Skip to main content

Appendix: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Innovation Diffusion Models

  • Chapter
Collaboration with Potential Users for Discontinuous Innovation
  • 647 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a theoretical and empirical comparison of quantitative innovation diffusion models with data from the software industry. Looking at some of the most widely used aggregate models, such as the Generalised Bass and the Kalish model, the inclusion of decision variables is compared to scientific groundings from innovation marketing, focusing on the analysis of their mathematical equations. Eligible attributes such as the reduction and the carry-through effect are addressed and performance simulations of the mapping function are run, using commonly observed pricing strategies. Adoption and marketing data of two innovative software products are applied to calibrate the models and to evaluate their forecasting precision by comparing the results with true data within a period of 10 months after initial release. It becomes evident that the predominant S-shaped models are not always suitable. A market analysis shows the complexity of market structures and the involved requirements for these models. Critical branch-related aspects, such as the reputation of the company, online distribution channels, and piracy are discussed and disclose future research spots in the estimation of diffusion shapes of innovative products.

This chapter was previously published in the Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 3(2), © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bass, F. M. 1969. A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables. Management Science, 15: 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F. M. 1980. The Relationship between Diffusion Rates, Experience Curves, and Demand Elasticities for Consumer Durable Technological Innovation. Journal of Business, 53: 551–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F. M., Jain, D. P., & Krishnan, T. V. 2000. Modeling the Marketing-Mix Influence in New Product Diffusion“. In V. Mahajan, E. Muller, & Y. Wind (Ed.), New-Product Diffusion: 99-123. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F. M., Krishnan, T. V., & Jain, D. C. 1994. Why the Bass Model Fits without Decision Variables. Marketing Science, 13: 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, P.A., & Fildes, R. 1998. The Role of Prices in Models of Innovation Diffusion. Journal of Forecasting, 17: 539–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow, G. C. 1967. Technological Change and the Demand of Computers. American Economic Review, 57: 1117–1130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dockner, E., & Jorgensen, S. 1988. Optimal Pricing Strategies for New Products in Dynamic Oligopolies. Marketing Science, 7: 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. S. 1991. Innovative Decision Processes. In H. Kassarjian, & T. Robertson (Ed.), Handbook of Consumer Behavior Theory and Research: 316-348. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Givon, M., Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. 1995. Software Piracy: Estimation of Lost Sales and the Impact on Software Diffusion. Journal of Marketing, 59: 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewing, M. 2012. A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Innovation Diffusion Models Applying Data from the Software Industry. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 3(2): 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horsky, D., & Simon, L. S. 1983. Advertising and the Diffusion of New Products. Journal of Marketing Science, 2: 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, D., Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. 1991. Innovation Diffusion in the Presence of Supply Restrictions. Marketing Science, 10: 83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica, 47: 261–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, S. 1985. A New Product Adoption Model with Price, Advertising, and Uncertainty. Management Science, 31: 1569–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalish, S., & Sen, S. K. 1986. Diffusion Models and the Marketing Mix for Single Products. In V. Mahajan, & Y. Wind (Ed.), Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance: 87-115. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, W. A., & Balasubramanian, S. K. 1987. Long-Term Forecasting with Innovation Diffusion Models: The Impact of Replacement Purchases. Journal of Forecasting, 6: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, W. A., & Balasubramanian, S. K. 1988. Long-term view of the Diffusion of Durables. International Journal of Research in Marketing: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liftin, T. 2000. Adoptionsfaktoren – Empirische Analyse am Beispiel eines innovativen Telekommunikationsdienstes. Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag: Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilien, G., Rangaswamy, A., & Van den Bulte, C. 1999. Diffusion Models: Managerial Applications and Software. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., & Muller, E. 1979. Innovation Diffusion and New Product Growth Models in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 43: 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F. M. 1990. New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research. Journal of Marketing, 54: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F. M. 1995. Diffusion of New Products: Empirical Generalizations and Managerial Uses. Journal of Marketing Science, 14: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan, V., & Peterson, R. A. 1978. Innovation Diffusion in a Dynamic Potential Adopter Population. Management Science, 15: 1589–1597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putsis, W. P., & Srinivasan, V. 2000. Estimation Techniques for Macro Diffusion Models. In V. Mahajan, E. Muller, & Y. Wind (Ed.), New-Product Diffusion: 263-294. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, K., & Chatterjee, R. 1995. Optimal Monopolist Pricing Under Demand Uncertainty in Dynamic Markets. Management Science, 41: 144–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. C., & Bass, F. M. 1985. Competition, Strategy, and Price Dynamics: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation. Journal of Marketing Research, 22: 283–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovations. 4th edition. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, F. 1993. An Examination of the Effect of Product Performance on Brand Reputation, Satisfaction, and Loyalty. European Journal of Marketing, 27: 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. 1982. ADPULS: An Advertising Model with Wearout and Pulsation. Journal of Marketing Research, 19: 352–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. 1992. Preismanagement. 2nd edition. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan, V., & Mason, C. H. 1986. Nonlinear Least Squares Estimation of New Product Diffusion Models. Marketing Science, 5: 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng, J.-T., & Thompson, G. L. 1983. Oligopoly Models for Optimal Advertising. Management Science, 29: 1087–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hewing, M. (2014). Appendix: A Theoretical and Empirical Comparison of Innovation Diffusion Models. In: Collaboration with Potential Users for Discontinuous Innovation. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-03753-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics