Skip to main content

Refined R&D Indicators for Pharmaceutical Industry

  • Conference paper
Future Information Technology

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 309))

Abstract

For the sake of providing evidences that contribute to policy making or strategy planning in pharmaceutical industry, we tried to create new R&D indicators to foresight the picture of pharmaceutical industries. We found that R&D pipelines can be good drug-R&D-indicator. We also show new drug-patent-indicators for identifying patents related with pharmaceutical entities’ R&D progress (”Pre-clinical” → ”Phase 1” → ”Phase 2” → ”Phase 3”→ ”Filed ”→ ”Approved” → ”Marketed”). IPC Count, forward citations, and Citations to Non-Patent Literature are found as new drug-patent-indicators. Not only R&D pipelines but also patents extracted by new drug-patent-indicators are considered to foresight pharmaceutical industries’ potential of creating new drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OECD Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies in a Global Market 216 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mihara, K.: Considerations on patent valuation based on patent classification and citation in biotechnological field. Johokanri 54(11), 738–749 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. OECD “Working Party on Industry Analysis Measuring patent ‘quality’: refined indicators for cross-country evidence” (2012) DSTI/EAS/IND/WPIA(2012)6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goto, A., Genba, K., Suzuki, J., Tamada, S.: RIETEI Discussion Paper Series 6-J-018 (2006) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caviggioli, F., Schellato, G., Ughetto, E.: Understanding patent quality: evidence from patent opposition cases at the European Patent Office, http://www.epip.eu/conferences/epip06/papers/Parallel%20Session%20Papers/CAVIGGIOLI%20Federico.pdf#search='Understanding+patent+quality%3A+evidence+from+patent+opposition+cases+at+the+European+Patent+Office' (accessed October 25, 2011)

  6. Trajtenbert, M.: A Penny for Your Quotes: Patent Citations and the Value of Innovation. RAND Journal of Economics 21(1), 172–187 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., Olivastro, D.: The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science. Research Policy 26, 317–330 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Callaert, J., Van Looy, B., Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Thijs, B.: Traces of Prior Art: An Analysis of Non-patent References found in Patent Documents. Scientometrics 69(1), 3–20 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassiman, B., Vaugelers, R., Zuniga, P.: In search of performance effects of (in)direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change 17(4), 611–646 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Branstetter, L.: Exploring the Link Between Academic Science and Industrial Innovation. Annals of Economic and Statistics 79/80, 119–142 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. OECD: Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard, 1–275 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Osabe, Y., Jibu, M.: Development of new indicators for the launch of a Japanese version of NIH (1). Johokanri 56(7), 448–458 (2013) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Osabe, Y., Jibu, M.: Development of new indicators for the launch of a Japanese version of NIH (2). Johokanri 56(9) (2013) (in press & in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Osabe, Y., Jibu, M.: Development of new indicators for the launch of a Japanese version of NIH (3). Johokanri 56(10) (2014) (in press & in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mari Jibu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jibu, M., Osabe, Y. (2014). Refined R&D Indicators for Pharmaceutical Industry. In: Park, J., Pan, Y., Kim, CS., Yang, Y. (eds) Future Information Technology. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 309. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55038-6_86

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55038-6_86

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-55037-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-55038-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics