Skip to main content

A Semantics Oriented Grammar for Chinese Treebanking

  • Conference paper
Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (CICLing 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8403))

  • 2060 Accesses

Abstract

Chinese grammar engineering has been a much debated task. Whilst semantic information has been reconed crucial for Chinese syntactic analysis and downstream applications, existing Chinese treebanks lack a consistent and strict sentential semantic formalism. In this paper, we introduce a semantics oriented grammar for Chinese, designed to provide basic supports for tasks such as automatic semantic parsing and sentence generation. It has a directed acyclic graph structure with a simple yet expressive label set, and leverages elementary predication to support logical form conversion. To our knowledge, it is the first Chinese grammar representation capable of direct transformation into logical forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Huang, C.R., Chen, F.Y., Chen, K.J., Ming Gao, Z., Chen, K.Y.: Sinica treebank: design criteria, annotation guidelines, and on-line interface. In: Proceedings of 2nd Chinese Language Processing Workshop (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xue, N., Xia, F., Chiou, F.D., Palmer, M.: The penn chinese treebank: Phrase structure annotation of a large corpus. NLE 11(2), 207–238 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, P.C., Tseng, H., Jurafsky, D., Manning, C.D.: Discriminative reordering with chinese grammatical relations features. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Syntax and Structure in Statistical Translation (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Che, W., Zhang, M., Shao, Y., Liu, T.: Semeval-2012 task 5: Chinese semantic dependency parsing. In: Proceedings of SemEval 2012, pp. 378–384 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Li, Z., Liu, T., Che, W.: Exploiting multiple treebanks for parsing with quasi-synchronous grammars. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012, pp. 675–684 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levy, R., Manning, C.D.: Is it harder to parse chinese, or the chinese treebank? In: Proceedings of the ACL 2003, pp. 439–446 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Petrov, S., Klein, D.: Improved inference for unlexicalized parsing. In: Proceedings of NAACL 2007, pp. 404–411 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, Y., Clark, S.: Syntactic processing using the generalized perceptron and beam search. Computational Linguistics 37, 105–151 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kummerfeld, J.K., Tse, D., Curran, J.R., Klein, D.: An empirical examination of challenges in chinese parsing. In: Proceedings of the 51st ACL, pp. 98–103 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, M., Li, J., Dong, Z., Wang, Z., Lu, D.: Building a large chinese corpus annotated with semantic dependency. In: Proceedings of the SIGHAN 2003, pp. 84–91 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nakazawa, T., Kurohashi, S.: Alignment by bilingual generation and monolingual derivation. In: Proceedings of COLING 2012, pp. 1963–1978 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhou, Q.: Building a large-scale annotated chinese corpus. In: Matoušek, V., Mautner, P. (eds.) TSD 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2807, pp. 106–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Bos, J., Clark, S., Steedman, M., Curran, J.R., Hockenmaier, J.: Wide-coverage semantic representations from a ccg parser. In: Proceedings of Coling, pp. 1240–1246 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kaplan, R., Riezler, S., King, T.H., Maxwell III, J.T., Vasserman, A., Crouch, R.: Speed and accuracy in shallow and deep stochastic parsing. In: Dumais, S., Marcu, D., Roukos, S. (eds.) Proceedings of NAACL 2004, pp. 97–104 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Toutanova, K., Manning, C.D., Shieber, S.M., Flickinger, D., Oepen, S.: Parse disambiguation for a rich hpsg grammar. In: Proceedings of TLT 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kenji, S., Jun’ichi, T.: Shift-reduce dependency DAG parsing. In: Proceedings of the Coling 2008, pp. 753–760 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Copestake, A., Flickinger, D., Pollard, C., Sag, I.A.: Minimal recursion semantics: An introduction. Research on Language and Computation 3, 281–332 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Daniel, G., Daniel, J.: Automatic labeling of semantic roles. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xue, N., Palmer, M.: Annotating the propositions in the penn chinese treebank. In: Proceedings of the Second SIGHAN (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zettlemoyer, L., Collins, M.: Online learning of relaxed CCG grammars for parsing to logical form. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP-CoNLL, pp. 678–687 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kay, M.: Chart generation. In: Proceedings of the 34th ACL, pp. 200–204 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clark, S., Curran, J.R.: Wide-coverage efficient statistical parsing with ccg and log-linear models. Computational Linguistics 33(4), 493–552 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Richard, M.: Formal Philosophy: Papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, New Haven (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Egg, M., Koller, A., Niehren, J.: The constraint language for lambda structures. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10, 457–485 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Mel’čuk, I.: Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kahane, S.: The meaning-text theory. Dependency and Valency. An International Handbook on Contemporary Research. De Gruyter, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Debusmann, R., Duchier, D., Koller, A., Kuhlmann, M., Smolka, G., Thater, S.: A relational syntax-semantics interface based on dependency grammar. In: Proceedings of Coling 2004, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 176–182 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, M., Zhang, Y., Che, W., Liu, T. (2014). A Semantics Oriented Grammar for Chinese Treebanking. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8403. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54906-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54906-9_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-54905-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-54906-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics