Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Eine "soziale Logik" der Demobilisierung: Einflüsse politischer Gesprächspartner auf Wahlbeteiligung und -enthaltung bei der Bundestagswahl 2009

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wahlen und Wähler

Zusammenfassung

Die Interaktion mit Personen des alltäglichen Umfelds beeinflusst nicht nur die Partei- und Kandidatenpräferenzen von Wählern (Huckfeldt, Johnson und Sprague 2004; Huckfeldt und Sprague 1995; Johnston und Pattie 2006; Schmitt-Beck 2000), sondern auch ihre Bereitschaft, sich politisch zu beteiligen. Bereits die frühen Columbia-Studien (Berelson, Lazarsfeld und McPhee 1954; Lazarsfeld, Berelson und Gaudet 1948) zeigten die große Bedeutung dieser "sozialen Logik der Politik" (Zuckerman 2005), jüngere Studien bestätigten sie mit weiterentwickeltem methodischem Instrumentarium für die Partei- bzw. Kandidatenwahl, zunehmend aber auch für die Wahlbeteiligung und andere Formen der politischen Partizipation (Johnston und Pattie 2006; Kenny 1992, 1993; McClurg 2003; Schmitt-Beck und Mackenrodt 2010; Zuckerman, Dasovi

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Berelson, Bernard R., Paul F. Lazarsfeld und William N. McPhee (1954): Voting. A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, William D., Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt und Justin Esarey (2010): "Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models. Is a Product Term Essential?", American Journal of Political Science 54: 248–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, Claudio (2005): "Nichtwahl", in Jürgen W. Falter und Harald Schoen (Hg.), Handbuch Wahlforschung, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 329–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, Jan W., und Sonja Zmerli (2010): "Introduction. Civicness, Equality, and Democracy – A ’Dark Side’ of Social Capital?", American Behavioral Scientist 53: 631–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downs, Anthony (1968): Ökonomische Theorie der Demokratie, Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilfort, Michael (1994): Die Nichtwähler. Wahlenthaltung als Form des Wahlverhaltens, Paderborn: Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, James H. (2005): "Turnout in a Small World", in Alan S. Zuckerman (Hg.), Social Logic of Politics, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, S. 269–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Oscar W., und Kerstin Völkl (2004): "Auf der Suche nach dem Nichtwähler neuen Typs. Eine Analyse aus Anlass der Bundestagswahl 2002", in Frank Brettschneider, Jan W. van Deth und Edeltraud Roller (Hg.), Die Bundestagswahl 2002. Analysen der Wahlergebnisse und des Wahlkampfes, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 221–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, William A. (1992): Talking Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gastil, John (2008): Political Communication and Deliberation, Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green und Christopher W. Larimer (2008): "Social Pressure and Voter Turnout. Evidence from a Large-scale Field Experiment", American Political Science Review 102: 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, Alan S., Donald P. Green und Christopher W. Larimer (2010): "An Experiment Testing the Relative Effectiveness of Encouraging Voter Participation by Inducing Feelings of Pride or Shame", Political Behavior 32: 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, Alan S., und Todd Rogers (2009): "Descriptive Social Norms and Motivation to Vote. Everybody’s Voting and So Should You", The Journal of Politics 71: 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert R. (2001): "The Social Communication of Political Expertise", American Journal of Political Science 45: 425–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert R., Paul E. Johnson und John D. Sprague (2004): Political Disagreement. The Survival of Diverse Opinions within Communication Networks, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert R., und John D. Sprague (1991): "Discussant Effects on Vote Choice – Intimacy, Structure, and Interdependence", The Journal of Politics 53: 122–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert R., und John D. Sprague (1995): Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication. Information and Influence in an Election Campaign, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Ron J., und Charles J. Pattie (2006): Putting Voters in their Place. Geography and Elections in Great Britain, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Christopher B. (1992): "Political Participation and Effects from the Social Environment", American Journal of Political Science 36: 259–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Christopher B. (1993): "The Microenvironment of Political Participation", American Politics Research 21: 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Christopher B. (1994): "The Microenvironment of Attitude Change", The Journal of Politics 56: 715–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Christopher B. (1998): "The Behavioral Consequences of Political Discussion. Another Look at Discussant Effects on Vote Choice", The Journal of Politics 60: 231–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary, Michael Tomz, und Jason Wittenberg (2000): "Making the Most of Statistical Analyses. Improving Interpretation and Presentation", American Journal of Political Science 44: 347–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klofstad, Casey A. (2007): "Talk Leads to Recruitment. Discussions about Politics and Current Events Increase Civic Participation", Political Research Quarterly 60: 180–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klofstad, Casey A. (2011): Civic Talk. Peers, Politics, and the Future of Democracy, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoke, David (1990): "Networks of Political Action. Towards Theory Construction", Social Forces 68: 1041–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Due Lake, Ronald, und Robert Huckfeldt (1998): "Social Capital, Social Networks, and Political Participation", Political Psychology 19: 567–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson und Hazel Gaudet (1948): The People’s Choice. How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, David, et al. (2010): "The Coevolution of Networks and Political Attitudes", Political Communication 27: 248–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, Jan E. (1990): "Social Interaction and Contextual Influences on Political Participation", American Politics Quarterly 18: 459–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Jeffrey (2005): "Choosing Alone? The Social Network Basis of Modern Political Choice", in Alan S. Zuckerman (Hg.), The Social Logic of Politics. Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, Arthur, und Matthew D. McCubbins (1998): The Democratic Dilemma. Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?, Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClurg, Scott D. (2003): "Social Networks and Political Participation. The Role of Social Interaction in Explaining Political Participation", Political Research Quarterly 56: 449–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClurg, Scott D. (2006): "The Electoral Relevance of Political Talk. Examining Disagreement and Expertise Effects in Social Networks on Political Participation", American Journal of Political Science 50: 737–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, Diana C. (2002): "The Consequences of Cross-cutting Networks for Political Participation", American Journal of Political Science 46: 838–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickerson, David W. (2008): "Is Voting Contagious? Evidence from Two Field Experiments", American Political Science Review 102: 49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattie, Charles J., und Ron J. Johnston (2002): "Political Talk and Voting. Does It Matter to Whom One Talks?", Environment and Planning 34: 1113–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert (1993): Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. (2000): Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rattinger, Hans et al. (2011): Zwischen Langeweile und Extremen. Die Bundestagswahl 2009, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richey, Sean (2008): "The Autoregressive Influence of Social Network Political Knowledge on Voting Behaviour", British Journal of Political Science 38: 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, Steven, und John M. Hansen (1993): Mobilization, Participation and Democracy in America, New York: Macmillan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger (2000): Politische Kommunikation und Wählerverhalten. Ein internationaler Vergleich, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Thorsten Faas und Ansgar Wolsing (2010): Kampagnendynamik bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. Die Rolling-Cross-Section-Studie im Rahmen der "German Longitudinal Election Study" 2009, Arbeitspapiere – Working Papers Nr. 134, 2010, Mannheim: Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, und Christian Mackenrodt (2010): "Social Networks and Mass Media as Mobilizers and Demobilizers. A Study of Turnout at a German Local Election", Electoral Studies 29: 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt-Beck, Rüdiger, Julia Partheymüller und Thorsten Faas (2012): "Einflüsse politischer Gesprächspartner auf Parteipräferenzen. Zur ’sozialen Logik’ des politischen Verhaltens bei der Bundestagswahl 2009", in Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck (Hg.), Wählen in Deutschland. Sonderheft 45 der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift, Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, S. 477–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, David A. (2009): "Social Networks and Collective Action", American Journal of Political Science 53: 122–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timpone, Richard J. (1998): "Structure, Behavior, and Voter Turnout in the United States", The American Political Science Review 92: 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg und Gary King (2001): CLARIFY. Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.0, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, Sidney, Kay L. Schlozman und Henry E. Brady (1995): Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, Martin P. (2000): "The Decline of Party Mobilization", in Russell J. Dalton und Martin P. Wattenberg (Hg.), Parties without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, Christof (2006): "Egozentrierte Netzwerke. Erhebungsverfahren und Datenqualität", in Andreas Diekmann (Hg.), Methoden der Sozialforschung. Sonderheft 44 der Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, S. 224–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Alan S. (Hg.) (2005): The Social Logic of Politics. Personal Networks as Contexts for Political Behavior, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, Alan S., Josip Dasović und Jennifer Fitzgerald (2007): Partisan Families. The Social Logic of Bounded Partisanship in Germany and Britain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mannheim, Deutschland

    Julia Partheymüller & Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck

Authors
  1. Julia Partheymüller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prof. Dr. Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Partheymüller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. für Sozialforschung, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Reichpietschufer 50, Berlin, 10785, Berlin, Germany

    Bernhard Weßels

  2. Feldkirchenstr. 21, Bamberg, 96052, Germany

    Harald Schoen

  3. Universität Stuttgart, Breitscheidstr. 2, Stuttgart, 70174, Germany

    Oscar W. Gabriel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Partheymüller, J., Schmitt-Beck, R. (2013). Eine "soziale Logik" der Demobilisierung: Einflüsse politischer Gesprächspartner auf Wahlbeteiligung und -enthaltung bei der Bundestagswahl 2009. In: Weßels, B., Schoen, H., Gabriel, O. (eds) Wahlen und Wähler. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01328-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01328-8_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-01327-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-01328-8

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation