Abstract
Social networks are key to drug markets as they are for many other types of human interaction. Rooted in both anthropology and sociology, network analysis is increasingly adopted in drug market research. Supply side studies to date mainly focus on large organised networks, and make use of police reports or telephone taps to describe the composition of these networks. The network perspective holds important opportunities to study other topics of supply, more specifically social supply. Already included in the name, the social aspect is deemed very important when studying supply relationships. But, at the same time, this relationship still includes an exchange of goods, which implies that a certain material or immaterial goal might be intended. This chapter discusses how a network perspective allows sketching the nuanced nature of supply relationships by placing them in a relational context. First, the way a network researcher views the world in general and drug markets in particular is discussed. Drug markets are then defined as a fluid collection of personal networks of different types of actors (e.g. users, suppliers, brokers, non-users…). It is in these particular personal networks that social supply is situated as a specific relationship between two actors that combines an aspect of exchange with an aspect of closeness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aldridge, J., Measham, F., & Williams, L. (2011). Illegal leisure revisited. Changing patterns of alcohol and drug use in adolescents and young adults. (Adolescence and Society). London: Routledge.
Aloise-Young, P. A., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1994). Peer influence on smoking initiation during early adolescence: a comparison of group members and group outsiders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 281-287.
Amos, A., Wiltshire, S., Bostock, Y., Haw, S., & McNeill, A. (2004). ‘You can’t go without a fag...you need it for your hash’ - a qualitative exploration of smoking, cannabis and young people. Addiction, 99(1), 77-81, doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00531.x.
Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1993). The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review, 58(6), 837-860.
Batson, D. (1993). Communal and Exchange Relationships: What is the Difference? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 16(3), 677-683, doi:10.1177/0146167293196002.
Bauman, K. E., & Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: Commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91(2), 185-198.
Bell, R., Pavis, S., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Amos, A. (1998). Young men's use of cannabis: Exploring changes in meaning and context over time. Drugs; Education, Prevention and Policy, 5(2), 141.
Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Calderoni, F. (2012). The structure of drug trafficking mafias: the 'Ndrangheta and cocaine. Crime Law and Social Change, 58(3), 321-349, doi:10.1007/s10611-012-9387-9.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684-691.
Coggan, N., & Mckellar, S. (1994). Drug-Use Amongst Peers - Peer Pressure or Peer Preference. Drugs-Education Prevention and Policy, 1(1), 15-26.
Coomber, R. (2006). Pusher myths: Re-situating the drug dealer. London: Free Associatin Books.
Coomber, R., & Moyle, L. (2014). Beyond drug dealing: Developing and extending the concept of ‘social supply’of illicit drugs to ‘minimally commercial supply’. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 21(2).
Coomber, R., & Turnbull, P. (2007). Arenas of drug transactions: Adolescent cannabis transactions in England - Social supply. Journal of Drug Issues, 37(4), 845-865.
Crossley, N. (2010). The social world of the network. Combining qualitative and quantitative elements in social network analysis. Sociologica, 1, 1-34.
Cullen, F. (2010). 'Two's up and poncing fags': young women' smoking practices, reciprocity and friendship. Gender and Education, 22(5), 491-504.
Dorn, N., Levi, M., & King, L. (2005). Literature review on upper level drug trafficking. Home Office Online Report 22/05. London: Home Office.
Dorn, N., Murji, K., & South, N. (1992). Traffickers: Drug markets and law enforcement: Psychology Press.
Duff, C. (2005). Party drugs and party people: examining the 'normalization' of recreational drug use in Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(3), 161-170, doi:DOI10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.02.001.
Erickson, B. H. (1981). Secret societies and social structure. Social Forces, 60(1), 188-210.
Galea, S., Nandi, A., & Vlahov, D. (2004). The social epidemiology of substance use. Epidemiologic reviews, 26(1), 36-52.
Giménez-Salinas Framis, A. (2013). Illegal Networks or Criminal Organizations: Structure, Power and Facilitators in Cocaine Trafficking Structures. In C. Morselli (Ed.), Crime and Networks. New York: Routledge.
Giuffre, K. (2013). Communities and networks: using social network analysis to rethink urban and community studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Harrison, L. D., Erickson, P. G., Korf, D. J., Brochu, S., & Benschop, A. (2007). How much for a dime bag? An exploration of youth drug markets. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, S27-S39, doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.009.
Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? 1. American journal of sociology, 106(4), 1013-1057.
Highet, G. (2003). Cannabis and smoking research: interviewing young people in self-selected friendship pairs. Health Education Research, 18(1), 108-118.
Highet, G. (2004). The role of cannabis in supporting young people's cigarette smoking: a qualitative approach. Health Education Research, 19(6), 635-643, doi:10.1093/her/cyg089.
Hough, M., Warburton, H., Few, B., May, T., Man, L., Witton, J., et al. (2003). A growing market: The domestic cultivation of cannabis. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Kirke, D. M. (2006). Teenagers and Substance Use: Social Networks and Peer Influence. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kobus, K., & Henry, D. B. (2010). Interplay of network position and peer substance use in early adolescent cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use. The journal of early adolescence., 30(2), 225-245.
Lee, N. H. (1969). Search for an Abortionist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: an introduction. In J. Scott, & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 11-25). London: Sage.
Mashek, D. J., & Aron, A. (2004). Handbook of closeness and intimacy: Psychology Press.
McCarty, C. (2002). Structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure, 3(1), Online.
McCarty, C., & Molina, J. L (2011). Personal networks. Research and applications. Draft, Online: http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/egolab/sites/grupsderecerca.uab.cat.egolab/files/pna.pdf
McGloin, J. M., & Nguyen, H. (2013). The importance of studying co-offending networks for criminological theory and policy. In C. Morselli (Ed.), Crime and Networks (pp. 13-27). New York: Routledge.
Michell, L., & Amos, A. (1997). Girls, pecking order and smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 44(12), 1861-1869.
Michell, M., & Pearson, L. (2000). Smoke rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 7(1), 21-37.
Mische, A., & White, H. C. (1998). Between conversation and situation: public switching dynamics across network-domains. Social Research, 65(3), 295-324.
Morselli, C. (2009). Inside criminal networks: Springer.
Morselli, C., Giguère, C., & Petit, K. (2007). The efficiency/security trade-off in criminal networks. Social Networks, 29(1), 143-153, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2006.05.001.
Oliver, K., Crossley, N., Edwards, G., Koskinen, J., Everett, M., & Broccatelli, C. (2014). Covert networks: structures, processes and types. Working paper of the Mitchell Centre for Network Analysis.
Paoli, L. (2002). The paradoxes of organized crime. Crime, Law & Social Change, 37, 51-97.
Papachristos, A. V. (2011). The coming of a networked criminology. Measuring Crime & Criminality: Advances in Criminological Theory, 17, 101-140.
Papachristos, A. V., & Smith, C. M. (2012). The Small World of Al Capone: The Embedded Nature of Criminal and Legitimate Social Networks. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2159899.
Parker, H. (2000). How young Britons obtain their drugs: Drugs transactions at the point of consumption. Crime Prevention Studies, 11, 59-82.
Pearson, G., Hobbs, R., Jones, S., Tierney, J., & Ward, J. (2001). Middle market drug distribution.
Pearson, M., & Michell, L. (2000). Smoke Rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 7(1), 21-37.
Potter, G. (2009). Exploring retail-level drug distribution: Social supply, 'real' dealers and the user/dealer interface. In Z. Demetrovics, J. Fountain, & K. Kraus (Eds.), Old & new policies, theories, research methods and drug users across Europe (pp. 50-74, ESSD Series). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.
Reuter, P. (1985). The organization of illegal markets: and economic analysis. Washington: National Institute of Justice.
Shewan, D., Dalgarno, P., & Reith, G. (2000). Perceived risk and risk reduction among ecstasy users: the role of drug, set, and setting. International Journal of Drug Policy, 10(6), 431-453.
Snijders, T., Spreen, M., & Zwaagstra, R. (1995). The use of mulitlevel modeling for analysing personal networks: networks of cocaine users in an urban area. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 5, 85-105.
Werse, B. (2008). Retail markets for cannabis—users, sharers, go-betweens and stash dealers. Cannabis in Europe: Dynamics in perception, policy and markets, 106-123.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vlaemynck, M. (2016). Social supply: a personal network perspective. In: Werse, B., Bernard, C. (eds) Friendly Business. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10329-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10329-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10328-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10329-3
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)