Skip to main content

The Sustainable Gamer: Developing Corporate Social Responsibility Through Games

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility

Part of the book series: FOM-Edition ((FOMEDITION))

Abstract

According to Wilson and Holton (Changing manager mindsets—Report of the working group on the development of professional skills for the practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (Department of Trade & Industry, The Corporate Responsibility Group), 2003), Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) entails behaviour that can be learned, but is not easily taught. As a consequence, a question arises: Can attitudes, knowledge, and skills important for teaching sustainable development and CSR be acquired with the use of simulation games? Based on the dynamically evolving educational market, current developments in educational psychology and practical experience as game developers, we provide evidence that games offer a unique toolbox for teaching CSR both in academia and in the organisational context. This learning approach comprises the missing link proposed in this chapter.

Even though all learning can be considered as learning from experience, there are significant qualities that make simulation games uniquely effective in teaching CSR. No other technique offers so many distinct features that can be employed in order to explore and understand CSR in practice—from gamified learning, to single-issue games, to complex system simulations. One of the qualities which characterises games is the potential to change participants’ mind-set with high fidelity simulations that allow them to discover complex relations and unexpected consequences of regular day-to-day business decisions, as well as to experience their long-term impact on the multiple bottom-line.

In this chapter, we provide both theoretical and practical insights into how simulations can be used for skills and knowledge development crucial for implementing CSR in a given organisational context. Apart from explaining the mechanisms behind the effectiveness of simulation games, we provide examples of different CSR simulation games developed across the world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 313 Consulting. (2013). ASTOR Flotilla. Krakow: 313 Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckhard, R. (1969). Organization development: Strategies and models. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, D., Burke, W., Seashore, E., Worley, C., & Tannenbaum, B. (2001). Statement of the board. In L. S. Ackerman-Anderson & D. Anderson (Eds.), The change leaders roadmap (pp. xxi–xxv). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, L., et al. (2007). Understanding and responding to societal demands on corporate responsibility (RESPONSE): Sixth framework programme priority 7, “Citizens and governance in a knowledge based society”; France: INSEAD. http://www.insead.edu/v1/ibis/response_project/documents/Response_FinalReport.pdf. Accessed 14 April 2014.

  • Coll, P., & Milrud, P. (2013). Dwelling near the ditch: A game on urban waste management. Red Cross Climate Center. http://www.climatecentre.org/downloads/File/Games/dwelling%20near%20the%20ditch/DND_RULES%20-%20ENGLISHupdated.pdf. Accessed 17 Jan 2014.

  • Conner, D., & Kelley, D. (1979). The emotional cycle of change. In J. E. Jones & J. W. Pfeiffer (Eds.), The 1979 annual handbook of group facilitators (pp. 82–102). San Diego: University Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (1997). Development and change organization. Cincinnati: South-Western.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (2000). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, L. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49(8), 725–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1993). The pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayes, A. B., Kayes, D. C., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Experiential learning in teams. Simulation Gaming, 36(3), 330–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2009). The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential learning. Simulation Gaming, 40(3), 297–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(6), 822–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liukkonen, B. (1998). The lake game. For people who care about lakes. Minnesota Sea Grant Program. University of Minnesota Duluth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnuszewski, P., & Slodka-Turner, A. (2011). Green & great. https://www.greenandgreat.games4sustainability.com. Accessed 17 Jan 2014.

  • Munson, L. (2013). New year, new workplace! http://www.siop.org/article_view.aspx?article=1203#.UvPBXbRZ64T. Accessed 17 Jan 2014.

  • Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prokopowicz, P., Żmuda, G., & Stocki, R. (3–6 Sept 2008). Cognitive theory of total participation management. Selected proceedings of the IAREP/SABE 2008 Conference at LUISS in Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, C. (2007). Computer-based simulations. In M. Silberman (Ed.), The handbook of experiential learning (pp. 138–154). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoners dilemma. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, E. (2006). Games and information: An introduction to game theory (4th edn.). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieber, L. P., & Noah, D. (2008). Games, simulations, and visual metaphors in education: Antagonism between enjoyment and learning. Educational Media International, 45(2), 77–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1964). Toward a modern approach that values: The valuing process in the mature person. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63(2), 160–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruohomäki, V. (2003). Simulation gaming for teaching CSR. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S. C., Zollo, M., & Manocha, R. (2–5 June 2009). Innovative approaches to developing socially responsible behavior in managers: Empirical evidence from Project RESPONSE. Paper presented at BAWB Conference, Cleveland, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. (2006). Worker participation: Current research and future trends. In V. Smith (Ed.), Research in the sociology of work. (Vol. 6, pp. xi–xxiii). Boston: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodexo. (2013). Workplace trends report. http://viewer.zmags.com/publication/f045b66f#/f045b66f/1. Accessed 17 Jan 2014.

  • Stocki, R., Prokopowicz, P., & Żmuda, G. (2008). Pełna partycypacja w zarządzaniu (Full participation in management). Krakow: Wolters Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suits, B. (1967). What is a game? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ukens, L. (2007). Training games. In M. Silberman (Ed.), The handbook of experiential learning (pp. 124–137). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner R. K. (1987). Tacit knowledge in everyday intelligent behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1236–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walmart. (2010). My sustainability plan. It’s a personal thing. http://www.walmartstores.com/sites/ResponsibilityReport/2011/social_associates_MSP.aspx. Accessed 17 Jan 2014

  • Wenzler, I. (2005). Simulations and social responsibility: Why should we bother? Research scope and perspective. In R. Shiratori, K. Arai, & F. Kato (Eds.), Gaming, simulations, and society (pp. 124–137). Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, A., & Holton, V. (2003). Changing manager mindsets—Report of the working group on the development of professional skills for the practice of Corporate Social Responsibility (Department of Trade & Industry, The Corporate Responsibility Group, April 2003). http://www.ashridge.org.uk/website/IC.nsf/wFARATT/Changing%20Manager%20Mindsets%20-%20Report%20of%20the%20Working%20Group%20on%20the%20Development%20of%20Professional%20Skills%20for%20the%20Practice%20of%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility/$file/ChangingManagerMindsets.pdf. Acceseed 16 June 2014.

  • WWF, & Allianz. (2010). CEO2. The climate business game. http://knowledge.allianz.com/ceo2/en_ext.html. Accessed 17 Jan 2014

  • Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in Web and mobile Apps. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Żmuda, G., Prokopowicz, P., & Stocki, R. (2008). Towards the model of total participation management: In search of wellbeing in a participative workplace. New York: Mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grzegorz Żmuda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Żmuda, G., Prokopowicz, P., Król, M. (2015). The Sustainable Gamer: Developing Corporate Social Responsibility Through Games. In: O'Riordan, L., Zmuda, P., Heinemann, S. (eds) New Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility. FOM-Edition. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06794-6_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics