Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mehr Partizipation – ein Heilmittel gegen die ‚Krise der Demokratie‘?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Demokratie und Krise

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten Jahren ist eine umfangreiche Literatur entstanden, die sich um eine Erklärung für die zunehmende politische Entfremdung und das schwindende Vertrauen in politische Institutionen in konsolidierten Demokratien bemüht (vgl. z. B. Norris 1999; Inglehart 2003; Dalton 2004; Dogan 2005; Newton 2006). In diesem Zusammenhang haben verschiedene Autoren eine lange Liste demokratischer „Krankheitssymptome“ (Schmitter 2010) zusammengetragen. Diese reichen von einer sinkenden Wahlbeteiligung, rückläufigen Mitgliederzahlen in Parteien und der abnehmenden Parteiidentifikation über größere Schwankungen der Wählerpräferenzen und Wahlergebnisse bis zu den daraus resultierenden Schwierigkeiten, Regierungsmehrheiten zu sichern, dem wachsenden Bedeutungsverlust des Parlaments und der zunehmenden Dezentralisierung von Regierungsgewalt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alonso, Sonia, John Keane und Wolfgang Merkel. Hrsg. 2011. The Future of Representative Democracy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, David. 2011. Direct Democracy Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avritzer, Leonardo. 2009. Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baiocchi, Gianpaolo. 2003. Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory. In Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, hrsg. Archon Fung und Erik Olin Wright, 45-76. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James. 1996. Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, Ian. 1996. The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, Bruce E., Russell J. Dalton und Susan E. Scarrow. Hrsg. 2003. Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Maxwell, Eric Hershberg und Kenneth E. Sharpe. Hrsg. 2012. New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, Roderic Ai. 2001. Citizen Views of Democracy in Latin America. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, Jorge G. 2006. Latin America’s Left Turn. Foreign Affairs 85 (3): 28–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castiglione, Dario und Mark E. Warren. 2006. Rethinking Democratic Representation: Eight Theoretical Issues. Paper presented at the Conference on “Rethinking Democratic Representation”, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, May 18-19, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, Vera Schattan P. 2004. Conselhos de Saúde Enquanto Instituições Políticas: O Que Está Faltando? In Participação e Deliberação: Teoria Democrática e Experiências Institucionais no Brasil Contemporâneo, hrsg. Vera Schattan P. Coelho und Marcos Nobre, 255-269. São Paulo: Editora 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil 1988. http://www.verfassungen.net/br/verf88-i.htm. Brasília, DF, Senado. Zugegriffen: 24. April 2014.

  • Crozier, Michel J., Samuel P. Huntington und Joji Watanuki. 1975. The Crisis of Democracy. Report on the Governability of Democracies to the Trilateral Commission. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. 2004. Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices. The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Larry und Leonardo Morlino. Hrsg. 2005. The Quality of Democracy: Improvement or Subversion?. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disch, Lisa. 2011. Toward a Mobilization Conception of Democratic Representation. American Political Science Review 105 (1): 100–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, Mattei. Hrsg. 2005. Political Mistrust and the Discrediting of Politicians. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, James S. 1991. Democracy and Deliberation. New Directions for Democratic Reform. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Jonathan. 1994. The Difficult Transition from Clientelism to Citizenship: Lessons from Mexico. World Politics 46 (2): 151–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon. 2004. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon. 2011. Reinventing Democracy in Latin America. Perspectives on Politics 9 (4): 857–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Michael und Paul Mitchell. Hrsg. 2008. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2007. The Politics of Deepening Local Democracy: Decentralization, Party Institutionalization, and Participation. Comparative Politics 39 (2): 147–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldfrank, Benjamin. 2011. Deepening Local Democracy in Latin America: Participation, Decentralization and the Left. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Carol und Sandip Sukhtankar. 2004. Does Economic Crisis Reduce Support for Markets and Democracy in Latin America? Some Evidence from Surveys of Public Opinion and Well Being. Journal of Latin American Studies 36 (2): 349–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, Amy und Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, Frances. 1998. Negotiating Economic Transitions in Liberalizing Polities: Political Representation and Economic Reform in Latin America. Cambridge: Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, Frances und Scott P. Mainwaring. Hrsg. 2005. The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, Kirk A. 2010. Venezuela’s Chavismo and Populism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, Jack Ernest Shalom. 1995. The Crisis of Representation in Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late 20th Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald F. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingelhart, Ronald F. 2003. How Solid is Mass Support for Democracy – And How Can We Measure It? Political Science and Politics 36 (1): 51–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köchler, Hans. 1987. The Crisis of Representative Democracy. Bern: Peter Lang GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2005. Direct Democratic Choice: The Swiss Experience. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagos, Marta. 2003. Support for and Satisfaction with Democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 15 (4): 471–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laserna, Roberto. 2009. Decentralization, Local Initiatives, and Citizenship in Bolivia, 1994-2004. In Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America, hrsg. Andrew D. Selee und Enrique Peruzzotti, 126-155. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Kay und Peter H. Merkl. Hrsg. 1988. When Parties Fail. Emerging Alternative Organizations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDuc, Lawrence. 2003. The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Toronto: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Daniel H. und José E. Molina. Hrsg. 2011. The Quality of Democracy in Latin America. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven und Kenneth M. Roberts. Hrsg. 2011. The Resurgence of the Latin American Left. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. und Alfred Stepan. 1978. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linz, Juan J. und Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Europe, South America and Post-communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lissidini, Alicia. 2012. Direct Democracy in Uruguay and Venezuela: New Voices, Old Practices. In New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence, hrsg. Maxwell A. Cameron, Eric Hershberg und Kenneth E. Sharpe, 149- 179. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott P. 2006. The Crisis of Representation in the Andes. Journal of Democracy 17 (3): 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott P. 2012. From Representative Democracy to Participatory Competitive Authoritarianism: Hugo Chávez and Venezuelan Politics. Perspectives on Politics 10 (4): 955–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott P. und Timothy R. Scully. Hrsg. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, Jane J. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, Jane J. 2003. Rethinking Representation. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2004. Embedded and Defective Democracies. Democratization 11 (5): 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morlino, Leonardo. 1998. Democracy between Consolidation and Crisis. Parties, Groups, and Citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton, Kenneth. 2006. Political support: social capital, civil society and political and economic performance. Political Studies 54 (4): 846–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa. 1999. Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries. World Development 21 (8): 1355–1369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1996. Illusions about Consolidation. Journal of Democracy 7, S. 34–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2001. Reflections on Contemporary South American Democracies. Journal of Latin American Studies 33 (3): 599–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo. 2004. Human Development, Human Rights, and Democracy. In The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications, hrsg. Guillermo O’Donnell, Jorge Vargas Cullell und Osvaldo M. Iazzetta, 9-92. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pállinger Zoltán Tibor Bruno Kaufmann Wilfried Marxer Theo Schiller. Hrsg. 2007. Direct Democracy in Europe: Developments and Prospects. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carol. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carol. 2012. Participatory Democracy Revisited. Perspectives on Politics 10 (1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peruzzotti, Enrique. 2009. The Politics of Institutional Innovation: The Implementation of Participatory Budgeting in the City of Buenos Aires. In Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America, hrsg. Andrew D. Selee und Enrique Peruzzotti, 40-61. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pharr, Susan J., Robert D. Putnam und Russell J. Dalton. 2000. Trouble in the Advanced Democracies? A Quarter-century of Declining Confidence. Journal of Democracy 11 (2): 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebinschi, Thamy. 2012. Participation as Representation: Democratic Policymaking in Brazil. In New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Voice and Consequence, hrsg. Maxwell A. Cameron, Eric Hershberg und Kenneth E. Sharpe, 53-74. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebinschi, Thamy. 2013. The Squared Circle of Participatory Democracy: Scaling up Deliberation to the National Level. Critical Policy Studies 7 (3): 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebinschi, Thamy und Fabiano Santos. 2011. Participação como Representação: O Impacto das Conferências Nacionais de Políticas Públicas no Congresso Nacional. Dados 54 (3): 259–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogrebinschi, Thamy und David Samuels. 2014. The Impact of Participatory Democracy. Evidence from Brazil’s National Public Policy Conferences. Comparative Politics 46 (3): 313–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. 2010. Democracy and the Limits of Self-government. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Kenneth M. und Erik Wibbels. 1999. Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations. American Political Science Review 93 (3): 575–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussef, Dilma. 2011. Mensagem ao Congresso Nacional. Brasília, DF: Presidência da República. http://glo.bo/g0gFH5. Zugegriffen: 29. April 2013.

  • Santos, Boaventura de Sousa. 1998. Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy. Politics & Society 26 (4): 461–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarsfield, Rodolfo und Fabián Echegaray. 2006. Opening the Black Box: How Satisfaction with Democracy and its Perceived Efficacy Affect Regime Preference in Latin America. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18 (2): 153–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saward, Michael. 2011. The wider canvas: representation and democracy in state and society. In The Future of Representative Democracy, hrsg. Sonia Alonso, John Keane und Wolfgang Merkel, 74-95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C. 2010. Twenty-Five Years, Fifteen Findings. Journal of Democracy 21 (1): 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitter, Philippe C. und Alexander H. Trechsel. 2004. The Future of Democracy in Europe: Trends, Analyses and Reforms. Brussels: Council of Europe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selee, Andrew D. 2009. An Alternative to Clientelism? Participatory Innovation in Mexico. In Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America, hrsg. Andrew D. Selee und Enrique Peruzzotti, 62-88. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selee, Andrew D. und Enrique Peruzzotti. Hrsg. 2009. Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America . Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sintomer, Yves, Carsten Herzberg, Giovanni Alegretti und Anja Röcke. 2010. Learning from the South: Participatory Budgeting Worldwide — An Invitation to Global Cooperation. Dialog global series No. 25. Bonn: InWEnt gGmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Cott, Donna Lee. 2008. Radical Democracy in the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wampler, Brian. 2007. Participatory Budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, Cooperation, and Accountability. Pennsylvania State University: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, Mark E. 2002. What Can Democratic Participation Mean Today? Political Theory 30: 678–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, Kurt. 2009. The Rise of Latin America’s Two Lefts: Insights from Rentier State Theory. Comparative Politics 41 (2): 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, Kurt, Raúl L. Madrid und Wendy Hunter. Hrsg. 2010. Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Abt. Demokratie und Demokratisierung, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB), Berlin, Deutschland

    Professor Thamy Pogrebinschi

Authors
  1. Professor Thamy Pogrebinschi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thamy Pogrebinschi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB) für Sozialforschung, Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Wolfgang Merkel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pogrebinschi, T. (2015). Mehr Partizipation – ein Heilmittel gegen die ‚Krise der Demokratie‘?. In: Merkel, W. (eds) Demokratie und Krise. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05945-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05945-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05944-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05945-3

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation