Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond unity: Nurturing diversity in synthetic biology and its publics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Synthetic Biology

  • 493 Accesses

Abstract

Alarmist concerns have recently been voiced over the lack of unity of synthetic biology. In its May 2014 issue, the prestigious journal Nature featured a special section entitled “Beyond divisions: Building the future of synthetic biology” (Nature 2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angeli Aguiton, S. (2010). Un vivant “sexy et à peu près faisable.” Anthropologie d’un concours d’ingénierie génétique. Master’s Dissertation. École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeli Aguiton, S. (2014). La démocratie des chimères: gouvernement des risques et des critiques de la biologie synthétique, en France et aux Etats-Unis. Thesis/Dissertation. Institut d’études politiques Sciences-Po Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Annaluru, N., Muller, H., Mitchell, L.A., Ramalingam, S., Stracquadanio, G., Richardson, S.M., … Chandrasegaran, S. (2014). Total synthesis of a functional designer eukaryotic chromosome. Science, 344(6179), 55–58. doi: 10.1126/science.1249252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwater, J., & Holliger, P. (2014). A synthetic approach to abiogenesis. Nature Methods, 11, 495–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, A., Bulpin, K., Calvert, J., Kearnes, M., Mackenzie, A., Marris, C., Martin, P, Molyneux- Hodgson, S., & Schyfter, P. (2012). Towards a Manifesto for Experimental Collaborations between Social and Natural Scientists. http://experimentalcollaborations.wordpress.com/. Accessed: 12 December 2014.

  • Balmer, A.S., & Bulpin, K.J. (2013). Left to their own devices: Post-ELSI, ethical equipment and the International Genetically Engineered Machine (iGEM) Competition. BioSocieties, 8, 311- 335. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3772706/. Accessed: 28 November 2014.

  • Batt, G. (2014). Cybergenetics: cells driven by computers. Communication at the workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (pp. 5–6). Accessed: 28 November 2014.

  • Bedau, M.A. (2014). How weak emergence drives synthetic biology. Communication at the workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (pp. 13–14). Accessed: 28 November 2014.

  • Bensaude Vincent, B. (2001). A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensaude Vincent, B. (2013a). Discipline-building in synthetic biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 122–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensaude Vincent, B. (2013b). Ethical perspectives on synthetic biology. Biological Theory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press (MIT Press): STM Titles, 2013, 8(4), 368–375. hal –00937211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, S.A. (2004). Redesigning genetics. Science, 306, 625–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, S.A., & Sismour, A.M. (2005). Synthetic biology. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benner, S.A., Chang F., & Yang Z. (2011). Synthetic biology, tinkering biology, and artificial biology: A perspective from chemistry. In: P. L. Luisi, & C. Chiarabelli (2011), Chemical Synthetic Biology (pp. 69–106). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, J. (2012). Ownership and sharing in synthetic biology: A “diverse ecology” of the open and the proprietary? BioSocieties, 7, 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, J. (2013). Collaboration as a research method? Navigating social scientific involvement in synthetic biology. In: N. Doorn, D. Schuurbiers, I. van de Poel, M. E. Gorman (eds.), Early engagement and new technologies: opening up the laboratory (pp. 175–194). Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Calvert, J., & Frow, E. (2014). Experimental Collaborations. Communication at the Workshop on the Research Agendas in the Societal Aspects of Synthetic Biology, Arizona State University, November 4–6, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, L. (2009). That was the synthetic biology that was. In: M. Schmidt, A. Kelle, A. Ganguli- Mitra, & H. de Vriend (eds.), Synthetic biology: The technoscience and its consequences (pp. 5–21). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R.H., (2011). Biology Is Technology. The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L.Y., Kosuri, S., & Endy, D. (2005). Refactoring bacteriophage T7. Molecular Systems Biology, 1, 2005.0018. doi: 10.1038/msb4100025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, G.M., Elowitz, M.B., Smolke, C.D., Voigt, C.A., & Weiss, R. (2014). Realizing the potential of synthetic biology. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 15, 289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.J. (2014). Synthetic biology: How best to build a cell? Bring in the biologists. Comments. Nature, 509, 155–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaplace, F. (2014). On the use of computer language for programming biological function. Communication at the workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1. pdf (pp. 21–22). Accessed: 27 November 2014.

  • Delcourt, M. (2014). Global Bioenergies – An application of synthetic biology: from carbohydrates to hydrocarbons. Communication at the workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (pp. 6–7). Accessed: 29 November 2014.

  • Gardner, T.S., Cantor, C.R., & Collins, J.J. (2000). Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature, 403, 339–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellington, A. (2014). Synthetic biology: How best to build a cell? Build green “bioalchemists.” Comments. Nature, 509, 155–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elowitz, M.B., & Leibler, S. (2000). A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature, 403, 335–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endy, D. (2005). Foundations for engineering biology. Nature, 438, 449–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhard, M. (2014). Differentiating the evaluation of synthetic biology. Communication at the workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (p.3). Accessed: 29 November 2014.

  • European Commission 2014. Science with and for society. Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2014–2015, part 16. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/main/h2020-wp1415-swfs_en.pdf. Accessed: 28 January 2014.

  • Frow, E., & Calvert, J. (2013). “Can simple biological systems be built from standardized interchangeable parts?” Negotiating biology and engineering in a synthetic biology competition. Engineering Studies, 5, 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusseneger, M. (2014). Synthetic biology: How best to build a cell? Make tools for mammalian cells. Comments. Nature, 509, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., & Trow M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrys, J. (2013). Plastic and the work of the biodegradable. In: J. Gabrys, G. Hawkins, & M. Michael (eds.). Accumulation: The Material Politics of Plastic (pp. 208–227). London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geim, A. K., & Novoselov, K. S. (2007). The rise of graphene. Nature Materials, 6, 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, J., & Maurer, S.M. (2009). Parts, property and sharing. Nature Biotechnology, 27, 1095–1098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobom, B. (1980). Surgery of genes – at the doorstep of synthetic biology. Medizinische Klinik, 75, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, D., & Marcus, G. (2008). Collaboration today and the re-imagination of the classic scene of fieldwork encounter. Collaborative Anthropologies, 1, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo, A. (2014). General-Purpose Programmable Evolution Machine on a Chip. Communication at the workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (pp. 12–13). Accessed: 24 November 2014.

  • Jullien, L. (2014). Biology-assisted Chemistry as an attractive paradigm for chemistry. Communication at the workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (pp. 7–8). Accessed: 29 November 2014.

  • Kastenhofer, K. (2013). Two sides of the same coin? The (techno)epistemic cultures of systems and synthetic biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 130–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1978). Seminar XI: The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis. New York, London: Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, H. (2012). Reflections on science and technoscience. Scientiae Studia, 10, 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacour, S. (2011). A legal version of the nanoworld. Comptes-rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de physique, 12, 693–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibniz, G.W. (1960). Die Philosophische Schriften von Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, vol. 3 (First ed. C. I. Gerhardt. Berlin: Weidmann, 1875–90). Hildesheim: Olms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lentini, R., Santero, S.P., Chizzolini, F., Cecchi, D., Fontana, J., Marchioretto, M., … Mansy, S.S. (2014). Integrating artificial with natural cells to translate chemical messages that direct E. coli behaviour. Nature Communications, 5, 4012. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levskaya, A., Chevalier, A.A., Tabor, J.J., Simpson, Z.B., Lavery, L.A., Levy, M., … Voigt, C.A. (2005). Synthetic biology: Engineering Escherichia coli to see light. Nature, 438(7067), 441–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeve, S. (2009). Le concept de technologie à l’échelle des molecules-machines. Philosophie des techniques à l’usage des citoyens du nanomonde. Thesis/Dissertation. University Paris Ouest Nanterre – La défense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loeve, S. (2014). Summary Report of the Paris Workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology. Synenergene. http://synenergene.eu/resource/summary-report-paris-workshop-worldviews-and-values-synthetic-biology. Accessed: 5 May 2015.

  • Loeve, S. (2014). Introductory remarks to the session “Ways of doing synthetic biology.” Communication at the Workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (pp. 4–5). Accessed: 29 November 2014.

  • Luisi, P.L. (1997). About various definitions of life. Origins of Life and Evolution of the Biosphere, 28, 613–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luisi, P.L. (1998). Does science see a purpose in life? Communication at the workshop Is There a Purpose in Nature? How to Navigate Between the Scylla of Mechanism and Charybdis of Teleology. Charles University Prague, March 22–25, 1998. http://web.archive.org/web/20070611152326/http://www.cts.cuni.cz/conf98/luisi.htm. Accessed: 19 January 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luisi, P.L. (2006). The Emergence of Life: From Chemical Origins to Synthetic Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luisi, P.L. (2011). The synthetic approach in biology: epistemological notes for synthetic biology. In: P. L. Luisi & C. Chiarabelli (2011). Chemical Synthetic Biology (p. 343–362). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, A. (2013a). Realizing the promise of biotechnology: Infrastructural-icons in synthetic biology. Futures, 48, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, A. (2013b). Synthetic biology and the technicity of biofuels. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 190–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malaterre, C. (2013). Synthetic biology and synthetic knowledge. Biological Theory, 8, 346–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansy, S.S. (2014). Building artificial cells to deceive natural cells. Communication at the Workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (pp. 23–24). Accessed: 29 November 2014.

  • Marcovich, A., & Shinn, T. (2012). Regimes of science production and diffusion: towards a transverse organization of knowledge. Scientiae Studia, 10, 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcovich, A., & Shinn, T. (2014). Towards a New Dimension: Exploring the Nanoscale. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marliere, P. (2009). The farther, the safer: a manifesto for securely navigating synthetic species away from the old living world. Systems and Synthetic Biology, 3, 77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marris, C. (2014). The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology. Science as Culture, 24, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxon, M. (2014). Synthetic biology: How best to build a cell? Agree on a definition. Comments. Nature, 509, 156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., Cserer, A., & Schmidt, M. (2013). Frankenstein 2.0.: Identifying and characterising synthetic biology engineers in science fiction films. Life Sciences Society and Policy, 9, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morange, M. (2009). A new revolution? The place of systems biology and synthetic biology in the history of biology. EMBO Reports, 10, S50-S53. Nature (2014). Synthetic Biology: Beyond Divisions. Nature, 509. Nature editors (2014). Tribal gathering. Nature, 509, 133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Methods editors (2014). Synthetic biology: back to the basics. Nature Methods, 11, 463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Nanotechnology editors (2006a). Small is different. Nature Nanotechnology, 1, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Nanotechnology editors (2006b). nan’o·tech·nol’o·gy n. Nature Nanotechnology, 1, 8–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Publishing Group (2014). Nature Special – Synthetic Biology: Beyond Divisions. Nature. Publishing.Group@ealert.nature.com , 8 May 2014 4:06 pm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nature Reviews Microbiology editors (2014). Milestones in synthetic (micro)biology. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 12, 309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novoselov, K.S., Fal, V.I., Colombo, L., Gellert, P.R., Schwab, M. G., & Kim, K. (2012). A roadmap for graphene. Nature, 490(7419), 192–200. doi: 10.1038/nature11458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Katsnelson, M. I., Grigorieva, I. V., … Firsov, A. A. (2005). Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature, 438(7065), 197–200. doi: 10.1038/nature04233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novoselov, K.S., Geim, A. K., Morozov, S. V., Jiang, D., Zhang, Y., Dubonos, S. V., … Firsov, A. A. (2004). Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science, 306(5696), 666–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1102896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M.A. (2009). Making knowledge in synthetic biology: Design meets kludge. Biological Theory, 4, 378–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, M.A., Powell, A., Davies, J. F., & Calvert, J. (2008). Knowledge-making distinctions in synthetic biology. BioEssays, 30, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastrana, E. (2011). Optogenetics: controlling cell function with light. Nature Methods, 8, 24–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peplow, M. (2013). Graphene: The quest for supercarbon. Nature, 503, 327–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pompon, D. (2014). Frontiers and views on metabolic engineering. Communication at the Workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (pp. 20–21). Accessed: 29 November 2014.

  • Potthast, T. (2009). Paradigm shifts versus fashion shifts? EMBO Reports, 10, S42–S45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P., & Bennett, G. (2007). From bioethics to human practices, or assembling contemporary equipment. In B. da Costa & K. Philip (eds.), Tactical biopolitics art, activism, and technoscience (pp. 389–400). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., & Boyle, J. (2007). Synthetic biology: caught between property rights, the public domain, and the commons. PLOS Biology, 5, e58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raimbault, B., Cointet, J.P., & Joly, P.B. (2013). Caractérisation du processus d’émergence de la biologie synthétique à partir d’une approche scientométrique. Médecine/Sciences, 29, 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, R.L. (2000). “Synthetic biology” makes its debut. Chemical Engineering News, 78, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roco, M.C., & Bainbridge, W. S. (2002). Converging technologies for improving human performance: integrating from the nanoscale. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 4, 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römer, W. (2014). Synthetic membrane biology – rebuilding cellular processes on artificial membrane systems. Communication at the Workshop Worldviews and Values in Synthetic Biology, University Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne, June 6–7, 2014. Written report at http://synenergene.eu/sites/default/files//uploads/WV%26Vs%20Summary%20Report%20of%20the%20Workshop_1.pdf (p.25). Accessed: 29 November 2014.

  • Sauro, H. (2014). Synthetic biology: How best to build a cell? Capitalize on evolution. Comments. Nature, 509, 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. (ed.) (2012). Synthetic biology: industrial and environmental applications. Weinheim: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szostak, J.W., Bartel, D.P., & Luisi, P.L. (2001). Synthesizing life. Nature, 409, 387–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. (2015). Constructing a “futurology from below”: a civil society contribution toward a research agenda. Journal of Responsible Innovation, (ahead-of-print), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap Coordination Group (2012). http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/publications/SyntheticBiologyRoadmap.pdf. Accessed: 20 December 2014.

  • Weiss, R. (2014). Synthetic biology: How best to build a cell? Automate efficient design. Comments. Nature, 509, 157.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. TSH-COSTECH, Compiègne Technology University, Compiègne, France

    Sacha Loeve

Authors
  1. Sacha Loeve
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Joachim Boldt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loeve, S. (2016). Beyond unity: Nurturing diversity in synthetic biology and its publics. In: Boldt, J. (eds) Synthetic Biology. Technikzukünfte, Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft / Futures of Technology, Science and Society. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10988-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation