Skip to main content

The “Tight Oil Revolution” and the Misinterpretation of the Power of Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Global Politics of Science and Technology - Vol. 2

Part of the book series: Global Power Shift ((GLOBAL))

  • 1233 Accesses

Abstract

The “tight oil revolution” is a prominent example of the misleading belief in the power of technology. We identify the “domination of nature paradigm”, which originated in the sixteenth century and developed into an influential ideology of Western society, as a root cause for the optimism that technology will always push the geological limits and provide us with an abundance of fossil fuels. As a case study, our discussion of the “tight oil revolution” will demonstrate (1) that natural factors like steep depletion rates are alarming symptoms of its unsustainability; (2) that the emergence of this revolution is only partially linked to the “power of technology”, but also to deregulation and Wall Street economics. The article concludes that we need to accept that there are insurmountable limits to technology’s “domination of nature”. Theoretically, this recognition should be reflected in International Relations, allowing for the incorporation of natural factors such as “peak oil” in order to provide us with sustainable models for a post-fossil era.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Deudney (1999a: 42) reminds us that important exceptions to this rule are being found in the disciplines of archeology, geography, economics, and history, all of which have contributed to the “study of the effects of the natural environment on politics”.

  2. 2.

    Galileo’s credo that theory must be confirmed by experimental observations and Newton with his mathematical formulation of the laws of nature have revolutionized the classical understanding of the world establishing the fundamentals of natural sciences.

  3. 3.

    For a critique of Merchant’s radical gender orientation in her interpretation see Bramwell (1989: 24–26).

  4. 4.

    LaPlace stated that once the initial and boundary conditions of all atoms in the world are known, their movements could be predicted into any future. Since such knowledge can only be theoretical and virtual, this statement became famous as “La Place’s demon”.

  5. 5.

    The uncertainty principle states that it is impossible to know a priori all relevant physical data of any physical system exactly. This result of mathematical calculations led Bohr and Heisenberg to the “Copenhagen interpretation”, which identifies any physical prediction at an atomic level as a probabilistic statement (Born 1957). This interpretation was fundamental in relating modern physics to macroscopic observations, while also allowing the integration of neuronal aspects of thinking and even esoteric views in the broader physical frame without logical contradictions (Dürr and Österreicher 2001).

  6. 6.

    To illustrate the consequences of the processes of entropy Homer-Dixon (2007) uses the example of the Roman Empire’s collapse.

  7. 7.

    Though Mitchell (2011: 238) does not want to be misunderstood as belonging to the camp of determinists and Malthusians.

  8. 8.

    Non-renewable resources were excluded from any analysis because they were considered to be abundant in the 1990s. This changed in the mid 2000s when questions of the availability of fossil fuels became an integral part of Homer-Dixon’s analysis. See Homer-Dixon (2007) and Homer-Dixon and Garrison (2010).

  9. 9.

    See also Deudney (1999b) and Peluso and Watts (2001: 15).

  10. 10.

    Peluso and Watts are extensively criticizing Homer Dixon in their introductory chapter as well as Hartman, Fairhead, Richards, and Watts in their contributions to the volume (Peluso and Watts 2001).

  11. 11.

    For further theoretical developments to be utilized for “energy affairs” within “International/Global Political Economy” see Stoddard (2013) and Coole (2013).

  12. 12.

    The big bang introduction of the “tight oil revolution” was only preceded by very few analyses referring to the Shale oil revolution (e.g. Mills 2012).

  13. 13.

    Certainly, energy self-sufficiency is not only a result of the tight oil revolution, but also because of the expected impact of new fuel-efficiency measures in transport (International Energy Agency 2012: 1 and table 3).

  14. 14.

    In recent years, the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) modified the reporting rules for gas and oil companies by allowing the inclusion of unconventional reserves. Without this change, most companies would no longer be able to report reserve additions larger than the decline due to the produced volumes during the year.

References

  • Banks, H. (1999). ENI’s Franco Bernabe says cheap oil won’t last long. Forbes, 161(12), 84–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Born, M. (1957). Physik im Wandel meiner Zeit. Braunschweig: Vieweg Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdaire, J.-M. (2011). Biographical notes. In C. Campbell (Ed.), Peak oil personalities (pp. 53–69). Skibbereen: Inspire Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlin, M. (1999). ARCO chairman says last days of oil age have begun: Calls on U.S. energy industry to meet clean fuel challenge. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/arco-chairman-says-last-days-of-oil-age-have-begun-calls-on-us-energy-industry-to-meet-clean-fuel-challenge-74862562.html

  • Bramwell, A. (1989). Ecology in the 20th century. A history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, I., & Hersh, K. A. (2013, May 23). When America stops importing energy. International Herald Tribune.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridge, G. (2011). Past peak oil: Political economy of energy crisis. In R. Peet, P. Robbins, & M. Watts (Eds.), Global political ecology (pp. 155–186). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C., & Laherrere, J. (1995). The world’s oil supply 1930–2050. Geneva: Petroconsultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D. (2013). Agentic capacities and capacious historical materialism: Thinking with new materialisms in the political sciences. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 41(3), 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalby, S. (1999). Threats from the South? Geopolitics, equity and environmental security. In D. H. Deudney & R. Matthew (Eds.), Contested grounds. Security and conflict in the new environmental politics (pp. 155–185). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deudney, H. D. (1999a). Bringing nature back in Geopolitical theory from the Greeks to the global era. In D. H. Deudney & R. Matthew (Eds.), Contested grounds. Security and conflict in the new environmental politics (pp. 25–60). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deudney, H. D. (1999b). Environmental security: A critique. In D. H. Deudney & R. Matthew (Eds.), Contested grounds. Security and conflict in the new environmental politics (pp. 187–219). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, J. (2012, December 18). Chris Finlayson and the Royal Dutch Shell reserves scandal. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://royaldutchshellplc.com/

  • Dürr, H.-P., & Österreicher, M. (2001). Wir erleben mehr als wir begreifen – Quantenphysik und Lebensfragen. Freiburg: Herder Spektrum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Energy Information Administration. (2013). Technically recoverable oil and shale gas resources: An assessment of 137 shale formations in 41 countries outside the United States. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/

  • EPA. (2005, August 8). Energy Policy Act 2005, Sec 322 (Hydraulic Fracturing).

    Google Scholar 

  • EWG. (2013). Fossil and nuclear fuels – the supply outlook, Energy Watch Group. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.energywatchgroup.org

  • Gagnon, N., Hall, C. A. S., & Brinker, L. (2009). A preliminary investigation of energy return on energy investment for global oil and gas production. Energies, 2, 490–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghouri, S., & Ghouri, A. (2012, June 18). The US unconventional oil revolution: Are we at the beginning of a new era for US oil? European Energy Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. B., Bertram, M., & Graedel, T. E. (2007). On the sustainability of metal supplies: A response to Tilton and Lagos. Resources Policy, 32, 24–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S., & Cleveland, C. J. (1981). Petroleum drilling and production in the United States: Yield per effort and net energy analysis. Science, 211, 576–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. A. S., & Klitgaard, K. (2012). Energy and the wealth of nations: Understanding the biophysical economy. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holditch, S. A. (2006). Tight gas sands. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 58(6), 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. (1999). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T. (2007). The upside of down. Catastrophe, creativity, and the renewal of civilization. London: Souvenir Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, T., & Garrison, N. (Eds.). (2010). Carbon shift. How peak oil and the climate crisis will change Canada. Toronto: Vintage Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • IHS Herold. (2014). Global upstream performance review 2013. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.herold.com/research/ihs_herold.page?p=42

  • International Energy Agency. (1998). World energy outlook 1998. Paris: OECD/IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency. (2012). World energy outlook 2012. Paris: OECD/IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency. (2013). World energy outlook 2013. Paris: OECD/IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klem, B. (2003). Dealing with scarcity and violent conflict (Clingendael Conflict Research Unit Working Paper 24). Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.clingendael.nl/sites/default/files/20031000_cru_working_paper_24.pdf

  • Kümmel, R., Ayres, R., & Lindenberger, D. (2009). The laws of physics and the methods of economics. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://ufn.ru/en/pacs/all/ and http://www.ewi.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Publikationen/Working_Paper/EWI_WP_08-02_Cost-Shares-Output-Elasticities.pdf

  • Leiss, W. (1974). The domination of nature. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litfin, K. (2003). Towards an integral perspective on world politics: Secularism, sovereignty and the challenge of global ecology. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32(1), 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, A. (2010, March 18). EPA launches national study of hydraulic fracturing. Pro Publica. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.propublica.org/article/epa-launches-national-study-of-hydraulic-fracturing

  • Merchant, C. (1989). The death of nature. Women, ecology and the scientific revolution. New York: HarperOne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, R. (2012, April 17). Cheer up: The world has plenty of oil. European Energy Review. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.europeanenergyreview.eu/site/pagina.php?id=3641

  • Mitchell, T. (2011). Carbon democracy. Political power in the age of oil. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. (2009, November 3). The Halliburton Loophole (Editorial). Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/03/opinion/03tue3.html

  • New York Times. (2011). Leaked industry documents. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/natural-gas-drilling-down-documents-4-intro.html?_r=0

  • New York Times. (2011a). Drilling down series. Accessed January 30, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/us/DRILLING_DOWN_SERIES.html?_r=0

  • Pattberg, P. (2007). Conquest, domination and control: Europe’s mastery of nature in historic perspective. Journal of Political Ecology, 14, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet, R., Robbins, P., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (2011). Global political ecology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso, N. L., & Watts, M. (Eds.). (2001). Violent environments. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, T., Giurco, D., Mudd, G., Mason, L., & Berisch, J. (2010, 22–25 August). Resource depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource management. Paper presented at the International Society for Ecological Economics (ISEE) 11th Biannual Conference, Oldenburg/Bremen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifkin, J. (1981). Entropy. A new world view. Toronto, ON: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D. (2013, February). Shale and Wall Street: Was the decline in natural gas prices orchestrated? Energy Policy Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speth, G. (1980). The global 2000 report to the President. Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review, 8(4), 695–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, E. (2013). Reconsidering the Ontological Foundations of International Energy Affairs: Realist geopolitics, market liberalism and a politico-economic alternative. European Security, 22(4), 437–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilton, J., & Lagos, G. (2007). Assessing the long-run availability of copper. Resources Policy, 32(1), 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wald, M. L. (2013, November 12). Shale’s effect on oil supply is forecast to be brief. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, H., & Markey, E. (2010). Memorandum to members of the subcommittee on energy and environment of the house of congress examining the potential impact of hydraulic fracturing. Memorandum 18th February. Accessed January 30, 2014, http://democrats.energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/20100218/hydraulic_fracturing_memo.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Peters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peters, S., Zittel, W. (2014). The “Tight Oil Revolution” and the Misinterpretation of the Power of Technology. In: Mayer, M., Carpes, M., Knoblich, R. (eds) The Global Politics of Science and Technology - Vol. 2. Global Power Shift. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55010-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics