Skip to main content

Wherein Lies The Value Of Equality When Equality Is No Longer ‘Natural’?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits

Abstract

Until the modern period, the idea that all humans are ‘natural equals’ was largely a legacy of Abrahamic theology. Many 18th century Enlightenment figures believed that the egalitarian spirit embodied in the Christian motto ‘the truth shall set you free’ could be continued with impunity once theology was replaced by science. However, as the 19th century showed, exemplarily by Darwin, this was not to be the case. Our science-based capacities to classify and monitor people at ever more fine-grained levels have only increased, opening the door to new forms of discrimination and even racism. I pursue this matter in relation to the rather different political logics associated with the two major modern forms of egalitarianism: ‘equality of opportunity’ and ‘equality of outcome’, concluding with a consideration of the new challenges posed by the emerging ideology of ‘transhumanism’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, Anthony. (2015). Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, Nick. (2014). Superintelligence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. (2000). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. (1983). “The ‘Reductio ad Symbolum’ and the Possibility of a ‘Linguistic Object’”. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 13: 129–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. (2000a). The Governance of Science. Milton Keynes UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. (2000b). Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for Our Times. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. (2006a). The New Sociological imagination. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. (2006b). ‘The Market: Source or Target of Morality?’ in Nico Stehr, Christoph Henning and Bernd Weiler (eds.), The Moralization of the Market. (New Brunswick New Jersey: Transaction Books), pp. 129–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. (2011). Humanity 2.0: What It Means to Be Human Past, Present and Future. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve. (2012). Preparing for Life in Humanity 2.0. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, Steve and Lipinska, Veronika. (2014). The Proactionary Imperative: A Foundation for Transhumanism. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. (2002). The Future of Human Nature. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, Jennifer Michael. (1999). ‘The solvency of metaphysics: The debate over racial science and moral philosophy in France, 1890–1919’. Isis 90: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, Fred. (1976). The Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istvan, Zoltan. (2015). ‘Why I advocate for becoming a machine’. Vice Motherboard (10 August). http://motherboard.vice.com/en_uk/read/why-i-advocate-for-becoming-a-machine

  • Kuhn, Thomas. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. (Orig. 1962). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, Hans. (1988). Mind Children. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Theodore. (2004). Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary. (1975). Mind, Language, and Reality (Philosophical Papers, vol. 2), Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Emma. (2001). Economic Sentiments. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weikart, Richard. (2002). ‘Darwinism and death: Devaluing human life in Germany, 1859–1920’. Journal of the History of Ideas 63: 323–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Michael. (1958). The Rise of the Meritocracy. London: Thames & Hudson.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Fuller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fuller, S. (2016). Wherein Lies The Value Of Equality When Equality Is No Longer ‘Natural’?. In: Machin, A., Stehr, N. (eds) Understanding Inequality: Social Costs and Benefits. zu | schriften der Zeppelin Universität. zwischen Wirtschaft, Kultur und Politik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11663-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11663-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-11662-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-11663-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics