Skip to main content

Summary

Social dilemmas (sometimes referred to as “problems of collective action”, “tragedy of the commons”, or “public goods problems”) are situations with strategically interdependent actors such that individually rational behavior leads to an outcome that is less desirable for each actor than had they cooperated. In this chapter, we provide an overview of models of social dilemmas and cooperation in social dilemmas that use game-theoretic tools. We first review examples of social dilemmas and formal modeling of such dilemmas. We distinguish between dilemmas that involve two actors and those that can involve more than two actors. We also discuss why the conceptualization of “social dilemma” is “theory dependent”. Second, we review mechanisms that can induce cooperation in social dilemmas. Cooperation of rational actors in a social dilemma requires that the dilemma is “embedded” in a more complex game. We discuss models for different types of embeddedness. The chapter likewise includes a sketch of models of cooperation based on social preferences and of simulation studies as an alternative to game-theoretic analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Arrow, K. (1974) The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balliet, D., L. B. Mulder and P. a. M. VAN Lange (2011) “Reward, Punishment, and Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 137: 594–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J. and D. Mookherjee (1987) “Institutional Structure and the Logic of Ongoing Collective Action.” American Political Science Review 81: 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, j., J. Dickhaut and K. McCabe (1995) “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History.” Games and Economic Behavior 10: 122–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1998) Game Theory and the Social Contract. Volume 2: Just Playing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. ([1964] 1996) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels (2000) “ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition.” American Economic Review 90: 166–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V. (2002) Social Networks and Trust. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V. AND W. Raub (2002) “Embedded Trust: Control and Learning.” Advances in Group Processes 19: 167–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V. AND W. Raub (2013) “Rational Choice Research on Social Dilemmas: Embeddedness Effects on Trust.” Pp. 113–150 in: R. Wittek, T. A. B. Snijders AND V. Nee (Ed.) Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, c. F. AND K. Weigelt (1988) “Experimental Tests of a Sequential Equilibrium Reputation Model.” Econometrica 56: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1964) “Collective Decisions.” Sociological Inquiry 34: 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1987) “Psychological Structure and Social Structure in Economic Models.” Pp. 181–185 in: R. M. Hogarth AND M. W. Reder (Ed.) Rational Choice. The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M AND B. Latane (1968) “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8: 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1988) “Trust as a Commodity.” Pp. 49–72 in: D. Gambetta (Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. (1985) “Volunteer’s Dilemma.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 29: 605–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. (2004) “The Power of Reciprocity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48: 487505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. AND S. Lindenberg (2001) “Cooperation: Sociological Aspects.” Pp. 27512756 in: N. J. Smelser AND P. B. Baltes (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Volume f. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. ([1893] 1973) De la Division du Travail Social. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M. (2006) Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A. AND J. J. Heckman (2009) “Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326: 535–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. AND S. Gachter (2000) “Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments.” American Economic Review 90: 980–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. AND H. Gintis (2007) “Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical Foundations.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. AND K. M. Schmidt (1999) “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. AND K. M. Schmidt (2006) “The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism - Experimental Evidence and New Theories.” Pp. 615–691 in: S.-C. Kolm AND J. M. Ythier (Ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. W. (1971) “A Non-Cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. W. (1990) Game Theory with Applications to Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachter, S. AND C. Thani (2011) “Micromotives, Microstructure, and Macrobehavior.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 35: 26–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1993) The Sicilian Mafia. The Business of Private Protection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (2010) Computational Social Science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960) “The Norm of Reciprocity.” American Sociological Review 25: 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1985) “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. J. AND R. H. Porter (1984) “Noncooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information.” Econometrica 52: 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (2006) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, W., R. Schmittberger AND B. Schwarze (1982) “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968) “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162: 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1982) “Exchange Theory on Strategic Bases.” Social Science Information 21: 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1977) Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and, Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. AND R. Selten (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegselmann, R. (1994) “Solidaritat in einer egoistischen Welt - eine Simulation.” Pp. 349–390 in: J. Nida-Rumelin (Ed.) Praktische Rationalitat - Grundlagen wad ethische Anwendungen des Rational-Choice Paradigmas. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. ([1651] 1991) Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAHNEMAN, D., J. L. Knetsoh AND R. Thaler (1986) “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market.” American, Economic Review 76: 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. B. (1997) Reputation: Studies in the Voluntary Elicitation of Good Conduct. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollook, P. (1998) “Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 183–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. (1990a) “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory.” Pp. 90–143 in: J. Alt AND K. Shepsle (Ed.) Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. (1990b) Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J. O. (1995) “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research.” Pp. 111–194 in: J. H. Kagel AND A. E. Roth (Ed.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. AND J. A. List (2007) “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preference Reveal About the Real World?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21: 153174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S. (1992) “The Method of Decreasing Abstraction.” Pp. 3–20 in: J. S. Coleman AND T. J. Fararo (Ed.) Rational Choice Theory. Advocacy and Critique. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S. (2001) “Social Rationality versus Rational Egoism.” Pp. 635–668 in: J. Turner (Ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, S. (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business.” American Sociological Review 28: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. W. (1991) “Learning to Cooperate: Stochastic and Tacit Collusion in Social Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 808–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. W. AND A. Flaohe (2002) “Learning Dynamics in Social Dilemmas.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 7229–7236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., D. C. North AND B. R. Weingast (1990) “The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchants.” Economics and Politics 2: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. a. (2006) “Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 314: 15601563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, A., J. Fitzgerald and C. Boeing (2000) “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History: A Re-Examination.” Experimental Economics 3: 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1937) The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1974) “Prisoner’s Dilemma - Recollections and Observations.” Pp. 18–34 in: A. Rapoport (Ed.) Game Theory as a Theory of Conflict Resolution. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, E. (2007) Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. (4th edition) Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W. (1988) “Problematic Social Situations and the ‘Large-Number Dilemma’.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 13: 311–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W. (2004) “Hostage Posting as a Mechanism of Trust: Binding, Compensation, and Signaling.” Rationality and Society 16: 319–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W., V. Buskens and M. A. L. M. van Assen (2011) “Micro-Macro Links and Microfoundations in Sociology.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 35: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W. and T. Voss (1986) “Die Sozialstruktur der Kooperation rationaler Egoisten. Zur ‘utilitaristischen’ Erklärung sozialer Ordnung.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 15: 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Rijt, A. and M. W. Macy (2009) “The Problem of Social Order: Egoism or Autonomy?” Advances in Group Processes 26: 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. W. (1981) “Games of Perfect Information, Predatory Pricing and the Chain-Store Paradox.” Journal of Economic Theory 25: 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sally, D. (1995) “Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992.” Rationality and Society 7: 58–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, M. and M. Taube (2003) “Evolution and Institutional Foundation of the Hawala Financial System.” International Review of Financial Analysis 12: 405–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1974) “Choice, Orderings and Morality.” Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, C. (1996) Trust and Commitments. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, C. and G. Keren (1999) “Determinants of Trust.” Pp. 355–385 in: D. V. Bude- SCU, I. Erev and R. Zwick (Ed.) Games and Human Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, C. and G. Keren (2001) “Do You Trust? Whom Do You Trust? When Do You Trust?” Advances in Group Processes 18: 129–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, F. (2012) Agent-Based Computational Sociology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1964) “A Theory of Oligopoly.” Journal of Political Economy 72: 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. ([1976] 1987) The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rev. ed. of Anarchy and Cooperation. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977) The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, S. and J. Weesie (2004) “Social Support among Heterogeneous Partners.” Analyse & Kritik 26: 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, T. (1982) “Rational Actors and Social Institutions: The Case of the Organic Emergence of Norms.” Pp. 76–100 in: W. Raub (Ed.) Theoretical Models and Empirical Analyses. Contributions to the Explanation of Individual Actions and Collective Phenomena. Utrecht: ESP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., W. G. Walster and E. Berscheid (1978) Equity. Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. ([1921] 1976) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tubingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weesie, J. (1988) Mathematical Models for Competition, Cooperation, and Social Networks. Utrecht: Diss. Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weesie, J. and W. Raub (1996) “Private Ordering: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Hostage Games.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 21: 201–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weesie, J., V. Büskens AND W. Raub (1998) “The Management of Trust Relations via Institutional and Structural Embeddedness.” Pp. 113–138 in: P. Doreian AND T. Fararo (Ed.) The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • WeibüLL, J. (1995) Evolutionary Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press. Wittek, R., T. A. B. Snijders AND V. Nee (Ed.) (2013) Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1974) The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balliet, D., L. B. Mulder and P. a. M. VAN Lange (2011) “Reward, Punishment, and Cooperation: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 137: 594–615.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J. and D. Mookherjee (1987) “Institutional Structure and the Logic of Ongoing Collective Action.” American Political Science Review 81: 129–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, j., J. Dickhaut and K. McCabe (1995) “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History.” Games and Economic Behavior 10: 122–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (1998) Game Theory and the Social Contract. Volume 2: Just Playing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P. M. ([1964] 1996) Exchange and Power in Social Life. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G. E. and A. Ockenfels (2000) “ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity and Competition.” American Economic Review 90: 166–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V. (2002) Social Networks and Trust. Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V. AND W. Raub (2002) “Embedded Trust: Control and Learning.” Advances in Group Processes 19: 167–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buskens, V. AND W. Raub (2013) “Rational Choice Research on Social Dilemmas: Embeddedness Effects on Trust.” Pp. 113–150 in: R. Wittek, T. A. B. Snijders AND V. Nee (Ed.) Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory. Experiments in Strategic Interaction. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, c. F. AND K. Weigelt (1988) “Experimental Tests of a Sequential Equilibrium Reputation Model.” Econometrica 56: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1964) “Collective Decisions.” Sociological Inquiry 34: 166–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1987) “Psychological Structure and Social Structure in Economic Models.” Pp. 181–185 in: R. M. Hogarth AND M. W. Reder (Ed.) Rational Choice. The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, J. S. (1990) Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley, J. M AND B. Latane (1968) “Bystander Intervention in Emergencies: Diffusion of Responsibility.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8: 377–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1988) “Trust as a Commodity.” Pp. 49–72 in: D. Gambetta (Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. (1985) “Volunteer’s Dilemma.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 29: 605–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. (2004) “The Power of Reciprocity.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48: 487505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekmann, A. AND S. Lindenberg (2001) “Cooperation: Sociological Aspects.” Pp. 27512756 in: N. J. Smelser AND P. B. Baltes (Ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Volume f. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. ([1893] 1973) De la Division du Travail Social. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. M. (2006) Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A. AND J. J. Heckman (2009) “Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326: 535–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. AND S. Gachter (2000) “Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments.” American Economic Review 90: 980–994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. AND H. Gintis (2007) “Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical Foundations.” Annual Review of Sociology 33: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. AND K. M. Schmidt (1999) “A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 817–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. AND K. M. Schmidt (2006) “The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism - Experimental Evidence and New Theories.” Pp. 615–691 in: S.-C. Kolm AND J. M. Ythier (Ed.) Handbook of the Economics of Giving, Altruism and Reciprocity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. W. (1971) “A Non-Cooperative Equilibrium for Supergames.” Review of Economic Studies 38: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J. W. (1990) Game Theory with Applications to Economics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachter, S. AND C. Thani (2011) “Micromotives, Microstructure, and Macrobehavior.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 35: 26–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1993) The Sicilian Mafia. The Business of Private Protection. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, N. (2010) Computational Social Science. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960) “The Norm of Reciprocity.” American Sociological Review 25: 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. (1985) “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91: 481–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, E. J. AND R. H. Porter (1984) “Noncooperative Collusion under Imperfect Price Information.” Econometrica 52: 87–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greif, A. (2006) Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy: Lessons from Medieval Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, W., R. Schmittberger AND B. Schwarze (1982) “An Experimental Analysis of Ultimatum Bargaining.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 367–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. (1968) “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162: 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1982) “Exchange Theory on Strategic Bases.” Social Science Information 21: 251–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. (1977) Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and, Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J. C. AND R. Selten (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegselmann, R. (1994) “Solidaritat in einer egoistischen Welt - eine Simulation.” Pp. 349–390 in: J. Nida-Rumelin (Ed.) Praktische Rationalitat - Grundlagen wad ethische Anwendungen des Rational-Choice Paradigmas. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. ([1651] 1991) Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • KAHNEMAN, D., J. L. Knetsoh AND R. Thaler (1986) “Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking: Entitlements in the Market.” American, Economic Review 76: 728–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, D. B. (1997) Reputation: Studies in the Voluntary Elicitation of Good Conduct. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollook, P. (1998) “Social Dilemmas: The Anatomy of Cooperation.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 183–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. (1990a) “Corporate Culture and Economic Theory.” Pp. 90–143 in: J. Alt AND K. Shepsle (Ed.) Perspectives on Positive Political Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps, D. M. (1990b) Game Theory and Economic Modelling. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J. O. (1995) “Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research.” Pp. 111–194 in: J. H. Kagel AND A. E. Roth (Ed.) The Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, S. D. AND J. A. List (2007) “What Do Laboratory Experiments Measuring Social Preference Reveal About the Real World?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 21: 153174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S. (1992) “The Method of Decreasing Abstraction.” Pp. 3–20 in: J. S. Coleman AND T. J. Fararo (Ed.) Rational Choice Theory. Advocacy and Critique. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenberg, S. (2001) “Social Rationality versus Rational Egoism.” Pp. 635–668 in: J. Turner (Ed.) Handbook of Sociological Theory. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, S. (1963) “Non-Contractual Relations in Business.” American Sociological Review 28: 55–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. W. (1991) “Learning to Cooperate: Stochastic and Tacit Collusion in Social Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 97: 808–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, M. W. AND A. Flaohe (2002) “Learning Dynamics in Social Dilemmas.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 7229–7236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P., D. C. North AND B. R. Weingast (1990) “The Role of Institutions in the Revival of Trade: The Law Merchants.” Economics and Politics 2: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. a. (2006) “Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 314: 15601563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965) The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, A., J. Fitzgerald and C. Boeing (2000) “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History: A Re-Examination.” Experimental Economics 3: 81–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1937) The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1974) “Prisoner’s Dilemma - Recollections and Observations.” Pp. 18–34 in: A. Rapoport (Ed.) Game Theory as a Theory of Conflict Resolution. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusen, E. (2007) Games and Information: An Introduction to Game Theory. (4th edition) Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W. (1988) “Problematic Social Situations and the ‘Large-Number Dilemma’.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 13: 311–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W. (2004) “Hostage Posting as a Mechanism of Trust: Binding, Compensation, and Signaling.” Rationality and Society 16: 319–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W., V. Buskens and M. A. L. M. van Assen (2011) “Micro-Macro Links and Microfoundations in Sociology.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 35: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raub, W. and T. Voss (1986) “Die Sozialstruktur der Kooperation rationaler Egoisten. Zur ‘utilitaristischen’ Erklärung sozialer Ordnung.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 15: 309–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Rijt, A. and M. W. Macy (2009) “The Problem of Social Order: Egoism or Autonomy?” Advances in Group Processes 26: 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. W. (1981) “Games of Perfect Information, Predatory Pricing and the Chain-Store Paradox.” Journal of Economic Theory 25: 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sally, D. (1995) “Conversation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analysis of Experiments from 1958 to 1992.” Rationality and Society 7: 58–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. C. (1978) Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, M. and M. Taube (2003) “Evolution and Institutional Foundation of the Hawala Financial System.” International Review of Financial Analysis 12: 405–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1974) “Choice, Orderings and Morality.” Choice, Welfare and Measurement. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, C. (1996) Trust and Commitments. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, C. and G. Keren (1999) “Determinants of Trust.” Pp. 355–385 in: D. V. Bude- SCU, I. Erev and R. Zwick (Ed.) Games and Human Behavior. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, C. and G. Keren (2001) “Do You Trust? Whom Do You Trust? When Do You Trust?” Advances in Group Processes 18: 129–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squazzoni, F. (2012) Agent-Based Computational Sociology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J. (1964) “A Theory of Oligopoly.” Journal of Political Economy 72: 44–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. ([1976] 1987) The Possibility of Cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Rev. ed. of Anarchy and Cooperation. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977) The Emergence of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt, S. and J. Weesie (2004) “Social Support among Heterogeneous Partners.” Analyse & Kritik 26: 398–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, T. (1982) “Rational Actors and Social Institutions: The Case of the Organic Emergence of Norms.” Pp. 76–100 in: W. Raub (Ed.) Theoretical Models and Empirical Analyses. Contributions to the Explanation of Individual Actions and Collective Phenomena. Utrecht: ESP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walster, E., W. G. Walster and E. Berscheid (1978) Equity. Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. ([1921] 1976) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tubingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1947) The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weesie, J. (1988) Mathematical Models for Competition, Cooperation, and Social Networks. Utrecht: Diss. Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weesie, J. and W. Raub (1996) “Private Ordering: A Comparative Institutional Analysis of Hostage Games.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 21: 201–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weesie, J., V. Büskens AND W. Raub (1998) “The Management of Trust Relations via Institutional and Structural Embeddedness.” Pp. 113–138 in: P. Doreian AND T. Fararo (Ed.) The Problem of Solidarity: Theories and Models. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  • WeibüLL, J. (1995) Evolutionary Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press. Wittek, R., T. A. B. Snijders AND V. Nee (Ed.) (2013) Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner Raub .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raub, W., Buskens, V., Corten, R. (2015). Social Dilemmas and Cooperation. In: Braun, N., Saam, N. (eds) Handbuch Modellbildung und Simulation in den Sozialwissenschaften. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01164-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01164-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-01163-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-01164-2

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics