Skip to main content

Social supply: a personal network perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Friendly Business

Abstract

Social networks are key to drug markets as they are for many other types of human interaction. Rooted in both anthropology and sociology, network analysis is increasingly adopted in drug market research. Supply side studies to date mainly focus on large organised networks, and make use of police reports or telephone taps to describe the composition of these networks. The network perspective holds important opportunities to study other topics of supply, more specifically social supply. Already included in the name, the social aspect is deemed very important when studying supply relationships. But, at the same time, this relationship still includes an exchange of goods, which implies that a certain material or immaterial goal might be intended. This chapter discusses how a network perspective allows sketching the nuanced nature of supply relationships by placing them in a relational context. First, the way a network researcher views the world in general and drug markets in particular is discussed. Drug markets are then defined as a fluid collection of personal networks of different types of actors (e.g. users, suppliers, brokers, non-users…). It is in these particular personal networks that social supply is situated as a specific relationship between two actors that combines an aspect of exchange with an aspect of closeness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldridge, J., Measham, F., & Williams, L. (2011). Illegal leisure revisited. Changing patterns of alcohol and drug use in adolescents and young adults. (Adolescence and Society). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aloise-Young, P. A., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1994). Peer influence on smoking initiation during early adolescence: a comparison of group members and group outsiders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 281-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amos, A., Wiltshire, S., Bostock, Y., Haw, S., & McNeill, A. (2004). ‘You can’t go without a fag...you need it for your hash’ - a qualitative exploration of smoking, cannabis and young people. Addiction, 99(1), 77-81, doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00531.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, W. E., & Faulkner, R. R. (1993). The social organization of conspiracy: Illegal networks in the heavy electrical equipment industry. American Sociological Review, 58(6), 837-860.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batson, D. (1993). Communal and Exchange Relationships: What is the Difference? Personality and social psychology bulletin, 16(3), 677-683, doi:10.1177/0146167293196002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, K. E., & Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: Commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91(2), 185-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, R., Pavis, S., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Amos, A. (1998). Young men's use of cannabis: Exploring changes in meaning and context over time. Drugs; Education, Prevention and Policy, 5(2), 141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calderoni, F. (2012). The structure of drug trafficking mafias: the 'Ndrangheta and cocaine. Crime Law and Social Change, 58(3), 321-349, doi:10.1007/s10611-012-9387-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1993). The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684-691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coggan, N., & Mckellar, S. (1994). Drug-Use Amongst Peers - Peer Pressure or Peer Preference. Drugs-Education Prevention and Policy, 1(1), 15-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomber, R. (2006). Pusher myths: Re-situating the drug dealer. London: Free Associatin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomber, R., & Moyle, L. (2014). Beyond drug dealing: Developing and extending the concept of ‘social supply’of illicit drugs to ‘minimally commercial supply’. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 21(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coomber, R., & Turnbull, P. (2007). Arenas of drug transactions: Adolescent cannabis transactions in England - Social supply. Journal of Drug Issues, 37(4), 845-865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N. (2010). The social world of the network. Combining qualitative and quantitative elements in social network analysis. Sociologica, 1, 1-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. (2010). 'Two's up and poncing fags': young women' smoking practices, reciprocity and friendship. Gender and Education, 22(5), 491-504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, N., Levi, M., & King, L. (2005). Literature review on upper level drug trafficking. Home Office Online Report 22/05. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, N., Murji, K., & South, N. (1992). Traffickers: Drug markets and law enforcement: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, C. (2005). Party drugs and party people: examining the 'normalization' of recreational drug use in Melbourne, Australia. International Journal of Drug Policy, 16(3), 161-170, doi:DOI10.1016/j.drugpo.2005.02.001.

  • Erickson, B. H. (1981). Secret societies and social structure. Social Forces, 60(1), 188-210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galea, S., Nandi, A., & Vlahov, D. (2004). The social epidemiology of substance use. Epidemiologic reviews, 26(1), 36-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giménez-Salinas Framis, A. (2013). Illegal Networks or Criminal Organizations: Structure, Power and Facilitators in Cocaine Trafficking Structures. In C. Morselli (Ed.), Crime and Networks. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuffre, K. (2013). Communities and networks: using social network analysis to rethink urban and community studies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American journal of sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, L. D., Erickson, P. G., Korf, D. J., Brochu, S., & Benschop, A. (2007). How much for a dime bag? An exploration of youth drug markets. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90, S27-S39, doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie, D. L. (2001). Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter? 1. American journal of sociology, 106(4), 1013-1057.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highet, G. (2003). Cannabis and smoking research: interviewing young people in self-selected friendship pairs. Health Education Research, 18(1), 108-118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highet, G. (2004). The role of cannabis in supporting young people's cigarette smoking: a qualitative approach. Health Education Research, 19(6), 635-643, doi:10.1093/her/cyg089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., Warburton, H., Few, B., May, T., Man, L., Witton, J., et al. (2003). A growing market: The domestic cultivation of cannabis. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirke, D. M. (2006). Teenagers and Substance Use: Social Networks and Peer Influence. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobus, K., & Henry, D. B. (2010). Interplay of network position and peer substance use in early adolescent cigarette, alcohol, and marijuana use. The journal of early adolescence., 30(2), 225-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. H. (1969). Search for an Abortionist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marin, A., & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: an introduction. In J. Scott, & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 11-25). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashek, D. J., & Aron, A. (2004). Handbook of closeness and intimacy: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, C. (2002). Structure in personal networks. Journal of Social Structure, 3(1), Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, C., & Molina, J. L (2011). Personal networks. Research and applications. Draft, Online: http://grupsderecerca.uab.cat/egolab/sites/grupsderecerca.uab.cat.egolab/files/pna.pdf

  • McGloin, J. M., & Nguyen, H. (2013). The importance of studying co-offending networks for criminological theory and policy. In C. Morselli (Ed.), Crime and Networks (pp. 13-27). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, L., & Amos, A. (1997). Girls, pecking order and smoking. Social Science & Medicine, 44(12), 1861-1869.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, M., & Pearson, L. (2000). Smoke rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs: education, prevention and policy, 7(1), 21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mische, A., & White, H. C. (1998). Between conversation and situation: public switching dynamics across network-domains. Social Research, 65(3), 295-324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, C. (2009). Inside criminal networks: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morselli, C., Giguère, C., & Petit, K. (2007). The efficiency/security trade-off in criminal networks. Social Networks, 29(1), 143-153, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2006.05.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, K., Crossley, N., Edwards, G., Koskinen, J., Everett, M., & Broccatelli, C. (2014). Covert networks: structures, processes and types. Working paper of the Mitchell Centre for Network Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paoli, L. (2002). The paradoxes of organized crime. Crime, Law & Social Change, 37, 51-97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos, A. V. (2011). The coming of a networked criminology. Measuring Crime & Criminality: Advances in Criminological Theory, 17, 101-140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papachristos, A. V., & Smith, C. M. (2012). The Small World of Al Capone: The Embedded Nature of Criminal and Legitimate Social Networks. Available at SSRN: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2159899.

  • Parker, H. (2000). How young Britons obtain their drugs: Drugs transactions at the point of consumption. Crime Prevention Studies, 11, 59-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, G., Hobbs, R., Jones, S., Tierney, J., & Ward, J. (2001). Middle market drug distribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, M., & Michell, L. (2000). Smoke Rings: social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs: Education, Prevention & Policy, 7(1), 21-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, G. (2009). Exploring retail-level drug distribution: Social supply, 'real' dealers and the user/dealer interface. In Z. Demetrovics, J. Fountain, & K. Kraus (Eds.), Old & new policies, theories, research methods and drug users across Europe (pp. 50-74, ESSD Series). Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuter, P. (1985). The organization of illegal markets: and economic analysis. Washington: National Institute of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shewan, D., Dalgarno, P., & Reith, G. (2000). Perceived risk and risk reduction among ecstasy users: the role of drug, set, and setting. International Journal of Drug Policy, 10(6), 431-453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T., Spreen, M., & Zwaagstra, R. (1995). The use of mulitlevel modeling for analysing personal networks: networks of cocaine users in an urban area. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology, 5, 85-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werse, B. (2008). Retail markets for cannabis—users, sharers, go-betweens and stash dealers. Cannabis in Europe: Dynamics in perception, policy and markets, 106-123.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marieke Vlaemynck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vlaemynck, M. (2016). Social supply: a personal network perspective. In: Werse, B., Bernard, C. (eds) Friendly Business. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10329-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-10329-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-10328-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-10329-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics