable turnover through selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 159–166. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Becker, T. E., & Colquitt, A. L. (1992). Potential versus actual faking of a biodata form: An analysis along several dimensions of item type. Personnel Psychology, 45, 389–406. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1992.tb00855.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berry, C. M., Sackett, P. R., & Landers, R. N. (2007). Revisiting interview-cognitive ability relationships: Attending to specific range restriction mechanisms in meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 837–874. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00093.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bliesener, T. (1996). Methodological moderators in validating biographical data in personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69, 107–120. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00603.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bobko, P., Roth, P. L., & Potosky, D. (1999). Derivation and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 52, 561–589. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00172.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Breaugh, J. A. (2009). The use of biodata for employee selection: Past research and future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 219–231. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.02.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Campion, M. A., Campion, J. E., & Hudson, J. P. (1994). Structured interviewing: A note on incremental validity and alternative question types. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 998–1002. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.6.998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Campion, M. A., Palmer, D. K., & Campion, J. E. (1997). A review of structure in the selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 50, 655–702. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00709.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carlson, K. D., Scullen, S. E., Schmidt, F. L., Rothstein, H., & Erwin, F. (1999). Generalizable biographical data validity can be achieved without multi-organizational development and keying. Personnel Psychology, 52, 731–755. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00179.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman, D. S., & Zweig, D. I. (2005). Developing a nomological network for interview structure: Antecedents and consequences of the structured selection interview. Personnel Psychology, 58, 673–702. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00516.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Conway, J. M., Jako, R. A., & Goodman, D. F. (1995). A meta-analysis of interrater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 565–579. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.5.565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cucina, J. M., Caputo, P. M., Thibodeaux, H. F., & Maclane, C. N. (2012). Unlocking the key to biodata scoring: A comparison of empirical, rational, and hybrid approaches at different sample sizes. Personnel Psychology, 65, 385–428. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01244.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dalessio, A. T., Crosby, M. M., & McManus, M. A. (1996). Stability of biodata keys and dimensions across English-speaking countries: A test of the cross-situational hypothesis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 289–296. doi:10.1007/BF02249604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dean, M. A. (2004). An assessment of biodata predictive ability across multiple performance criteria. Applied H.R.M. Research, 9, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Devlin, S. E., Abrahams, N. M., & Edwards, J. E. (1992). Empirical keying of biographical data: Cross-validity as a function of scaling procedure and sample size. Military Psychology, 4, 119–136. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp0403_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. DIN Deutsches Institut für Normung e. V. (2016). DIN 33430: Anforderungen an berufsbezogene Eignungsdiagnostik. Berlin: Beuth.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dipboye, R. L. (1994). Structured and unstructured selection interviews: Beyond the job-fit model. In G. R. Ferris (Hrsg.), Research in personnel and human resources management (12. Aufl., S. 79–123). Greenwich: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dipboye, R. L., & Jackson, S. (1999). Interviewer experience and expertise effects. In R. W. Eder & M. M. Harris (Hrsg.), The employment interview handbook (S. 259–278). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Dipboye, R. L., Stramler, C., & Fontanelle, G. A. (1984). The effects of the application on recall of information from the interview. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 561–575. doi:10.2307/256045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. England, G. W. (1971). Development and use of weighted application blanks (überarb. Aufl.). Oxford: U. Minnesota Industrial Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fine, S. A., & Cronshaw, S. (1994). The role of job analysis in establishing the validity of biodata. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. 39–64). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358. doi:10.1037/h0061470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Furnham, A. (2008). HR professionals’ beliefs about, and knowledge of, assessment techniques and psychometric tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16, 300–305. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2008.00436.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gehrlein, T. M., Dipboye, R. L., & Shahani, C. (1993). Nontraditional validity calculations and differential interviewer experience: Implications for selection interviews. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 53, 457–469. doi:10.1177/0013164493053002015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Goldsmith, D. (1922). The use of the personal history blank as a salesmanship test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 6, 149–155. doi:10.1037/h0073592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Graham, K. E., McDaniel, M. A., Douglas, E. F., & Snell, A. F. (2002). Biodata validity decay and score inflation with faking: Do item attributes explain variance across items? Journal of Business and Psychology, 16, 573–592. doi:10.1023/A:1015454319119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Graves, L. M., & Karren, R. J. (1999). Are some interviewers better than others? In R. W. Eder & M. M. Harris (Hrsg.), The employment interview handbook (S. 243–258). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W., & Gaertner, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of antecedents and correlates of employee turnover: Update, moderator tests, and research implications for the next millennium. Journal of Management, 26, 463–488. doi:10.1177/014920630002600305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Harris, M. M. (1989). Reconsidering the employment interview: A review of recent literature and suggestions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 42, 691–726. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00673.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hausknecht, J. P., Day, D. V., & Thomas, S. C. (2004). Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 57, 639–683. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hein, M., & Wesley, S. (1994). Scaling biodata through subgrouping. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. 171–196). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hinrichs, J. R., Haanperä, S., & Sonkin, L. (1976). Validity of a biographical information blank across national boundaries. Personnel Psychology, 29, 417–421. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1976.tb00425.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hogan, J. B. (1994). Empirical keying of background data measures. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. 69–107). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hough, L., & Paullin, C. (1994). Construct-oriented scale construction: The rational approach. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. 109–145). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Huffcutt, A. I. (2011). An empirical review of the employment interview construct literature. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 62–81. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2010.00535.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Huffcutt, A. I., & Arthur, W. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 29, 184–190. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Huffcutt, A. I., & Culbertson, S. S. (2010). Interviews. In S. Zedeck (Hrsg.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (S. 185–203). Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Huffcutt, A. I., Roth, P. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). A meta analytic investigation of cognitive ability in employment interview evaluations: Moderating characteristics and implications for incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 459–474. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Stone, N. J. (2001). Identification and meta-analytic assessment of psychological constructs measured in employment interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 897–913. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Huffcutt, A. I., Weekley, J. A., Wiesner, W. H., Degroot, T. G., & Jones, C. (2001). Comparison of situational and behavior description interview questions for higher-level positions. Personnel Psychology, 54, 619–644. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00225.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Huffcutt, A. I., Conway, J. M., Roth, P. L., & Klehe, U. C. (2004). The impact of job complexity and study design of situational and behavior description interview validity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 262–273. doi:10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.280_1.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Huffcutt, A. I., Culbertson, S. S., & Weyhrauch, W. S. (2013). Employment interview reliability: New meta-analytic estimates by structure and format. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 21, 264–276. doi:10.1111/ijsa.12036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hunter, J. E., & Hirsh, H. R. (1987). Applications of meta-analysis. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Hrsg.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (S. 321–357). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hunter, J. E., & Hunter, R. F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72–98. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.96.1.72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparison of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577–580. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.5.577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Janz, T. (1989). Patterned behavior description interviews: The best prophet of the future is the past. In R. W. Eder & G. R. Ferris (Hrsg.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice (S. 158–168). Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Janz, T., Hellervik, L., & Gillmore, D. C. (1986). Behavior description interviewing. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Jetter, W. (1998). Strukturierte Interviews und PC-gestützte Auswahlverfahren. Personalwirtschaft, 6, 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Karas, M., & West, J. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata development for selection to a differentiated performance domain. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 86–96. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Kataoka, H. C., Latham, G. P., & Whyte, G. (1997). The relative resistance of the situational, patterned behavior, and conventional structured interviews to anchoring effects. Human Performance, 10, 47–63. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1001_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kici, G., & Westhoff, K. (2000). Anforderungen an psychologisch-diagnostische Interviews in der Praxis. Report Psychologie, 25, 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kici, G., & Westhoff, K. (2004). Evaluation of requirements for the assessment and construction of interview guides in psychological assessment. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 20, 83–98. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.20.2.83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kilcullen, R. N., White, L. A., Mumford, M. D., & Mack, H. (1995). Assessing the construct validity of rational biodata scales. Military Psychology, 7, 17–28. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp0701_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Klehe, U. C., & Latham, G. P. (2005). The predictive and incremental validity of the situational and patterned behavior description interviews for teamplaying behavior. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 13, 108–115. doi:10.1111/j.0965-075X.2005.00305.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Klehe, U. C., & Latham, G. P. (2006). What would you do – really or ideally? Constructs underlying the behavior description interview and the situational interview in predicting typical versus maximum performance. Human Performance, 19, 357–382. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1904_3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Krajewski, H. T., Goffin, R. D., McCarthy, J. M., Rothstein, M. G., & Johnston, N. (2006). Comparing the validity of structured interviews for managerial-level employees: Should we look to the past or focus on the future? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 411–432. doi:10.1348/096317905X68790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Latham, G. P. (1989). The reliability, validity, and practicability of the Situational Interview. In R. W. Eder & G. R. Ferris (Hrsg.), The employment interview: Theory, research, and practice (S. 169–182). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Latham, G. P., Saari, L. M., Pursell, E. D., & Campion, M. A. (1980). The situational interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 17, 422–427. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Latham, G. P., & Sue-Chan, C. (1999). A meta-analysis of the situational interview: An enumerative review of reasons for its validity. Canadian Psychology, 40, 56–67. doi:10.1037/h0086826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lautenschlager, G. J., & Shaffer, G. S. (1987). Reexamining the component stability of Owens’s biographical questionnaire. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 149–152. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lefkowitz, J., Gebbia, M. I., Balsam, T., & Dunn, L. (1999). Dimensions of biodata items and their relationships to item validity. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 331–350. doi:10.1348/096317999166716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Levashina, J., & Campion, M. A. (2006). A model of faking likelihood in the employment interview. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 299–316. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00353.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Levashina, J., Hartwell, C. J., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67, 241–293. doi:10.1111/peps.12052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal-setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Macan, T. (2009). The employment interview: A review of current studies and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 19, 203–218. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2009.03.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Macan, T. H., Avedon, M. J., Paese, M., & Smith, D. E. (1994). The effects of applicants’ reactions to cognitive ability tests and an assessment center. Personnel Psychology, 47, 715–738. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01573.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Mael, F. A. (1991). A conceptual rationale for the domain and attributes of biodata items. Personnel Psychology, 44, 763–792. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00698.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Mayfield, E. C. (1964). The selection interview: A reevaluation of published research. Personnel Psychology, 17, 599–616. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1964.tb00065.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. McCarthy, J., & Goffin, R. (2004). Measuring job interview anxiety: Beyond weak knees and sweaty palms. Personnel Psychology, 57, 607–637. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00002.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. McDaniel, M. A., Whetzel, D. L., Schmidt, F. L., & Maurer, S. D. (1994). The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599–616. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. McManus, M. A., & Kelly, M. L. (1999). Personality measures and biodata: Evidence regarding their incremental predictive value in the life insurance industry. Personnel Psychology, 52, 137–148. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb01817.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Mitchell, T. W., & Klimoski, R. J. (1982). Is it rational to be empirical? A test of methods for scoring biographical data. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 411–418. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.67.4.411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Morton, K. S. (1994). A schema model of dispositional attribution in the employment selection process. Doctoral dissertation, Florida State University.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Moscoso, S. (2000). Selection interview: A review of validity evidence, adverse impact and applicant reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 237–247. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Mount, M. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2000). Incremental validity of empirically keyed biodata scales over GMA and the five factor personality constructs. Personnel Psychology, 53, 299–323. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00203.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Mumford, M. D. (1999). Construct validity and background data: Issues, abuses, and future directions. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 117–145. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00015-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Mumford, M. D., & Owens, W. A. (1987). Methodology review: Principles, procedures, and findings in the application of background data measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 1–31. doi:10.1177/014662168701100101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Mumford, M. D., Stokes, G. S., & Owens, W. A. (1990). Patterns of life history: The ecology of human individuality. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  86. Mumford, M. D., Costanza, D. P., Connelly, M. S., & Johnson, J. F. (1996). Item generation procedures and background data scales: Implications for construct and criterion-related validity. Personnel Psychology, 49, 361–398. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01804.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Mumford, M. D., Whetzel, D. L., Murphy, S. T., & Eubanks, D. L. (2007). Background data. In D. L. Whetzel & G. R. Wheaton (Hrsg.), Applied measurement: Industrial psychology in human resources management (S. 201–233). New York: Taylor & Francis Group & Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Mumford, M. D., Barrett, J. D., & Hester, K. S. (2012). Background data: Use of experiential knowledge in personnel selection. In N. Schmitt (Hrsg.), The Oxford handbook of personnel assessment and selection (S. 353–382). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Nickels, B. J. (1994). The nature of biodata. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. 1–16). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  90. Orpen, C. (1985). Patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews: A comparative validity study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 774–776. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.70,4.774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Oswald, F. L., Schmitt, N., Kim, B. H., Ramsay, L. J., & Gillespie, M. A. (2004). Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 187–207. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Owens, W. A. (1976). Background data. In M. D. Dunette (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (S. 609–644). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Owens, W. A., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1979). Toward a classification of persons. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 569–607. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.64.5.569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Pace, L. A., & Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1977). Legal concerns in the use of weighted applications. Personnel Psychology, 30, 159–166. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1977.tb02085.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Posthuma, R. A., Morgeson, F. P., & Campion, M. A. (2002). Beyond employment interview validity: A comprehensive narrative review of recent research and trends over time. Personnel Psychology, 55, 1–81. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00103.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Whitney, D., & Smith, M. (1996). Individual differences in interviewer ratings: The impact of standardization, consensus discussion, and sampling error on the validity of a structured interview. Personnel Psychology, 49, 85–102. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01792.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Püttner, I. (2014). Rechtliche Aspekte der Personalarbeit. In H. Schuler, & U. P. Kanning (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (3. überarb. u. erw. Aufl., S. 1201–1226). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Reilly, R. R., & Chao, G. R. (1982). Validity and fairness of some alternative employee selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 35, 1–62. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1982.tb02184.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Reiter-Palmon, R., & Connelly, M. S. (2000). Item selection counts: A comparison of empirical key and rational scale validities in theory-based and non-theory-based item pools. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 143–151. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.1.143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Robertson, I. T., & Smith, M. (2001). Personnel selection. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74, 441–472. doi:10.1348/096317901167479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Roth, P. L., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2013). A meta-analysis of interviews and cognitive ability: Back to the future? Journal of Personnel Psycholog, 12, 157–169. doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Rothstein, H. R., Schmidt, F. L., Erwin, F. W., Owens, W. A., & Sparks, C. P. (1990). Biographical data in employment selection: Can validities be made generalizable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 175–184. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.2.175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Russell, C. J. (1994). Generation procedures for biodata items: A point of departure. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. 17–38). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Russell, C. J., Mattson, J., Devlin, S. E., & Atwater, D. (1990). Predictive validity of biodata items generated from retrospective life experience essays. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 569–580. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H., & Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: Nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359–391. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00165.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Ryan, A. M., & Sackett, P. R. (1989). Exploratory study of individual assessment practices: Interrater-reliability and judgments of assessor effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 568–579. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the employment interview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 299–324. doi:10.1080/13594320244000184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262–274. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (1992). Test-taking dispositions: A missing link? Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 629–637. doi:10.1037/0021-9010,77.5.629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Schmitt, N., Gooding, R. Z., Noe, R. A., & Kirsch, M. (1984). Metaanalyses of validity studies published between 1964 and 1982 and the investigation of study characteristics. Personnel Psychology, 37, 407–422. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1984.tb00519.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Schmitt, N., Jennings, D., & Toney, R. (1999). Can we develop measures of hypothetical constructs? Human Resource Management Review, 9, 169–183. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00017-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Schoenfeldt, L. F. (1999). From dust bowl empiricism to rational constructs in biographical data. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 147–167. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00016-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Schoenfeldt, L. F., & Mendoza, J. L. (1994). Developing and using factorially derived biographical scales. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. 147–169). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Schuler, H. (1992). Das Multimodale Interview. Diagnostica, 38, 281–300.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Schuler, H. (1994). Selektion und Selbstselektion durch das Multimodale Interview. In L. von Rosenstiel, T. Lang, & E. Sigl (Hrsg.), Fach- und Führungsnachwuchs finden und fördern (S. 97–112). Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  116. Schuler, H. (2002). Das Einstellungsinterview. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Schuler, H. (2014a). Biografieorientierte Verfahren der Personalauswahl. In H. Schuler, & U. P. Kanning (Hrsg.), Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie (3. überarb. u. erw. Aufl., S. 257–299). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Schuler, H. (2014b). Psychologische Personalauswahl – Eignungsdiagnostik für Personalentscheidungen und Berufsberatung (4. vollst. überarb. u. erw. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Schuler, H., & Funke, U. (1989). Berufseignungsdiagnostik. In E. Roth (Hrsg.), Organisationspsychologie. Enzyklopädie der Psychologie D, Serie 3 (Bd. 3, S. 281–320). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  120. Schuler, H., Hell, B., Trapmann, S., Schaar, H., & Boramir, I. (2007). Die Nutzung psychologischer Verfahren der externen Personalauswahl in deutschen Unternehmen: Ein Vergleich über 20 Jahre. Zeitschrift für Personalpsychologie, 2, 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Schwab, D. P., & Oliver, R. L. (1974). Predicting tenure with biographical data: Exhuming buried evidence. Personnel Psychology, 27, 125–128. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1974.tb02068.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Shackleton, V., & Newell, S. (1994). European management selection methods: A comparison of five countries. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2, 91–102. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2389.1994.tb00155.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Shaffer, G. S., Saunders, V., & Owens, W. A. (1986). Additional evidence for the accuracy of biographical data: Long-term retest and observer ratings. Personnel Psychology, 39, 791–809. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1986.tb00595.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Sharf, J. C. (1994). The impact of legal and equal employment opportunity issues on personal history inquiries. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. 351–390). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  125. Snell, A. F., Stokes, G. S., Sands, M. M., & McBridge, J. R. (1994). Adolescent life experiences as predictors of occupational attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 131–141. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.1.131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Stokes, G. S. (1994). Introduction and history. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Hrsg.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (S. VX–VXII). Palo Alto: CPP Books.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Stokes, G. S., & Cooper, L. A. (2001). Content/construct approaches in life history form development for selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 138–151. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Stokes, G. S., & Cooper, L. A. (2004). Biodata. In J. C. Thomas (Hrsg.), Comprehensive handbook of psychological assessment, Vol. 4: Industrial and organizational assessment (S. 243–268). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Stokes, G. S., & Searcy, C. A. (1999). Specification of scales in biodata form development: Rational vs. empirical and global vs. specific. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7, 72–85. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Stokes, G. S., Toth, C. S., Searcy, C. A., Stroupe, J. P., & Carter, G. W. (1999). Construct/rational biodata dimensions to predict salesperson performance: Report on the U.S. department of labor sales study. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 185–218. doi:10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00018-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Strobel, A., Lammerskitten, E., & Glodek, R. (2010). Die Interview-Standards des Arbeitskreis Assessment Center e. V. – Entwicklung, Inhalte. Nutzen. Wirtschaftspsychologie, 2, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Strobel, A., & Westhoff, K. (2009). Diagnoseinstrument zur Erfassung der Interviewerkompetenz in der Personalauswahl (DIPA). Frankfurt a. M.: Pearson Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Strobel, A., & Westhoff, K. (2010). Eignungsinterview. In K. Westhoff, C. Hagemeister, M. Kersting, F. Lang, H. Moosbrugger, G. Reimann, & G. Stemmler (Hrsg.), Grundwissen für die berufsbezogene Eignungsbeurteilung nach DIN 33430 (3. überarb Aufl., S. 84–101). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Taylor, P. J., & O’Driscoll, M. P. (1995). Structured employment interviewing. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Taylor, P. J., & Small, B. (2002). Asking applicants what they would do versus what they did do: A meta-analytic comparison of situational and past behaviour employment interview questions. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 75, 277–294. doi:10.1348/096317902320369712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Trost, G. (1996). Interview. Grundlagen und Methoden der Differentiellen Psychologie. In K. J. Groffmann & L. Michel (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie (Bd. 1, S. 463–505). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Valenzi, E., & Andrews, I. R. (1973). Individual differences in the decision process of employment interviewers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58, 49–53. doi:10.1037/h0021696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Van der Zee, K. I., Bakker, A. B., & Bakker, P. (2002). Why are structured interviews so rarely used in personnel selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 176–184. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Van Iddekinge, C. H., Raymark, P. H., & Roth, P. L. (2005). Assessing personality with a structured employment interview: Construct-related validity and susceptibility to response inflation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 536–552. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Vinchur, A. J., Schippmann, J. S., Switzer, F. S. I., & Roth, P. L. (1998). A meta-analytic review of predictors of job performance for salespeople. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 586–597. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Wagner, R. (1949). The employment interview: A critical summary. Personnel Psychology, 2, 17–46. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1949.tb01669.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Webster, E. C. (1964). Decision making in the employment interview. Montreal: Industrial Relations Centre, McGill University.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Webster, E. C. (1982). The employment interview. Schomberg: SIP Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Westhoff, K. (2000). Das psychologisch-diagnostische Interview – Ein Überblick über die Forschung für die Praxis. Report Psychologie, 25, 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Westhoff, K. (Hrsg.). (2009). Das Entscheidungsorientierte Gespräch (EOG) als Eignungsinterview. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Westhoff, K., Hagemeister, C., & Eckert, H. (2002). On the objectivity of oral examinations in psychology. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 149–157. doi:10.1024/0170-1789.23.2.149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Westhoff, K., & Kluck, M. L. (2014). Psychologische Gutachten schreiben und beurteilen (6. vollst. überarb. u. erw. Aufl.). Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  148. Westhoff, K., & Strobel, A. (2009a). Leitfadenkonstruktion. In K. Westhoff (Hrsg.). Das Entscheidungsorientierte Gespräch (EOG) als Eignungsinterview (S. 79–86). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Westhoff, K., & Strobel, A. (2009b). Strukturierung des Eignungsinterviews. In K. Westhoff (Hrsg.). Das Entscheidungsorientierte Gespräch (EOG) als Eignungsinterview (S. 27–36). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  150. Westhoff, K., & Strobel, A. (2011). Interview. In M. Amelang & L. F. Hornke (Hrsg.), Enzyklopädie der Psychologie. Themenbereich B, Methodologie und Methoden. Serie II, Psychologische Diagnostik. Band II, Methoden (S. 371–413). Göttingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  151. Wiesner, W. H., & Cronshaw, S. F. (1988). A meta-analytic investigation of the impact of interview format and degree of structure on the validity of the employment interview. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 61, 275–290. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Persönlichkeitspsychologie und Diagnostik, Institut für Psychologie, TU Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Deutschland

    Anja Strobel & Luise Franke-Bartholdt

Authors
  1. Anja Strobel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Luise Franke-Bartholdt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Strobel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Berlin, Germany

    Diana Eva Krause

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strobel, A., Franke-Bartholdt, L. (2017). Interviewverfahren und biografischer Fragebogen. In: Krause, D. (eds) Personalauswahl. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14567-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14567-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-14566-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-14567-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation