Skip to main content

Using Research to Generate Advice for Women: Examples from Negotiation Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte

Abstract

The gender gaps in pay and authority are rooted in social structures and behaviors of both men and women. These gaps will not be closed by “fixing women” to fit into a man’s world. Nonetheless, women want research-based strategies that they can use to overcome the barriers they encounter to fair pay and career advancement. Negotiation is one academic field in which such advice is being generated. The chapter centers on three recommendations for women to enhance their career negotiations. They involve using knowledge about gender stereotypes, reducing sources of ambiguity that heighten the potential for disadvantageous gender effects, and employing negotiating strategies that help women improve their social and material outcomes. The chapter closes with directions for future research to develop more organizationally grounded perspectives on how women from diverse backgrounds negotiate their career paths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amanatullah, E. T., & Morris, M. W. (2010). Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 256–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babcock, L., & Laschever, S. (2003). Women don’t ask. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Babcock, L., Bowles, H. R., & Bear, J. (2012). A model of when to negotiate: Why women don’t ask. In R. T. A. Croson & G. E. Bolton (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic conflict resolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bowles, H. R. (2013). Psychological perspectives on gender in negotiation. In M. K. Ryan & N. R. Branscombe (Eds.), The Sage handbook of gender and psychology (pp. 465–483). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowles, H. R., & Babcock, L. (2013). How can women escape the compensation negotiation dilemma? Relational accounts are one answer. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(1), 80–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowles, H. R., & McGinn, K. L. (2008). Gender in job negotiations: A two-level game. Negotiation Journal, 24(4), 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowles, H. R., Babcock, L., & McGinn, K. L. (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 951–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowles, H., Babcock, L., & Lai, L. (2007). Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103, 84–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y. R., Leung, K., & Chen, C. C. (2009). Bringing national culture to the table: Making a difference with cross-cultural differences and perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 217–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. E. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 103–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, R., & Ury, R. (1981). Getting to yes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gutlove, P., Bowles, H., Deyton, P., Potter, J., & Walleser, L. (2014). Women, negotiations, and career advancement: Report from a survey at the 2013 Simmons Leadership Conference CGO Insights. Boston: Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hinds, P., Liu, L., & Lyon, J. (2011). Putting the global in global work: An intercultural lens on the practice of cross-national collaboration. The Academy of Management Annals, 5, 135–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Why men still get more promotions than women. Harvard Business Review, 88(9), 80–126.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle. Psychological Science, 16(3), 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolb, D. M., & Kickul, J. (2006). It pays to ask: Negotiating conditions for leadership success CGO Insights. Boston: Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kolb, D. M., & McGinn, K. L. (2009). Beyond gender and negotiation to gendered negotiations. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 2(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kray, L. J., & Gelfand, M. J. (2009). Relief versus regret: The effect of gender and negotiating norm ambiguity on reactions to having one’s first offer accepted. Social Cognition, 27(3), 418–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kray, L. J., & Shirako, A. (2011). Stereotype threat in organizations: An examination of its scope, triggers, and possible interventions. In T. S. M. Inzlicht (Ed.), Stereotype threat: Theory, process, and application (pp. 173–187). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kray, L. J., Thompson, L., & Galinsky, A. (2001). Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 942–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kray, L. J., Galinsky, A. D., & Thompson, L. (2002). Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2), 386–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Livingston, R. W., & Pearce, N. A. (2009). The teddy-bear effect. Does having a baby face benefit black chief executive officers? Psychological Science, 20(10), 1229–1236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Livingston, R. W., Rosette, A. S., & Washington, E. F. (2012). Can an agentic black woman get ahead? The impact of race and interpersonal dominance on perceptions of female leaders. Psychological Science, 23(4), 354–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Major, B., McFarlin, D. B., & Gagnon, D. (1984a). Overworked and underpaid: On the nature of gender differences in personal entitlement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1399–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Major, B., Vanderslice, V., & McFarlin, D. B. (1984b). Effects of pay expected on pay received: The confirmatory nature of initial expectations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14(5), 399–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rudman, L. A. (1998). Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 629–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sandberg, S. (2013). Lean in: Women, work, and the will to lead. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shih, M., & Pittinsky, T. L. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10(1), 80–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Small, D. A., Gelfand, M., Babcock, L., & Gettman, H. (2007). Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 600–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. The World Bank Group. (2014). The World Bank annual report 2014. http://www.worldbank.org/en/about/annual-report. Accessed 25 June 2015.

  34. Wade, M. E. (2001). Women and salary negotiation: The costs of self-advocacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wrzesniewski, A., Berg, J. M., & Dutton, J. E. (2010). Turn the job you have into the job you want. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 114–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Riley Bowles .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bowles, H., Thomason, B. (2015). Using Research to Generate Advice for Women: Examples from Negotiation Research. In: Welpe, I., Brosi, P., Ritzenhöfer, L., Schwarzmüller, T. (eds) Auswahl von Männern und Frauen als Führungskräfte. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09469-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-09469-0_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-09468-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-09469-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics